Skip to main content

Biocontrol of multi-drug resistant pathogenic bacteria in drainage water by locally isolated bacteriophage

Abstract

In areas with limited water resources, the reuse of treated drainage water for non-potable purposes is increasingly recognised as a valuable and sustainable water resource. Numerous pathogenic bacteria found in drainage water have a detrimental impact on public health. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the current worldwide delay in the production of new antibiotics may make the issue of this microbial water pollution even more challenging. This challenge aided the resumption of phage treatment to address this alarming issue. In this study, strains of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and their phages were isolated from drainage and surface water from Bahr El-Baqar and El-Manzala Lake in Damietta governorate, Egypt. Bacterial strains were identified by microscopical and biochemical examinations which were confirmed by 16 S rDNA sequencing. The susceptibility of these bacteria to several antibiotics revealed that most of the isolates had multiple antibiotic resistances (MAR). The calculated MAR index values (> 0.25) categorized study sites as potentially hazardous to health. Lytic bacteriophages against these multidrug-resistant strains of E. coli and P. aeruginosa were isolated and characterized. The isolated phages were found to be pH and heat stable and were all members of the Caudovirales order as recognized by the electron microscope. They infect 88.9% of E. coli strains and 100% of P. aeruginosa strains examined. Under laboratory conditions, the use of a phage cocktail resulted in a considerable reduction in bacterial growth. The removal efficiency (%) for E. coli and P. aeruginosa colonies increased with time and maximized at 24 h revealing a nearly 100% reduction after incubation with the phage mixture. The study candidates new phages for detecting and controlling other bacterial pathogens of public health concern to limit water pollution and maintain adequate hygiene.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In Egypt, agriculture uses the most readily available water, accounting for more than 85% of the total demand; hence, drainage water is recycled to close the gap between supply and demand [1]. Bahr El-Baqar drain is considered one of the most polluted drains in Egypt. That drain pumps 2.3 BCM of water annually into Lake Manzala. It is passing through the heavily populated governorates of Qalubeya, Sharkia, Ismailia, and Port Said. Particulate, nutrient, heavy metal, hydrocarbon, and hazardous chemical residues, such as herbicide and pesticide residues, make up the wastewater in the drain [2]. Although Bahr El-Baqr is the largest drain in the Eastern Delta, its high degree of pollution prevented it from being connected to the El-Salam Canal, which transports mixed drainage and fresh water to Sinai. Large volumes of water that could have been used for irrigation are lost as a result of this problem [3].

Numerous bacteria, including gastrointestinal pathogens, are present in drainage water (E. coli, Proteus sp, Salmonella sp, Shigella sp, Citrobacter sp) which causes diarrhoea in both humans and animals when it enters the gastrointestinal tract. Diarrheal illness was considered the third-leading cause of child death worldwide in 2017, which killed more than 500,000 children under the age of five [4]. These intestinal infections can spread if industrial and livestock wastes are not properly controlled.

The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria may make the issue of microbiological water contamination even more challenging [5]. The issues with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGNB) are particularly alarming. These bacteria include Klebsiella sp, Enterobacter sp, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp. These problems are primarily caused by the overuse and abuse of antibiotics [6].

E. coli is an indicator bacterium that gives clear proof of recent faecal contamination. Because of the various pathogenicity mechanisms and illnesses that it can cause, E. coli is the most notable example of a gram-negative bacterium associated with a variety of diseases [7]. P. aeruginosa is one of the most often discovered multidrug-resistant organisms in the world [8].

Phage treatment has been researched due to the global spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections [9]. These bacteriophages, in contrast to conventional broad-spectrum antibiotics, target particular bacteria without damaging others. In the lytic (or virulent) lifestyle, the host cell’s replication and eventual destruction are facilitated by hijacking the machinery. This results in the production of progeny while also killing the host [8, 10]. The enormous variety and abundance of phages found in nature make it a simple source which is chosen for a range of applications, such as decontamination, infection control, detection, diagnosis, anti-bacterial therapy and phage typing. Bacteriophages can be used as bacterial pathogen indicators and as biocontrol agents in wastewater treatment [11].

In response to previous challenges, the present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a newly isolated phage cocktail for detecting and reduction of some gram-negative bacteria in water, being the best control model for water-born opportunistic pathogens of public health concern.

Materials and methods

Collection of water samples

The study was carried out between May 2018 and June 2019. An overall total of 75 water samples were collected from the Bahr El-Baqr drain outlet, pump station, sedimentation basin, drying basin, surface flow basin, subsurface flow basin, and exits from Lake Manzala.

All analyses were done according to the Water and Wastewater Examination Standards of the American public health association [12]. Water samples were taken from the subsurface layer at a depth of 50 cm and placed in sterile, clean polyethene plastic bottles. All samples for physical, chemical, or bacteriological investigation were kept in ice boxes and submitted right away to the lab for examination. All analyses were carried out in the Central Laboratory for Environmental Quality Monitoring (CLEQM) National Water Research Center (NWRC), Cairo, Egypt, Virology Lab., Agric., Microbiology Dept. Fac. of Agriculture, Ain shams University, Shobra El-Kheima, Qalubia Governorate, Egypt and bacteriology Lab., Sci., Microbiology Dept. Fac. of Science, Ain shams University, Alabbasia, Cairo Governorate, Egypt.

Isolation and identification of specific bacteria

E. coli and P. aeruginosa were the most common pathogens found in wastewater. Water samples were quickly filtered using a 0.45 µ m membrane, the membrane was plated on m-TEC agar medium for E. coli and M-PA-C agar medium for P. aeruginosa. Typical colonies were sub-cultured for purification and confirmation on Eosin Methylene Blue agar plates for E. coli and Cetrimide agar for P. aeruginosa. Gram staining, colony morphology, and other traditional biochemical methods were used to identify bacterial isolates [13].

Molecular identification of bacterial isolates

Genomic DNA was extracted using Bacterial Genomic DNA Isolation Kit RKT09 (Chromous Biotech Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India) and visualized on 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel. Gene amplification was carried out using a Thermal cycler (ABI 2720) in 100 µl reaction volume containing 2.5 mM of dNTP, 10x PCR buffer, 3U of Taq DNA polymerase, 10 ng template DNA, and 400 ng of primer (F) 5’-GGGGGATCTTCGGACCTCA-3’, and primer (R) 5’-TCCTTAGAGTGCCCACCCG-3’ which were designed for aquatic gram-negative bacteria [14, 15]. The sequencing was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol using Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (V. 3.1, Applied Bio-system) and analyzed in an Applied Bio-system analyzer. The sequences of 16 S-rDNA for these strains were finally submitted to the NCBI GenBank database, USA, and compared to other available sequences using an automated alignment tool blast program and assigned their accession numbers [16].

Pathogenicity test for bacterial isolates

This test was carried out by using the Congo Red Agar (CRA) method [17]. On Congo red agar medium, single colonies from each isolate of a 24-hr old pure bacterial culture were streaked. For easier result annotation, the cultures were kept at room temperature for 48 h after 24 h of incubation at 35 oC. Colonies that appeared red were noted as positive results and considered to be pathogen isolates (virulent). Colonies that were not red were considered to be non-pathogen isolates and were recorded as negative results (avirulent).

Antibiotic sensitivity test for bacterial isolates

Eleven commercially manufactured antibiotic discs from Oxoid-UK were selected for this study to examine their effectiveness against bacteria isolated from water samples. These drugs belonged to eleven classes of antibiotics: Penicillin, Cephalosporins, Glycopeptides, Aminoglycosides, Tetracyclines, Macrolides, Lincosamides, Quinolones, Sulfa drugs, Nitrofurans and Chloramphenicol. The standard agar disk diffusion method was performed [18]. According to protocols defined for the assessment of antibiotic compounds as directed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, the diameters of the inhibition zones surrounding the antibiotic discs were measured to the nearest whole millimetre and reported [19].

Multiple antibiotics resistance indexing

The Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index was calculated according to the following formula:

MAR = X/nY.

Where:

X: the number of resistances determined among population “Y”.

n: the number of tested antibiotics.

*Values of MAR higher than 0.25 pose a high-risk source of contamination [20, 21].

Detection of bacteriophages

Isolation and enrichment of E. coli and P. aeruginosa phages

The phages specific for isolated and identified bacterial strains of E. coli and P. aeruginosa collected from water samples were detected [22]. Five ml of the obtained water samples were added to Erlenmeyer flasks (250 ml), each of which contained 50 ml of nutrient broth. Mixtures of each strain (1ml) were added, and the flasks were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h, with shaking at 150 rpm using shaking incubator. After incubation, the liquid cultures were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 15 min to remove the cell culture debris. Chloroform was added to the supernatant (1:10 v/v), followed by a vigorously shaking for 3–5 min, then the flasks were allowed to be settled for 30 min to remove any contaminating bacteria.

Assaying of E. coli and P. aeruginosa phages

Bacteriophages were detected both qualitatively and quantitatively using the spot test and over layer agar techniques (Plaque assay technique) [22].

Chemical purification and concentration of isolated phages

Phage purification and concentration were carried out using a two-phase liquid system with dextran sulphate and polyethylene glycol [23]. The mixture centrifuged at 2000 rpm for l0min. Then, the supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 16,000 rpm for 2 h at 4 °C. In order to conduct the analysis, the phage pellets were resuspended in 1ml of saline solution.

Characterization of E. coli and P. aeruginosa phages

Electron microscopy examination

One drop of each isolated phage suspension (1012 pfu/ml) was placed on a 200 mesh carbon-coated copper grid and allowed to absorb for approximately 20 min, the excess liquid was removed with filter paper dick. The grids were negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate (pH 4.5) for 90 s and left for drying and then examined using a JOEL-JEM- 1010 electron microscope operated at 80 KV (Electron microscope unit, Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology, Al-Azhar Univ., Cairo) [24].

Host range pattern

Agar double-layer plates were used for host range assay. P. aeruginosa, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 and E. coli, E. coli ATCC 25,922 and E. coli ATCC 10,536 were used as different host in individual plates. ATCC strains were obtained from the Egyptian Microbial Culture Collection (EMCC) at Cairo Microbial Resource Center. Plates were prepared by pouring a base layer of 45 ml of nutrient agar medium with 1.5% agar in Petri dishes 10 cm in diameter. The basal layer was allowed to solidify. A mixture of 3 ml melted semi-solid agar and 1 ml of the bacterial host were poured into each plate, 24 h incubation of the used strains. The surface of every plate was spotted with 5 µL of every single phage isolate. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, plates were examined for lysis of bacteria at the sites where the drops had been applied and the obtained data were recorded.

Physical properties of virions

Thermal stability

Two ml of each phage suspension were incubated at 40 ºC, 50 ºC, 60 ºC, 70 ºC, 80 ºC, 90 ºC and 100 ºC for 10 min with sudden cooling. Phage infectivity was determined by plaque assay technique [25].

PH stability

One ml of each phage suspension was transferred into test tubes containing 9 ml of nutrient broth. The pH of the total suspension was adjusted at various values from 4 to 12. The pH values of the nutrient broth were adjusted using 0.1 M HCl or NaOH. After an hour of incubation at 37 ºC, the infectivity of phages was determined by carrying out a double-layer technique [26].

Challenging with phage cocktail

Investigation of the effects of identified phages on decreasing the viable count of the E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacteria was detected in sewage water samples.

Water samples collected from the Bahr El-Baqar drain were divided into 3 parts (2 L for each part). Two L was used as control, 2 L of wastewater was treated with a cocktail of coliphage, and 2 L was treated with a cocktail of E. coli or Pseudomonas phages. The phage cocktail was prepared by mixing equal volumes of isolated phages (10 ml of each phage) specific to bacterial hosts (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) at a concentration of 1012 PFU/ml as determined by plaque assay.

Water samples collected from the Bahr El-Baqar drain were inoculated with a phages cocktail (1 L/1 ml) and incubated at (37 ◦C and 150 rpm). Both E. coli and P. aeruginosa colonies were counted at different time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 h) incubation. After each incubation period, each 100 ml of treated water was filtered. Plates with specific media incubated with the membrane for 24 h at 44.5 ± 0.2◦C for E. coli and 72 h at 41.5 ± 0.5 oC for P. aeruginosa. Finally, bacterial colonies were counted and the average results were recorded in (cfu/100ml).

The efficiency of bacteriophages was detected by counting bacterial colonies before and after treatment [7]. The removal efficiency (%) for E. coli and P. aeruginosa was calculated as the following equation:

Removal efficiency = (count before treatment - count after treatment)/count before treatment x100.

Results

Isolation and identification of specific bacterial isolates

  1. E. coli.

       E. coli isolates gave red to magenta colonies on the membrane filter after incubation on a modified mTEC agar medium. It was isolated and confirmed by streaking on MacConkey agar medium giving pink growth and on Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar medium showing purple growth with a green metallic sheen.

  1. P. aeruginosa.

    P. aeruginosa colonies showed a flat appearance with light outer rims, brownish to greenish black centres and 0.8 to 2.2 mm in diameter on membrane filter after incubation on M-PA-C agar medium. By streaking on cetrimide agar plates, it appeared as blue-green colonies on plates.

Molecular identification of bacterial isolates

The PCR-amplified products were separated into two unique fragments with varying molecular weights: R1 (818 bp) and R2 (1119 bp) Using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The nucleotide sequences of the two Egyptian strains were compared with strains from other regions using multiple sequence alignment (MSA). The NCBI GenBank database in the USA received nucleotide sequence submissions, which were given the accession numbers MK064165.1 and MK071734.1, respectively. Relying on MSA analysis, a phylogenetic tree was built to demonstrate the genetic relationships between the GenBank recorded strains of P. aeruginosa strain R2 and E. coli strain R1, as well as other recorded strains [13].

In vitro virulence ability

The ability to differentiate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria is based on the ability to bind CR dye in Congo red media, which is an essential phenotypic marker. Isolates that bind to CR dye in Congo red media generate red colonies, which are referred to be virulent isolates. When isolates lose their ability to attach to the CR, they lose their virulence and grow into white, yellow, or any colour other than red colonies. As shown in Table 1, Congo red was positive for 96% of P. aeruginosa isolates followed by E. coli (83%).

Table 1 Pathogenicity test for bacterial isolates from water resources

Antibiotic sensitivity test for bacterial isolates

Bacterial isolates were classified as sensitive (S), intermediate (I) or resistant (R) to each antibiotic type according to NCCLS/CCLS [19], as presented in Table 2. The Most of E. coli isolates collected from different sites were resistant to cephalothin and Clindamycin (94.4%) followed by Erythromycin (78.9%), Amoxycillin/Clavulanate and (72%), vancomycin (71%) and sensitive to Nitrofurantoin, chloramphenicol, Ofloxacin, sulfa/trimethoprim, Tetracycline and Kanamycin. All P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to cephalothin, Kanamycin, Erythromycin, Clindamycin, sulfa/trimethoprim, Nitrofurantoin, and chloramphenicol. This was followed by vancomycin (88%), Tetracycline and Amoxycillin/Clavulanate (72%) while they were sensitive to Ofloxacin.

Table 2 Resistance pattern of E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains against individual antibiotics

Multiple antibiotics resistance (MAR) index

Susceptibility of bacteria to different antibiotics (11 items) showed multiple antibiotics resistance (MAR) for the most of isolates. Calculations of MAR for individual bacterial species revealed that the most MAR values were recorded by P. aeruginosa (0.90) and then E. coli (0.45). Calculated MAR index values (above 0.25) classified the area of study as a potentially health-risk environment.

Detection of E. coli and P. aeruginosa phages

Bacteriophages specific for E. coli were isolated from Bahr El-Baqar Drain outlet (1), Manzala wetland: water pumping station (2), sedimentation basins (3), drying basins (4), surface flow basins (5), subsurface flow basins (6) and Manzala Lake (7) water. The results of the spot test technique showed bacterial lysis in the form of the spot area within the E. coli lawn. Similar results were obtained also for P. aeruginosa phages.

Characterization of the isolated phages

Morphological characteristics of virions

Electron microscopy of the isolated E. coli and P. aeruginosa phages particles revealed the three isolated coliphages and the three P. aeruginosa phages had an isometric head and tail. The bacteriophage resembles those of the Myoviridae and Siphoviridae families according to the International Committee on Taxonomy of viruses (ICTV) as shown in Table 3 and illustrated by Fig. 1.

Table 3 Morphological properties of six phage isolates specific for E. coli and P. aeruginosa as identified by TEM.
Fig. 1
figure 1

Electron micrographs of isolated phages negatively stained with uranyl acetate. (A) Coliphage isolates C1, C2 and C3, respectively. (B) P. aeruginosa phage isolates Ps1, Ps2 and Ps3, respectively

Host range of the isolated phages

Lysis of different strains of both E. coli and P. aeruginosa by the phage isolates C1, C2, C3 and Ps1, Ps2 and Ps3, respectively were examined by the spot test. Data revealed that phages C1, C2 and C3 lysed E. coli R1 and E. coliATCC 25,922 strains while failed to lyse E. coliATCC 10,536. On the other hand, the phages Ps1, Ps2 and Ps3 lysed P. aeruginosa R2 and P. aeruginosaATCC 27853strains as shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Host range pattern of the isolated phages to different strains of E. coli and P. aeruginosa

Thermal inactivation point (TIP) of the isolated phages

As represented in Fig. 2, E. coli phages as well as P. aeruginosa phages were affected by the heat and the rate of inhibition was increased portionaly with the heat degree. The TIP of E. coli C1phage was 90 oC, while it was 100 oC for C2 and C3. The TIP of the Ps1 phage was 90 oC, and it was 80 oC for both Ps2 and Ps3 phages.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Thermal inactivation point of the isolated phages specific for both E. coli and P. aeruginosa

Stability of the isolated phages to acidic and alkaline conditions

The effect of pH values of the medium on the phage activity was examined by the exposure of phage particles to pH from 4 to 12 for 1 h at 37oC. Results in Fig. 3 showed full inhibition was found in all phages when exposed to pH 4, 11 and 12. The optimum pH value for the phage activation was pH 7 for all phages. The phage particles tolerated the alkali media more than the acidic media.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of different pH values on phages infectivity

Effect of E.coli and P.aeruginosa phages on bacterial load in their aquatic environment

Application of E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacteriophages for reduction of both bacterial host numbers in drainage water of Bahr El-Baqar was carried out. Data presented in Figs. (4& 5) showed bacteriophages specific for E. coli reduced the total numbers of E. coli that naturally occurred in the drainage water with the rate of 16.7, 31.2, 54.2, 62.5, 81.3, 91.7 and 99.6% after 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h,12 and 24 h, respectively from the addition of the bacteriophages to the crude drain water. The addition of the phages specific for P. aeruginosa to the crude drain water with the rate of 0.001 ml to 1000 ml reduced the total number naturally occurred in the drainage water with the rate of 21.0, 91.5, 92.5, 97.0, 98.0, 98.5 and 99.5% after 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h,12 and 24 h, respectively.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Removal efficiency (%) for E. coli strains was gradually increasing in a time- dependent manner

Fig. 5
figure 5

Removal efficiency (%) for P. aeruginosa strains was gradually increasing in a time-dependent manner

Removal efficiency (%) for E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains was gradually increased in a time-dependent manner and peaked at 24 h post incubation with a phages cocktail. In wastewater samples, E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains revealed at least 99% reduction post 24 h of treatment with the mixture of phages. Data revealed that bacteriophages can be used to reduce bacterial load.

Discussion

Waterborne pathogenic bacteria, such as E. coli and P. aeruginosa in water streams continue to be one of the most serious public health concerns, owing to their high expense of removal via traditional techniques in sewage treatment plants, as well as their morbidity, mortality, and destruction of nature [27]. Current wastewater treatment activities have shifted away from physical and chemical technologies, in search of new ways to efficiently eradicate those deadly pathogenic microbes. Selectable phages have shown to be useful biological control agents because of their great specificity, and efficacy in eliminating their many targeting bacterial hosts [28, 29]. Lytic phages have proven to be beneficial in sewage treatment plants, especially in activated sludge processes. By eliminating the bacteria that cause foam, they could be employed as anti - foaming agents and sludge biomass removers.

The Congo red binding characteristic (Crb+), which is often employed as a measure of absorption and has been connected directly to pathogenicity and was widely used in vitro to investigate the pathogenicity of bacterial isolates [30]. Due to the presence of a close link between Congo red binding and hemin, which serves as an iron supply for the organisms, and protoporphyrin, the main component of the cell surface protein. Because of their structural similarity, they might be employed interchangeably to discriminate virulent and non-virulent isolates in solid media [31].

Certain Gram-negative bacteria isolates that are pathogenic attach the dye Congo red from solid agar media and generate red colonies (Crb+), while isolates that do not absorb the dye generate white colonies (Crb-) and are not pathogenic. In this study, among organisms with virulence associated with the ability to bind Congo red are E. coli and P. aeruginosa, these results are in agreement with the findings recorded by Mahgoub et al. [32]. The most pathogenic bacteria are P. aeruginosa followed by E. coli with 96% and 83% respectively. These findings suggested that all of the bacteria recovered were highly pathogenic, posing a significant risk to humans and the environment.

The antibiotic resistance of bacteria isolates was determined by calculating the total number and percentages of resistant bacterium isolates from water samples collected from various locations. Cephalothin resistance was observed for 97% of all bacterial isolates. Clindamycin 94.4%, erythromycin 77%, vancomycin 63%, nitrofurantoin 62%, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 57.2%, amoxycillin/clavulanic acid 54.4%, chloramphenicol 52.8%, kanamycin 47%, and tetracycline 33%. Finally, ofloxacin resistance was the lowest percentage, with only 16% of all bacterial isolates demonstrating resistance.

These findings are consistent with those of Mahgoub et al. [32], who found cephalothin resistance to be (98.2%), followed by clindamycin (95.2%), methicillin (91.7%), erythromycin (79.4%), tobramycin and chloramphenicol (66.2%), sulfa/trimethoprim (63.2%), and vancomycin (62.3%). Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) values for detected bacterial species obtained from water samples from various sites revealed that P. aeruginosa (0.87) had the highest MAR values, followed by E. coli (0.58). Krumperman [20] reported that MAR values greater than 0.25 indicated a substantial danger of pollution. Sadly, all of these estimated MAR scores were clearly over the high-risk level (0.25). According to the MAR index calculated at each sampling location, all the sites included in this investigation were at high hazard at various degrees.

In light of the previously discussed results from antibiotics susceptibility tests and measurement of MAR index values, it was clear that the pollution levels suggested by physicochemical and bacteriological analyses play a significant role in the incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and that the spread of these bacteria is dependent on pollution levels.

For identification and genetic level conformation, two bacterial isolates E. coli and P. aeruginosa were isolated from various locations in this study Bahr El-Baqar Drain and lake Manzala. DNA was isolated and amplified using the traditional PCR method with particular primer sequences for E. coli and P. aeruginosa 16s rDNA. Several studies have used the 16s rDNA sequence to investigate the genetic diversity of E. coli and P. aeruginosa isolates [32, 33, 7]. Using the DNAMAN tool, the sequences were matched to bacterial species in the GenBank database and identified as P. aeruginosa strain R2 (Accession No. MK071734.1) and E. coli strain R1 (Accession No. MK064165.1).

Mainly, phages are isolated from locations that serve as habitats for the host bacteria, such as sewage, soil, and water. According to our findings, the number and behaviour of phages were strongly influenced by the density of their hosts. After enrichment, phages specific for E. coli strains and P. aeruginosa strains were collected from all studied sites with concentrations ranging from 107 to 109 pfu ml− 1 for E. coli and 106 to 108 pfu ml− 1 for P. aeruginosa phages, respectively, and designed as C1 to C3 phages specific for E. coli and Ps1 to Ps3 phages specific for P. aeruginosa. these findings were similar to those reported by Mahgoub et al. [32], who collected sewage water from wastewater treatment plants (WTs) in Egypt’s El-Sharkia Governorate. On the other hand, the titre of phages for E. coli and P. aeruginosa that detected by El-Dougdoug et al. [33] which recorded 10 2 pfu ml− 1 was so far from these results, these differences due to the variance in density of bacteria specific to phages.

All isolated phages specific for E.coli and P.aeruginosa form a circular, clear plaque with a diameter from 1 to 5 mm, which is consistent with the findings of El-Dougdoug et al. [33], who found that all isolated phages from wastewater samples which collected from New Cairo, Gabal El-Asfar, and Helwan formed circular plaques with diameters ranging from 1 to 5 mm. C1, C2, and C3 are the names of the E. coli-specific phages while P. aeruginosa-specific phages were known as Ps1, Ps2, and Ps3. The single plaque isolation procedure was used to obtain a single plaque from these plaques. The bacteriophages were propagated using the liquid propagation method to obtain huge volumes of bacteriophage suspension. Finally, polyethylene glycol sedimentation was used to purify the generated bacteriophage stock lysates, yielding purified, concentrated bacteriophage stock lysate [32, 34]. After chemical purification, the high titer (1012 pfu/ml) of E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacteriophage stock produced was matched with those obtained by El-Dougdoug et al. [33].

The morphological characteristics of isolated phages revealed varied lengths by using TEM. According to the International Committee on Virus Taxonomy, all isolated phages belonged to the Siphoviridae and Myoviridae families. The laters contain a large number of phages that infect species of the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae groups, which agrees with our findings [32, 33, 7]. The host range of the isolated bacteriophage may be narrowly restricted within a bacterial species. According to the host range, all coliphages were lysosensible to E. coli R1 and E. coli ATCC 25,922. However, none of the separated phages was able to lyse E. coli ATCC 10,536. While all pseudomonas phages were able to lyse P. aeruginosa strain R2 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853. These findings were similar to those obtained by Mahgoub et al. [32].

In this study, most plaques were formed after heating at 40 oC. As the temperature increased, the vitality of phages decreased. Heat stability was found in all three E. coli phages. These findings were not matched with results obtained by Samhan et al. [35], who isolated three E. coli phages (ECP) from the Ismailia Canal Mostorod section that were heat sensitive. On the other hand, the infectivity of P. aeruginosa phages P2 and P3 was disappeared after a 10-minute exposure to 80 °C, while p1 not detected after a 10-minute exposure to 100 °C.

Six isolated phages of E. coli and P. aeruginosa were viable at different pH levels ranging from 5 to 10; these data are similar to those obtained by Samhan et al. [35]. The phages lost their viability at low pH levels due to The acid denaturation the of protein which caused the phage inactivation. Bacteriophages have been effectively used in the treatment of wastewater as biological agents or tracers for their specific bacterial hosts [8]. The effects of identified phages on reducing the viable count of E. coli and P. aeruginosa bacteria in sewage water samples were investigated. Bacterial infection with the examined phages was tracked for 24 h. The decline in bacteria achieved by phages was compared to a control group. With time, phage infection resulted in a significant reduction in E. coli and P. aeruginosa production. The removal efficiency (%) for E. coli and P. aeruginosa strains increased throughout time and peaked at 24 h after incubation with the phages cocktail. After 24 h of treatment with a mixture of phages, E. coli and P. aeruginosa microorganisms in wastewater samples showed a 99.5% reduction.

These results are compatible with Elbahnasawy et al. [7] who studied a new coliphage for biocontrol of MDR E. coli and coliforms in wastewater. Total and faecal coliforms were reduced by at least 30-fold in all water samples after 12 h of treatment with a combination of coliphages. Saad et al. [36] used bacteriophage to inactivate pathogenic bacteria from wastewater. The bacterial reduction rate is 5 times higher than that determined for the control filter. These results show the positive impact of the phage on bacterial inactivation and the improvement of water treatment.

Furthermore, numerous authors proposed that bacteriophages be used in conjunction with bacterial markers as a trustworthy sign of faecal contamination. It is now necessary to pay attention to its effectiveness in the control and lysis of harmful bacteria that outperform antibiotics.

Conclusion

This study discussed the diversity of phages and their potential role in improving water quality by reducing the number of pathogenic multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli and p. aeruginosa. Results demonstrated the high efficacy of lytic phages in controlling the growth of MDR E. coli and p. aeruginosa in drainage water of the Bahr el baqar drain. Our approach proved to be simple, fast, cost-effective, and specific for the reduction wide range of these strains, being important water-borne pathogens for public health. We recommend the use of advanced molecular techniques for the rapid and accurate identification of phages. In addition, the future production of commercial phage mix to utilize it as bacterial bio-control agents in different water resources. Hence, our study recommends the protection of surface water resources from pollution by enforcement of the actual application of LAW 48∕1982 regarding the protection of the river Nile and waterways from pollution.

Availability of data and materials

The sequence reads of E. coli and p. aeruginosa strains are available in GenBank under accession numbers MK064165 and MK071734 (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/nuccore/MK064165.1 and https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/nuccore/MK071734.1).

Abbreviations

BBD:

Bahr El-Baqr drain

MAR:

multiple antibiotic resistances

MDR:

multidrug-resistant

MDRGNB:

multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria

BCM:

billion cubic meters

CLEQM:

Central Laboratory for Environmental Quality Monitoring

NWRC:

National Water Research Center

CRA:

Congo Red Agar

TIP:

Thermal inactivation point

MSA:

multiple sequence alignment

NCCLS/CCLS:

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards/ Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

EMB:

Eosin Methylene Blue

mTEC:

membrane Thermotolerant E. coli

M-PA-C:

modified P. aeruginosa culture

References

  1. Aboulfotoh AM. Chemical enhancement of bahr el baqar drain in Egypt using alum, ferric chloride, cement. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2021; 12:1036–1045

  2. Fouad HA, Hefny RM, Kamel AM, Liethy MAE, Hemdan BA. Assessment of biological augmentation technology of hazardous pollutants existing in drainage water in Bahr El-Baqar drain, Egypt. Egypt J Chem. 2020;63(7):2551–63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Raslan AM, Riad PH, Hagras MA. 1D hydraulic modelling of Bahr El-Baqar new channel for northwest Sinai reclamation project, Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2020;11:971–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Troeger CE, Khalil IA, Blacker BF, Biehl MH, Albertson SB, Zimsen SRM, Rao PC, Abate D, Admasie A, Ahmadi A et al. Quantifying risks and interventions that have affected the burden of lower respiratory infections among children younger than 5 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. Infect. Dis 2020;(1):37–59 https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30401-3.

  5. Azzam IM, Safaa M, Ezzat MS, Othman AO, El-Dougdoug AK. Antibiotics resistance phenomenon and virulence ability in bacteriafrom water environment. Water Sci. 2017;31:109–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lupan I, Carpa R, Oltean A, Kelemen BS, Popescu O. Release of antibiotic resistant bacteria by a waste treatment plant from Romania. Microbes Environ. 2017;32(3):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Elbahnasawy MA, Sayed E, Azzam EE. Newly isolated coliphages for bio-controlling multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strains. Environ Nanatechnol Monit Manage. 2021;16:100542.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ezzat SM, Azzam MI. An approach using a novel phage mix for detecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa in water. Wat Environ J. 2020;34(2):189–202. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/wej.12452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikolich MP, Filippov AA. Bacteriophage Therapy: Developments and Directions. Antibiotics (Basel). Mar 24;9(3):135. doi: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics9030135 (2020).

  10. Clokie MRJ, Millard AD, Letarov AV, Heaphy S. Phages in nature. Bacteriophage. 2011;1:31–45. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4161/bact.1.1.14942.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Azzam MI, Ibrahim SS. Novel and rapid technology for dissecting and removing microbial community in aquatic environment. Egypt J of Appl Sci. 2021;36(7–8):85–204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.21608/ejas.2021.195273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American Public Health Association (APHA) and American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF): Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd (Edn.), American Public Health Association, Washington., 2017.

  13. Soliman RM, Othman BA, Shoman SA, Gado MM, Azzam MI. Assessment of Bahr El-Baqar Drain and its environmental impact on Manzala Lake in Egypt. J Ecol Nat Resour. 2022;ISSN:2578–4994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tripathi P, Banerjee G, Gupta M, Saxena S, Ramteke PW. Assessment of phylogenetic affiliation using 16s rRNA gene sequence analysis for P. aeruginosa in patients of lower respiratory tract infection. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138(4):557–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Azzam MI, Korayem AS, Othman SA, Mohammed FA. Assessment of some drinking water plants effciency at El-Menofeya Governorate, Egypt. Environ Nano Monit & Mang. 2022;18:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol Jul. 2016;33(7):1870–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Berkhoff HA, Vinal AC. Congo red medium to distinguish between invasive and non-invasive E. coli pathogenic for poultry. Avian Dis. 1986;30:117–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards/ Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (NCCLS/CLSI): Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Seventeenth informational supplement, M2-A9 and M7-A7, Wayne. P.A., U.S.A. 2017.

  20. Krumperman PH. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to indentify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;46:165–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hinton M, Hedges AJ, Linton AH. The ecology of E. coli in market calves fed a milk substitute diet. J. Appl. Bateriol., 58: 27–35. Inno 26: 102332 (1985).

  22. Adams MH. Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience Publishers; 1959.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Othman BA, Askora AA, Awny NM, Abo- Senna AS. Characterization of virulent bacteriophages for Streptomyces griseoflavus isolated from soil. Pak. J. Biotechnol. 5, 109–119. patients of lower respiratory tract infection. Indian patients of lower respiratory tract infection. Indian Journal of Medical Research 138(4): 557–559 (2008).

  24. Othman BA. Isolation of lambdoid bacteriophage β4 EC from sewage polluted drinking water. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of Microbiology, Cairo, pp. 25–27 (1997).

  25. Srinivasan P, Ramasamy P, Brennan GP, Hanna REB. Inhbitory effects of bacterophages on the growth of Vibrio sp. pathogens of shrimp in the Indian agaculture environment, Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2,166 – 83. to evaluate water quality spatial and temporal variation (2007).

  26. Jamalludeen N, Johnson P, Robert F, Kropinski A, Erika J, Gyles C. Isolation and characterization of nine bacteriophages that lyse O149 enterotoxigenic E. coli. Veti Microbiol. 2007;124:47–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jassim SA, Limoges RG, El-Cheikh H. Bacteriophage biocontrol in wastewater treatment. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32 (4), 70. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11274-016-2028-1. Journal of Medical Research 138(4): 557–559. kiln dust and fly ash. J Mater Environ Sci 12(8): 1036 (2016).

  28. Zhang Y, Hu Z. Combined treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms with bacteriophages and chlorine. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110(1):286–95. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/bit.24630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wagemans J, Tsonos J, Holtappels D, Fortuna K, Hernalsteens J, De Greve H, Estrozi L, Bacia-Verloop M, Moriscot C, Noben J, Schoehn G, Lavigne R. Structural analysis of jumbo coliphage phAPEC6. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3119):1–13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21093119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Swaminathan TR, Chandran ND, Dorairajan N. Virulence attributes of E. coli associated with colisepticaemic chickens. Ind J Anim Sci. 2004;74:248–52.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ewers C, Janssen T, Kiessling S, Philipp HC, Wieler LH. Molecular epidemiology of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) isolated from colisepticemia in poultry. Vet Microbiol. 2004;104:91–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahgoub SA, Muhammad MIS, Abd-Elsalam ST, Alkhazindar MM, Abdel-Shafy HI. Isolation and characterization of pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococcus faecalis lytic bacteriophages from wastewater for controlling multidrug resistant bacterial strains. Plant Archives Vol. 20, Supplement 2, pp. 450–464 (2020).

  33. El-Dougdoug NK, Nasr-Eldin MA, Azzam MI, Mohamed AA, Hazaa MM. Improving Wastewater Treatment using dried Banana Leaves and Bacteriophage Cocktail. Egypt J Bot Vol. 2020;60(1):199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sundaram A, Dhevagi P. A novel approach for pathogen reduction in wastewater treatment. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2013;11:2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Samhan FA, Askora AA, Ezzat SM, Abu El-Nil EI. Differential Effects of Physical and Chemical factors on infectivity of three coliphages used as Water Quality Indicator. Egypt J Microbiol. 2016;51:45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Saad M, Said M, Bousselmi L, Ghrabi A. Use of bacteriophage to inactivate pathogenic bacteria from wastewater. J Environ Sci Health Part A. 2022. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/10934529.2022.2036551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dept. of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams Univ.; Dept. of Agric. Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams Univ.; Dept. of Microbiology, Central Laboratory for Environmental Quality Monitoring (CLEQM) at National Water Research Center (NWRC), Egypt for their support.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Rabab M. Soliman, and Mohamed I. Azzam designed the study and preformed the experiments. Badawi A. Othman and Sahar A. Shoman analyzed the data. Rabab M. Soliman, Mohamed I. Azzam and Marwa M. Gado wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabab M. Soliman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soliman, R.M., Othman, B.A., Shoman, S.A. et al. Biocontrol of multi-drug resistant pathogenic bacteria in drainage water by locally isolated bacteriophage. BMC Microbiol 23, 118 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-02847-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-023-02847-4

Keywords