Skip to main content

Isolation of nematophagous fungi from soil samples collected from three different agro-ecologies of Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Several species of nematophagous fungi exist in nature that can capture and kill nematodes as natural predators of soil-dwelling worms. These are important in agriculture and animal husbandry as biological control agents. The diversity of nematophagous fungi found from soil had not been studied in Ethiopia.

Objective

This study aimed to isolate Nematophagous Fungi from Soil Samples Collected From three Different Agro-Ecologies of Ethiopia.

Methods

Cross-sectional study was conducted and samples were collected from three different agro-climatic zones of Ethiopia; Debre-Berhan (highland), Bishoftu (mid-altitude), and Awash (lowland). Twenty-seven soil samples were randomly taken from each of the three different agro-ecological climates (9 from each agro-ecological climatic zone). For each study site, samples were collected from the soil of decomposed animal feces/dung, agricultural/farmlands, and forest lands in triplicates.

Results

The present study disclosed that nematophagous fungi were widespread from the study area. A total of 33 species of nematophagous fungi belonging to four genera, Arthrobotryes, Paecilomyces, Monacrosporium, and Harposporium were identified. Arthrobotrys were the most commonly isolated genera followed by Paecilomyces. The six identified species were Arthrobotrys oligospora, Paecilomyces lilacinus, Arthrobotryes dactyloides, Monacosporum eudermatum, Harposporium helicoides, and Monacosporum cionopagum.

Conclusion

This study indicated that Arthrobothryes oligospora was the most common species in Bishoftu and Awash whereas. In Debre-Berhan, Paecilomyces lilacinus was the most prevalent species. Monacosporum cionapagum was not isolated from dung soil and agricultural soil whereas Harposporium helicoides and Arthrobothryes dactyloides were not found from dung and forest soil respectively.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastrointestinal nematodes in grazing animals produce significant productivity losses and are a worldwide animal welfare issue. Repeated use of anthelmintics to control helminth infection frequently led to the development of drug resistance [1]. Resistance to all classes of broad-spectrum anthelmintics has already been reported [2]. As time has passed problems of multi-resistance to more than one class have occurred and the multi-resistant nematode has become a major threat to the whole small ruminant industry [3].

Due to the failure of anthelmintic drenches, many scholars have been underway for the past 25 years to have alternatives to chemical control [4]. The demand for the development of alternatives such as biological control agents is expanding for both animal and plant helminth pathogens [5]. The use of biological control methods such as nematode-trapping fungi, diets high in condensed tannins and other plant materials, as well as other nutritional approaches have all been examined as possible approaches to reduce the impact of nematode parasites in domestic livestock [4].

Biological control is a method in which biological agents can be used to reduce the population of parasites either on pasture or in the host and by so doing minimize the frequency of anthelmintic usage [6]. One example of biological control against gastrointestinal nematodes is the use of some species of soil-derived fungi (Nematophagous fungi). These fungi have the potential to reduce nematode larval populations on pasture by using these either as their main source of nutrients or as a supplement to a saprophytic existence [7]. Natural feeders of gastrointestinal nematodes, nematophagous fungus, have received a lot of attention because of their potential importance as biological control agents for nematodes that parasitize plants, animals, and humans [8,9,10]. They are micro-fungi that can capture, kill, and digest nematodes [11] and hence are natural predators of soil-dwelling nematodes [12].

Based on their mechanism of action or killing process Nematophagus fungus is grouped into four classes (endoparasitic fungi, nematode-trapping fungi, egg parasitizing fungi, and toxin-producing fungi) [13,14,15]. Nematophagous fungi have the potential to reduce pasture contamination by reducing the numbers of larvae in and around dung due to their ability to kill nematodes in the niches occupied by juvenile (larval) stages of parasites [16]. They are found in terrestrial and aquatic environments. However, they are mostly concentrated in the upper part of the soil, in pastures, leaf litter, mangroves, and certain shallow water bodies [17, 18]. Therefore, it can be relatively easy to isolate nematophagous fungi, particularly from soils and organic matter.

Despite the aforementioned advantages of Nematophagus fungi and as far as available literature is concerned, no study has ever attempted in Ethiopia to isolate and characterize nematophagous fungi, which can be used as potential biological agents against helminth parasites of livestock. Therefore, this study aimed to isolate Nematophagous Fungi from Soil Samples Collected From three Different Agro-Ecologies of Ethiopia.

Methods

Study area and period

Samples for this research work were collected from three different agro-climatic zones of Ethiopia; Debre-Berhan (highland), Bishoftu (mid-altitude), and Awash (lowland) (Fig. 1). Debre-Berhan is the city of north Shewa zone of the Amhara region. It is about 120 km northeast of Addis Ababa with an altitude of 2,780 m above sea level. This is a mountainous area dissected by rivers and streams. The average annual rainfall in the region is 920 mm, while the average monthly minimum and maximum ranges of air temperature vary between 2.4 °C and 8.5 °C and 18 °C to 23.3 °C respectively. The average soil temperature at 5 cm depth is 13.6 °C. The second study area, Bishoftu, is found around 44 km southeast of Addis Ababa and it has an elevation of about 1,878 m above sea level (mid-altitude). The area experiences a bimodal rainfall pattern with a short rainy season from February to April and the long rainy season from the middle of June to the end of September. The remaining months are dry periods. The area gets an annual average rainfall of 892 mm and the average annual temperature is 18.7 °C. The third study site, Awash, is located in Administrative Zone three of the Afar Region, above a gorge on the Awash River, after which the town is named. Awash Fentale District is a pastoral area in Afar National Regional State found 225 km northeast of Addis Ababa. The elevation of the area is between 736 and 801 m above sea level, of which 90% are pastoralists and 10% are agro-pastoralist areas. People in the region, therefore, depend mainly on livestock production for their livelihood [19]. The lowlands are generally characterized by relatively high temperatures, drought, and fragile arid and semiarid ecology [20].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of a study area

Collection and storage of soil samples

Isolation of nematophagous fungi was conducted from November 2019 to January 2020. To isolate the nematophagous fungi, 27 soil samples were randomly taken from each of the three different agro-ecological climates (9 from each agro-ecological climatic zone). For each study site, samples were collected from the soil of decomposed animal feces/dung, agricultural/farmlands, and forest lands in triplicates. The Geographic coordinates (location) and altitudes of the sampling site were measured by a Graphical positioning System (GPS) (see Additional file 1). From each site, approximately 250 g of soil sample was collected from the surface to the depth of 5 cm by an auger. To avoid cross-contamination, the auger was sterilized by dipping it in ethanol between sampling points. These sampled soils were collected in a closed sterile polythene bag and labeled, properly stored in the icebox, and brought to the laboratory, then processed within the subsequent day of collection [21].

Isolation of nematophagous fungi

All laboratory works were conducted in the Microbiology laboratory located in the College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture in Addis Ababa University.

Culturing

Isolation of the nematophagous fungi was done using the soil sprinkle technique [22]. Using chloramphenicol-2% water agar (CHF-WA) medium, primary isolation of nematophagous fungi was achieved. The prepared agar was dispensed into 10 cm diameter Petri dishes. The 2 g soil samples were distributed in the center of Petri dishes containing the water–agar medium with 0.05% concentration of chloramphenicol. Then, 1 ml of live Haemonchus contortus third-stage larvae (obtained from Veterinary parasitological laboratory in College of Veterinary Medicine in Addis Ababa University) was added as bait, and the Petri dishes were incubated at 27 °C and monitored daily under a stereomicroscope for 10 days.

Sub-culturing

After 10 days of culturing, fragments of the culture were transferred to Petri dishes containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium with chloramphenicol until pure fungal cultures were obtained [23]. Then a fragment of agar was cut from the periphery of actively growing culture using a sterile scalpel blade with a handle. Then the fragment was transferred to new plates, 1 ml of resuspended Haemonchus contortus larvae was added. Finally, we follow until the fungus forms a trapping structure and conidia. The nematophagous fungus was grown for two weeks in commercial PDA at 25 °C to detect conidia and morphology of trapping structure of nematophagous fungi species [10]. The morphology of the trapping device and conidia which were characterized by BRIC (2014) was used to aid the identification of nematophagous fungi. Actively growing cultures in Petridis plates were then examined under both the binocular dissecting microscope and the compound microscope. Characteristics such as nodular development, branching, and conidia were noted with this type of examination. Conidium shape was then determined by making temporary mounts in lactophenol-cotton blue.

Staining

Lactophenol cotton blue is a stain that is used to examine fungal elements following either a tape preparation or a scraping. This stain contains phenol that kills the organisms, lactic acid that preserves fungal structures, and cotton blue that stains the chitin found in the fungal cell walls. The microscopic fungal morphology was used to identify nematophagous fungi. Four-step activities were conducted to accomplish such tasks. First, a drop of lactophenol cotton blue solution was added on a clean slide after that a small amount of fungal culture (mycelial mat) was removed from the edge (young colonies) by using one sterilized needle, and fungal culture was prepared on the slide by using the second needle to tease out the fungal structures then the coverslip was gently placed on the slide by lowering it down and avoiding air bubbles, finally the identification of nematophagous fungi species was conducted based on the morphology of trapping structures and conidia by high objective power of compound microscope [24, 25]. Material requirements and procedures for lactophenol cotton blue staining materials are available (see Additional file 2). In the end, the isolated fungi were identified at both the genus and species level based on their morphological characters and microscopic analysis.

Determination of soil moisture

To determine the moisture content of the soil sample, two aluminum foils were prepared and their empty weight was taken. An aliquot of approximately 50 g of moist soil was placed into each aluminum foil and was reweighed. The soil was dried overnight at 105 °C in the oven. After allowing the dishes to cool, the soil sample within the dish was weighed to know the weight of the dry soil. Then the moisture content was calculated by the following formula [26].

$$\% \,moisture\,content\, = \,\tfrac{(Weight\,of\,moist\,soil)\,\, - \,\,(weight\,of\,dry\,soil)}{{Weight\,of\,dry\,soil}}$$

Data analysis

Data on the presence or absence of the different types and numbers of nematophagous fungi was entered into Microsoft Office Excel 2007 software, and STATA 14 was used for descriptive analysis such as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square test was used to determine the presence of an association between soil sample type, soil moisture, and agro-ecological climates, and P values ≤ 0.05 were considered as a significant association.

Results

Isolation of fungal species

In this study, a total of thirty-three nematophagous fungal isolates of four genera and six fungal species were obtained from three different soil samples (dung, forest, and agricultural soil samples) taken from three different agro-ecological zones (Debre-Berhan, Bishoftu, and Awash) (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of isolated fungal Species from each location with Soil samples

The four genera identified in this study were Arthrobotrys, Paecilomyces, Monacrosporium, and Harposporium. Arthrobotrys was the most widely isolated genera with an occurrence of 51.5% followed by Paecilomyces with an occurrence of 30.3%. Except for Harposporium which was not isolated from lowland samples (Awash), all the three genera prevail in all agro-ecologies. Arthrobotrys were more prevalent in soil samples from Awash and Bishoftu areas, which represent lowlands and mid-altitudes respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Occurrence of four genera of nematophagous fungi in three agro-ecologies

Species of nematophagous fungi by agro-ecological zone and sample type

Based on the morphological characterization of fungal conidia, the six species of nematophagous fungus isolated in this study were Arthrobotrys oligospora, A. dactyloides, Paecilomyces lilacinus, Monacrosporium cionopagum, M. eudermatum, and Harposporium helicoides. Arthrobotrys oligospora was the most commonly detected species with an occurrence of 36.4% followed by Paecilomyces lilacinus with 30.3%. The dominant species from the lowland Awash and midland Bishoftu areas were A. oligospora and P. lilacinus whereas, in Debre-Berhan (highland), P. lilacinus and A. dactyloides were more available than others. A. oligosporawas is commonly found in dung and forest soils in Awash and Bishoftu whereas P. lilacinus was better isolated from dung soil of Awash and dung and forest soils of the Debre-Berhan area. A. dactyloides is abundant in agri-soil of the highland category (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of fungal species by soil sample and study area

Association between soil moisture and isolated fungal species

The moisture content of the soil samples ranged between 1% and 14.8% (2.2%-14.8% for dung soil, 1%-7.5% for agri-soil, and 1%-5.9% for forest soil), dung soil being at a higher frequency in the moisture content category of ≥ 7% (P = 0.0001, Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Distribution of fungal species by soil sample and soil moisture content

On the other hand, 23 (69.7%) fungal species were identified from soil samples that had moisture content less than or equal to 7% whereas the remaining 30.3% inhabited soils with moisture content above 7% (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Distribution of fungal species by soil sample and soil moisture content

A. oligospora and P. lilacinus were common in both categories of soil moisture in general and in the lowland in particular (Fig. 6). Despite these facts, there is no appreciable effect of soil moisture on the occurrence of the different species of fungi (P > 0.05).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Prevalence of fungal species in study sites with two soil moisture categories

Discussion

Soil harbors a diverse range of fungi and many of them are rivals of nematodes. At the same time, many economically important nematode parasites of livestock spend much of their life cycle in soil, foliage, or dung. In these environments, they are particularly vulnerable to a wide range of soil-borne nematophagous fungi that kill nematodes after they have trapped them, or have been ingested as spores [27].

Different study findings support our study (Table 2). This study has demonstrated that nematophagous fungi were widespread in occurrence and their diversity differs from one agro-ecological climate zone to the other. This is consistent with a study by Gray NF, which revealed nematophagous fungi have an extensive worldwide distribution, in all climates, and habitats [17]. It is also in line with a previous study from China [28,29,30] that reported the presence of nematophagous fungi in a wide range of environments.

Table 2 Previous study findings on the isolation of Nematophagus fungi

In this study, four major genera, Arthrobotrys, Paecilomyces, Monacrosporium, and Harposporium were isolated from the three agro-ecologies and three soil sources. Studies from different countries support our study findings [23, 31].

The study at hand revealed that Arthrobotrys oligosporawas are the most dominant species of nematophagous fungus. It had the characteristics of the ability to form adhesive trapping nets when in contact with nematodes. It was isolated from compost/decomposed dung soil, agricultural soil, and forest soil with an overall frequency of 36.36%. This result may be indicating that Arthrobotryes oligospora were best adapted to the biotic and abiotic conditions of many areas. Another possible reason may be related to its high saprophytic ability and the increased agricultural intensification caused by soil disturbance and the addition of fertilizers. Similar results have been reported in South Africa [32, 33], Kenya [34, 35], China [14, 36,37,38], and Oman [39].

The greatest diversity of nematophagous fungi species was recorded in midland (Bishoftu). This is maybe due to suitable/optimum environmental conditions (temperature, rainfall, moisture, and light) and land morphology. From low land (Awash), they are least diverse perhaps due to their high temperature, drought, scarce rainfall, fragile arid and semi-arid ecology, and minimum land disturbance/ cultivation or far miming activity. In Debre Berhan, the nematophagous species were more diverse than lowland/Awash and less diverse than the midland due to the conducive environmental condition [35].

This study also examined the relation of soil type and soil moisture on the distribution of nematophagous fungi. The interaction of soil type with nematophagous fungi species indicated that the highest percentage was obtained from dung soil, which is known to be rich in organic matter. This is maybe due to the presence of macronutrients (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium) from compost and the presence of nematodes that are excreted with animal feces.

In this study, Arthrobotryes oligospora was the most abundant in forest and dung soils, compared to agricultural soil suggesting an abundance of organic matter in such soils and the preference of these conidia forming fungal species for such types of soils. As different scholars revealed [38, 40], Nitrogen, Phosphorous, Potassium, Iron and nematode density affect the distribution of nematophagous fungal species.

The current study has demonstrated that the moisture content of the soil sample had no significant difference with the fungal species isolated. The dominant species, Arthrobothrys oligospora was the most common in both categories of soil moisture examined. Such characteristics vary with species of the fungi [41], working on fungal species Hirsutella Minnesotans have reported that the species has a greater potential to multiply and control pest nematodes in cooler, drier, and heavier soils.

Despite it being the first, this study is not without limitations since we did not assess the molecular characterization and the efficacy of the nematophagous fungi. Therefore, further experimental studies should be conducted on the identification, molecular characterization, and efficacy of nematophagous fungi. Besides, optimum growth conditions should be studied for mass culturing of nematophagous fungi to use for the commercial purpose of biological controlling of nematode parasites. Furthermore, when evaluating fungal prevalence at soil moisture level, we did not take into account other environmental parameters such as soil organic matter, carbon, and other nutrients.

Conclusion

The study has confirmed that nematophagous fungi were widely distributed in the study agro-ecological climatic zones but differ in their diversity. The in vitro experimental study was conducted from PDA and WA (2%) by using Haemonchus contortus as the bait. This study isolates a total of 33 nematophagous species which are grouped into four genera and six species. The genera were Arthrobotrys, Paecilomyces, Monacrosporium, and Harposporium. On the other hand, the species identified were Arthrobothryes oligospora, Arthrobotrys dactyloides, Harposporium helicoides, Monacrosporium cionopagum, Monacosporum eudermatum, and Paecilomyces lilacinus. Among these, the distribution of Arthrobothryes oligospora was the highest but Monacosporum cionopagum was the lowest. The interaction of soil type with nematophagous fungi species indicated the highest percentage was obtained from dung soil. This study has demonstrated that the Arthrobotrys oligospora was the most common in each category of soil moisture examined. However, the moisture content of the soil sample had no significant difference with the fungal species isolated. Further experimental studies on the identification, molecular characterization, and efficacy of nematophagous fungus are recommended by the authors. Furthermore, optimal growth conditions for mass culturing of nematophagous fungi should be investigated to employ them commercially for biological nematode parasite control.

Availability of data and materials

All result-based data is in the paper and anyone can access the data set from the corresponding author (maradonaber02@gmail.com).

Abbreviations

AR:

Anthelmintic Resistance

AOL:

Arthrobotrys oligospora Lectin

BCA:

Biological Control Agent

BW:

Body Weight

CSA:

Central Statistical Agency

CMA:

Corn Meal Agar

CHF-WA:

Chloramphenicol Water Agar

ECM:

Extracellular Matrix

GIN:

Gastro-Intestinal Nematodes

GIT:

Gastro-Intestinal Tract

NMSA:

National Metrology Service Agency

NTF:

Nematode Trapping Fungus

PCR:

Polymerase Chain Reaction

PDA:

Potato Dextrose Agar

WA:

Water Agar

References

  1. Terefe G, Lacroux C, Andreoletti O, Grisez C, Prevot F, Bergeaud JP, et al. Immune response to Haemonchus contortus infection in susceptible (INRA 401) and resistant (Barbados Black Belly) breeds of lambs. Parasite Immunol. 2007;29:415–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sissay MM, Asefa A, Uggla A, Waller PJ. Anthelmintic resistance of nematode parasites of small ruminants in eastern Ethiopia : Exploitation of refugia to restore anthelmintic efficacy. Vet Parasitol. 2006;135:337–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morton CO, Hirsch PR, Peberdy JP, Kerry BR. Cloning of and genetic variation in protease VCP1 from the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia. Mycol Res. 2003;107:38–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford AM, Paterson KA, Dodds KG, Tascon CD, Williamson PA, Thomson MR, et al. Discovery of quantitative trait loci for resistance to parasitic nematode infection in sheep: I Analysis of outcross pedigrees. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grønvold J, Henriksen SA, Larsen M, Nansen P, Wolstrup J. Biological control. Aspects of biological control - with special reference to arthropods, protozoans and helminths of domesticated animals. Vet Parasitol. 1996;64:47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eilenberg J, Hajek A, Lomer C. Suggestions for unifying the terminology in biological control. Biocontrol. 2001;46:387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harman GE. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathol. 2006;96:190–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jansson H-B, Persson C, Odeslius R. Growth and capture activities of nematophagous fungi in soil visualized by low temperature scanning electron microscopy. Mycologia. 2000;92:10–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanyal PK. Screening for Indian isolates of predacious fungi for use in biological control against nematode parasites of ruminants. Vet Res Commun. 2000;24(1):55–62.

  10. Ghahfarokhi MS, Abyaneh MR, Bahadori SR, Eslami A, Zare R, Ebrahimi M. Screening of soil and sheep faecal samples for predacious fungi: Isolation and characterization of the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora. Iran Biomed J. 2004;8:135–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hsueh YP, Mahanti P, Schroeder FC, Sternberg PW. Nematode-trapping fungi eavesdrop on nematode pheromones. Curr Biol. 2013;23:83–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brudzynski SM. Social origin of vocal communication in rodents. 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Nordbring-Hertz, B., Jansson, H.-B. and Tunlid, A. Nematophagous Fungi. In eLS, (Ed.). 2011. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/9780470015902.a0000374.pub3.

  14. Niu XM, Zhang KQ. Arthrobotrys oligospora: A model organism for understanding the interaction between fungi and nematodes. Mycology. 2011;2:59–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hay FS, Niezen JH, Ridley GS, Bateson L, Miller C, Robertson H. The influence of pasture species and time of deposition of sheep dung on infestation by nematophagous fungi. Appl Soil Ecol. 1997;6:181–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grønvold J, Wolstrup J, Henriksen SA, Nansen P. Field experiments on the ability of Arthrobotrys oligospora (Hyphomycetales) to reduce the number of larvae of Cooperia oncophora (Trichostrongylidae) in cow pats and surrounding grass. J Helminthol. 1987;61(1):65–71.

  17. Gray NF. Nematophagous fungi with particular reference to their ecology. Biol Rev - Cambridge Philos Soc. 1987;62:245–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Suckling DM. Benefits from biological control of weeds in New Zealand range from negligible to massive: a retrospective analysis. Biological Control. 2013;66(1):27–32.

  19. CSA (Central Statistical Agency G of E. Summary and Statistical Report of the Population and Housing Census: Population Size by Age and Sex. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Workne H. Analysis of technical efficiency of the Ethiopian agro-processing industry. the case of Biscuit and pasta processing unit(Doctorial dissertation, AAU). 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fowler M. New zealand predacious fungi. New Zeal J Bot. 1970;8:283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaffee BA, Muldoon AE, Westerdahl BB. Failure of a mycelia formulation of the nematophagous fungus Hirsutella rhossiliensis to suppress the nematode Heterodera schachtii. Biol Control. 1996;6:340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saumell CA, Fernández AS, Fusé LA, Rodríguez M, Sagüés MF, Iglesias LE. Nematophagous fungi from decomposing cattle faeces in Argentina. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2015;32:252–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Domsch, K.H., Gams, W. and Anderson THL. Compendium of Soil Fungi. Acad Press London. 1980.

  25. Van Oorschot CA. Taxonomy of the Dactylaria comlex, V. A review of Arthrobotrys and allied genera. Stud Mycol. 1985;26:61–96.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Haney RL, Haney EB. Simple and rapid laboratory method for rewetting dry soil for incubations. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2010;41:1493–501.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barron GLX. Nematophagous fungi: Endoparasites of Rhabditis terricola. Microb Ecol. 1977;4:157–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hao Y, Mo M, Su HY, Zhang K. Ecology of aquatic nematode-trapping hyphomycetes in southwestern China. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2005;40:175–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Swe A, Li J, Zhang KQ, Pointing SB, Jeewon R, Hyde KD. Nematode-trapping fungi. Curr Res Environ Appl Mycol. 2011;1:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swe A, Jeewon R, Hyde KD. Nematode-trapping fungi from Arthrobotrys mangrove habitats. Cryptogam Mycol. 2008;28:333–54.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shams Ghahfarokhi M, RazzaghiAbyaneh M, RanjbarBahadori S, Eslami A, Zare R, Ebrahimi M. Screening of Soil and Sheep Faecal Samples for Predacious Fungi: Isolation and Characterization of the Nematode-Trapping Fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora. Iran Biomed J. 2004;8:135–42.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Durand DT, Boshoff HM, Michael LM, Krecek RC. Survey of nematophagous fungi in South Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2005;72:185–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Farrell FC, Jaffee BA, Strong DR. The nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora in soilof the Bodega marine reserve: distribution and dependence on nematode parasitized moth larvae. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:1422–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wachira PM, Okoth S, Kimenju J, Mibey RK. Influence of land use and soil management practices on the occurrence of nematode destroying fungi in Taita Taveta. Kenya Trop Subtrop Agroecosystems. 2009;10:213–23.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wairimu WJ. Diversity of naturally occurring nematode destroying fungi and their interaction with soil amendments in banana farms in Meru and Embu counties. Dr Diss Univ Nairobi. 2016;:1–99.

  36. Yang Y, Yang E, An Z, Liu X. volution of nematode-trapping cells of predatory fungi of the Orbiliaceae based on evidence from rRNA-encoding DNA and multiprotein seqvolution of nematode-trapping cells of predatory fungi of the Orbiliaceae based on evidence from rRNA-encoding DNA and m. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:8379–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Swe A, Jeewon R, Pointing SB, Hyde KD. Diversity and aboundance of nematode-traping fungi from decaying litter interristerial, freshwater and man grove. Biodivers Conserv. 2009;18:1695–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jaffee BA. wood, nematodes and the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotryes oligospora. Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36:1171–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Elshafie AE, Al-Mueini R, Al-Bahry SN, Akindi AY, Mahmud I, Al-Rawahi SH. Diversity and trapping efficiency of nematophagous fungi from Oman. Mediterr Phytopathol union. 2006;45:266–70.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mo MH, Chen WM, Yang HR, Zhang KQ. Diversity and metal tolerance of nematode-trapping fungi in Pb-polluted soils. J Microbiol. 2008;46:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xiang M, Xiang PA, Liu X, Zang L. Effect of enviroment on the aboundance and the activity of the nematophagous fungi Hirsutella Minnesotensis in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;71:413–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge Haile-eyesus Dejene and Getinet Ayalew for their invaluable help while conducting this research work. Besides, we want to appreciate and acknowledge Muluken Tekle for his great contribution, both technically and scientifically, while doing our work in the laboratory room.

Funding

This research was funded by the graduate programs’ research support of Addis Ababa University and the BiOCON thematic research project being funded by the Office of the Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer of the University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MB initiated the research concept, analyzed the data, presented and interpreted the results, and wrote up the draft manuscript. HW, GM, and GT were involved in the analysis, interpretation, and reviewing the final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maradona Berhanu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent participate

Ethical clearance for the study was given by the Animal research ethical review Committee of Addis Ababa University, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary file 1.

Geographic coordinates (GPS location) andaltitude of the sampling site.

Additional file 2: Supplementary File 2.

Material requirement and procedures for lactophenol cotton bluestaining materials.

Additional file 3: Supplementary file 3. 

Microscopic morphology of isolated nematophagous fungal conidia(A) Arthrobotryes oligospora (pear-shapedtwo celled conidia, distal cell is smaller than the proximal); (B) Monacosporium eudermatum (ellipsoidal conidia with sharp ended);(C) Monacrosporium cionopagum(apicalmulticellular conidia with somewhat arrow ends); (D) Harposporium helicoides(curved conidia with barbed ends); (E) Paecilomyces lilacinus (Conidia areellipsoid in shape and are single celled conidiophores develop in group oflateral branches from which each 2-4 bottle shaped phialides grow); (F) Arthrobotrys dactyloides (two celledconidia, proximal and distal cells has almost equal size), (G) L3 of Haemonchus contortus trapped by nematode trapping fungi.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berhanu, M., Waktole, H., Mamo, G. et al. Isolation of nematophagous fungi from soil samples collected from three different agro-ecologies of Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol 22, 159 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-022-02572-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12866-022-02572-4

Keywords

  • Nematophagous fungi
  • Nematode
  • Agroecology
  • Soil