Skip to main content
Download PDF

Improved phyllosphere microbiome composition of tea plant with the application of small peptides in combination with rhamnolipid

BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 302 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Small peptides play a crucial role in plant growth and adaptation to the environment. Exogenous small peptides are often applied together with surfactants as foliar fertilizers, but the impact of small peptides and surfactants on the tea phyllosphere microbiome remains unknown.

Results

In this study, we investigated the effects of small peptides and different surfactants on the tea phyllosphere microbiome using 16S and ITS sequencing. Our results showed that the use of small peptides reduced the bacterial diversity of the tea phyllosphere microbiome and increased the fungal diversity, while the use of surfactants influenced the diversity of bacteria and fungi. Furthermore, the addition of rhamnolipid to small peptides significantly improved the tea phyllosphere microbiome community structure, making beneficial microorganisms such as Pseudomonas, Chryseobacterium, Meyerozyma, and Vishniacozyma dominant populations.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the combined use of small peptides and surfactants can significantly modify the tea phyllosphere microbiome community structure, particularly for beneficial microorganisms closely related to tea plant health. Thus, this preliminary study offers initial insights that could guide the application of small peptides and surfactants in agricultural production, particularly with respect to their potential for modulating the phyllosphere microbiome community in tea plant management.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Small peptides (Small molecule oligopeptides) have been extensively used in various fertilizers due to their crucial roles in maintaining plant growth and development, aiding plant adaptation to the environment, promoting plant metabolism, and inducing plant immune responses [1,2,3,4]. The effects of small peptides on microorganisms are multifaceted. Small peptides can improve the resistance of plants, make plants easier to form symbiotic relationships with some beneficial microorganisms, promote their growth and reproduction in plants, and also regulate and activate the immune system of plants, and inhibit the growth and reproduction of harmful microorganisms [5,6,7,8,9]. Importantly, small peptides also serve as nutrients to provide nourishment for microorganisms. Our previous studies have demonstrated that small peptides can enhance the ability of tea plants to resist abiotic stress by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and regulating hormone and amino acid metabolism pathways [10]. However, the effect of small peptides on tea phyllosphere microorganisms has not been reported.

Rhamnolipid and sophorolipid are non-toxic, harmless, edible, and degradable biosurfactants that are commonly employed in conjunction with foliar fertilizers to enhance their efficacy [11,12,13,14]. Rhamnolipid is a biological metabolic substance produced by Pseudomonas or Burkholderia, which exhibits inhibitory effects on the growth and reproduction of certain plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi [15]. Moreover, it can serve as a natural carbon source, providing energy for the metabolism of dominant microorganisms, thereby augmenting their numbers and activity [16, 17]. Sophorolipid, on the other hand, represents a class of microbial secondary metabolites produced by Candida through a specific fermentation process utilizing sugar and vegetable oil as carbon sources [18,19,20]. Although its impact on microorganisms is similar to that of rhamnolipid, its selectivity towards bacterial and fungal communities differs [12]. Tween 20, a chemical surfactant widely employed in agriculture, also exerts a significant effect on microorganisms [21, 22]. However, the effect of the combination of small peptides and surfactants on the phyllosphere microbiome remains unknown, particularly in terms of their effects on beneficial microorganisms and plant pathogens.

Tea phyllosphere microorganisms are an important part of tea plant growth, which are closely related to the health of tea plants. Similar to soil microorganisms, the study of phyllosphere microorganisms is equally important. Stimulating the maximum potential of phyllosphere microorganisms and utilizing them can bring agricultural production to a new stage. Studies have shown that the development-specific metabolites in tea plants drive the assembly of functional phyllosphere microbial communities and their biological functions of continuously inhibiting fungal diseases [23]. At the same time, studies have also revealed the basic mechanism of microbiome assembly in tea plants and the potential impact of microbiome-mediated resilience frameworks on leaf homeostasis [24]. However, for tea plants, there are still few studies on phyllosphere microorganisms.

In this study, small peptides were used alone or in combination with three surfactants (chemical surfactants and biosurfactants) to explore the effects of small peptides and surfactants on the phyllosphere microbial community of tea plants. We speculate that the use of small peptides and surfactants will significantly change the community composition of tea phyllosphere microorganisms, especially beneficial microorganisms or pathogens closely related to tea tree health. Through this study, we give the optimal combination of small peptides and surfactants in the application of tea plants and can provide a reference for the regulation of the phyllosphere microbial community in tea tree planting management.

Results and analysis

OTUs cluster analysis of phyllosphere bacteria and fungi

To analyze the species diversity of bacteria and fungi in tea phyllosphere after the application of small peptides and surfactants, and to better demonstrate the species differences between different treatments, the effective data obtained were subjected to OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) clustering analysis, and Venn diagrams were generated. As shown in Fig. 1A, there were 640 common OTUs among the tea phyllosphere bacteria in different treatments, of which 464 were unique to the CK, 201 to the P0, 151 to the PT, 88 to the PR, and 249 to the PS. As shown in Fig. 1B, there were 220 common OTUs among the tea phyllosphere fungi in different treatments, of which 372 were unique to the CK, 535 to the P0, 151 to the PT, 88 to the PR, and 249 to the PS.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Venn diagram of bacteria in each group based on OTUs(A). Venn diagram of fungi in each group based on OTUs(B). Foliar spraying with pure water (CK). Foliar spraying with small peptides (P0). Foliar spraying with small peptides and Tween-20 (PT). Foliar spraying with small peptides and rhamnolipid (PR). Foliar spraying with small peptides and sophorolipid (PS).

Full size image

Diversity analysis of bacteria and fungi in phyllosphere

To analyze the richness, diversity, and community composition of leaf-associated microbial communities under different treatments, we conducted alpha diversity and beta diversity analyses (Figure S1). The Shannon index reflects the total number and proportional abundance of classifications in a sample, with higher community diversity indicating a more even species distribution and larger Shannon index. The Chao1 index estimates the total number of species in the community sample. The Shannon index and Chao1 index of P0 bacteria were significantly higher than those of CK, while the Shannon index and Chao1 index of P0 fungi were significantly lower than CK. The use of small peptides resulted in a decrease in bacterial diversity and an increase in fungal diversity. Additionally, we performed UPGMA cluster analysis based on the OTU-weighted UniFrac distance, where greater distance indicates greater differences in community structure among the treatments.

Cluster analysis of phyllosphere bacteria and fungi at the genus level

To analyze the differences in the composition of the phyllosphere microbiome after the application of small peptides and surfactants, we conducted clustering analysis of bacteria and fungi at the genus level. As shown in Fig. 2A, the bacterial community of CK was mainly composed of Bacillus, Limnobacter, Methyloversatilis and Actinomycetospora, while that of P0 was dominated by Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Marmoricola and Lactobacillus. The bacterial community of PT was mainly composed of Paracoccus, unidentified Halomonadaceae and Brevundimonas, while that of PR was dominated by Pseudomonas and Chryseobacterium. The bacterial community of PS was mainly composed of unidentified Beijerinckiaceae, unidentified Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter, Massilia, Truepera and Cutibacterium. As shown in Fig. 2B, the fungal community of CK treatment was mainly composed of Plectosphaerella, Coniothyrium, Diutina, and Hastodontia, while that of P0 was dominated by Acrophialophora, Ramularia, Malassezia and Gonatophragmium. The fungal community of PT was mainly composed of Cyphellophora, Debaryomyces, Cryptococcus, Pseudopestalotiopsis and Phallus, while that of PR was dominated by Meyerozyma, Zasmidium, Vishniacozyma, Penicillium and Aspergillus. The fungal community of PS was mainly composed of Pezoloma, Diaporthe, Phialocephala and Lichenomphalia. Our results indicate that the dominant populations of microorganisms in each treatment were different, suggesting that small peptides and different surfactants have different selectivity towards bacteria and fungi.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cluster heat map of species abundance of bacteria in each group at genus level(A). Cluster heat map of species abundance of fungi at genus level(B). The vertical is the grouping information, the horizontal is the species classification information, and the clustering tree in the figure is the genus-level clustering tree; the values corresponding to the heat map are Z-Score standardized relative quantitative data

Full size image

Difference analysis of phyllosphere microbial community structure between each treatment group and control group

Analysis of bacterial community structure differences

To better compare the biologically relevant differences in phyllosphere bacterial community composition between the treatment groups and the control group after the application of small peptides and surfactants, we used LEfSe (LDA Effect Size) to identify statistically significant biomarkers. There were 9 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the bacterial community structure between CK and P0, of which Xanthomonadaceae, Stenotrophomonas, Enterobacteriaceae, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Sphingomonadales, Sphingomonadaceae, and Sphingomonas were dominant in P0, while Escherichia was dominant in CK (Fig. 3A). There were 7 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the bacterial community structure between CK and PT, of which Firmicutes, Clostridia, unidentified Clostridia, Lachnospiraceae, Bacilli, Acidobacteriota, and Escherichia were dominant in CK, while there were no dominant populations in PT (Fig. 3B). There were 25 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the bacterial community structure between CK and PR, of which Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacterales, Sphingomonas, Proteobacteria, Sphingomonadales, Sphingomonadaceae, Chryseobacterium indologenes, Chryseobacterium, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Flavobacteriales, and Weeksellaceae were dominant in PR, while Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum, Halomonadaceae, Pseudomonadales, Burkholderiaceae, unidentified Actinobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Clostridia, unidentified Clostridia, Lachnospiraceae, Rhodocyclaceae, Kineosporiaceae, and Kineosporiales were dominant in CK (Fig. 3C). There were 10 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the bacterial community structure between CK and PS, of which Sphingomonas paucimobilis, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacterales, Sphingomonas, Sphingomonadaceae, Sphingomonadales, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Stenotrophomonas were dominant in PS, while Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum, Bacilli, and Lactobacillales were dominant in CK (Fig. 3D). Our results suggest that the combination of small peptides and rhamnolipid has the most significant impact on the bacterial community in the tea phyllosphere.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Populations with significant difference in bacterial abundance between CK and P0(A). Populations with significant differences in bacterial abundance between CK and PT(B). Populations with significant differences in bacterial abundance between CK and PR(C). Populations with significant difference in bacterial abundance between CK and PS(D). The LDA value distribution histogram shows the species whose LDA Score is greater than the set value (default setting is 4), that is, biomarker with statistical differences between groups. The length of the bar chart represents the degree of influence of different species. The longer the length, the greater the contribution of the species to the difference between groups

Full size image

Analysis of fungal community structure differences

To better compare the biologically relevant differences in phyllosphere fungal community composition between the treatment groups and the control group after the application of small peptides and surfactants, we used LEfSe (LDA Effect Size) to identify statistically significant biomarkers. There were 5 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the fungal community structure between CK and P0, of which Capnodiales, Cladosporiaceae, Cladosporium sp, Cladosporium, and Malassezia sp were dominant in P0, while there were no dominant populations in CK (Fig. 4A). There were 12 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the fungal community structure between CK and PT, of which Eurotiomycetes, Cyphellophora oxyspora, Cyphellophora, Chaetothyriales, Capnodiaceae, Leptoxyphium sp, Cyphellophoraceae, Leptoxyphium, and Papiliotrema flavescens were dominant in PT, while Diutina and Diutina catenulata were dominant in CK (Fig. 4B). There were 6 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the fungal community structure between CK and PR, of which Capnodiales, Dothideomycetes, Zasmidium, and Zasmidium fructigenum were dominant in PR, while Saccharomycetales fam Incertae sedis and Agaricomycetes were dominant in CK (Fig. 4C). There were 2 biomarkers that significantly differentiated the fungal community structure between CK and PS, of which Pleosporales was dominant in CK, while there were no dominant populations in PS (Fig. 4D). Our results suggest that PT and PR have the most significant impact on the fungal community in the tea phyllosphere.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Populations with significant difference in fungal abundance between CK and P0(A). Populations with significant differences in fungal abundance between CK and PT(B). Populations with significant difference in fungal abundance between CK and PR(C). Populations with significant difference in fungal abundance between CK and PS(D). The LDA value distribution histogram shows the species whose LDA Score is greater than the set value (default setting is 4), that is, biomarker with statistical differences between groups. The length of the bar chart represents the degree of influence of different species. The longer the length, the greater the contribution of the species to the difference between groups

Full size image

Effects of spraying small peptides and surfactants on the microbial function of tea leaves

Relative cluster analysis of phyllosphere bacterial function

To analyze the impact of the application of small peptides and surfactants on the functional profile of bacterial communities in the tea phyllosphere, we used Tax4Fun2 to annotate and cluster their functional profiles. As shown in Fig. 5A, the bacterial functions in CK were mainly enriched in Aging, Energy metabolism, Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, Translation, and Cellular community – prokaryotes. The bacterial functions in P0 were mainly enriched in Replication and repair, Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, and Cell growth and death. The bacterial functions in PT were mainly enriched in Amino acid metabolism, Lipid metabolism, and Metabolism of other amino acids. The bacterial functions in PR were mainly enriched in Folding, sorting and degradation, Cellular community - prokaryotes, Membrane transport, Nucleotide metabolism, Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, Cell motility, and Immune system. The bacterial functions in PS treatment were mainly enriched in Carbohydrate metabolism.

Relative cluster analysis of phyllosphere fungi function

To analyze the impact of the application of small peptides and surfactants on the functional profile of fungal communities in the tea phyllosphere, we used FunGuild to annotate and cluster their functional profiles. As shown in Fig. 5B, the fungal functions in CK were mainly enriched in Endophyte-Plant Pathogen-Wood Saprotroph, Plant Pathogen-Wood Saprotroph, and Animal Pathogen-Endophyte-Plant Pathogen-Wood Saprotroph. The fungal functions in P0 were mainly enriched in Animal Pathogen-Undefined-Saprotroph, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal, and Ectomycorrhizal. The fungal functions in PT treatment were mainly enriched in Dung Saprotroph-Soil Saprotroph and Phyllosphere Saprotroph. The fungal functions in PR were mainly enriched in Plant Pathogen-Soil Saprotroph-Wood Saprotroph, Plant Pathogen-Undefined Saprotroph, and Undefined Saprotroph. The fungal functions in PS were mainly enriched in Bryophyte Parasite-Undefined Saprotroph, Endophyte, Lichenized, and Soil Saprotroph. These results suggest that the application of small peptides and surfactants significantly impacts the functional profile of fungal communities in the tea phyllosphere, with significant differences observed among the different treatment groups.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Tax4Fun2 functional annotation clustering heat map of bacteria based on OTUs between groups(A). FunGuild functional annotation clustering heat map of fungi based on OTUs between groups(B). Horizontal represents functional annotation information, vertical represents sample information, and lattice represents relative abundance. The redder the color, the higher the relative abundance, and the bluer the relative abundance

Full size image

Discussion

After foliar application of small peptides, the number of unique OTUs specific to bacterial communities in the tea phyllosphere was significantly reduced to 201, compared to 464 in the control group. In contrast, the number of unique OTUs specific to fungal communities significantly increased to 535, compared to 372 in the control group. The use of small peptides resulted in the dominance of Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, and Lactobacillus as bacterial populations, and the dominance of Acrophialophora, Ramularia, Malassezia, and Gonatophragmium as fungal populations. The fungus Acrophialophora has demonstrated potential in instigating a multitude of defense mechanisms against plant early blight pathogens [25]. The amplification of this advantageous fungus through the administration of small peptides could potentially suppress pathogen infection and support healthy plant growth and development [26]. Conversely, although no studies have directly shown that Ramularia can cause tea plant diseases, studies have shown that Ramularia can cause diseases in many plants, including but not limited to barley, beets and strawberries [27, 28]. Therefore, this risk can be given due attention when using small peptides as foliar fertilizers. Small peptides significantly inhibited the proliferation of Plectosphaerella and Coniothyrium compared to the control group. Plectosphaerella is a plant pathogen that can cause organ rot and result in significant agricultural losses [29, 30], while Coniothyrium is also a plant pathogen that poses a potential threat to agricultural production [31, 32]. Small peptides may possess potential inhibitory effects on Plectosphaerella and Coniothyrium compared to the control group indicates their potential role in suppressing plant pathogenic fungi.

As a chemical surfactant, Tween 20 significantly inhibited the diversity of bacterial and fungal communities in the tea phyllosphere. The addition of Tween 20 to small peptides resulted in a reduction of 50 OTUs specific to bacterial communities and 251 OTUs specific to fungal communities. The impact of Tween 20 on fungal populations was more significant. The use of Tween 20 resulted in the dominance of Paracoccus, unidentified Halomonadaceae, and Brevundimonas as bacterial populations, and the dominance of Cyphellophora, Debaryomyces, Cryptococcus, Pseudopestalotiopsis, and Phallus as fungal populations. Brevundimonas has the potential to improve plant growth and promote nitrogen uptake [33]. Debaryomyces can be used for surfactant production, enhance oxidative stress tolerance, and serve as a biological control agent against post-harvest fruit diseases. It also has the potential to help plants resist anthracnose disease [34,35,36]. However, it should be noted that Cyphellophora is a plant pathogenic fungus [37], and specifically, Pseudopestalotiopsis is a pathogen that can cause grey blight disease of tea [38,39,40]. Therefore, based on this study, Tween 20 may not be suitable for use in tea plants, but further research is needed to prove this conclusion.

As a biological surfactant, rhamnolipid significantly inhibited the diversity of bacterial and fungal communities in the tea phyllosphere. The addition of rhamnolipid to small peptides resulted in a reduction of 113 OTUs specific to bacterial communities and 257 OTUs specific to fungal communities. The impact of rhamnolipid on fungal populations was more significant. The use of rhamnolipid resulted in the dominance of Pseudomonas and Chryseobacterium as bacterial populations, and the dominance of Meyerozyma, Zasmidium, Vishniacozyma, Penicillium, and Aspergillus as fungal populations. Pseudomonas has the potential to act as a plant biostimulant and improve drought resistance in rapeseed [41, 42]. Studies have shown that Chryseobacterium in the rice phyllosphere has a role in suppressing rice blast disease [43], and Chryseobacterium isolated from potato tissue can act as a biocontrol agent against bacterial wilt disease [44]. Meyerozyma is a beneficial plant-microbe that promotes plant growth [45], triggers plant immune responses [46] and has multiple beneficial effects such as preventing post-harvest decay and insect pest control in fruits [47, 48]. Vishniacozyma has a biocontrol effect against plant diseases caused by fungi [49, 50] and can inhibit plant decay [51]. All indications indicate that the combination of small peptides and rhamnolipid is the optimal combination for this study.

The addition of sophorolipid to small peptides resulted in an increase of 48 OTUs specific to bacterial communities and a reduction of 156 OTUs specific to fungal communities in the tea phyllosphere. The impact of sophorolipid on fungal populations was more significant. The use of sophorolipid resulted in the dominance of Acinetobacter, Massilia, Truepera, and Cutibacterium as bacterial populations, and the dominance of Pezoloma, Diaporthe, Phialocephala, and Lichenomphalia as fungal populations. Acinetobacter has the potential to promote plant growth by secreting plant growth hormone-like substances [52]. Massilia is a chloroacetamide herbicide-degrading bacterium [53]. Pezoloma may have the potential to alleviate plant drought stress [54], and Phialocephala can suppress some plant pathogens [55]. However, Diaporthe is frequently reported as a plant pathogen that can infect various plants and cause significant crop diseases. Therefore, when using sophorolipid, attention should be paid to the prevention and control of this pathogen [56,57,58].

Conclusions

The use of small peptides and surfactants as common additives in foliar fertilizers significantly affected the structure of the tea phyllosphere microbial community. The use of small peptides reduced the diversity of bacterial communities in the tea phyllosphere and increased the diversity of fungal communities. The use of surfactants influenced the diversity of bacteria and fungi. However, the optimal combination in this experiment was found to be small peptides and rhamnolipid. The addition of rhamnolipid to small peptides resulted in the dominance of several beneficial microbes, such as Pseudomonas, Chryseobacterium, Meyerozyma, and Vishniacozyma, which may have the potential to promote the growth of tea plants and improve the immune response of tea plants. It is essential to consider the impact of foliar fertilizers on the tea phyllosphere microbial community and their function to ensure stability and sustainability during their application. The results of this study can provide a reference for the regulation of the phyllosphere microbial community in tea plant cultivation management. However, we acknowledge that these findings are based on a single experiment and thus recommend additional research to validate and expand upon our results.

Materials and methods

Experimental materials

Two-year-old national excellent variety “Longjing 43” tea plants were planted in nutrient pots with suitable cultivation substrates and were grown in a controlled environment chamber (planted on July 21, 2022). The organic matter content of the cultivation substrate was about 60%, the total porosity was about 75%, the bulk density was about 0.35%, and the pH was about 5.5. The tea plants were maintained under the following growth conditions: 14 h of daylight and 10 h of darkness, light intensity of 1000 lx, and air humidity of 70%.

Experimental treatments

After seven days of adaptation to an environment of 28℃ during the day and 22℃ at night, tea plants were subjected to the following treatments (Table 1): foliar spraying with pure water (CK), 6 g L− 1 of small peptides (P0), 6 g L− 1 of small peptides and 4‰ Tween-20 chemical surfactant (PT), 6 g L− 1 of small peptides and 4‰ rhamnolipid (PR), and 6 g L− 1 of small peptides and 4‰ sophorolipid (PS). Dose selection criteria refer to previous studies [10]. Small peptides were provided by Shandong Tianjiu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Heze, China). Tween-20 was provided by Tianjin Beilian Fine Chemicals Development Priority Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Rhamnolipid was provided by Shaanxi Ruijie Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Xi ‘an, China). Sophorolipid is provided by Shandong Yousuo Chemical Technology Co., Ltd (Heze, China). The treatments were applied every seven days during the experimental period. Each treatment had a total of 60 tea plants, and each treatment was divided into 3 groups, with 20 plants in each group. Tea phyllosphere samples were collected for bacterial and fungal community analysis four days after second treatment. The first mature leaf under the new shoots of the same tea tree was selected for analysis, and 20 leaves at the same leaf position were selected for each sample.

Table 1 The treatment methods in the test
Full size table

Sequencing analysis of Phyllosphere Surface Bacterial and Fungal Communities

In this experiment, 16S amplicon sequencing was used to sequence the bacterial community [59,60,61], and ITS amplicon sequencing was used to sequence the fungal community [62, 63]. Each treatment was repeated three times.

Genomic DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted from the samples using the CTAB method, and the purity and concentration of the DNA were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis [64]. The extracted DNA was diluted to a concentration of 1ng µl− 1 with sterile water, and specific primers with barcodes, Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix with GC Buffer from New England Biolabs, and a high-efficiency, high-fidelity enzyme were used for PCR amplification to ensure amplification efficiency and accuracy. The DNA samples underwent individual amplification within the V4 hyper variable regions via the utilization of PCR employing primers 515 F and 806R for 16 S rDNA in bacteria, and primers ITS5-1737 F and ITS2-2043R for ITS in fungi [65].

PCR product mixing and purification

PCR products were detected by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the qualified PCR products were purified using magnetic beads. After enzyme quantification, the PCR products were mixed in equal amounts according to the concentration of the PCR products, thoroughly mixed, and then subjected to 2% agarose gel electrophoresis again. The target bands of the PCR products were recovered using the gel recovery kit provided by Qiagen.

Library Construction and sequencing

The TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit was used for library construction, and the constructed library was quantified using Qubit and Q-PCR. The library was sequenced using the NovaSeq6000.

Sequencing data Processing and Analysis

The raw sequencing data were processed using the interactive Metware Microbial Diversity Analysis Cloud platform (https://cloud.metware.cn/, Metware Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). After splicing, filtering, and de-chimerization, the data were subjected to Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) clustering, species annotation, α-diversity analysis, and β-diversity analysis. The bacterial function was predicted using Tax4Fun2 [66], and the fungal function was predicted using FunGuild [67].

Data Availability

The raw sequencing data were deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA952937 for bacteria and PRJNA953843 for fungi.

Abbreviations

CK:

Foliar spraying with pure water

P0:

Foliar spraying with small peptides

PT:

Foliar spraying with small peptides and Tween-20

PR:

Foliar spraying with small peptides and rhamnolipid

PS:

Foliar spraying with small peptides and sophorolipid

OTUs:

Operational taxonomic units

References

  1. Chen L-Y. Small peptides, big roles – RALFs regulate pollen tube growth and burst in plant reproduction. J Genet Genomics. 2018;45:121–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cirillo V, Molisso D, Aprile AM, Maggio A, Rao R. Systemin peptide application improves tomato salt stress tolerance and reveals common adaptation mechanisms to biotic and abiotic stress in plants. Environ Exp Bot. 2022;199:104865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Takahashi F, Suzuki T, Osakabe Y, Betsuyaku S, Kondo Y, Dohmae N, et al. A small peptide modulates stomatal control via abscisic acid in long-distance signalling. Nature. 2018. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41586-018-0009-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim M-J, Jeon BW, Oh E, Seo PJ, Kim J. Peptide signaling during Plant Reproduction. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26:822–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Von Borowski RG, Macedo AJ, Gnoatto SCB. Peptides as a strategy against biofilm-forming microorganisms: structure-activity relationship perspectives. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;114:114–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Viana de Freitas T, Karmakar U, Vasconcelos AG, Santos MA, Oliveira do, Vale Lira B, Costa S et al. Release of immunomodulatory peptides at bacterial membrane interfaces as a novel strategy to fight microorganisms. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2023;:103056.

  7. Lu F, Alenyorege EA, Ouyang N, Zhou A, Ma H. Simulated natural and high temperature solid-state fermentation of soybean meal: a comparative study regarding microorganisms, functional properties and structural characteristics. LWT. 2022;159:113125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill PW, Farrell M, Roberts P, Farrar J, Grant H, Newsham KK, et al. Soil- and enantiomer-specific metabolism of amino acids and their peptides by Antarctic soil microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:2410–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Riedel K, Renneberg R, Scheller F. Studies in peptide utilization by microorganisms using biosensor techniques. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem. 1989;276:113–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen H, Song Y, Li H, Zaman S, Fan K, Ding Z, et al. Enhancing the adaptability of tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.) to high-temperature stress with small peptides and biosurfactants. Plants-Basel. 2023;12:2817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Appah S, Jia W, Ou M, Wang P, Asante EA. Analysis of potential impaction and phytotoxicity of surfactant-plant surface interaction in pesticide application. Crop Prot. 2020;127:104961.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sachdev DP, Cameotra SS. Biosurfactants in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:1005–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bing-fu G, Yong G, Jun W, Li-juan Z, Long-guo J, Hui-long H, et al. Co-treatment with surfactant and sonication significantly improves Agrobacterium-mediated resistant bud formation and transient expression efficiency in soybean. J Integr Agric. 2015;14:1242–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu S-S, Tseng C-T, Yang Y-H, Liu Y-C, Chang J-C, Gyawali P, et al. Potential of a combination of entomopathogenic fungal strains and a non-ionic surfactant to control the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda). J Asia-Pac Entomol. 2022;25:102001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xia B, Huang D, Ye M, Qiu H, Chen H, Zhao K, et al. Effects of rhamnolipids on bacterial communities in contaminated soil and earthworm guts. Pedosphere. 2022. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shao B, Liu Z, Zhong H, Zeng G, Liu G, Yu M, et al. Effects of rhamnolipids on microorganism characteristics and applications in composting: a review. Microbiol Res. 2017;200:33–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren H, Wu F, Ju H, Wu D, Wei Z. Elaborating the role of rhamnolipids on the formation of humic substances during rice straw composting based on Fenton pretreatment and fungal inoculation. Bioresour Technol. 2023;376:128843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dierickx S, Castelein M, Remmery J, De Clercq V, Lodens S, Baccile N, et al. From bumblebee to bioeconomy: recent developments and perspectives for sophorolipid biosynthesis. Biotechnol Adv. 2022;54:107788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Farias CBB, Almeida FCG, Silva IA, Souza TC, Meira HM, Soares da Silva R, de CF, et al. Production of green surfactants: market prospects. Electron J Biotechnol. 2021;51:28–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Qazi MA, Wang Q, Dai Z. Sophorolipids bioproduction in the yeast Starmerella bombicola: current trends and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2022;346:126593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang R, Wu X, Xiao Y, Kong D, Li Y, Wang H. Tween 20 regulate the function and structure of transmembrane proteins of Bacillus cereus: promoting transmembrane transport of fluoranthene. J Hazard Mater. 2021;403:123707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cherepova N, Veljanov D. Effect of sorbitan monolaurate polyoxyalkylene (tween 20) on the ultrastructure of some bacteria. Cytobios. 1994;80:179–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu P, Fan X, Mao Y, Cheng H, Xu A, Lai W, et al. Temporal metabolite responsiveness of microbiota in the tea plant phyllosphere promotes continuous suppression of fungal pathogens. J Adv Res. 2022;39:49–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu P, Stirling E, Xie H, Li W, Lv X, Matsumoto H, et al. Continental scale deciphering of microbiome networks untangles the phyllosphere homeostasis in tea plant. J Adv Res. 2023;44:13–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Daroodi Z, Taheri P, Tarighi S. Endophytic fungus Acrophialophora jodhpurensis induced resistance against tomato early blight via interplay of reactive oxygen species, iron and antioxidants. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2021;115:101681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li J-H, Muhammad Aslam M, Gao Y-Y, Dai L, Hao G-F, Wei Z, et al. Microbiome-mediated signal transduction within the plant holobiont. Trends Microbiol. 2023. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.tim.2022.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Videira SIR, Groenewald JZ, Braun U, Shin HD, Crous PW. All that glitters is not Ramularia. Stud Mycol. 2016;:49–163.

  28. Baltaduonyte M, Dabkevicius Z, Braziene Z, Surviliene E. Dynamics of spread and control of cercospora (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) And ramularia (Ramularia beticola Fautrey & F.Lamb.) Leaf spot in sugar beet crops. Zemdirbyste. 2013;100:401–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang XQ, Ma SY, Peng ZX, Wang ZQ, Qiao M, Yu Z. Diversity of Plectosphaerella within aquatic plants from southwest China, with P. endophytica and P. sichuanensis spp. nov. MycoKeys. 2021;:57–75.

  30. Carlucci A, Raimondo ML, Santos J, Phillips AJL. Plectosphaerella species associated with root and collar rots of horticultural crops in southern Italy. Persoonia. 2012;28:34–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lopez DAC, Cuenca FP, Zeller KA, Cardwell KF. Characterization of the select agent, Coniothyrium glycines, causal pathogen of soybean red leaf blotch. Phytopathology. 2022;112:84–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zeng L-M, Zhang J, Han Y-C, Yang L, Wu M, Jiang D-H, et al. Degradation of oxalic acid by the mycoparasite Coniothyrium minitans plays an important role in interacting with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:2591–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Naqqash T, Imran A, Hameed S, Shahid M, Majeed A, Iqbal J, et al. First report of diazotrophic Brevundimonas spp. as growth enhancer and root colonizer of potato. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hernandez-Montiel LG, Gutierrez-Perez ED, Murillo-Amador B, Vero S, Chiquito-Contrera RG, Rincon-Enriquez G. Mechanisms employed by &ITDebaryomyces hansenii&IT in biological control of anthracnose disease on papaya fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2018;139:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sui Y, Wang Z, Zhang D, Wang Q. Oxidative stress adaptation of the antagonistic yeast, Debaryomyces hansenii, increases fitness in the microenvironment of kiwifruit wound and biocontrol efficacy against postharvest diseases. Biol Control. 2021;152:104428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaur J, Kaur S, Kumar M, Krishnan P, Minhas AP. Studies on production, optimization and machine learning-based prediction of biosurfactant from Debaryomyces hansenii CBS767. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2022;19:8465–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun Q, Zhang P, Zhao Z, Li X, Sun X, Jiang W. Continuous Wheat/Soybean cropping influences soybean yield and Rhizosphere Microbial Community structure and function. Agronomy-Basel. 2023;13:28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsai I, Chung C-L, Lin S-R, Hung T-H, Shen T-L, Hu C-Y, et al. Cryptic diversity, Molecular Systematics, and pathogenicity of Genus Pestalotiopsis and Allied Genera Causing Gray Blight Disease of Tea in Taiwan, with a description of a New Pseudopestalotiopsis Species. PLANT DIS. 2021;105:425–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shahriar SA, Nur-Shakirah AO, Mohd MH. Neopestalotiopsis clavispora and pseudopestalotiopsis camelliae-sinensis causing grey blight disease of tea (Camellia sinensis) in Malaysia. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2022;162:709–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Maharachchikumbura SSN, Guo L-D, Liu Z-Y, Hyde KD. Pseudopestalotiopsis ignota and Ps. Camelliae spp. nov associated with grey blight disease of tea in China. Mycol Prog. 2016;15:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Guerra M, Carrasco-Fernández J, Valdés JH, Panichini M, Castro JF. Draft genome of Pseudomonas sp. RGM 2987 isolated from Stevia philippiana roots reveals its potential as a plant biostimulant and potentially constitutes a novel species. Electron J Biotechnol. 2023;61:9–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tanveer S, Akhtar N, Ilyas N, Sayyed RZ, Fitriatin BN, Perveen K et al. Interactive effects of Pseudomonas putida and salicylic acid for mitigating drought tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.). Heliyon. 2023;:e14193.

  43. Kumar M, Charishma K, Sahu KP, Sheoran N, Patel A, Kundu A, et al. Rice leaf associated Chryseobacterium species: an untapped antagonistic flavobacterium displays volatile mediated suppression of rice blast disease. Biol Control. 2021;161:104703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bahmani K, Hasanzadeh N, Harighi B, Marefat A. Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from potato tissues and their effects as biological control agents against bacterial wilt. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2021;116:101692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rani V, Bhatia A, Kaushik R. Methane oxidizing-plant growth-promoting yeast isolated from indian rice fields. Indian J Agric Sci. 2021;91:369–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang J, Li J, Li J, Li J, Liu S, Gao W. LSP1, a responsive protein from Meyerozyma guilliermondii, elicits defence response and improves glycyrrhizic acid biosynthesis in Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch adventitious roots. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:3510–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Al-Rahbi BaA, Al-Sadi AM, Al-Mahmooli IH, Al-Maawali SS, Al-Mahruqi NMT, Velazhahan R. Meyerozyma guilliermondii SQUCC-33Y suppresses postharvest fruit rot of strawberry caused by Alternaria alternata. Austral Plant Pathol. 2021;50:349–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Aguirre-Guitron L, Calderon-Santoyo M, Ulises Bautista-Rosales P, Arturo Ragazzo-Sanchez J. Application of powder formulation of Meyerozyma caribbica for postharvest control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in mango (Mangifera indica L). LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2019;113:108271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Nian L, Xie Y, Zhang H, Wang M, Yuan B, Cheng S, et al. Vishniacozyma victoriae: an endophytic antagonist yeast of kiwifruit with biocontrol effect to Botrytis cinerea. Food Chem. 2023;411:135442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gorordo MF, Lucca ME, Sangorrin MP. Biocontrol Efficacy of the Vishniacozyma Victoriae in Semi-Commercial assays for the control of Postharvest Fungal Diseases of Organic Pears. Curr Microbiol. 2022;79:259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lutz MC, Lopes CA, Sosa MC, Sangorrin MP. Semi-commercial testing of regional yeasts selected from North Patagonia Argentina for the biocontrol of pear postharvest decays. Biol Control. 2020;150:104246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rokhbakhsh-Zamin F, Sachdev D, Kazemi-Pour N, Engineer A, Pardesi KR, Zinjarde S, et al. Characterization of plant-growth-promoting traits of Acinetobacter species isolated from rhizosphere of Pennisetum glaucum. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21:556–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee H, Kim D-U, Park S, Yoon J-H, Ka J-O. Massilia chloroacetimidivorans sp. nov., a chloroacetamide herbicide-degrading bacterium isolated from soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:751–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Mu D, Du N, Zwiazek JJ. Inoculation with Ericoid Mycorrhizal Associations alleviates Drought stress in Lowland and Upland Velvetleaf Blueberry (Vaccinium myrtilloides) seedlings. Plants-Basel. 2021;10:2786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tellenbach C, Sumarah MW, Gruenig CR, Miller JD. Inhibition of Phytophthora species by secondary metabolites produced by the dark septate endophyte Phialocephala europaea. Fungal Ecol. 2013;6:12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gomes RR, Glienke C, Videira SIR, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. Diaporthe: a genus of endophytic, saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi. Persoonia. 2013;31:1–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Guo YS, Crous PW, Bai Q, Fu M, Yang MM, Wang XH, et al. High diversity of Diaporthe species associated with pear shoot canker in China. Persoonia. 2020;45:132–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Dissanayake AJ, Liu M, Zhang W, Chen Z, Udayanga D, Chukeatirote E, et al. Morphological and molecular characterisation of Diaporthe species associated with grapevine trunk disease in China. Fungal Biol. 2015;119:283–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Youssef N, Sheik CS, Krumholz LR, Najar FZ, Roe BA, Elshahed MS. Comparison of species richness estimates obtained using nearly complete fragments and simulated pyrosequencing-generated fragments in 16S rRNA gene-based environmental surveys. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108 supplement_1:4516–22.

  61. Hess M, Sczyrba A, Egan R, Kim T-W, Chokhawala H, Schroth G, et al. Metagenomic Discovery of Biomass-Degrading genes and genomes from cow Rumen. Science. 2011;331:463–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bachy C, Dolan JR, López-García P, Deschamps P, Moreira D. Accuracy of protist diversity assessments: morphology compared with cloning and direct pyrosequencing of 18S rRNA genes and ITS regions using the conspicuous tintinnid ciliates as a case study. ISME J. 2013;7:244–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Improved software detection. And extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods in Ecology & Evolution. 2013;4.

  64. Masoodi KZ, Lone SM, Rasool RS. Chapter 7 - genomic DNA extraction from the plant leaves using the CTAB method. In: Masoodi KZ, Lone SM, Rasool RS, editors. Advanced Methods in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Academic Press; 2021. pp. 37–44.

  65. Song Y, Sun L, Wang H, Zhang S, Fan K, Mao Y, et al. Enzymatic fermentation of rapeseed cake significantly improved the soil environment of tea rhizosphere. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23:250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Wemheuer F, Taylor JA, Daniel R, Johnston E, Meinicke P, Thomas T et al. Tax4Fun2: a R-based tool for the rapid prediction of habitat-specific functional profiles and functional redundancy based on 16S rRNA gene marker gene sequences. 2018;:490037.

  67. A NHN, B ZS BSTB, C SB. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 2016;20:241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The research was funded by the Technology System of Modern Agricultural Industry in Shandong Province (SDAIT-19-01), the Special Foundation for Distinguished Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province (No.ts201712057), the Livelihood Project of Qingdao City (21-1-4-ny-2-nsh), the Special Talent Program of SAAS (CXGC2023A11), the Agricultural Improved Variety Project of Shandong Province(2020LZGC010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tea Research Institute, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China

    Hao Chen, Yujie Song, Kai Fan, Yilin Mao, Jie Zhang, Yang Xu, Xinyue Yin & Yu Wang

  2. Tea Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China

    Shuangshuang Wang & Zhaotang Ding

  3. Rizhao Tea Research Institute, Rizhao, 276827, China

    Hui Wang

Authors
  1. Hao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yujie Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuangshuang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kai Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yilin Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jie Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xinyue Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhaotang Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HC conducted an experiment, analyzed the data, and wrote a manuscript. YS collected samples. ZD, YW and KF put forward hypotheses and designed experiments. SW reviewed the manuscript. YM, YX, HW, JZ and XY participated in the experimental design and guided the research. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yu Wang or Zhaotang Ding.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We confirmed that all methods involving the plant and its material complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Song, Y., Wang, S. et al. Improved phyllosphere microbiome composition of tea plant with the application of small peptides in combination with rhamnolipid. BMC Microbiol 23, 302 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03043-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-03043-0

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us