Skip to main content
Download PDF

Limited effects of azithromycin on the oropharyngeal microbiome in children with CF and early pseudomonas infection

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 312 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and chronic azithromycin (AZ) have known clinical benefits for children with CF, likely due to antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. The effects of chronic AZ in combination with TIS on the airway microbiome have not been extensively investigated. Oropharyngeal swab samples were collected in the OPTIMIZE multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial examining the addition of AZ to TIS in 198 children with CF and early P. aeruginosa infection. Bacterial small subunit rRNA gene community profiles were determined. The effects of TIS and AZ were assessed on oropharyngeal microbial diversity and composition to uncover whether effects on the bacterial community may be a mechanism of action related to the observed changes in clinical outcomes.

Results

Substantial changes in bacterial communities (total bacterial load, diversity and relative abundance of specific taxa) were observed by week 3 of TIS treatment for both the AZ and placebo groups. On average, these shifts were due to changes in non-traditional CF taxa that were not sustained at the later study visits (weeks 13 and 26). Bacterial community measures did not differ between the AZ and placebo groups.

Conclusions

This study provides further evidence that the mechanism for AZ’s effect on clinical outcomes is not due solely to action on airway microbial composition.

Peer Review reports

Background

Much of the morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF) is due to lung infections, more specifically, pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a traditional CF lung pathogen associated with worse clinical outcomes [1]. Consequently, eradication of initial PA infection remains standard of care [2]. Tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and chronic Azithromycin (AZ), either alone or in combination, improve clinical outcomes for people with and without chronic PA infection [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. OPTIMIZE (Optimizing Treatment for Early Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Cystic Fibrosis) was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that evaluated whether the addition of AZ to TIS in children with cystic fibrosis and early PA infection decreased the risk of pulmonary exacerbation and prolonged the time to PA recurrence. Prior to the widespread introduction of CFTR modulators, the OPTIMIZE trial showed AZ, in addition to TIS, was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) and an increase in body weight in children with newly acquired PA compared to TIS alone. Despite improved clinical outcomes, there was no difference in rates of PA eradication or recurrence between AZ and placebo treatment groups [4], suggesting the benefits of AZ were not due to improved PA eradication.

Macrolide antibiotics, including AZ, have known anti-inflammatory properties and may have indirect antibacterial activity through alternative mechanisms, such as immunomodulatory, and anti-viral effects, as well as impact on PA biofilm formation, quorum sensing and airway epithelial sodium channel activation, among others [13, 14]. An ancillary study to OPTIMIZE evaluated the effects of randomized AZ treatment on circulating biomarkers of inflammation [15]. A significant decrease in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was observed at 39 weeks but was not sustained at 78 weeks. Changes in myeloperoxidase, calprotectin and neutrophil count were not different between AZ and placebo groups. Given the demonstrated benefits of AZ without a consistent effect on typical CF pathogens or traditional inflammatory markers to explain the clinical improvement, alternative explanations by which AZ improves pulmonary disease remain of interest.

In the OPTIMIZE study, the addition of AZ to TIS conferred additional clinical benefit, despite no apparent change in PA infection. There is evidence to support that both TIS and AZ may modulate the airway microbiome beyond traditional CF pathogens [16, 17], which may convey clinical benefits outside of their effect on PA. A recent study by Acosta et al. evaluated the microbiome from 38 adults with CF, before and after starting AZ using banked sputum samples [18]. This study found no significant shifts in sputum microbiome related to initiation of AZ suggesting that the observed clinical benefits are unrelated to the modification of the microbial community. These findings were observed in an older CF cohort, where more than half of the study participants started AZ due to concerns of clinical deterioration and other antimicrobial treatments, specifically TIS, could not be tightly controlled. Such limitations necessitate further study to assess the changes of the microbial community with regards to initiation of AZ.

In this ancillary study of oropharyngeal samples collected during the OPTIMIZE clinical trial, we evaluate the impact of TIS with and without AZ on the diversity and composition of the microbiome to determine whether effects on the bacterial community is a potential mechanism of action related to the observed changes in clinical outcomes.

Results

Participant and sample characteristics at baseline

Descriptive clinical and demographic information for the eradication and PA stratified cohorts (Fig. 1) are provided in Table 1. At baseline (week 0), PA was detected by culture in 92 participants and by sequencing in 67 participants. PA detection by both methods was observed in 52 participants and PA was not detected by either method in 91 participants. The most abundant genus at baseline was Streptococcus, which was the dominant taxa in 80 participants (Fig. 2). In 72 participants, baseline oropharyngeal bacterial communities were not dominated by a single genus. Fewer participants had bacterial communities dominated by other genera including Prevotella, Neisseria, Staphylococcus, Haemophilus, Rothia and Porphyromonas. Oropharyngeal bacterial community composition and ecological metrics at baseline were assessed for differences between analytical groups to confirm randomization did not impact these variables. Neither total bacterial load (TBL) nor Shannon Diversity Index (SDI) differed between treatment groups at the baseline visit for either cohort (Table 2). Sequences indicative of Streptococcus mitis|oralis|pneumoniae (herein referred to as the Streptococcus mitis group) were the most abundant taxon in OP swabs at baseline across both groups (Figure E1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT diagram. Overview of participants and samples collected for microbiome analysis during the OPTIMIZE trial. Tobramycin inhaled solution (TIS) was utilized based on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) culture results. The eradication cohort represents the initial course of TIS with placebo or azithromycin. The PA stratified cohort represents participants that were consistently on or off TIS following the initial eradiation attempt. Visit 1 – baseline, Visit 2 – week 3, Visit 3 – week 13, Visit 4 – week 26, AZ = azithromycin

Full size image
Table 1 Participant demographics by cohorts
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Bacterial composition of baseline samples for all subjects arranged by dominant taxon. Streptococcus was the most prominent taxon (n = 80) followed by Prevotella (N = 16) and Neisseria (n = 15). Staphylococcus (n = 4) and Haemophilus (n = 3) are shown as representative of CF pathogens. Other is a composite category created by summing all other taxa and was dominant for the 80 samples not included in the selected genera (includes 4 samples each dominated by Rothia and Porphyromonas). Few samples contain high relative abundance of PA (max RA < 40%). Dominant taxa abbreviations: OTH = Other; STR = Streptococcus; PRV = Prevotella; NEI = Neisseria; STA = Staphylococcus; H = Haemophilus.

Full size image
Table 2 Comparison of AZ versus placebo on microbiome outcomes between baseline and week 3
Full size table

Significant changes in microbial communities occurred at week 3 in both AZ and placebo groups

Morisita-Horn (MH) and percent of shared taxa (Jaccard) beta diversity were used to compare the bacterial communities between baseline and week 3 samples from the same participant; higher values indicate similarity between the communities. Low beta diversity values indicated significant shifts in the bacterial community in both the community structure and the proportion of shared taxa (Fig. 3). The distribution of beta diversity values did not differ between the AZ and placebo groups. Significant decreases in TBL and SDI after 3 weeks of treatment were observed in both the placebo and AZ groups (Figure E2) and these decreases also did not differ by randomized treatment (Table 2). There were no clinically meaningful changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) or Staphylococcus aureus relative abundance (RA) (Fig. 3). Only two participants had notable PA relative abundance at baseline, one in each randomized group, and both relative abundances decreased with treatment. The majority of the participants with high RA for Staphylococcus aureus at baseline had a decrease at week 3 but there are instances where this CF pathogen increased. Haemophilus also decreased in both AZ and placebo groups. Significant decreases were observed for several other non-traditional CF pathogens including Veillonella, Lactobacillales, Streptococcus parasanguinis, Gemella, Neisseria subflava and Leptotrichia, whereas, Prevotella melaninogenica, Porphyromonas, Rothia and Erysipelotrichaceae increased (Figure E3). Changes from baseline to week 3 were similar between the AZ and placebo groups (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Changes in individual taxa between baseline and week 3. Volcano plot (A), points are labeled if FDR p < 0.05 and absolute median estimate greater than 0.5 RA. P-value for volcano plot calculated using signed rank test for each taxa. Changes for individual taxa identified in the volcano plots are displayed (B). Placebo + TIS (n = 97); azithromycin + TIS (n = 101) at each visit

Full size image

Changes in microbial communities were not sustained at six month visit

On average, the large shifts in bacterial communities observed at week 3 reverted back to baseline at week 13 and 26. More specifically, MH values comparing later study visits to baseline increased compared to the week 3 comparison. This, in combination with higher MH between weeks 13 and 26, suggests the large shifts in communities at week 3 were not sustained at the later time points (Fig. 4). Similarly, Shannon alpha diversity and total bacterial load returned to baseline at the later study visits. Changes in specific taxa that had large shifts at visit 3 also returned to baseline levels by weeks 13 and 26 (Figure E4). These patterns for all microbial measures were present irrespective of TIS or AZ treatment or PA stratification (Figures E5, E6, and E7).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Long term changes in communities were not sustained over 26 weeks. Morisita-Horn (A) values compare bacterial compositions between each study visit and baseline. Changes in total bacterial load (B) and Shannon Diversity (C) observed at week 3 return to baseline levels at the later study visits. Observed values over time are indicated with a line for each individual. Figure includes 108 subjects at each study visit. MH = Morisita-Horn beta diversity

Full size image

Sustained shifts in microbial communities were observed in a small subset of participants

Given the variability in the bacterial community changes over time, the relevance of these changes was evaluated with regard to treatment differences in clinical outcomes. Changes in bacterial communities at the 3 and 13 week study visits relative to baseline were evaluated using MH (MH0 − 3 and MH0 − 13). MH values were compared with the PEx outcome, stratified by treatment, to determine the clinical relevance of these shifts. Eight subjects who experienced a PEx prior to week 13 were excluded since their first exacerbation occurred prior to the observed change in their bacterial community, one subject was missing a week 13 sample. After graphical inspection of MH0 − 13 versus PEx outcomes, differential effects of treatment appear to occur at low MH values (Figure E8). Using a MH cutoff of 0.2 (roughly equal to the 50th percentile for MH0 − 3 and the 25th percentile for MH0 − 13), proportions of PEx, median number of PEx and time to next PEx are compared across treatments in Table E3. For those subjects that had higher MH values (i.e., more stable bacterial communities) there was no difference between treatment groups for any of the PEx outcomes. However, in those with large shifts in their bacterial communities observed at the week 13 study visit, the AZ treatment groups had better PEx outcomes compared to the placebo group, specifically fewer PEx events (42% versus 85%) and longer times to first PEx (Figure E9). These effects were present in the subset who also experienced large shifts at the week 3 study visit (Table E3). Of the 22 subjects with large shifts in their microbial communities between baseline and 13 weeks MH0 − 13 < 0.2), the difference between AZ and placebo groups was not due to a reduction in traditional CF pathogens by graphical inspection (Figure E10 & E11).

Discussion

In this study, the majority of baseline oropharyngeal bacterial communities were either dominated by Streptococcus or had high evenness, i.e., not dominated by any single taxa. Despite the eligibility requirement of a PA positive culture, few subjects had detectable PA by sequencing in the baseline visit sample, moreover, the majority also did not have predominance of other CF taxa. Significant decreases in total bacterial load and diversity, as well as substantial changes in bacterial communities were observed by the week 3 study visit for most subjects and did not differ by treatment group (AZ vs. placebo), suggesting these changes are related to TIS. On average, these shifts were due to changes in non-traditional CF taxa that reverted to baseline levels by the 26-week study visit. Decreases in PA and Staphylococcus aureus were observed in both treatment groups, but these taxa were only detected in a small number of subjects at baseline. Changes in microbial measures observed at week 3 were not sustained at later visits, both for the cohort with only a single 28-day series of TIS and for the cohort with three culture-based series of 28-day TIS. There was a small subset of subjects (22%) with sustained changes in their bacterial communities at the week 13 study visit that might benefit from AZ. This sub-group may be identifiable by their baseline community which tended to have lower diversity, Streptococcus and Veillonella. However, these effects do not appear to be directly related to selective pressure on the community composition at the taxonomic level, i.e., the mechanism is not related to the reduction or enrichment of certain taxa.

The OPTIMIZE trial showed a significant reduction in risk of pulmonary exacerbation with inclusion of AZ in addition to TIS for treatment of initial PA infection [4]. Clinical improvements were observed despite no differences in PA eradication rates. Similarly, the TEACH trial also did not observe a decrease in PA density in AZ compared to placebo [19]. The TEACH trial included an older CF age cohort with higher initial PA densities at baseline and evaluated AZ in combination with TIS. These data and results from other studies in CF [5, 11, 18, 20], in addition to the results presented here, provide further evidence that the mechanism for azithromycin’s effect on clinical outcomes is unrelated to antimicrobial action against PA.

Baseline bacterial communities mainly consisted of non-traditional bacteria (anaerobes and bacteria typically classified as oral commensals), despite the enrollment criteria of a positive PA culture. Recent microbiome studies in children have reported similar non-traditional bacteria in cohorts that include sputum from children with HIV [21], in an asthma study that collected hypopharyngeal aspirates [22] and other studies from early PA infection in CF [23]. Sputum from adults with CF collected prior to AZ treatment was more typically dominated by traditional CF pathogens, however a few subjects did exhibit less dominated bacterial communities that included anaerobes, similar to what we observed [18].

Additionally, several randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of macrolide treatment on oropharyngeal microbial communities in adult cohorts (average age ranged from 38 to 65 across studies) outside of CF have been reported [24,25,26,27]. Similar to our findings, the baseline communities in all of these studies were dominated by Streptococcus and Prevotella. A change in total bacterial load was not reported after 48 weeks of a macrolide in a study of non-CF bronchiectasis [25]. Changes in alpha diversity measures are discrepant between studies, one found that evenness decreased [25], whereas no changes were observed in a cohort of healthy individuals [26]. Similarly, the results of studies differ with regards to changes in individual taxa, specifically Streptococcus and Haemophilus, some indicated significant changes in these taxa [25,26,27] whereas others did not [24]. More generally, the resilience of the airway microbiome associated with antibiotic related perturbations has been observed in other CF studies, including both pediatric and adult cohorts [28,29,30,31].

Similar to our finding, a recent study using banked sputum samples [18] did not observe major impacts on the bacterial communities following 2 years of AZ treatment. However, decreases in Prevotella and increases in Haemophilus were reported. This is in contrast to our study that showed an increase in Prevotella and a decrease in Haemophilus at the week 3 study visit then a return to baseline levels. These discrepancies may be due to the longer follow-up time of the Acosta et al. study, or the reason for initiation of AZ treatment, as more than half of the patients started AZ related to concerns of clinical deterioration. Additionally, TIS was more strictly controlled in OPTIMIZE, whereas this wasn’t possible in the Acosta study. Our findings suggest that the large changes in the microbiome may be attributed to TIS rather than to AZ. Previous studies evaluating microbiome changes due to TIS similarly found shifts in bacterial communities that were not sustained over time [16, 17]. Furthermore, shifts in taxonomy were not correlated with functional differences by metagenomics [17].

While the prevalence of lung infections decreases with highly effective CFTR modulators [32], prospective studies suggest that infection persists after initiation of ivacaftor [33, 34] or elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor [35, 36]. Evidence for changes in airway inflammation with highly effective modulators is mixed and prospective studies are ongoing [37]. Thus, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory therapies, including AZ, are likely to remain a valuable tool for managing CF lung disease and understanding the mechanism of activity may influence use in modulator treated populations.

Major strengths of this study include the large multicenter cohort of young children with CF enrolled soon after initial PA infection, longitudinal study design with multiple collected oropharyngeal samples, consistent administration of concurrent TIS and was ancillary to a randomized clinical trial that allows a more direct inference of causal relationships. However, it is not without limitations, OP samples were used to describe airway bacterial communities and may not be representative of the lower airway in all participants [38]. Despite this, OP samples remain used clinically to manage PA airway infection in children with CF and are more feasible than collecting lower airway samples. Further, our results aligned with previous studies of AZ using sputum samples collected from older CF individuals [18], which partially addresses this limitation. Our study is unable to make any inferences regarding potential functional or metabolic shifts in the bacterial communities or impacts on other components of the microbiome (including viruses or fungi) as only total bacterial load and microbial taxonomic composition were assessed. Some of the comparisons were based on small sample sizes and require further validation.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the impact on clinical outcomes observed during the OPTIMIZE trial was not due to antimicrobial effect by AZ on the oropharyngeal bacterial community composition even in a younger cohort randomized to treatment and accounting for concurrent TIS use. The mechanism of action for AZ is unlikely to be directly affecting the airway microbiome.

Methods

An expanded Methods section is available in the online supplement.

Study design

The parent OPTIMIZE study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in children with CF who were 6 months to 18 years of age at the time of new isolation of PA from respiratory-tract cultures (OPTIMIZE NCT02054156) [4]. Study participants with a new positive PA culture were treated with a 28-day course of TIS and an additional 28 days of TIS treatment for those who remained PA positive at 21 days. Over the remaining quarters of the study, treatment with TIS was given for an additional 28 days only when participants tested positive for PA. Study participants were randomized to receive either azithromycin three times weekly or matched placebo over the entire 18-month study period.

The OPTIMIZE trial included 221 randomized subjects. For this ancillary study, data from participants with missing baseline oropharyngeal (OP) samples or with fewer than 2 OP samples were excluded, resulting in 198 participants. OP samples were obtained from all participants up to eight visits over the 78-week study (n = 1,457 swabs). The OPTIMIZE trial was converted to an open label observational study after demonstrating significantly decreased rates of PEx in the AZ group as compared to placebo during an interim analysis. The analysis described here was limited to the subset of swabs collected during the randomized-blinded portion of OPTIMIZE (Fig. 1: CONSORT diagram). Two analytic cohorts were generated using a subset of data from the randomized portion of the trial. The first cohort included 198 participants comprised of those with samples collected at both baseline and 3 weeks after randomization (initial eradication analytic cohort). All subjects in the initial eradication cohort were concurrently on TIS, thus allowing effects of AZ to be assessed in combination with TIS. The second cohort examined the impact of azithromycin over 26 weeks. Per the study protocol, participants with PA positive cultures at any visit after week 3 were provided a 28-day course of TIS at that visit. The second analytic cohort was generated after stratifying participants by exposure to culture based TIS (stratified PA analytic cohort) and consisted of a group that only received a single TIS treatment and a group that received 3 series of culture based TIS. This second analytic cohort contained 432 samples from 108 participants to evaluate the impact of azithromycin over 6-months, holding TIS exposure constant (Fig. 1). Data for the swabs collected during the observational phase are included in the online supplement. The swabs were frozen at -80 °C and batch shipped on dry ice to the Cystic Fibrosis Microbiome Analysis Core, a CF Foundation funded national resource center at Children’s Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus for microbiome analysis.

Microbiome

DNA was extracted after enzymatic digestion [39, 40] using the EZ1 Advanced extraction platform (Qiagen). Total bacterial load was determined by the Nadkarni qPCR assay [41, 42]. Bacterial community profiles were determined by sequence analysis of V1/V2 16S rRNA gene fragment following our previously described methods [1, 43]. Species assignments for specific genera (Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Prevotella, Neisseria and Streptococcus) were made based on high levels of sequence identity (> 99.9%) using heavily curated reference sequences [44]. In cases where multiple species are indistinguishable by 16S rRNA gene sequence, groups of species were assigned. Sequences not affiliated with a species remain assigned at the genus level. Community profiles were used to calculate alpha diversity metrics (Shannon Diversity Index, Shannon Evenness) and relative abundance of community constituents. Community profiles were compared using the Morisita-Horn beta diversity metric.

Statistical analyses

Comparisons in microbiome outcomes (total bacterial load (TBL), Shannon Diversity Index (SDI), Morisita-Horn beta diversity (MH) and the relative abundances of individual taxa) across treatment groups were evaluated using non-parametric rank-based asymptotic tests with continuity corrections (Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests and signed rank tests for within subject changes over time). Medians and distribution free 95% confidence limits are presented for microbial measures. In addition, exploratory data analysis that included graphical inspection and principal coordinates analysis (PCOA) was used to assess correlation with clinical factors. The Morisita-Horn and Jaccard beta diversity measures were compared across groups using a beta regression model. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate time to first pulmonary exacerbation. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (The SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and R version 3.4.1 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Data availability

The clinical data that support the findings of this study are available from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of CFF. The DNA sequencing data reported in this paper have been deposited in the NCBI Short Read Archive database under accession number PRJNA954039 following guidelines from the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Abbreviations

AZ:

Azithromycin

CF:

Cystic Fibrosis

MH:

Morisita-Horn

OP:

Oropharyngeal

PA:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

PCOA:

Principal coordinates analysis

PEx:

Pulmonary exacerbation

RA:

Relative abundance

SDI:

Shannon diversity index

TBL:

total bacterial load

TIS:

Tobramycin inhalation solution

References

  1. Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Ahrens Richard C, Chmiel JF, Clancy JP et al. Airway Microbiota across age and Disease spectrum in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(5).

  2. Mogayzel PJ Jr., Naureckas ET, Robinson KA, Brady C, Guill M, Lahiri T, et al. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation pulmonary guideline. Pharmacologic approaches to prevention and eradication of initial Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(10):1640–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramsey BW, Pepe MS, Quan JM, Otto KL, Montgomery AB, Williams-Warren J, et al. Intermittent administration of inhaled tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(1):23–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer-Hamblett N, Retsch-Bogart G, Kloster M, Accurso F, Rosenfeld M, Albers G, et al. Azithromycin for early Pseudomonas Infection in cystic fibrosis. The OPTIMIZE Randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(9):1177–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen CR, Pressler T, Koch C, Høiby N. Long-term azitromycin treatment of cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection; an observational cohort study. J Cyst Fibros. 2005;4(1):35–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Denis A, Touzet S, Diabaté L, Durieu I, Lemonnier L, Poupon-Bourdy S, et al. Quantifying long-term changes in lung function and exacerbations after initiation of azithromycin in cystic fibrosis. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2020;17(2):195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramsey BW, Dorkin HL, Eisenberg JD, Gibson RL, Harwood IR, Kravitz RM, et al. Efficacy of Aerosolized Tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(24):1740–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Konstan MW, Flume PA, Kappler M, Chiron R, Higgins M, Brockhaus F, et al. Safety, efficacy and convenience of tobramycin inhalation powder in cystic fibrosis patients: the EAGER trial. J Cyst Fibros. 2011;10(1):54–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Konstan MW, Geller DE, Minić P, Brockhaus F, Zhang J, Angyalosi G. Tobramycin inhalation powder for P. Aeruginosa Infection in cystic fibrosis: the EVOLVE trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46(3):230–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saiman L, Anstead M, Mayer-Hamblett N, Lands LC, Kloster M, Hocevar-Trnka J, et al. Effect of azithromycin on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis uninfected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(17):1707–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saiman L, Marshall BC, Mayer-Hamblett N, Burns JL, Quittner AL, Cibene DA, et al. Azithromycin in patients with cystic fibrosis chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosaA Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2003;290(13):1749–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Southern KW, Barker PM, Solis-Moya A, Patel L. Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012(11).

  13. Altenburg J, de Graaff CS, van der Werf TS, Boersma WG. Immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics - part 1: biological mechanisms. Respir Int Rev Thorac Dis. 2011;81(1):67–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliver ME, Hinks TSC. Azithromycin in viral Infections. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31(2):e2163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pittman JE, Skalland MS, Sagel SD, Ramsey BW, Mayer-Hamblett N, Retsch-Bogart GZ. Impact of azithromycin on serum inflammatory markers in children with cystic fibrosis and new Pseudomonas. J Cyst Fibros. 2022;21(6):946–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heirali A, Thornton C, Acosta N, Somayaji R, Laforest Lapointe I, Storey D, et al. Sputum Microbiota in adults with CF associates with response to inhaled tobramycin. Thorax. 2020;75(12):1058–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson MT, Wolter DJ, Eng A, Weiss EJ, Vo AT, Brittnacher MJ, et al. Maintenance tobramycin primarily affects untargeted bacteria in the CF sputum microbiome. Thorax. 2020;75(9):780–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Acosta N, Thornton CS, Surette MG, Somayaji R, Rossi L, Rabin HR, et al. Azithromycin and the microbiota of cystic fibrosis sputum. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols DP, Singh PK, Baines A, Caverly LJ, Chmiel JF, GIbson RL, et al. Testing the effects of combining azithromycin with inhaled tobramycin for P. Aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: a randomised, controlled clinical trial. Thorax. 2022;77(6):581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Samson C, Tamalet A, Thien HV, Taytard J, Perisson C, Nathan N, et al. Long-term effects of azithromycin in patients with cystic fibrosis. Respir Med. 2016;117:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abotsi RE, Dube FS, Rehman AM, Claassen-Weitz S, Xia Y, Simms V, et al. Sputum bacterial load and bacterial composition correlate with lung function and are altered by long-term azithromycin treatment in children with HIV-associated chronic lung Disease. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Thorsen J, Stokholm J, Rasmussen MA, Mortensen MS, Brejnrod AD, Hjelmsø M, et al. The Airway Microbiota modulates Effect of Azithromycin Treatment for episodes of recurrent asthma-like symptoms in Preschool children: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;204(2):149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jackson L, Waters V. Factors influencing the acquisition and eradication of early Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2021;20(1):8–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burr LD, Taylor SL, Richard A, Schreiber V, Lingman S, Martin M, et al. Assessment of Long-Term Macrolide exposure on the Oropharyngeal Microbiome and Macrolide Resistance in healthy adults and consequences for onward transmission of resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(4):e02246–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Choo JM, Abell GCJ, Thomson R, Morgan L, Waterer G, Gordon DL, et al. Impact of long-term erythromycin therapy on the Oropharyngeal Microbiome and Resistance Gene Reservoir in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis. mSphere. 2018;3(2). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/msphere.00103-18.

  26. Lopes dos Santos Santiago G, Brusselle G, Dauwe K, Deschaght P, Verhofstede C, Vaneechoutte D, et al. Influence of chronic azithromycin treatment on the composition of the oropharyngeal microbial community in patients with severe Asthma. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17(1):109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rogers G, Bruce K, Martin M, Burr L, Serisier D. The effect of long-term macrolide treatment on respiratory microbiota composition in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: an analysis from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled BLESS trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2014;2(12):988–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Price KE, Hampton TH, Gifford AH, Dolben EL, Hogan DA, Morrison HG, et al. Unique microbial communities persist in individual cystic fibrosis patients throughout a clinical exacerbation. Microbiome. 2013;1(1):27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Raghuvanshi R, Vasco K, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Jiang L, Morton JT, Li D, et al. High-resolution Longitudinal Dynamics of the cystic fibrosis sputum Microbiome and Metabolome through Antibiotic Therapy. mSystems. 2020;5(3). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/msystems.00292-20.

  30. Widder S, Zhao J, Carmody LA, Zhang Q, Kalikin LM, Schloss PD, et al. Association of bacterial community types, functional microbial processes and lung Disease in cystic fibrosis airways. ISME J. 2022;16(4):905–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao J, Schloss PD, Kalikin LM, Carmody LA, Foster BK, Petrosino JF et al. Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(15):5809-14.

  32. Heltshe SL, Mayer-Hamblett N, Burns JL, Khan U, Baines A, Ramsey BW, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients with G551D-CFTR treated with ivacaftor. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(5):703–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hisert KB, Heltshe SL, Pope C, Jorth P, Wu X, Edwards RM et al. Restoring CFTR Function Reduces Airway Bacteria and Inflammation in People With Cystic Fibrosis and Chronic Lung Infections. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2017.

  34. Rowe SM, Heltshe SL, Gonska T, Donaldson SH, Borowitz D, Gelfond D, et al. Clinical mechanism of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane Conductance Regulator Potentiator Ivacaftor in G551D-mediated cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(2):175–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Beck MR, Hornick DB, Pena TA, Singh SB, Wright BA. Impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on bacterial cultures from people with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023;58(5):1569–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nichols DP, Morgan SJ, Skalland M, Vo AT, Van Dalfsen JM, Singh SBP et al. Pharmacologic improvement of CFTR function rapidly decreases sputum pathogen density but lung Infections generally persist. J Clin Investig. 2023.

  37. Waters VJ, LiPuma JJ. Airway Infection in cystic fibrosis: Microbiology and Management. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2022;11(Supplement2):1–S2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Stevens MJ, Szefler SJ, Accurso FJ, et al. Assessment of airway microbiota and inflammation in cystic fibrosis using multiple sampling methods. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(2):221–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao J, Carmody LA, Kalikin LM, Li J, Petrosino JF, Schloss PD, et al. Impact of enhanced Staphylococcus DNA extraction on Microbial Community measures in cystic fibrosis Sputum. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e33127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Williamson KM, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Johnson EJ, Zemanick ET, Harris JK. Impact of enzymatic digestion on bacterial community composition in CF airway samples. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Nadkarni MA, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology. 2002;148(Pt 1):257–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Sagel SD, Stevens MJ, Accurso FJ, Harris JK. Reliability of quantitative real-time PCR for bacterial detection in cystic fibrosis airway specimens. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e15101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Robertson CE, Harris JK, Wagner BD, Granger D, Browne K, Tatem B, et al. Explicet: graphical user interface software for metadata-driven management, analysis and visualization of microbiome data. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(23):3100–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mourani PM, Sontag MK, Williamson KM, Harris JK, Reeder R, Locandro C et al. Temporal airway microbiome changes related to ventilator-associated Pneumonia in children. Eur Respir J. 2021;57(3).

Download references

Funding

Sources of support: Supported by NIH grants U01HL114623 and U01HL114589. Additional support was provided through NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards: UL1 TR002535,

UL1TR002319, UL1TR001108, UL1TR1425, and UL1TR001082. Contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA

    Brandie D. Wagner

  2. Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA

    Brandie D. Wagner, Edith T. Zemanick, Scott D. Sagel, Mark J. Stevens & J. Kirk Harris

  3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA

    Edith T. Zemanick, Scott D. Sagel, Mark J. Stevens & J. Kirk Harris

  4. Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA

    Charles E. Robertson

  5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Nicole Mayer-Hamblett & Bonnie W. Ramsey

  6. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Nicole Mayer-Hamblett

  7. Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA

    Nicole Mayer-Hamblett & Bonnie W. Ramsey

  8. Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    George Retsch-Bogart

Authors
  1. Brandie D. Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edith T. Zemanick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott D. Sagel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Charles E. Robertson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark J. Stevens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nicole Mayer-Hamblett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. George Retsch-Bogart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bonnie W. Ramsey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Kirk Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and Design: NM-H, GR-B, BWR Drafting of Manuscript: JKH, BDW, SDS Review and Revision of Manuscript: BDW, ETZ, SDS, CER, MJS, NM-H, GR-B, BWR, JKH Data collection: JKH, CER, MJS Analysis and Data Interpretation: BDW, ETZ, JKH, CER, NM-H, BWR.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandie D. Wagner.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work is an ancillary study to the parent randomized, placebo-controlled OPTIMIZE clinical trial. Eligible participants were recruited from 45 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation–accredited centers in the United States. This research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by each of the 45 centers institutional review boards including the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (CoMIRB #14–0088) where the OP samples were processed (all site review boards are listed in the supplementary section). Written informed consent and HIPPA Authorization were obtained from all patients over 17 years or from parents or legal guardians of patients younger than 18 years. Assent was obtained from patients between 10 and 17 years. A DSMB monitored the trial using pre-specified stopping guidelines for efficacy and safety, further details related to participant consent and approval can be found in the trial registration (NCT02054156).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors SDS, JKH, CER and MJS declare that they have no competing interests. BDW received honoraria for CFF DSMB participation. NM-H received honoraria for NIH DSMB participation and consulting fees from Enterprise Therapeutics. BWR received consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Cystetic Medicines and Sionna Therapeutics. Dr. Ramsey also serves as Chair of an NHLBI DSMB. ETZ received consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and received honoraria from CFF. GR-B received grant funding from Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table E1

. Changes in microbiome measures from baseline in the PA stratified cohort. Table E2. Describe low MH cohort. Table E3. Effect of AZ treatment on PEx outcomes stratified by changes in microbial composition. Figure E1. Compare bacterial communities between randomized groups at baseline. Heatmap with taxa presented in rows, samples in columns, the darker blue indicates higher RA. Figure E2. Initial eradication cohort. Large shifts in the communities between week 0 and 3 were observed. Morisita-Horn (A) values compare bacterial compositions between week 3 visit and baseline, MH values typically observed between replicates is indicated by the shaded area. Changes in the proportion of shared taxa between paired samples (B) averaged around 45%. Although these changes are significantly different across treatment groups the magnitude of difference is not clinically meaningful. Decreases were observed in both total bacterial load (C) and Shannon Diversity (D) after three weeks of treatment with either Placebo +TIS (n = 97) or azithromycin +TIS (n = 101). AZ=azithromycin; MH=Morisita-Horn beta diversity. Figure E3. Distributions of differences between week 3 and baseline. Boxplots of the differences in RA for select taxa by treatment group are displayed. AZ=azithromycin. Figure E4. Bacterial communities over time. Heatmap with taxa presented in rows, samples in columns, the darker blue indicates higher RA. Figure E5. Distribution of MH by PA stratified cohorts comparing communities at each study visit to baseline. Figure E6. Distribution of change in TBL and SDI over time by PA stratified cohorts. TBL=total bacterial load; SDI = Shannon Diversity Index. Figure E7. Change from baseline for microbial measures by PA stratified cohorts. Figure E8. PEx outcomes (any PEx (top) 0=no, 1=yes; number of PEx (bottom)) plotted versus MH0-13 stratified by treatment. Figure E9. Time to PEx based on initial eradication treatment group stratified by community stability (MH < 0.2). bacterial community profiles for 22 individuals with large shifts in community composition between baseline and week 13 had differential response to treatment. Figure E10. Microbial community composition for 22 subjects with low MH0-13. Each subject is displayed in a separate panels showings amples from each study visit. Labels on top of panels represent the randomized treatment group, age, de-identified id, number and days to 1st PEx (or censoring time if 0 PEx). Figure E11. PCoA showing whether the 22 subjects with low MH0-13 are converging to a similar community (top), subjects with higher MH0-13 are plotted for comparison (bottom).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, B.D., Zemanick, E.T., Sagel, S.D. et al. Limited effects of azithromycin on the oropharyngeal microbiome in children with CF and early pseudomonas infection. BMC Microbiol 23, 312 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03073-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03073-8

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us