Skip to main content
Download PDF

Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacterales from hospitals and community settings in Gaza Strip, Palestine

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 376 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) is a major driver of the global spread of these antibiotic resistance determinants. Here we determined the rate of fecal ESBL-PE carriage in pediatric hospitals and community-serving healthcare centers serving adults and children in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.

Methods

A total of 373 fecal and rectal samples were collected from different hospitals and clinics in Gaza. The antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the disk diffusion method and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines. The bacterial isolates were tested for ESBL production using phenotypic methods (double disk synergy test and growth on selective chromogenic media). BlaCTX−M, blaSHV, and blaTEM genes were sought by PCR.

Results

Out of the 373 isolates tested, 138 (37%) were considered ESBL positive as revealed by phenotypic tests. The prevalence of ESBLs among hospitalized patients was 39.1% (hospital setting) whereas, among outpatients attending community healthcare centers, it was 35.1% (community setting). ESBL production among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Citrobacter freundii, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella aerogenes isolates was 52.8%, 39.1%, 26.7%, 2.8%, and 2.1% respectively. Meropenem and amikacin were the most effective antibiotics against ESBL producers (68.9% and 73.6% susceptibility, respectively), while only 15.2%, 22.5%, and 24.6% remained susceptible to ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone, respectively. Out of 138 phenotypically ESBL-positive isolates, 98 randomly chosen were screened for blaCTX−M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes. The prevalence rate of blaCTX−M was 45.9%, while blaTEM and blaSHV genes were detected in 16.8% and 5.2% of CTX-M-negative isolates (corresponding mostly for K. pneumoniae isolates in the case of SHV-PCR), respectively.

Conclusions

The study revealed an alarmingly high prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales among hospitalized children but also in the community of the Gaza Strip. In addition, 30% of ESBL-producers were already resistant to carbapenems, the treatment of choice of infections with ESBL-producers.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase -Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) emerged as a serious threat worldwide in hospitals and community settings and infections with these bacteria are usually challenging as therapeutic options are drastically reduced [1,2,3]. Bacteria colonizing the human intestine are an important reservoir of resistance genes that contributes to the spread of ESBL-PE but also of ESBL-encoding genes in communities and in hospitals [4, 5].

ESBL are enzymes primarily produced by a variety of Gram-negative bacilli, in particular Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli [6, 7]. They are also produced by non-fermentative Gram-negative organisms, such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [8]. ESBL are β-lactamases capable of conferring bacterial resistance to penicillins, first, second, and third-generation cephalosporins (3GC), and aztreonam (but not cephamycins or carbapenems) through ß-lactam hydrolysis, and they are inhibited by clavulanic acid and tazobactam [7]. These enzymes are often encoded by genes located on large plasmids, and these also carry genes for resistance to other antimicrobial agents such as aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, sulphonamides, tetracyclines, and chloramphenicol [9]. Initially, ESBLs were derived from TEM and SHV-type β-lactamases, which were mainly produced by K. pneumoniae, a major cause of hospital-acquired infections. CTX-M-type ESBLs emerged in early 2000 and have become within 10 years the main ESBLs produced in hospitals and in the community, especially for E. coli [10, 11].

The horizontal transfer of resistance genes carried on plasmids is thought to be one of the primary causes of the dissemination of MDR isolates [12]. The human intestinal tract provides an important reservoir for ESBL-producing bacteria and colonized persons are at risk for developing infections due to ESBL producers and at risk for their dissemination [13,14,15]. In hospital settings, patient-to-patient transmission of these bacteria may occur [13, 16, 17]. The widespread use of 3GC and fluoroquinolones has been pointed out as a major cause for the selection of ESBL producers [18]. In addition, bacterial infections due to ESBL-PE have been associated with improper antibiotic use, increased hospital costs, length of stay, and patient mortality [19].

The highest ESBL-PE carriage prevalence has been described in Asia, whereas prevalence rates are lower in Europe and North America [20,21,22]. Before 2008, the prevalence of community-acquired ESBL-PE in Thailand was low (less than 10%) but has rapidly increased to more than 60% in recent years, posing a significant challenge for antibiotic therapy to combat both nosocomial and also community-acquired infections [23, 24].

Several studies have described the fecal carriage of ESBL-PE in the community and hospital settings [25,26,27,28]. Great variations were found in the ESBL-PE carriage rates in the Eastern Mediterranean, with rates ranging from 28% in Tunisia to 43% in Lebanon, to 70% in Egypt [29,30,31].

In Gaza Strip, Palestine, previous studies have shown high rates of ESBL-PE responsible of infections in two hospitals, with 22% in Naser and 37.5% in Al Shifa hospitals [32, 33].

However, the fecal carriage of ESBL-PE has never been addressed previously in Palestine in community settings. The Gaza Strip (31°250 N, 34° 200 E) is a narrow territory (41 km long and 6–12 km wide) along the eastern Mediterranean coast, with tightly controlled borders abutting Israel and Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula. It is regarded as one of the world’s most densely populated areas, with a population of approximately 2.1 million inhabitants (37.5% of the total estimated Palestinian population) and a population density of 4,073/km2, nearly ten-fold more than in the West Bank (433/km2) [34].

The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL-PEs in hospitalized paediatric patients and outpatients attending community healthcare centers in the Gaza Strip.

Materials and methods

Study design

The study was set out as a cross-sectional study in three pediatric hospitals and three Primary Health Care (PHC) clinics located in Gaza city. Among the 373 samples analyzed, 200 were fecal samples (53.6%) from outpatients attending community healthcare centers including Al-Remal, Al-Sourani, and Sabha Harazin clinics and 173 were rectal swab samples (46.4%) from hospitalized infants in the nursery departments of Al-Naser, Al-Rantisi and Al-Shifa hospitals. The average age of those children was from 2 days to 2 years. However, most of them were below 1 year of age.

The samples were collected from March to September 2019. The study was approved by the department of human resources and development of the Ministry of Health – Gaza and the local Helsinki committee under the study approval number PHRC/HC/226/17.

Culture of isolates

Fecal and rectal samples were transported in Amies transport medium to the laboratory of microbiology of the Al Aqsa University – Gaza, where they were spread and incubated at 37 °C overnight on MacConkey agar plates (HiMedia, Mumbai, India). Bacterial isolates were identified upon cultural characteristics and relevant biochemical galleries (API, bioMérieux, Marcy-l-Etoile, France).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates was performed by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended by CLSI guidelines [35] using Mueller-Hinton agar. Before inoculation, the swab stick was dipped into a bacterial suspension having visually equivalent turbidity to a 0.5 McFarland standard. The antibiotics used in this study were those currently available in Palestinian hospitals to treat Gram-negative infections: Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10 µg), Cefotaxime (30 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), Ceftazidime (30 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Amikacin (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Imipenem (10 µg), Amoxicillin (30 µg), Cephalexin (30 µg), Cefuroxime (30 µg), Co-Trimoxazole (25 µg), Meropenem (10 µg) and Doxycycline (30 µg) (HiMedia, Mumbai, India). The zone of inhibition was interpreted for each antimicrobial agent, reporting the organism as resistant, intermediate, or susceptible according to CLSI [35].

Phenotypic detection of ESBLs using double disk synergy test

To infer the presence of an ESBL, synergy image between ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 µg) containing discs were monitored. The three 3GC containing discs were placed at 20 mm (edge to edge) from the Amoxycillin/Clavulanic acid disc that was placed in the middle of the plate. After 24-h incubation, if an enhanced zone of inhibition between either of the Cephalosporin antibiotics and the Amoxycillin/Clavulanic acid disc occurred, the test was considered positive for the production of ESBL. K. pneumoniae ATCC 700,603 and E. coli ATCC 25,922 were used as positive and negative controls, respectively [36]. We have done the calculation of MDR by counting the isolates which are resistant to three different families.

Phenotypic detection of ESBLs using CHROMagar ESBL

Each bacterial isolate was cultured on CHROMagar ESBL agar and was incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 18 to 24 h. Colonies of ESBL producers develop species-specific colors (dark pink to reddish for E. coli; metallic blue for Klebsiella spp.; and a brown halo for P. mirabilis). Non-Enterobacterales and non-ESBL-producers grew with colorless colonies or not at all on CHROMagar ESBL agar, respectively [37].

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from cultured bacteria by a rapid alkaline lysis as previously described [38]. Briefly, one bacterial colony was suspended in 20 µL of lysis buffer (0.25% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.05 N NaOH) and heated at 95 °C for 15 min. The cell lysate was diluted with 180 µL of distilled water. The cell debris was pelted by centrifugation at 16 000 x g for 5 min. and the supernatants were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or frozen at -20 °C until further use.

Detection of bla CTX−M, bla TEM, and bla SHV genes by PCR

The sequences of the primers used for the detection of the SHV gene were 5’GCC CGG GTT ATT CTT ATT TGT CGC-3’as a forward primer and 5’- TCT TTC CGA TGC CGC CGC CAG TCA-3’ as a reverse primer. The two primers amplify a 1016 bp fragment [39]. For detection of the CTX-M gene, the sequences of the primers used were 5’-ACC GCG ATA TCG TTG GT-3’as a forward primer and 5’-CGC TTT GCG ATG TGC AG-3’ as a reverse primer. The two primers produce a 550 bp amplicon [40]. For detection of the TEM gene, the sequences of the primers used were 5’- ATG AGT ATT CAA CAT TTC CG-3’as a forward primer and 5’- CCA ATG CTT AAT CAG TGA GG-3’ as a reverse primer. The two primers produce an 858 bp amplicon [41].

The reactions were performed in 25 µl final volumes in the presence of 1 µM of each primer, 2 µl of DNA, and 1X of the GoTaq Green MMX (Promega, Madison, USA). The thermal cycling program for detection of the SHV, CTX-M, and TEM genes was as follows: one cycle of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at the proper temperature (54 °C for SHV, 55 °C for CTX-M and 68 °C for TEM), and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. A final extension step was performed at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel. The fragments were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized and photographed using a gel documentation system. A 100 bp ladder was run as a molecular weight marker (Bioline, Meridian Bioscience, Memphis, TN, USA). A positive control and blank negative control were tested in each run to exclude contamination.

Statistical analysis

The results were tabulated and analyzed using version 20 of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Frequencies, cross-tabulation, and appropriate statistical tests such as Chi-square test and Fisher exact test were performed. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Phenotypic detection

The number of samples that were collected from the hospitals Al-Shifa, Al-Naser, and Al-Rantisi was: 65 (38%), 65 (38%), and 41 (23.9%), respectively. The number of samples from the clinics Al-Remal, Sabha Harazin, and Al-Sourani was 97 (48%), 50 (24.7%), and 55 (27.3%), respectively (Table 1). Thus, a total of 373 samples were plated on MacConkey agar plates. A single colony from every bacterial isolate has been retained for any further investigation, encompassing bacterial identification, susceptibility testing, and ESBL production testing. Hundred and thirty-eight (37%) were considered positive phenotypically for ESBL production as revealed by the synergy testing and 235 (63%) were considered non-ESBLs based on absence of synergy image. In addition, these isolates did not grow on ChromAgar ESBL media, a media used to screen for ESBL-PE. In comparison between hospitals and community-serving healthcare centers, the prevalence of ESBL was similar, 39.1% and 35.1%, respectively.

The ESBL production rates at AL-Rantisi Hospital, AL-Nasser Hospital, and AL-Shifa Hospital were 24.3%, 36.9%, and 50.7%, respectively. In contrast, the prevalence of ESBL at Al-Remal Clinic, Sabha Harazin Clinic, and AL-Sourani Clinic was 42.2%, 34.5%, and 22%, respectively (Table 1).

Regarding the bacterial isolates, E. coli accounted for 57.9% (n = 216), with 63 from hospitalized patients and 153 from community outpatients. K. pneumoniae constituted 34.1% (n = 127), with 87 from hospitalized patients and 40 from community outpatients. Other isolates included C. freundii at 4% (n = 15), K. aerogenes at 2.6% (n = 10), and P. mirabilis at 1.3% (n = 5) (Table 1).

In hospitals, the predominant ESBL-producing species was K. pneumoniae, accounting for 54.5% (36 cases), followed by E. coli at 31.8% (21/66), C. freundii at 4.5% (3), P. mirabilis at 6% (4), and K. aerogens at 3% (2). Among the community patient clinic population, E. coli was the most common ESBL producer at 72.2% (52/72), followed by K. pneumoniae at 25% (18/ 72 cases), C. freundii at 1.4% (1), and K. aerogenes at 1.4% (1) (Table 1).

Table 1 Prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates among microbial species from Gaza hospitals and clinics
Full size table

The ESBL rate in hospitals varied between the different departments. For example, in the AL-Rantisi hospital, the prevalence rate of ESBL among the departments of dialysis, neurology, and hematology/oncology was 50%, 23.1%, and 10%, respectively (P value = 0.05). The ESBL rate in the nursery and pediatric ICU departments in the Al-Naser hospital was 55.2% and 44.5%, respectively (P value = 0.390), whereas the prevalence rate in these departments in the AL-Shifa hospital was 57.6% and 17.9%, respectively (P value = 0.002). The highest rate of ESBL production was found in the nursery department among the departments in both the Al-Shifa and Al-Naser hospitals (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of ESBL-producing isolates among the different departments of the AL-Rantisi, AL-Naser, and AL-Shifa hospitals
Full size table

Genotypic detection

Out of the 138 isolates with ESBL phenotype, 98 were randomly screened for blaCTX−M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes. These bacteria were 31 E. coli, 56 K. pneumoniae, 4 C. freundii, 3 P. mirabilis and 4 K. aerogenes. Using PCR, 60 isolates (61.2%) were positive for at least one gene. The blaCTX−M gene was detected in 13 (41.9%) E. coli, 27 (48.2%) K. pneumoniae, 2 (50%) C. freundii, 1(33.3%) P. mirabilis and 2 (50%) K. aerogenes isolates (Table 3), e.g. 45.9% of the phenotypically suspected ESBL-producing Enterobacterales.

The results of TEM and SHV PCR were considered only in the CTX-M-negative isolates. Out of the 54.1% CTX-M-negative isolates, which was composed of 18 E. coli, 29 K. pneumoniae, 2 C. freundii, 2 P. mirabilis and 2 (50%) K. aerogenes, the positivity of blaTEM in these species was 27%, 24%, 50%, 100% and 50% respectively, and for blaSHV it was 42.8% for K. pneumoniae, 50% for C. freundii and 100% for K. aerogenes isolates, respectively. For 38 isolates, no positive PCR was evidenced, suggesting that a novel and undetectable CTX-M, TEM, or SHV-variant be present, or simply an ESBL that was not screened for, such as GES, PER, BEL, and others.

Table 3 Prevalence of each gene among ESBL-PE
Full size table

Antibiotic profile

Based on the overall characteristics of antibiotics, meropenem was found to be the most efficient on the 373 Enterobacterales, with a susceptibility rate of 74.5%, followed by amikacin with 74.3%. On the other hand, amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were the least effective antibiotics, with a resistance rate of 72.9% and 68.4%, respectively.

Out of the 138 ESBL producers, amikacin and meropenem demonstrated the highest effectiveness against them, with susceptibility rates of 73.6% and 68.9%, respectively. On the other hand, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone had high resistance rates of 84.8%, 77.5%, and 75.4%, respectively. Additionally, the resistance rate for amoxicillin was also high, reaching up to 79.7%.

Among the 235 non-ESBL producers, a higher susceptibility rate was found for meropenem and amikacin, with 84.1% and 75.4%, respectively. However, the resistance rates for amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid still very high with 68.9% and 62.3% of resistant bacteria, respectively, as indicated in Table 4.

Among the ESBL producers, 47.1% (65/138) had resistance to eight antibiotics or more, while among the non-ESBL producers, the prevalence was lower at 26.4% (62/235). Additionally, the prevalence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) was higher among ESBL isolates, with 90.6% (125/138) compared to non-ESBL producers, where the prevalence was 72.8% (171/235).

Table 4 Comparison of susceptibility profiles between ESBL and non-ESBL producing isolates
Full size table

Discussion

Fecal carriage of ESBL-PE is one of the primary mechanisms for their global spread in hospital and community settings worldwide. Extensive use of beta-lactam antibiotics in hospitals and community has created a major problem leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs [42]. In this study, we estimated and characterized the prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales in the community and hospital settings in Gaza Strip. No previous studies have investigated the prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL in both settings in Gaza Strip.

In the present study, the overall fecal carriage of ESBL-PE was 37%. Among the participants, pediatric hospitalized patients showed a prevalence of 39.1%, whereas children and adults attending community healthcare centers exhibited a slightly lower rate of 35.1%, while it was 39.1% in pediatric hospitalized patients and 35.1% in adults and children outpatients seen in community healthcare centers.

This ESBL‑PE fecal carriage rate is quite high when compared to those reported in the Czech Republic, 8.2% in hospitalized patients and 3.2% in community subjects [43]; in Spain, 5.5% in outpatients and 3.7% in healthy volunteers [44]; in the Netherlands, 10.1% in community patients [45]; 16.7% in outpatients attending community health centers in Malawi [46] and 17.1% among children under five years in Ethiopia [47].

ESBL-PE are widely acknowledged as significant pathogens acquired in hospitals among children and are frequently associated with outbreaks. Our findings are consistent with other researchs. For instance, Akenten et al. discovered that the rate of stool carriage of ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP was 40.9% in children under 5 years old in the hospital [48]. Our study recorded a higher prevalence compared to another investigation that reported an overall fecal carriage rate of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae of 17.1% in children under five attending outpatient departments [47]. Furthermore, another study reported an even higher faecal ESBL carriage rate of 54% among the 171 children they examined [49].

In our research, we observed that 35.1% of community patients carried ESBL in their fecal samples. Similar high rates of fecal carriage of ESBL-PE have been observed, in Turkey with 34.3% and 30% among community outpatients and individuals attending routine check-up clinics, respectively [50, 51], and in Nepal with 30.92% among participants of the Out Patient Department [5]. Furthermore, our findings showed a higher prevalence compared to Onduru et al., in Blantyre, Malawi who reported a 16.67% prevalence of community-acquired ESBL-PE [46]. Our results were higher when compared to France (6.0%), Switzerland (5.8%), Japan (6.4%), Tunisia (7.3%), Germany (6.4%), and Libya (13.4%) or Malawi (16.67%). On the other hand, it is lower than the rates reported in China (50%), Egypt (63%), and Thailand (65.7%) [23, 46, 52,53,54,55,56].

Our findings suggest that ESBL-PE are present in hospital settings but also in the community at similar rates. Several factors contribute to ESBL-PE colonization and infection, including poor drug quality or inadequate posology, irrational antibiotic use, unskilled practitioners, self-medication, unsanitary conditions that contribute to the spread of resistant bacteria, and insufficient surveillance programs [57, 58].

In our study, different rates of ESBL production were observed according to the species, with as expected E. coli, and K. pneumoniae (52.8%, 39.1%) being the top species. Interestingly, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae were also observed in the community, suggesting community spread of these bacteria.

Among the 153 E. coli isolates obtained from community patients, 53 (34.6%) were found to be ESBL producers, a notably higher percentage compared to findings from other studies. In a study conducted by Bezabih et al. in 2021, they reported a global pooled prevalence of ESBL E. coli intestinal carriage in the community to be 16.5% [25]. Moreover, ESBL production among K. pneumoniae was higher (39.1%) in comparison with a study conducted in Turkey (8%), whereas ESBL production among E. coli in Turkey (92%) was higher in comparison with our findings (52.8%) [59]. In another study conducted in Saudi Arabia, ESBL production in community isolates of E. coli was higher (95.6%) in comparison with our results, while ESBL production among Klebsiella spp. was lower (4.4%) [60].

ESBL genotype

Out of 98 isolates screened for blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaSHV genes using PCR, 60 (61.2%) have at least one gene. CTX-M enzymes are the most common ESBL types in both hospital and community settings worldwide [7, 61]. In our study, the blaCTX-M gene was more prevalent than blaTEM and blaSHV. These findings are consistent with previous reports from other countries that found CTX-M to be more dominant than other types [54, 56, 62, 63].

It is worth noting that the CTX-M ß-lactamase genes are widely known to be carried on plasmids that are used as vehicles for horizontal movement of resistance genes, in addition to carrying on resistance to other drugs such as aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones [30, 64, 65].

Co-existence of all three bla genes was observed in 12 (12.3%) isolates in this study, which was consistent with the study of Saho et al., who detected their existence in 10.0% of isolates but higher than the report from North India where they observed only in 6.5% of the tested isolates [66]. The presence of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M, along with impermeability, can result in carbapenem resistance [67], which is a major cause of concern in Gaza Strip. Indeed, in our study carbapenem resistance was very high 24.3%, which could be linked also to the presence of carbapenemases.

In this study, the blaCTX-M gene was detected in 45.9% of the ESBL-PE, which is lower in comparison to that reported by Erdogan who detected blaCTX-M in 87.5% of the ESBL-PE [50] and also reported in other several studies [51, 53]. This low percentage of blaCTX-M gene may be due to regional variation, sample selection, timeframe, and antibiotic usage. In addition, it may be linked to the spread of a variant not detected using our primers or the spread of another ESBL such as PER, VEB, or GES. Further investigations are necessary to tackle this issue.

The prevalence rate of blaTEM and blaSHV genes were 16.8% and 5.2% in CTX-M-negative isolates, respectively. The presence of blaTEM and blaSHV genes in these isolates may be at the origin of the ESBL-phenotype, but further sequencing of the PCR product is necessary to conclude. One striking result is that only 42% of K. pneumoniaewere SHV positive. Possible explanations could be the presence of SHV alleles not detected with our primers, or the presence of K. pneumoniae subspecies quasipneumoniae, that expresses LEN-type enzymes, or K. variicola that expresses OKP-type enzymes, that cannot be easily distinguished using biochemical tests from K. pneumoniae.

Antibiotic profile

Antibiotic resistance is a major scientific concern, both in hospitals and in the community. Exposure to 3GC was associated with a significant risk of ESBL carriage in our study. In the current study, ESBL-PE isolates showed high resistance rates against ceftazidime, amoxicillin, and cefotaxime (84.8%, 79.7%, and 77.5%) respectively.

The rate of resistance against doxycycline and cefotaxime was 55.1%. Previous studies have shown that ESBL-PE have a high resistance rate to 1st & 2nd generation cephalosporin, which are always used to treat infections caused by gram-negative bacteria [68]. We found that amikacin and meropenem were the most effective antibiotics against ESBL-PE (73.6%, and 68.9%) respectively. Our results are in close agreement with studies done in Saudi Arabia (meropenem 88%, amikacin 91%) [60], in central India (meropenem 87.5%, amikacin 83.92%) [20], Jimma, Ethiopia (amikacin 83.7%) [69], Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (meropenem 96.7%, amikacin 82.1%) [70], and India (meropenem 94.0%, amikacin 82.6%) [71].

High rates of carbapenem resistance is particularly worrisome especially in bacteria that are already resistant to multiple other classes of antibiotics, making infections caused by these organisms extremely difficult to treat. The rampant use of carbapenems for treating ESBL‑PE may lead to selection of carbapenem resistance.

The prevalence of resistance to four and eight antibiotics in ESBL-PE was 81.8% and 47.1%, respectively. The prevalence of MDR phenotype among ESBL-PE was 90.6% (125/138) and 72.8% (71/235) among non-ESBL producers. This is comparable with a study that reported the prevalence of MDR among ESBL producers to be 96.3%, whereas only 30% of the non-ESBL-producers were MDR strains [70].

Limitations of this study

PCR for ß-lactamase gene detection (CTX-M, SHV, and TEM) was performed only on a part of the isolates due to limited financial resources. In addition, PCR products could not be sequenced, and thus we could only speculate that a TEM/SHV ESBL was present in case of a positive synergy test and negative CTX-M PCR. Similarly, we were unable to perform PCR tests for the detection of other ESBL and/or carbapenemase genes, which could be also present as meropenem resistance was almost 31% among ESBL-PE.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the intestinal carriage of ESBL-PE in hospitalized and community patients in Gaza Strip. This study showed high fecal colonization of ESBL-PE that is similar in hospitals and community settings in Gaza Strip. Antibiotic resistance and MDR among ESBL-PE are higher than for non-ESBL isolates. ESBL-PE isolates showed resistance to meropenem in 30% of the cases, which is alarming because this antibiotic is the drug of choice for the treatment of MDR GNB bacterial infections. Further studies are now necessary to identify the underlying resistance mechanisms to carbapenems.

With high rates of ESBL-producing isolates, irrational use of 3GC must be discouraged to reduce the selection pressure on these MDR bacteria and avoid treatment failures. Rational antibiotic prescription based on local guidelines to prevent the development of bacterial resistance is highly recommended. It is important to identify ESBL colonization in hospitalized patients to prevent further spread in hospital settings, but also to the community. The intestinal carriage of ESBL-PE poses a significant public health challenge, emphasizing the urgent need to improve sanitation and the implementation of antibiotic stewardship.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study were included in this article.

References

  1. Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S, Kaye KS, Ben-Ami R, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y. Clinical and economic impact of bacteremia with extended- spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(4):1257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL, Horan TC Jr., Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, Cardo DM. Estimating health care-associated Infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(2):160–6. 2002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shanthi M, Sekar U. Extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for Infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. J Assoc Physicians India. 2010;58:41–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ariffin H, Navaratnam P, Mohamed M, Arasu A, Abdullah WA, Lee CL, Peng LH. Ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream Infection in children with febrile neutropenia. Int J Infect Dis IJID: Official Publication Int Soc Infect Dis. 2000;4(1):21–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mandal DK, Sah SK, Mishra SK, Sharma S, Kattel HP, Pandit S, Yadav PK, Laghu U, Lama R, Sah NP, et al. Carriage of extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and AmpC-β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) in Healthy Community and Outpatient Department (OPD) patients in Nepal. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2020;2020:5154217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Falagas ME, Karageorgopoulos DE. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms. J Hosp Infect. 2009;73(4):345–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacoby GA, Munoz-Price LS. The new beta-lactamases. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(4):380–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paterson DL. Recommendation for treatment of severe Infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000;6(9):460–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirelis B, Navarro F, Miró E, Mesa RJ, Coll P, Prats G. Community transmission of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(8):1024–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pitout JD, Laupland KB. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(3):159–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sunde M, Simonsen GS, Slettemeås JS, Böckerman I, Norström M, Integron. Plasmid and Host Strain Characteristics of Escherichia coli from humans and food included in the Norwegian Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Programs. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0128797.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben-Ami R, Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D, Giladi M, Chmelnitsky I, Leavitt A, Carmeli Y. Influx of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae into the hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(7):925–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mesa RJ, Blanc V, Blanch AR, Cortés P, González JJ, Lavilla S, Miró E, Muniesa M, Saco M, Tórtola MT, et al. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in different environments (humans, food, animal farms and sewage). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(1):211–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peña C, Pujol M, Ardanuy C, Ricart A, Pallares R, Liñares J, Ariza J, Gudiol F. Epidemiology and successful control of a large outbreak due to Klebsiella pneumoniae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(1):53–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris AD, Perencevich EN, Johnson JK, Paterson DL, Morris JG, Strauss SM, Johnson JA. Patient-to-patient transmission is important in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(10):1347–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kola A, Holst M, Chaberny IF, Ziesing S, Suerbaum S, Gastmeier P. Surveillance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria and routine use of contact isolation: experience from a three-year period. J Hosp Infect. 2007;66(1):46–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan BH, Tan AL. Community-acquired bacteremia with an ESBL-producing Escherichia coli strain–a case report. Int J Infect Dis. 2002;6(4):318–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shashwati N, Kiran T, Dhanvijay AG. Study of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae and antibiotic coresistance in a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5(1):30–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hawkey PM. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a product of globalization. J Hosp Infect. 2015;89(4):241–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Islam S, Selvarangan R, Kanwar N, McHenry R, Chappell JD, Halasa N, Wikswo ME, Payne DC, Azimi PH, McDonald LC, et al. Intestinal carriage of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant and extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Healthy US children. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2018;7(3):234–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pilmis B, Cattoir V, Lecointe D, Limelette A, Grall I, Mizrahi A, Marcade G, Poilane I, Guillard T, Bourgeois Nicolaos N, et al. Carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in French hospitals: the PORTABLSE study. J Hosp Infect. 2018;98(3):247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasaki T, Hirai I, Niki M, Nakamura T, Komalamisra C, Maipanich W, Kusolsuk T, Sa-Nguankiat S, Pubampen S, Yamamoto Y. High prevalence of CTX-M beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens obtained from healthy individuals in Thailand. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(4):666–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Woerther PL, Burdet C, Chachaty E, Andremont A. Trends in human fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the community: toward the globalization of CTX-M. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(4):744–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bezabih YM, Sabiiti W, Alamneh E, Bezabih A, Peterson GM, Bezabhe WM, Roujeinikova A. The global prevalence and trend of human intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in the community. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(1):22–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Babu R, Kumar A, Karim S, Warrier S, Nair SG, Singh SK, Biswas R. Faecal carriage rate of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospitalised patients and healthy asymptomatic individuals coming for health check-up. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016;6:150–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ko YJ, Moon HW, Hur M, Park CM, Cho SE, Yun YM. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Korean community and hospital settings. Infection. 2013;41(1):9–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sjölander I, Hansen F, Elmanama A, Khayyat R, Abu-Zant A, Hussein A, Taha AA, Hammerum AM, Ciofu O. Detection of NDM-2-producing Acinetobacter baumannii and VIM-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Palestine. Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2014;2(2):93–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trabelsi R, Yengui M, Mhaya A, Rebai A, Arpin C, Gdoura R. Detection of extended-spectrum betalactamase and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Tunisia. Arch Biotechnol Biomed. 2023;7:001–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moghnieh R, Araj GF, Awad L, Daoud Z, Mokhbat JE, Jisr T, Abdallah D, Azar N, Irani-Hakimeh N, Balkis MM, et al. A compilation of antimicrobial susceptibility data from a network of 13 Lebanese hospitals reflecting the national situation during 2015–2016. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohamed ES, Khairy RMM, Abdelrahim SS. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of ESBL and AmpC β -lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae strains isolated from UTIs in Egypt. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):19832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. El Astal Z, Ramadan H. Occurrence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Int J Integr Biol. 2008;2(2):122.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tayh GA, Laham AL, Elmanama NA, Slama AA. KB. Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of ESBL among Gram-negative bacteria isolated from burn unit of Al Shifa hospital in Gaza, Palestine. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2016;5(3).

  34. Wikipedia contributors. Demographics of the Palestinian territories. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2022. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Palestinian_territories (accessed on 15th March 2022).

  35. CLSI. : Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Vol. 26th ed., CLSI supplement M100S. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018.

  36. Niumsup PR, Tansawai U, Boonkerd N, Polwichai P, Dejsirilert S. Dissemination of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in Thai hospitals. J Infect Chemother. 2008;14(6):404–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hornsey M, Phee L, Woodford N, Turton J, Meunier D, Thomas C, Wareham DW. Evaluation of three selective chromogenic media, CHROMagar ESBL, CHROMagar CTX-M and CHROMagar KPC, for the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing OXA-48 carbapenemase. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(4):348–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. El Aila NA, Tency I, Claeys G, Saerens B, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M. Genotyping of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci) isolated from vaginal and rectal swabs of women at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Nüesch-Inderbinen MT, Hächler H, Kayser FH. Detection of genes coding for extended-spectrum SHV beta-lactamases in clinical isolates by a molecular genetic method, and comparison with the E test. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15(5):398–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bonnet R, Dutour C, Sampaio JL, Chanal C, Sirot D, Labia R, De Champs C, Sirot J. Novel cefotaximase (CTX-M-16) with increased catalytic efficiency due to substitution Asp-240–>Gly. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(8):2269–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Arlet G, Brami G, Décrè D, Flippo A, Gaillot O, Lagrange PH, Philippon A. Molecular characterisation by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of TEM beta-lactamases. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;134(2–3):203–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yasmin T. Prevalence of ESBL among Esch. Coli and Klebsiella spp in a tertiary care hospital and molecular detection of important ESBL producing genes by multiplex PCR. J Mymensingh: Mymensingh Medical College; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Husickova V, Cekanova L, Chroma M, Htoutou-Sedlakova M, Hricova K, Kolar M. Carriage of ESBL- and AmpC-positive Enterobacteriaceae in the gastrointestinal tract of community subjects and hospitalized patients in the Czech Republic. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2012;156(4):348–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Valverde A, Coque TM, Sánchez-Moreno MP, Rollán A, Baquero F, Cantón R. Dramatic increase in prevalence of fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae during nonoutbreak situations in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(10):4769–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Reuland EA, Overdevest IT, Al Naiemi N, Kalpoe JS, Rijnsburger MC, Raadsen SA, Ligtenberg-Burgman I, van der Zwaluw KW, Heck M, Savelkoul PH, et al. High prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae carriage in Dutch community patients with gastrointestinal complaints. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(6):542–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Onduru OG, Mkakosya RS, Rumisha SF, Aboud S. Carriage prevalence of extended-spectrum β-Lactamase producing enterobacterales in Outpatients Attending Community Health Centers in Blantyre, Malawi. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021; 6(4).

  47. Tola MA, Abera NA, Gebeyehu YM, Dinku SF, Tullu KD. High prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae fecal carriage among children under five years in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0258117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Akenten CW, Khan NA, Mbwana J, Krumkamp R, Fosu D, Paintsil EK, Boahen KG, Osei-Mensa J, Maiga-Ascofare O, May J, et al. Carriage of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli among children in rural Ghana: a cross-sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023;12(1):60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Medboua-Benbalagh C, Touati A, Kermas R, Gharout-Sait A, Brasme L, Mezhoud H, Touati D, Guillard T, de Champs C. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains is Associated with worse outcome in patients hospitalized in the Pediatric Oncology Unit of Beni-Messous Hospital in Algiers, Algeria. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(6):757–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Erdoğan D, Cömert F, Köktürk SEPETCİE, Külah F. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp in a Turkish community. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47(1):172–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hazirolan G, Mumcuoglu I, Altan G, Özmen BB, Aksu N, Karahan ZC. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and Ampc beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Turkish community. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(1):81–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ahmed SF, Ali MM, Mohamed ZK, Moussa TA, Klena JD. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in a Libyan community. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ouchar Mahamat O, Tidjani A, Lounnas M, Hide M, Benavides J, Somasse C, Ouedraogo AS, Sanou S, Carrière C, Bañuls AL, et al. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospital and community settings in Chad. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Reuland EA, Halaby T, Hays JP, de Jongh DM, Snetselaar HD, van Keulen M, Elders PJ, Savelkoul PH, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM. Al Naiemi N. plasmid-mediated AmpC: prevalence in community-acquired isolates in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and risk factors for carriage. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(1):e0113033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Seiffert SN, Hilty M, Kronenberg A, Droz S, Perreten V, Endimiani A. Extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in community, specialized outpatient clinic and hospital settings in Switzerland. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(10):2249–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Valenza G, Nickel S, Pfeifer Y, Eller C, Krupa E, Lehner-Reindl V, Höller C. Extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli as intestinal colonizers in the German community. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):1228–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tandé D, Jallot N, Bougoudogo F, Montagnon T, Gouriou S, Sizun J. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Malian orphanage. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(3):472–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Valverde A, Grill F, Coque TM, Pintado V, Baquero F, Cantón R, Cobo J. High rate of intestinal colonization with extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing organisms in household contacts of infected community patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(8):2796–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Azap O, Arslan H, Karaman S, Togan T. Risk factors for fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp in the community. Turk J Med Sci. 2007;37(1):31–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kader AA, Kamath KA. Faecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in the community. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15(6):1365–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bonnet R. Growing group of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: the CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Weisenberg SA, Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Alexander EL, Rhee KY, Kreiswirth BN, Jenkins SG. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in international travelers and non-travelers in New York City. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang J, Zheng B, Zhao L, Wei Z, Ji J, Li L, Xiao Y. Nationwide high prevalence of CTX-M and an increase of CTX-M-55 in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with community-onset Infections in Chinese county hospitals. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Fam NS, Defasque S, Bert F, Leflon-Guibout V, El-Ray A, El-Ghannam M, Attia ME, Omar M, Desouki DG, Valla D, et al. Faecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enterobacteria in Liver Disease patients from two hospitals in Egypt and France: a comparative epidemiological study. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143(6):1247–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yu HS, Lee JC, Kang HY, Jeong YS, Lee EY, Choi CH, Tae SH, Lee YC, Seol SY, Cho DT. Prevalence of dfr genes associated with integrons and dissemination of dfrA17 among urinary isolates of Escherichia coli in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53(3):445–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sahoo S, Otta S, Swain B, Kar SK. Detection and genetic characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases producers in a tertiary care hospital. J Lab Physicians. 2019;11(03):253–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Livermore DM, Sefton AM, Scott GM. Properties and potential of ertapenem. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52(3):331–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Brink A, Moolman J, da Silva MC, Botha M. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of selected bacteraemic pathogens from private institutions in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2007;97(4):273–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Siraj S, Ali S, Wondafrash B. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli at Jimma University specialized hospital, south-west, Ethiopia. J Mol Microbiol Res 2015; 5.

  70. Teklu DS, Negeri AA, Legese MH, Bedada TL, Woldemariam HK, Tullu KD. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production and multi-drug resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Kaur J, Chopra S, Sheevani MG. Modified double disc synergy test to detect ESBL production in urinary isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(2):229–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Mohammed Al Madhoun, Hadeel Ghareeb, Rola Badwan, Eman Abu Shamla, and Alaa Abu Jalad for their valuable assistance in different aspects of this study. We are grateful to Prof. Mario Vaneechoutte for his critical review of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Al-Aqsa University Gaza, Gaza, Palestine

    Nabil Abdullah El Aila & Basim Mohammed Ayesh

  2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Al Azhar University-Gaza, Gaza, Palestine

    Nahed Ali Al Laham

  3. Bacteriology-Hygiene unit, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    Thierry Naas

  4. LabEx LERMIT, Faculty of Medicine, Team ReSIST, UMR1184, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, CEA, France

    Thierry Naas

  5. French National Reference Center for Antimicrobial resistances, Hôpital Bicêtre, AP- HP Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    Thierry Naas

Authors
  1. Nabil Abdullah El Aila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nahed Ali Al Laham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Basim Mohammed Ayesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thierry Naas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, N.E., N.A., and B.A.; validation, N.E., N.A., B.A., and T.N.; formal analysis, N.E., N.A., and B.A.; investigation, N.E., N.A., and B.A.; writing—original draft preparation, N.E., B.A., N.A., and T.N.; writing, review and editing, N.E., B.A., N.A., and T.N. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil Abdullah El Aila.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All ethical considerations and guidelines relating to the collection of rectal swabs from pediatric hospitals and fecal samples from outpatient clinics in Gaza Strip were followed. Informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian of all study participants. The study was approved by the department of human resources and development in the Ministry of Health-Gaza and the local Helsinki committee (approval number: PHRC/HC/226/17).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Aila, N.A., Laham, N.A.A., Ayesh, B.M. et al. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacterales from hospitals and community settings in Gaza Strip, Palestine. BMC Microbiol 23, 376 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03102-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03102-6

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us