Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of clonal lineages on susceptibility of Staphylococcus lugdunensis to chlorhexidine digluconate and chloride benzalkonium

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 337 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Little is known about susceptibility of Staphylococcus lugdunensis to antiseptics. The objective of this study was to evaluate, at the molecular and phenotypic level, the susceptibility of 49 clinical S. lugdunensis strains (belonging to the seven clonal complexes [CCs] defined by multilocus sequence typing) to two antiseptics frequently used in healthcare settings (chlorhexidine digluconate [CHX] and chloride benzalkonium [BAC]).

Results

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), by broth microdilution method, varied for BAC from 0.25 mg/L to 8 mg/L (MIC50 = 1 mg/L, MIC90 = 2 mg/L) and for CHX from 0.5 mg/L to 2 mg/L (MIC50 = 1 mg/L, MIC90 = 2 mg/L). The BAC and CHX minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) varied from 2 mg/L to 8 mg/L (MBC50 = 4 mg/L, MBC90 = 8 mg/L) and from 2 mg/L to 4 mg/L (MBC50 and MBC90 = 4 mg/L), respectively. A reduced susceptibility to CHX (MIC = 2 mg/L) was observed for 12.2% of the strains and that to BAC (MIC ≥ 4 mg/L) for 4.1%. The norA resistance gene was detected in all the 49 isolates, whereas the qacA gene was rarely encountered (two strains; 4.1%). The qacC, qacG, qacH, and qacJ genes were not detected. The two strains harboring the qacA gene had reduced susceptibility to both antiseptics and belonged to CC3.

Conclusion

The norA gene was detected in all the strains, suggesting that it could belong to the core genome of S. lugdunensis. S. lugdunensis is highly susceptible to both antiseptics tested. Reduced susceptibility to BAC and CHX was a rare phenomenon. Of note, a tendency to higher MICs of BAC was detected for CC3 isolates. These results should be confirmed on a larger collection of strains.

Peer Review reports

Background

S. lugdunensis is a particularly virulent species of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) [1]. This microorganism is a skin commensal but is also an opportunistic pathogen able to cause potentially severe community-acquired infections as well as healthcare-associated infections [2, 3].

Several molecular typing methods, including multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and fbl-typing, revealed a clonal population structure, with no phylogenetic lineage associated with invasive infections [4, 5]. To date, seven clonal complexes (CCs) have been described (http://bigsdb.web.pasteur.fr/staphlugdunensis/). Strains isolated worldwide from hospitalized patients mainly belong to CC1 and CC3 [6,7,8]. Even if some methicillin resistant clones are circulating in Asia [8,9,10], this species currently remains highly sensitive to antibiotics [3]. Predominance of some CCs could then be explained by the low genetic diversity of the species [11] or by an increased ability of these CCs to survive in the hospital environment by biofilm formation [1] and/or resistance to antiseptics.

Two antiseptics, chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) and benzalkonium chloride (BAC), are widely used in health care settings including skin and wound antisepsis [12, 13]. Antiseptic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS is mediated by efflux pumps: NorA and QacA belonging to the major facilitator superfamily, and QacC, QacG, QacH and QacJ belonging to the multidrug resistant transporter family [14,15,16]. This resistance is phenotypically characterized by high minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to antiseptics, even if there is no consensual definition [17, 18]. Antiseptic resistance can be associated with the presence of resistance genes, which can belong to the core genome such as the norA gene in S. aureus [19], or be encoded by a plasmid like qac genes, identified in S. aureus and various species of CoNS [14].

So far, little is known about S. lugdunensis resistance to antiseptics [20, 21]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of resistance to the widely used antiseptics BAC and CHX by using both phenotypic and genotypic methods, in a collection of S. lugdunensis clinical isolates representing the seven CCs described to date.

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility test results

The antibiotic susceptibility results of the 49 S. lugdunensis strains are shown in Table 1. Eleven strains (22.4%) were resistant to penicillin G. The rate of strains resistant to kanamycin, tobramycin, fusidic acid and tetracyclin was 4.1% (2/49 strains) and that of strains resistant to gentamicin, erythromycin and clindamycin was 2% (1/49 strains). One strain (2%) was resistant to methicillin (methicillin-resistant S. lugdunensis, MRSL). This strain was multidrug resistant and belonged to CC3.

Table 1 Antibiotic susceptibility testing for the 49 S. lugdunensis strains
Full size table

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration

The MICs of CHX ranged from 0.5 to 2 mg/L and those of BAC from 0.25 to 8 mg/L (Table 2). The MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L respectively, for both CHX and BAC. Reduced susceptibility to CHX and BAC was observed for 12.2% (6/49) and 4.1% (2/49) of strains, respectively.

Table 2 Susceptibility testing of the 49 S. lugdunensis strains to CHX and BAC
Full size table

The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) ranged from 2 to 4 mg/L and 2 to 8 mg/L for CHX and BAC, respectively. The MBC50 and MBC90 of CHX were 4 mg/L. The MBC50 and MBC90 of BAC were 4 mg/L and 8 mg/L, respectively.

MIC and MBC distribution of CHX and BAC according to the CC is shown in Table 3. BAC MICs tended to vary according to the CC of the strains. The BAC MICs of the CC5 and singleton (belonging to any of the CC described) strains (mean of 0.55 mg/L and 0.81 mg/L, respectively) appeared to be lower than those of the other CCs. On the contrary, strains belonging to CC3 had the highest MIC values (mean of 2.18). No noticeable trend was highlighted regarding the MBC distributions of either CHX or BAC.

Table 3 MIC and MBC values of CHX and BAC according to the CC
Full size table

Detection ofnorAandqacgenes.

The norA gene was detected by PCR in all S. lugdunensis strains (Table 2). Two strains were positive for the qacA gene. Interestingly, these two strains had decreased susceptibility to both antiseptics (CHX and BAC) (Table 2) and belonged to CC3. The qacC, qacG, qacH and qacJ genes were not detected. To rule out false negative PCR in the highly variable qac genes, their absence was confirmed by blastn in the 11 strains whose genome sequences were available (SL_13, SL_29, SL_55, SL_117, SL_118, SL_122, 22FJ, 25AC, 27HJ, 33RM, 37BH).

Discussion

S. lugdunensis is recognized as a virulent species of CoNS responsible for severe infections. In hospital settings, predominant clones (CC1 and CC3) have been described [5, 6, 8], suggesting a potential adaptation to this environment. With the widespread use of antiseptics in healthcare facilities, there are concerns about antiseptic tolerance and resistance [17]. However, little is known about S. lugdunensis susceptibility to antiseptics.

Only two previous studies on antiseptic susceptibility have included a small number of S. lugdunensis strains: one in Sommer et al.’s work [22] and eight in the study of Addetia et al. [20]. Our study is the first to investigate the antiseptic susceptibility of such a large collection of S. lugdunensis strains from different clinical settings and geographical origins and representing the seven CCs described to date. Resistance was assessed by determining MIC and MBC by broth microdilution for the two commonly used antiseptics CHX and BAC. Standardized methods to determine MIC/MBC and consensus to define antiseptic resistance are missing [23]. Therefore, we applied protocols and MIC breakpoints widely used in literature for Staphylococcus spp. and defined reduced susceptibility to CHX and BAC when MIC > 1.5 mg/L and > 3 mg/L, respectively [18].

In our study, lower BAC MICs were observed (0.25 mg/L to 8 mg/L) compared to previous studies using broth microdilution. Indeed, they have shown that BAC MICs for clinical CoNS strains and S. aureus varied similarly between 0.25 mg/L and 64 mg/L [24,25,26,27,28]. The only two S. lugdunensis strains with reduced susceptibility to BAC in our study belonged to the CC3. In contrast, the CC5 and singleton ST strains tended to have lower MICs. For S. aureus, Kernberger-Fisher et al. have similarly showed that strains belonging to the major human lineages CC22 and CC5 had significantly higher CHX MIC values than the main animal lineage ST398 [29].

S. lugdunensis strains exhibited here low CHX MICs (MIC90 = 2 mg/L) with a narrow value distribution, similar to that obtained by Addetia et al. for eight S. lugdunensis strains (CHX MICs determined by broth microdilution ranging from 0.5 to 1 mg/L) [20]. In contrast, in literature, CHX MICs vary from 0.125 mg/L to 32 mg/L for other CoNS species [20, 24, 25, 28, 30], and from 0.25 mg/L to 8 mg/L for S. aureus [24, 25].

The CHX and BAC MBC determined here were close to MIC values, and remained much below the antiseptic concentration used in practice. Considering the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) defined for S. aureus by Morissey et al. (i.e. MIC = 8 mg/L and MBC > 64 mg/L for CHX, and MIC = 16 mg/L and MBC = 32 mg/L for BAC), all the 49 S. lugdunensis strains tested would be considered as wild-type [31].

In addition, resistance to CHX and BAC was assessed by a genotypic method. The norA gene was detected in all strains of our collection, suggesting that it belongs to the core genome of S. lugdunensis. Similarly, Costa et al. showed that norA is part of the core genome of S. aureus, but exists as multiple alleles [19]. Increased antiseptic resistance of S. aureus strains has been associated with NorA-mediated efflux via the overexpression of the norA gene [32, 33]. Thus, it would be interesting to compare norA expression levels of the strains in our collection.

On the contrary, the prevalence of the qacA gene was low (4.1%) in this study. This result contrasts with the variations of the qacA prevalence previously described for CoNS (42.4–62.4%) [24, 25, 34] and for S. aureus (from 10.5 to 21.8% for methicillin-susceptible strains and from 8,3 to 83.3% for methicillin-resistant strains) [18, 24, 25, 34,35,36]. Here, the qacC, qacG, qacH and qacJ genes were not detected by PCR. Due to lack of DNA conservation, some of the PCR primers described in the literature may fail to detect qac genes [14]. However, blast analysis confirmed the absence of qac gene sequences in the 11 whole genome sequences available. The prevalence of these genes in other CoNS species and in S. aureus varies greatly between studies (0–44.2% of isolates) [18, 24, 34,35,36]. The low prevalence of these plasmid-encoded qac genes observed for S. lugdunensis could be explained by the multiple barriers of this species genome that prevent horizontal gene transfer by mobile genetic elements [11, 37].

Interestingly, the two S. lugdunensis strains positive for the qacA resistance gene had reduced susceptibility for both CHX and BAC. This could suggest a relationship between qac genes and reduced susceptibility to antiseptics, as demonstrated in several studies for S. aureus and CoNs [20, 22,23,24] but to be confirmed on a larger number of strains. Whole genome studies of S. lugdunensis strains with reduced susceptibility to antiseptics could lead to identify mechanisms contributing to a reduced susceptibility to antiseptics in this species.

Cross-resistance to antibiotics and antiseptics remains controversial. Some studies have reported cross-resistance between CHX and antibiotics (e.g. cefoxitin, penicillin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, tetracyclin), especially for S. epidermidis, S. warneri and S. aureus [25, 38, 39]. The only MRSL strain in our study showed reduced susceptibility to both CHX and BAC. MRSL, more prevalent in Asia [9, 10, 40], could represent a major health issue worldwide. Analysis of a larger number of MRSL strains would therefore be necessary to track such a putative link between methicillin resistance and reduced susceptibility to antiseptics.

Conclusions

This study conducted on a large collection of strains shows that, unlike other CoNS, S. lugdunensis is highly susceptible to CHX and BAC. However, the first description of a reduced susceptibility to these antiseptics in two CC3 strains, highlights a potential risk for infection control in healthcare settings.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

Forty-nine clinical strains of S. lugdunensis isolated from 49 patients were included in this study [see Additional file 1]. They were recovered from carriage (n = 12) or infections (n = 37) and collected in seven French regions (Strasbourg, Rouen, Tours, Nancy, Montpellier, Nantes, Bordeaux) and Sweden (one strain from Kronoberg) between 2013 and 2016. All 49 strains were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). Strains were previously characterized by MLST and/or fbl-typing [5]. Forty-five strains belonged to the seven CCs described [(CC1, n = 11), (CC2, n = 5), (CC3, n = 11), (CC4, n = 4), (CC5, n = 5), (CC6, n = 5) and (CC7, n = 4)], three were singleton STs [(ST13, n = 1) and (ST28, n = 2)] and for one strain data were not obtained. S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as a quality control strain for all the susceptibility tests [20, 41].

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommendations (https://www.eucast.org/) [41]. The following antibiotic disks were tested: penicillin G (1 UI), kanamycin (30 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), quinupristin/dalfopristin (15 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), norfloxacin (10 µg), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (25 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg), rifampicin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), tetracyclin (30 µg), minocyclin (30 µg), and linezolid (10 µg) (I2A, Montpellier, France).

Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimal bactericidal concentration determination

The MIC of CHX (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, USA) and BAC (Sigma, Saint Louis, USA) was determined by broth microdilution method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [42]. The concentration range tested for CHX and BAC varied from 0.25 mg/L to 128 mg/L. Strains with MIC below or equal to 1 mg/L were categorized susceptible to CHX ; reduced susceptibility was defined for strains with MIC between 1.5 mg/L and 3 mg/L. Strains with MIC below or equal to 3 mg/L were considered susceptible to BAC and strains with MIC values higher than 3 mg/L exhibited reduced susceptibility [18].

For MBC determination, 10 µL of the suspension in MIC wells without visible microbial growth were subcultured onto Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The MBC was noted as the lowest antiseptic concentration for which no growth was observed [33].

All MIC and MBC experiments were carried out in triplicate. MIC and MBC obtained twice were recorded as the final values.

Molecular detection of antiseptic resistance genes

DNA extraction was performed using the InstaGene™ Matrix kit (Bio-Rad), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Each strain’s DNA was screened by PCR for the presence of norA, qacA, qacC, qacG, qacH, and qacJ genes using primers presented in Table 4 [43]. PCR reaction was composed of 0.25 µL (0.50 µM) of each primer, 12.5 µL of Go Taq® G2 Green Master Mix, 5 µL of DNA and 7 µL of sterile water, for a final volume of 25 µL. PCRs were performed, using a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), as follows: initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were visualized under UV after migration for 45 min at 110 V on 1.5% gel containing 0.005 mg/L ethidium bromide.

Table 4 List of PCR primers
Full size table

Research ofqacgenes in whole genomes.

We collected the 11 whole genomes of strains used in this study available on NCBI (accession numbers: GCA_008728755.1, GCA_008728775.1, GCA_008728795.1, GCA_008728815.1, GCA_008728715.1, GCA_008728735.1, GCA_002097035.1, GCA_002096135.1, GCA_002096155.1, GCA_002104555.1, GCA_002096075.1) and the reference sequences of the qacA, qacC, qacG, qacH and qacJ genes (NCBI accession numbers: NC_007931.1, GQ900464.1, NG_051904.1, NC_019081.1, NG_048046.1) cited in the publication by Worthing KA et al., 2018 [44]. Each qac gene reference sequence was searched for in the whole genomes of the strains using blastn.

Data Availability

All data of this study are included in this article [and in its supplementary information file].

Abbreviations

BAC:

Benzalkonium chloride

CC:

Clonal complex

CHX:

Chlorhexidine digluconate

CoNS:

Coagulase-negative staphylococci

DNA:

Desoxyribonucleic acid

ECOFF:

Epidemiological cut-off

MBC:

Minimum bactericidal concentration

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

MLST:

Multilocus sequence typing

MRSL:

Methicillin-resistant S. lugdunensis

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

QAC:

Quaternary ammonium compound

References

  1. Argemi X, Hansmann Y, Riegel P, Prévost G. Is Staphylococcus lugdunensis Significant in Clinical samples? J Clin Microbiol Nov. 2017;55(11):3167–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Frank KL, del Pozo JL, Patel R. From Clinical Microbiology to Infection pathogenesis: how daring to be different works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(1):111–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Heilbronner S, Foster TJ. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: a skin commensal with invasive pathogenic potential. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021;34(2):e00205–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chassain B, Lemée L, Didi J, Thiberge JM, Brisse S, Pons JL, et al. Multilocus sequence typing analysis of Staphylococcus lugdunensis implies a Clonal Population structure. J Clin Microbiol Sept. 2012;50(9):3003–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dahyot S, Lebeurre J, Laumay F, Argemi X, Dubos C, Lemée L, et al. Fbl-typing of Staphylococcus lugdunensis: a Frontline Tool for Epidemiological studies, but not predictive of fibrinogen binding ability. Front Microbiol 17 may. 2019;10:1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dahyot S, Lebeurre J, Argemi X, François P, Lemée L, Prévost G, et al. Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) and Tandem repeat sequence typing (TRST), helpful tools for subtyping Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Sci Rep Dec. 2018;8(1):11669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kosecka-Strojek M, Wolska-Gębarzewska M, Podbielska-Kubera A, Samet A, Krawczyk B, Międzobrodzki J, et al. May Staphylococcus lugdunensis be an Etiological factor of chronic maxillary sinuses Infection? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(12):6450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeh CF, Chang SC, Cheng CW, Lin JF, Liu TP, Lu JJ. Clinical features, outcomes, and molecular characteristics of community- and Health Care-Associated Staphylococcus lugdunensis Infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(8):2051–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan TY, Ng SY, He J, Microbiological, Characteristics. Presumptive identification, and antibiotic susceptibilities of Staphylococcus lugdunensis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(7):2393–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ho PL, Leung SMH, Chow KH, Tse CWS, Cheng VCC, Tse H, et al. Carriage niches and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and methicillin-resistant S. lugdunensis among patients undergoing long-term renal replacement therapy. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;81(2):141–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Argemi X, Matelska D, Ginalski K, Riegel P, Hansmann Y, Bloom J, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Staphylococcus lugdunensis shows a closed pan-genome and multiple barriers to horizontal gene transfer. BMC Genomics Dec. 2018;19(1):621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Williamson DA, Carter GP, Howden BP. Current and emerging topical antibacterials and antiseptics: agents, Action, and resistance patterns. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(3):827–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Merchel Piovesan Pereira B, Tagkopoulos I. Benzalkonium chlorides: uses, Regulatory Status, and Microbial Resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85(13):e00377–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wassenaar TM, Ussery D, Nielsen LN, Ingmer H. Review and phylogenetic analysis of qac genes that reduce susceptibility to quaternary ammonium compounds in Staphylococcus species. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2015;5(1):44–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lekshmi M. Modulation of antimicrobial efflux pumps of the major facilitator superfamily in Staphylococcus aureus. AIMS Microbiol. 2018;4(1):1–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Poole K. Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 1 July. 2005;56(1):20–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van den Poel B, Saegeman V, Schuermans A. Increasing usage of chlorhexidine in health care settings: blessing or curse? A narrative review of the risk of chlorhexidine resistance and the implications for Infection prevention and control. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;41(3):349–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shamsudin MN, Alreshidi MA, Hamat RA, Alshrari AS, Atshan SS, Neela V. High prevalence of qacA/B carriage among clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Malaysia. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81(3):206–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Costa SS, Sobkowiak B, Parreira R, Edgeworth JD, Viveiros M, Clark TG, et al. Genetic diversity of norA, Coding for a Main Efflux Pump of Staphylococcus aureus. Front Genet. 2019;9:710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Addetia A, Greninger AL, Adler A, Yuan S, Makhsous N, Qin X, et al. A novel, widespread qacA allele results in reduced Chlorhexidine susceptibility in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother Jun. 2019;63(6):e02607–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleurette J, Bès M, Brun Y, Freney J, Forey F, Coulet M, Reverdy ME, Etienne J. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and S. schleiferi: bacteriological characteristics and susceptibility to anyimicrobial agents. Res Microbiol. 1989;140(2):107–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sommer LM, Krauss J, Hultén KG, Dunn J, Kaplan SL, McNeil JC. The prevalence of antiseptic tolerance genes among Staphylococci and Enterococci in a Pediatric Population. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol mar. 2019;40(3):333–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Horner C, Mawer D, Wilcox M. Reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine in staphylococci: is it increasing and does it matter? J Antimicrob Chemother 1 nov. 2012;67(11):2547–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Taheri N, Ardebili A, Amouzandeh-Nobaveh A, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Frequency of Antiseptic Resistance among Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolated from a University Hospital in Central Iran. Oman Med J 1 nov. 2016;31(6):426–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang M, O’Donoghue MM, Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Boost MV. Prevalence of antiseptic-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci colonising nurses and the general population in Hong Kong. J Hosp Infect Jun. 2011;78(2):113–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kampf G. Adaptive microbial response to low level benzalkonium chloride exposure. J Hosp Infect Nov. 2018;100(3):e1–e22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Correa JE, Paulis AD, Predari S, Sordelli DO, Jeric PE. First report of qacG, qacH and qacJ genes in Staphylococcus haemolyticus human clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother Nov. 2008;62(5):956–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lepainteur M, Royer G, Bourrel AS, Romain O, Duport C, Doucet-Populaire F, Decousser JW. Prevalence of resistance to antiseptics and mupirocin among invasive coagulase-negative staphylococci from very preterm neonates in NICU: the creeping threat? J Hosp Infect. 2013;83(4):333–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kernberger-Fischer IA, Krischek C, Strommenger B, Fiegen U, Beyerbach M, Kreienbrock L, et al. Susceptibility of Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates of various clonal lineages from Germany to eight biocides. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(13):e00799–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Duran N, Temiz M, Duran GG, Eryılmaz N, Jenedi K. Relationship between the resistance genes to quaternary ammonium compounds and antibiotic resistance in staphylococci isolated from surgical site Infections. Med Sci Monit apr. 2014;2:20:544–50.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morrissey I, Oggioni MR, Knight D, Curiao T, Coque T, Kalkanci A, et al. Evaluation of epidemiological cut-off values indicates that Biocide resistant subpopulations are uncommon in natural isolates of clinically-relevant Microorganisms. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Costa SS, Viveiros M, Amaral L, Couto I. Multidrug Efflux pumps in Staphylococcus aureus: an update. Open Microbiol J 22 March. 2013;7(1):59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. LaBreck PT, Bochi-Layec AC, Stanbro J, Dabbah-Krancher G, Simons MP, Merrell DS. Systematic Analysis of Efflux Pump-Mediated Antiseptic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Suggests a Need for Greater Antiseptic Stewardship. mSphere. 26 feb 2020;5(1):e00959-19.

  34. Ignak S, Nakipoglu Y, Gurler B. Frequency of antiseptic resistance genes in clinical staphycocci and enterococci isolates in Turkey. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Dec. 2017;6(1):88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vali L, Davies SE, Lai LLG, Dave J, Amyes SGB. Frequency of biocide resistance genes, antibiotic resistance and the effect of chlorhexidine exposure on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 4 Feb. 2008;61(3):524–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mayer S, Boos M, Beyer A, Fluit AC, Schmitz FJ. Distribution of the antiseptic resistance genes qacA, qacB and qacC in 497 methicillin-resistant and -susceptible European isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 1 June. 2001;47(6):896–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Heilbronner S, Hanses F, Monk IR, Speziale P, Foster TJ. Sortase A promotes virulence in experimental Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis. Microbiol (Reading). 2013;159(Pt 10):2141–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kampf G. Acquired resistance to chlorhexidine – is it time to establish an ‘antiseptic stewardship’ initiative? J Hosp Infect Nov. 2016;94(3):213–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. El Sayed Zaki M, Bastawy S, Montasser K. Molecular study of resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to antiseptic quaternary ammonium compounds. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;17:94–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chang SC, Lin LC, Lu JJ. Comparative genomic analyses reveal potential factors responsible for the ST6 Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus lugdunensis endemic in a hospital. Front Microbiol 25 nov. 2021;12:765437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 13.0., 2023. http://www.eucast.org.

  42. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically M07 11th Edition 2018.

  43. Noguchi N, Hase M, Kitta M, Sasatsu M, Deguchi K, Kono M. Antiseptic susceptibility and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;172(2):247–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Worthing KA, Marcus A, Abraham S, Trott DJ, Norris JM. Qac genes and biocide tolerance in clinical veterinary methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet Microbiol. 2018;216:153–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank X. Argemi, L. Bieber, V. Dubois, H. Marchandin, F. Mory, G. Prévost, A. Reynaud and N. van der Mee-Marquet for kindly supplying strains.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Univ Rouen Normandie, UNICAEN, Inserm, Normandie Univ, DYNAMICURE UMR 1311, F - 76000, Rouen, France

    Laurie Destruel, Marine Lecomte, Maxime Grand & Marie Leoz

  2. Univ Rouen Normandie, UNICAEN, Inserm, Normandie Univ, DYNAMICURE UMR 1311, CHU Rouen, Department of Bacteriology, F - 76000, Rouen, France

    Martine Pestel-Caron & Sandrine Dahyot

Authors
  1. Laurie Destruel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marine Lecomte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maxime Grand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marie Leoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martine Pestel-Caron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sandrine Dahyot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LD, SD and MPC designed the study. LD and M. Lecomte, M. Leoz performed the experiments. LD, M. Lecomte, MG, M. Leoz, SD, MPC participated in analyzing and interpreting the results. LD, SD, MG, M. Leoz, MPC wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Dahyot.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All isolates were generated and analyzed as part of microbiological diagnostics and were exempt from ethics committee approval. The data and isolates were de-identified so that these were irretrievably unlinked to an identifiable person.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Destruel, L., Lecomte, M., Grand, M. et al. Impact of clonal lineages on susceptibility of Staphylococcus lugdunensis to chlorhexidine digluconate and chloride benzalkonium. BMC Microbiol 23, 337 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03088-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03088-1

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us