Skip to main content

Bullet-related bacterial wound infections among injured personnel at emergency site hospitals in Bahir Dar: prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and associated factors



Bullet-related bacterial wound infection can be caused by high-velocity bullets and shrapnel injuries. In Ethiopia, significant injuries were reported that may cause severe wound infections, persistent systemic infections and may lead to amputation and mortality. The magnitude, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and factors associated with bacterial wound infections among patients with bullet-related injuries are not yet studied particularly at health facilities in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine the prevalence, bacterial profiles, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and factors associated with bacterial infections among patients with bullet-related injuries at referral health facilities in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia.


A Hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with bullet-related injuries at three referral health facilities in Bahir Dar from May 25 to July 27, 2022. A total of 384 patients with bullet-related injuries were included in the study. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Wound swabs were collected aseptically and cultured on Blood and MacConkey agar following bacteriological standards. Biochemical tests were performed to differentiate bacteria for positive cultivation and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the isolates were done on Muller Hinton agar using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique according to the 2021 Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guideline. The data were entered using Epi-Info version 7.3 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive data were presented using frequency, percentages, figures, and charts. Logistic regression was carried out to identify factors associated with bacterial wound infections. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


The prevalence of bullet-related bacterial wound infection among three referral hospitals in Bahir Dar city was 54.7%. The most commonly isolated Gram-negative organism was Klebsiella spps 49 (23.3%) while among Gram-positive organism, Staphylococcus aureus 58 (27.6%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) 18 (8.6%). Contamination, hospitalization and smoking habit were significantly associated with the presence of bullet-related bacterial wound infections. Over 97% multidrug resistant (MDR) bacterial isolates were identified and of theses, E. coli, Proteus species, Citrobactor, and Staphylococcus aureus were highly drug resistant.


Increased prevalence of bullet-related bacterial wound infection was noticed in this study. S. aureus followed by Klebsiella species were most commonly isolated bacteria. High frequency of resistance to Ampicillin, Oxacillin, Cefepime, Ceftriaxone, Ceftazidime, Vancomycin, and Norfloxacin was observed. Therefore, proper handling of bullet injuries, prompt investigation of bacterial infections, monitoring of drug sensitivity patterns and antibiotic usage are critical.

Peer Review reports


Physical damage to the skin is one of the major establishement of wound [1] where microbial pathogens can get access to deep skin tissues and cause wound infections [2, 3]. Bullet-related wound infection is occurred as a result of high speed bullet skin damage coupled with microbial contamination raised from military trenches [4].

When a fired bullet hits a person, the jacket of the bullet may remain in the cutaneous tissue and may continues to pass through subcutaneous, muscle and bone to produce severe wound. The wound then widens the breaks of the continuity of the skin and gives opportunity to several pathogens to multiply and cause infection [5]. Multiplication of pathogens in the injured tissues results a local wound infection that may lead to serious bullet-related health issues than from wounds inflicted by bullets [6, 7]. During injury, the shrapnel damages tearing flesh, breaking bones, and usually causes pointed irregular wounds and causes unavoidable sepsis [8], and becomes a serious global cause of morbidity and mortality [9].

Antibiotics are commonly used immediately upon arrival to the health institution to prevent the occurence of bullet-related wound infection [10]. However, some studies showed that bacteria can contaminate the wound immediately after injury [11] and obviously during hospitalization [12]. Since bullet-related wounds are different from other traumatic injuries due to the higher velocity of projectiles or blast devices, more severe injuries and wounds are often contaminated by clothing, soil, and environmental debris [10, 13]. Although several advancements have been made to abate combat-related mortality and case fatality rates (CFR), complications remain the main cause of morbidity and mortality of combat-injured personnel [14].

Furthermore, continual evolution of battlefield tactics that lead to new mechanisms of injury managenet and echo pattern trends to prevent complications of wound infections [15]. However, severe wound infections and antimicrobial resistance continue to rise and apparently need sustainable solutions [16, 17]. In developing countries like Ethiopia where trauma centers are not sufficiently available during war time, significant bullet-related injuries have been observed where persistent wound or systemic infections may lead to extremity amputation [18]. In bullet-related injuries, rapid surgical interventions can be primarily carried out using an amputation procedure to prevent life-threatening infections followed by microscopic identification of microorganisms and characterization of wound flora [2, 19] to initiate antimicrobial treatment.

Eventhough antimicrobial therapy is often used for perioperative prophylaxis and treatment of wound infections, a global rate of antimicrobial resistance is ever growing serious threat [5, 19] which also worsens the health conditions of bullet injured patients. This is the most challenging problem in fragile and conflict-affected regions [20]. Therefore, the current study was designed to assess the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and factors associated with bacterial wound infections among patients with bullet-related injuries at three emergency site hospitals in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia.


Study design, period, and area

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May 25 to July 27, 2022 at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (FHCSH), Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital (TGSH) and Northwestern Military Command Level 3 Hospital (NMCL3H), Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia. During conflict seasons, FHCSH, TGSH and NMCL3H served about 2000, 3000 and 6000 injuries per month in their surgical wards, orthopedic wards, and others including emergency tents.

Study participants and eligibility criteria

All patients with bullet-related injury attending at Bahir Dar city hospitals were the source population. The study populations were bullet-injured patients who were clinically diagnosed in the orthopedic and surgical wards of these hospitals during the study period. All bullet-related injured patients at selected hospitals in Bahir Dar city were included in the study. Unconscious patients and injuries not related to the bullet injury were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination and sampling technique

The sample size was calculated by EPI Info 7.3 for a single population proportion based on the following assumption. Since bullet-related wound infections in Ethiopia was not studied, we considered its prevalence could be an 50% with a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 5%. Using a single population proportion formula, a total of 384 bullet-related injured patients were included in the study.

Study variables

Wound infection was a dependent variable while socio-demographic factors, personal habits, hospitalization stay, possible contamination history during injury, previous antibiotics use for prophylaxis and before the operational procedure, anatomical location of the wound, bacterial isolates and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and types of bullets for injuries were independent variables.

Data collection

A questionnaire was developed after consulting previous publications and customized for data collection. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected using face-to-face interviews and medical charts. Data were collected from each casualty including types of bullet of injury, location of injury, and antibiotics used.

Specimen collection, transportation, and processing

Swab samples from wound pus were aseptically collected from the injured site of wound infection of bullet-related injured patients using sterile swabs before cleaning the wound. Each collected wound swab was innoculated into a tube containing Stuart’s transport medium (Oxoid, UK) and transported to the Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University using a cold-chain vaccine carrier.

Bacterial culture techniques

The specimens were plated onto blood agar (Oxoid UK) and MacConkey (Oxoid UK) agar plates using a sterile wooden swab and wire loop. Innoculated agar plates were incubated at 37 °C in ambient air. The plates were used to grow gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods. Growth was inspected at 24 h.

Bacterial identification

Gram staining was performed from the grown pure colony and based on the gram reaction, the identification of Gram-positive bacteria were further characterized by catalase and coagulase tests. Gram-negative rods were identified based on their gram reaction and colony characteristics. Once isolates of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were isolated, they were subjected to various biochemical tests for species identification. Enterobacteriaceae were identified by H2S (Hydrogen Sulfide) and gas production in TSI (Triple Sugar Iron) agar, citrate utilization, urease test, sulfur indole motility test, oxidase, and carbohydrate utilization tests following standard operational procedures (SOPs).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The antibiotic sensitivity test for the isolated organism was determined by Kirby- Bauer disc diffusion method. Bacterial inoculums were prepared from 3 to 5 pure colonies by suspending the freshly grown bacteria in 5 ml sterile saline. The suspension was compared with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standards and was streaked on the entire Muller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK) then, antimicrobial-impregnated paper disks were placed on the plate and incubated aerobically at 37˚C for 24 h and the results were interpreted according to CLSI (2021) guideline [21]. The zone of inhibition was measured by calibrated ruler and interpreted as sensitive, intermediate or resistant by using a standard chart. Antibiotics were selected based on accordance with availability in the market, frequent prescription and based on CLSI, 2021 guidelines. These antibiotics were Cefepime (30 µg), Ampicillin (10 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Norfloxacin (10 µg), Ceftazidime (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5µ), Vancomycin (10 µg), Oxacillin (30 µg), Tetracycline (15 mg) and Erythromycin (30 µg). Vancomycin and Oxacillin were used only for Gram-positive cocci isolates.

Data quality control

The reliability of the study findings were guaranteed by implementing quality control (QC) measures throughout the whole process of the laboratory procedures. All materials, equipment, and procedures were adequately controlled and each procedure was aseptically performed. In addition, culture media were tested for sterility and performance. The sterility of the media was checked by incubating 5% of prepared media at 37˚C for 24–48 h. If there were no growth of bacteria on the prepared media, the procedures were continued. If there were the growth of bacteria, the whole batch of media were discarded. Growth performance of the media was checked by inoculating control strains of American Type Cell Collection (ATCC) E. coli 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and S.aureus ATCC 25923. The control strains were kindly provided from Amhara Public Health Institute (APHI). To standardize the inoculum density of bacterial suspension for the susceptibility test, a barium sulfate (BaSO4) turbidity standard, equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard was used.

Data analysis

Data were cleaned, coded, and entered into EPI info 7.3 and exported to SPSS statistical software version 25 for analysis. Descriptive statistics such as socio-demographic, and clinical characteristics of the study participants along with bacterial isolates and their antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile were calculated. Logistic regression analyses were used to test the relationship between the dependent variable and independent variables. Variables that showed a p-value < 0.25 in univariate logistic regression were selected for further analyses using multivariable logistic regression to avoid the effect of confounding factors. The frequency and percentages of bacterial isolates were calculated and p-value < 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval were considered statistically significant. Finally, the results were presented in words, graphs, and tables.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval

was obtained from the ethical review committee of the College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University (protocol No. 387/2022) prior to the commencement of the study. Permission letters obtained from APHI were given to the selected hospitals where the study population were admitted. Study participants were asked for verbal consent and written consent forms were obtained for full enrolnment. Study participants with positive culture results and AST were communicated with their caregivers (physicians, health officers or nurses) at the hospital for appropriate treatment and possible medical care. Subject confidentiality and any other special data security requirements were maintained and assured. Subject confidentiality was maintained by getting informed concent, avoiding personal information, identities and adresses and any other special data security requirements were assured.


Demographic and clinical profile of patients with bullet-related bacterial wound infections

A total of 384 specimens were collected from bullet-related injured patients from May 25 to July 27, 2022. In this study, the prevalence of bullet-related bacterial wound infections in the study population was 54.7%. Among 384 bullet-injured patients included in the study, 199 (51.8%) were in the age range of 14–24 years with a mean ± SD age of 31.7 ± 1.14 and 368 (95.8%) were male. Of the total of 384 injured patients, 318 (82.8%) were Amhara in ethnicity, 321 (83.5%) were atleast able to write and read, 206 (46.4%) were study subjects who never drunk alcohol and most of them were never smoking cigarettes (319(83.1%)) and chewing khat (336(87.5%)) (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of patients with a bullet-related bacterial infection in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia (N = 384)

In this study, of the total of 384 injured patients, 251 (65.2%) were contaminated with soil during injury, and the majority of patients were injured their hands and legs (147 (38.3%)) followed by the abdomen (83 (21.6%)), and head and neck (70 (18.2%)). The mechanism of bullet-related wound injury were mostly occurred by Kalashnikov-bullet (149 (41.8%) and sniper bullet (51 (13.3%)) followed by other bullets. During this study, 103 (28.8%) bullet-injured patients were admitted for 60 days in the hospital while 53 (13.8%) were for 90 to 180 days. Of the total 384 injured patients, 234 (60.9%) started antibiotics delayed after injury (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical and microbiological characteristics of patients with bullet-related bacterial wound infections (N = 384)

Among the total of 210 positive cultures of swab specimens collected from three selected hospitals in Bahir Dar city, 120 (58.5%) were isolated from bullet-injured patients in FHCSH, 56 (49.5%) were in TGSH and 34 (51.5%) were in NMCL3H (Table 3).

Table 3 Culture positivity of bullet-related wounds of study subjects at selected three hospitals, in Bahir Dar Northwest Ethiopia (N = 210)

Bacterial profile of bullet-related wound infections

Of the 384 swab specimens, 210 (54 0.7%) were culture positive for bacterial pathogens and 174 (45.3%) were bacteriologically sterile. The presence of only one species isolated from each sample was the most frequent (207 (98.6%)) while more than one species were isolated from only 3 (1.4%) swab specimens. From the total of 210 bacterial isolates, 134 (63.8%) were Gram-negative while 76 (32.2%) were Gram-positive. The most common Gram-negative organism cultured from bullet-related wounded patient specimens was Klebsiella species. It was the predominant organism isolated (49 (23.3%)) followed by Escherichia coli (28 (13.3%)), Proteus species (28 (13.3%)), Pseudomonas species (13 (6.2%)), Citrobacter species (9 (4.3%)) and Enterobacter species (7 (3.4%)). Among the Gram-positive cocci cultured from the specimens of bullet-injured patients, the most frequently isolated organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (58 (27.6%)) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (18 (8.6%)) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Bacterial profile of bullet-related wound infections of study subjects at selected three hospitals, in Bahir Dar Northwest Ethiopia. The bacterial species are as follows: Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris Klebsiella rhinosceleromatis, Proteus mirabils, Citerobacter spp, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS), Klebsiella ozeanae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A total of eleven antibiotics were used to test antimicrobial susceptibility profile of those isolated bacteria. The antibiotics were Gentamycin, Ampicillin, Oxacillin, Cefepime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Tetracycline, Norfloxacin, Vancomycin, Erythromycin, Ciprofloxacin. The most common antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria were Escherichia coli, Citerobacter species and Proteus species.

Escherichia coli isolates were resistance to Ampicillin (100%), Cefepime (100%) Ceftazidime (100%), Ceftriaxone (100%), Tetracycline (86%), Norfloxacin (85.7%), Erythromycin (92.1%), Gentamycin (50%). The next antibiotic-resistant isolate was Citrobacter species which was sensitive to only Ciprofloxacin (77.8%) but resistant to other antimicrobial agents including Gentamycin (100%), Ampicillin (100), Cefepime (100%), Ceftazidime (100%), Erythromycin (100%), Ceftriaxone (89.9%) and Tetracycline (77.8%). Proteus species was also resistant to several antibiotics such as P. mirabilis (100%) to Ampicillin, P. vulgaris (89.5%) to Ampicillin and (100%) to Cefepime, P. mirabilis (100%) and P. vulgaris (90%) to Ceftazidime, P mirabilis (100%) and P. vulgaris (89.5%) to Ceftriaxone, P. mirabilis (100%) and P. vulgaris (94.7%) to Tetracycline, P. mirabilis (100%) and P. vulgaris (89.5%) to Erythromycin and P. mirabilis (66.7%) and P. vulgaris (64.4%) to Ciprofloxacillin. Unexpectedly, in this study, Klebsiella and Pseudomonas species were found to be sensitive to some antibiotics. For instance, about 82% K. rhinosceleromatis, K. pneumoniae (75.9%) and K. ozeanae (55.6%) isolates were sensitive to Gentamycin, K. rhinosceleromatis (77.7%) and K. ozenae (56%) were sensitive to Erythromycin, and K. rhinosceleromatis (72%), K. pneumoniae (62.1%) were sensitive to Ciprofloxacin. Pseudomonas species isolates were generally sensitive to Gentamycin (92.3%), Erythromycin (76.9%) and Ciprofloxacin (84.6%).

Among Gram positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus was resistant to various antibiotics including Oxacillin (100%), Vancomycin (89.5%), Norfloxacin (87.9%), Erythromycin (87.7%), Tetracycline (65.5%), Ciprofloxacin (79.3%), Cefepime (100%), Ceftriaxone (100%) and Ceftazidime (100%) while sensitive to Gentamycin. Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) isolates were resistant to most antibiotics employed in the study (Table 4). In this study, bacterial isolates with intermediate antibiotic resistance to antimicrobial agents were not observed.

Table 4 Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of organisms isolated from bullet-related bacterial wound infections in selected hospitals, Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia (n = 210 isolates)

Multidrug resistance profile of bacterial isolates

In the current study, isolates which didn’t respond to three or more antibiotics were considered as multidrug-resistant [22]. Hence, among Gram-negative bacterial isolates, K. rhinoscleromatis (7/11(63.6%)), K. ozeanae (9/9(100)), K. pneumoniae (25/29(86.2%)), P. aeruginosa (5/13(38.5%)), P. mirabilis (7/9(87.5%)), Citrobacter species (9/9(100)), P. vulgaris (18/19(94.7%)), E. coli (27/28(96.4%)), Enterobacter aerogens (4/5(80.0%)), Enterobacter cloacae (1/2(50%)) were categorized in to multi-drug resistant isolates. From the Gram-positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus (57/58(98.3%)), CoNS (17/18(94.4%)). As a result, the overall multi-drug resistant rate was 97.6%. The most frequently isolated Gram-negative MDR bacteria were Citrobacter species, E. coli, Proteus species and Enterobacter species. Among the Gram-positive cocci, Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics employed in this study (Table 5).

Table 5 Multidrug resistance profile of bacterial isolates with ≥ 3 antimicrobial agents isolated from bullet-related wound infection

Factors associated with bullet-related bacterial wound infections

Based on the univariate analysis of bullet-related bacterial isolates, variables such as contamination of bullet wounded site, location of the wound, hospitalization, types of the bullet and khat chewing were selected for possible inclusion in multivariate logistic regression models to avoid confounding effects. The multivariate analysis specified that bullet-related bacterial isolates were significantly associated with habit of cigarette smoking (AOR = 1.43, 95%CI(0.195,1.946), p-value = 0.036), soil contamination of bullet-wounded site (AOR = 4.55, 95%CI(1.086,19.098), p-value = 0.038) and hospitalization stay (AOR = 3.147, 95%IC(0.436,6.896), p-value = 0.004). Patients who had soil contamination upon bullet injury were about 5 times more likely to have bacterial wound infections compared to other contaminants. Patients’ hospitalization stay for more than 2 months was found 3 times more likely to cause bacterial wound infections than patients stayed in hospital for fewer than 2 months (Table 6).

Table 6 Factors associated with bullet-related wound bacterial infection in selected hospitals of Bahir-Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022 (n = 384)


The prevalence of bullet-related bacterial wound infections in three selected hospitals in Bahir Dar city was 54.7% where bacterial wound infection is still one of the main causes of hospitalizations in the study area with high possibilities of morbidity and mortality even with the current advancement of antimicrobial agents. From the total of 210 culture-positive specimens, 134 (63.8%) were Gram-negative bacteria and 76 (36.2%) were Gram-positive. This indicated that the most frequently isolated bacteria from bullet-related wounds were Gram-negative bacteria including Klebsiella species (49(23.3%)), Escherichia coli (28(13.3%)), Proteus species (28(13.3%)), Pseudomonas species (13(6.2%)), Citerobacter species (9(4.3%)) and Enterobacter species (7(3.4%)) while isolates of Gram-positive cocci were Staphylococcus aureus (58(27.6%)) and coagulase negative Staphylococci (18(8.6%)). These findings were also reported by previously conducted studies in Ukraine [2, 5].

Majority of swab specimens (207(98.6%)) of bullet-injured wounds exhibited only one bacterial species while more than one bacterial species were isolated from few number of wound specimens (3(1.4%)). This data was also demonstrated by other studies done in Ukraine [5]. In the current study, among Gram-positive isolates, Staphylococcus aureus (58(27.6%)) and coagulase-negative Staphylococci species (18(8.6%)) were frequently isolated organisms from wound specimens. This was also explained by other studies conducted previously in the USA [11, 23]. Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria caused illnesses can produce more severe symptoms than their predecessors. Even though novel antibiotics have shown considerable promise against antibiotic-resistant bacteria, rapid diagnosis remains a serious challenge due to antimicrobial resistance bacteria [24]. In this study, Gram negative bacterial isolates such as Escherichia coli (96.4%), Proteus Species (92.6%), Citrobacter Species (100%), Enterobacter species (71,4%), K. pneumoniae (86.2%) and P. aeruginosa (38.5%) were resistant to most antibiotics (Gentamycin, Ampicillin, Cefepime, Ceftriaxone, Ceftazidime, Tetracycline, Norfloxacin, Erythromycin, and Ciprofloxacin) while the Gram positive cocci, Staphylococcus aureus (98.3%), were resistance to Oxacillin, Ampicillin, Cefepime and Ceftriaxone. The previous studies conducted in Syria also showed that the most common Gram negative isolated bacteria were E. coli (100%), Proteus species (63%), Enterobacter species (78%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (82%), Pseudomonas species (17%) and the Gram positive cocci, Staphylococcus aureus (73%), was resistant to the most antimicrobials [17, 19] which is a relatively different compared to this study. This variation might be due to the difference in the type of injuries, site of injuries, awareness to wound contamination and geographic locations.

Among the bacterial isolates of bullet-related wound infections, Pseudomonas and Klebsiella species isolates were sensitive to most frequently used antibiotics in the study area. These species were sensitive to Gentamycin, Erythromycin and Ciprofloxacin. The Gram positive cocci including Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative Staphylococci isolates were resistant to Oxacillin and Vancomycin and also resistant to most broad-spectrum antibiotics tested in the study. This is explained by a previous study conducted in Iraq [11, 17]. However, bullet-related bacterial wound infections have not yet adequately characterized the trends of infectious complications and associated outcomes in injured personnel during the conflict situations [25].

Multidrug resistance profiles of bacterial isolates to most antibiotics tested were observed in the present study. This was in agreement with the previous study conducted in two countries Iraq and Afganistan [17]. Gram negative bacterial isolates resistant to more than or equal to three antibiotics were K.rhinosceratis (7/11(63.6%)), K.ozeanae (9/9(100%)), K. pneumoniae (25/29(86.2%)), P. aeruginosa (5/13(38.5%)), P. mirabilis (7/9(87.5%)), Citerobacter species (9/9(100%)), Proteus vulgaris (18/19(94.7%)), E.coli (27/28(96.4%)), Enterobacter aerogens (4/5(80.0%)), Enterobacter cloacae (1/2(50%)) while the Gram positive cocci were Staphylococcus aureus (57/58(98.3%)) and CoNS (17/18(94.4%)).

Factors associated with the development of bullet-related bacterial wound infections include wound type and severity, site and location of the wound, individuals’ habit, the presence of embedded foreign material or fragments such as injured personnel’s clothing, dirt, and debris, initiation of antimicrobial agents, prior antimicrobial pressure, hospitalization and the presence of nosocomial pathogens, especially multidrug-resistant pathogens at treatment facilities [1, 26]. As indicated in the previous study done in Beirut [27], we found that hospitalization of bullet-injured personnel was significantly associated with bacterial isolates of bullet-related wounds. Contamination of bullet-injured wounds with environmental materials including personnel closes, dust or soil was also associated with the bacterial isolates of wound infections which is in agreement with other study conducted in the USA [11]. The other factor associated with bacterial isolates was the smoking habit of bullet-injured personnel though most of study participants in our study never smoked cigarates.

Limitations of the study

Unavailaibility of documented history of prophylactic use of antibiotics and period of stay at the site of combat after bullet injury and anaerobic bacterial pathogens that could be difficult to culture in our laboratory setting were among the limitations of the current study.


The prevalence of bacterial isolates among bullet-related wound patients was 54.7%. The most frequently isolated bacteria was S. aureus followed by Klebsiella species, E. coli, Proteus species and CoNS. These isolates were MDR to ≥ 3 antibiotics employed in the study. Hence, avoiding soil or other contaminants upon bullet-injury, prompt investigation of bullet-related bacterial wound infections, monitoring of their drug sensitivity patterns, proper antibiotic usage and infection prevention practice awareness creation in vulnerable personnels are essential to reduce mortality and morbidity associated with bullet-related wound bacterial infection.

Data availability

The study materials and data are available from the corresponding author upon request.



Anti-Microbial Resistance


Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test


Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute


Coagulase Negative Staphylococci


Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital


Multidrug Resistance


North West Command Level3 Bahir Dar Hospital


Amhara Public Health Institute


Post-Traumatic Osteomyelitis


Quality Control


  1. Ayalew S. Bacterial profile and drug resistance pattern of pathogens isolated from wound infection at Armed Force Referral and Teaching Hospital. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Puca V, Marulli RZ, Grande R, Vitale I, Niro A, Molinaro G, et al. Microbial species isolated from infected wounds and antimicrobial resistance analysis: data emerging from a three-years retrospective study. Antibiotics. 2021;10(10):1162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mama M, Abdissa A, Sewunet T. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South-West Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 


  5. Valentine KP, Viacheslav KM. Bacterial flora of combat wounds from eastern Ukraine and time-specified changes of bacterial recovery during treatment in Ukrainian military hospital. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goniewicz K, Burkle FM, Horne S, Borowska-Stefańska M, Wiśniewski S, Khorram-Manesh A. The influence of War and Conflict on Infectious Disease: a Rapid Review of historical lessons we have yet to learn. Sustainability. 2021;13(19):10783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray CK, Yun HC, Markelz AE, Okulicz JF, Vento TJ, Burgess TH, et al. Operation United Assistance: infectious disease threats to deployed military personnel. Mil Med. 2015;180(6):626–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen K, Riddle MS, Danko JR, Blazes DL, Hayden R, Tasker SA, et al. Trauma-related infections in battlefield casualties from Iraq. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):803.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dau A, Tloba S, Daw M. Characterization of wound infections among patients injured during the 2011 Libyan conflict. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 19 (4), 356–361, 2013. 2013.

  10. Akers KS, Mende K, Cheatle KA, Zera WC, Yu X, Beckius ML, et al. Biofilms and persistent wound infections in United States military trauma patients: a case–control analysis. BMC infectious diseases. 2014;14(1):1–11.

  11. Murray CK, Roop SA, Hospenthal DR, Dooley DP, Wenner K, Hammock J, et al. Bacteriology of war wounds at the time of injury. Military medicine. 2006;171(9):826-9.

  12. Ita O, Onyedibe K, Egah D. Assessment of Infections in Soft Tissue Injuries Following Penetrating Trauma; A Clinicolaboratory Dilemma. Jos Journal of Medicine. 2012;6(2):13 – 8.

  13. Bartlett CS, Helfet DL, Hausman MR, Strauss E. Ballistics and gunshot wounds:effects on musculoskeletal tissues. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2000;8(1):21–36.

  14. Tribble DR, Murray CK, Lloyd BA, Ganesan A, Mende K, Blyth DM, et al. After the battlefield: infectious complications among wounded warriors in the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study. Military medicine. 2019;184(Supplement_2):18–25.

  15. Aronson NE, Sanders JW, Moran KA. In harm’s way: infections in deployed American military forces. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006;43(8):1045-51.

  16. Blyth DM, Yun HC, Tribble DR, Murray CK. Lessons of war: Combat-related injury infections during the Vietnam War and Operation Iraqi and Enduring Freedom. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2015;79(4 0 2 0 0 2014 0 0 0 0 0):S227.

  17. Calhoun JH, Murray CK, Manring M. Multidrug-resistant organisms in military wounds from Iraq and Afghanistan. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2008;466(6):1356-62.

  18. Abraham Y, Wamisho BL. Microbial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from open fracture wounds presenting to the err of black-lion hospital, Addis Ababa University,Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2009;3(12):939 – 51.

  19. Älgå A, Wong S, Shoaib M, Lundgren K, Giske CG, von Schreeb J, et al. Infection with high proportion of multidrug-resistant bacteria in conflict-related injuries is associated with poor outcomes and excess resource consumption: a cohort study of Syrian patients treated in Jordan. BMC infectious diseases. 2018;18(1):1–6.

  20. Kobeissi E, Menassa M, Moussally K, Repetto E, Soboh I, Hajjar M, et al. The socioeconomic burden of antibiotic resistance in conflict-affected settings and refugee hosting countries: a systematic scoping review. Conflict and health. 2021;15(1):1–9.

  21. CLSI. 2021. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, M100,31st ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.

  22. Wang M, Wei H, Zhao Y, Shang L, Di L, Lyu C, Liu J. Analysis of multidrug-resistant bacteria in 3223 patients with hospital-acquired infections (HAI) from a tertiary general hospital in China. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2019;19(1):86–93.

  23. Abbara A, Rawson TM, Karah N, El-Amin W, Hatcher J, Tajaldin B, et al. A summary and appraisal of existing evidence of antimicrobial resistance in the Syrian conflict.International journal of infectious diseases. 2018;75:26–33.

  24. Khan ZA, Siddiqui MF, Park S. Current and emerging methods of antibiotic susceptibility testing. Diagnostics. 2019;9(2):49.

  25. Eardley W, Brown K, Bonner T, Green A, Clasper J. Infection in conflict wounded.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011;366(1562):204 – 18.

  26. Teicher CL, Ronat J-B, Fakhri RM, Basel M, Labar AS, Herard P, et al. Antimicrobial drug–resistant bacteria isolated from Syrian war–injured patients, August 2011–march 2013. Emerging infectious diseases. 2014;20(11):1949.

  27. Sahli Z, Bizri A, Abu-Sittah G. Microbiology and risk factors associated with war-related wound infections in the Middle East. Epidemiology & Infection. 2016;144(13):2848-57.

Download references


We would like to acknowledge medical personnels in FHCSH, TGSH and NWCL3H orthopedics and surgical wards for their cooperation during the study.


There was no financial support for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ET conceived the study, drafted, revised the study proposal, collect the data, performed data analysis and interpretation and drafted the manuscript. AM, FM, and YS conceived the study, revised the study proposal, supervised data collection, revised and approved the submission of the manuscript. The final manuscript has been read and approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enanu Tigabu.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval

(protocol No. 387/2022) was obtained from the ethical review committee of the College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University prior to the commencement of the study. Permission letters obtained from Amhara Public Health Institute (APHI) were given to the selected hospitals in order to include study participants and collect essential data. Those patients who volunteered to be part of the study were asked for verbal and written consent. Study participants with positive culture results and their AST profiles were communicated with their caregivers in the hospital for appropriate treatment and possible medical care. Subject confidentiality and any other special data security requirements were maintained and assured. All information obtained from the participants was kept confidential and the data were used for research purposes only.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tigabu, E., Melese, A., Mekonen, F. et al. Bullet-related bacterial wound infections among injured personnel at emergency site hospitals in Bahir Dar: prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and associated factors. BMC Microbiol 24, 166 (2024).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: