Skip to main content

Advertisement

The spent culture supernatant of Pseudomonas syringae contains azelaic acid

Article metrics

Abstract

Background

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (PSA) is an emerging kiwifruit bacterial pathogen which since 2008 has caused considerable losses. No quorum sensing (QS) signaling molecule has yet been reported from PSA and the aim of this study was to identify possible intercellular signals produced by PSA.

Results

A secreted metabolome analysis resulted in the identification of 83 putative compounds, one of them was the nine carbon saturated dicarboxylic acid called azelaic acid. Azelaic acid, which is a nine-carbon (C9) saturated dicarboxylic acid, has been reported in plants as a mobile signal that primes systemic defenses. In addition, its structure,(which is associated with fatty acid biosynthesis) is similar to other known bacterial QS signals like the Diffusible Signal Facor (DSF). For these reason it could be acting as s signal molecule. Analytical and structural studies by NMR spectroscopy confirmed that in PSA spent supernatants azelaic acid was present. Quantification studies further revealed that 20 μg/L of were present and was also found in the spent supernatants of several other P. syringae pathovars. The RNAseq transcriptome study however did not determine whether azelaic acid could behave as a QS molecule.

Conclusions

This study reports of the possible natural biosynthesis of azelaic acid by bacteria. The production of azelaic acid by P. syringae pathovars can be associated with plant-bacteria signaling.

Background

Bacteria produces and secretes an array of low molecular weight secondary metabolites; in most cases their function remains unknown. Several have been implicated in signaling, as having in vitro antimicrobial activity or being involved in host-pathogen interactions. The production of small low molecular weight microbially produced molecules is also hugely exploited by many private companies around the world [1, 2].

It is now known that bacteria produces and senses a variety of small signals that enable them to act coordinately as a community in a process known as quorum sensing (QS) [3, 4]. In the last 20 years, many bacterial species have been reported to produce QS signals and it is reasonable to assume that most, if not all, use small chemical compounds to communicate with their neighborhood [5,6,7].

In the Pseudomonas group of phytopathogens, QS is a common regulatory mechanism. It occurs commonly via the LuxI/LuxR circuit, which produces and responds to N-acylhomoserine lactone (AHL) signals. LuxI-family proteins are the signal synthases that are responsible for producing AHLs, whereas LuxR-family members are the AHL-responsive cytoplasmic DNA-binding transcriptional activators. The LuxR-family protein forms a complex with the AHL at threshold concentrations and affects the transcription of target genes [8,9,10]. Several Gram-negative bacteria also produce long chain fatty acids and fatty acid methyl esters as QS signal molecules. Some examples of these types of molecules are (i) PQS (pseudomonas quinolone signal) 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4(1H)-quinolone is produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, (ii) HHQ signal, 2-heptyl-4 (1H)-quinolone by Bacillus atrophaeus and Pseudomonas [11, 12] (iii) the DSF, diffusible signaling factor, cis-11-methyl-2-dodecenoic acid by Xanthomonas and Burkholderia [13,14,15] and (iv) 3OH-PAME, hydroxyl-palmitic acid methyl ester by Ralstonia solanacearum [16].

QS-dependent regulation in bacteria is most often involved in the coordinated community action of bacteria like inhibiting host defense responses, biofilm formation, production of extracellular enzymes and virulence factors that ultimately leads to the colonization of a niche in the host [17,18,19]. Interestingly, recent studies on QS have evidenced deviation from the canonical AHL responsive LuxI/R system and its involvement in virulence [20]. For instance, we have reported that Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (PSA) is devoid of a LuxI/R canonical QS system and does not produce AHLs. The PSA genome does not possess a LuxI AHL synthase gene. Interestingly however, it possesses three LuxR- proteins closely related to the QS LuxR family (these are called LuxR solos). These LuxR solos were later identified either responding to exogenous AHLs or to a yet unidentified plant low molecular mass compound [21, 22].

PSA is an emerging plant pathogen which causes canker or leaf spot on kiwifruit plants (Actinidiae spp.) [23]. PSA was first described in Japan in the 1980s, and later it was reported in Korea and Europe causing damage in kiwifruit orchards [24]. In the European region, the disease was first noticed in central Italy in 1992 where it remained sporadic and with a low incidence for 15 years [25] however in 2007/2008 serious economic losses started to be observed particularly in the Lazio region as well as in the rest of the world [26].

To our knowledge no QS system has been yet been identified in PSA. In the P. syringae group of species, only very few pathovars have been reported to possess a complete archetypical AHL QS system [27,28,29]. In the rest of the pathovars it remains unknown whether they possess a QS system, which is yet to be identified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the production of low molecular weight compounds by PSA that could be involved in QS signaling.

An extracellular metabolome of PSA was determined and among the compounds identified was a nine carbon di-carboxylic acid molecule that could be azelaic acid. It was of interest to investigate this possibility since it has been previously reported as a mobile signal in plants and its structure is related to other known QS molecules. Jung et al. for the first time demonstrated that azelaic acid primes systemic defenses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Elevated levels of azelaic acid were detected in the vascular sap upon challenging with the P. syringae pathogen suggesting that this molecule can move systemically, most probably through the plant vasculature and contribute to long-distance signaling in plant defense against pathogens [30, 31]. The mechanism of azelaic acid synthesis in plant has however not yet been elucidated and it has recently been postulated that it could be derived from lipids via peroxidation [32].

Azelaic acid is a straight chained nine-carbon (C9) saturated dicarboxylic acid with a molecular weight of 188.22 and a melting point of 105.5 °C. It occurs naturally in whole grain cereals, rye, and barley [33]. We report here that P. syringae pathovars could also produce azelaic acid hence be responsible, at least in part, of azelaic acid accumulation in plants. Our analytical chemical studies have confirmed azelaic acid presence in the culture supernatants being a common feature in Pseudomonas syringae pathovars. From our studies, we concluded that azelaic acid in PSA is not involved in cell-cell signaling in response to cell density. We report the possible biosynthesis of azelaic acid by P. syringae pathovars and possible biological roles are discussed.

Results

Metabolome studies of P. syringae pv. actinidiae and P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi

With the aim of identifying novel signaling molecules produced by P. syringae pv. actinidiae (PSA), we analyzed the extracellular metabolome profile using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). PSA was cultured in M9 liquid growth medium with glucose as the sole carbon source (M9-glucose), cells were then harvested in the late logarithmic/early stationary phase of growth and the spent cell free supernatant was subsequently extracted with ethyl acetate for total metabolome analysis by subjecting it to GC-MS. Chromatograms revealed the putative presence of 83 different metabolites (Additional file 1), among which was the 9-carbon dicarboxylic acid azelaic acid. A similar metabolome experiment was performed using another closely related plant pathogen, namely P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi (PSV), which causes the olive knot disease in the olive plant [34]. Interestingly, like PSA, the metabolome of PSV also contained small amounts of azelaic acid (Additional file 2). As a control, the same analysis was performed using the M9 glucose medium and in this case, no azelaic acid was detected (Additional file 3).

Extraction and purification of azelaic acid from PSA spent supernatants

In order to unequivocally confirm the presence of azelaic acid in the PSA supernatants, we purified azelaic acid from PSA spent supernatants by HPLC using a C18 reverse phase column with detection wavelength at 220 nm. HPLC fractions with azelaic acid were analyzed by GC-MS and showed the ion fragments at m/z 41, 55.1, 74, 87, 97, 111, 124, 136.9, 152, 185.1, and 206.9 (Fig. 1a, b) with retention time and m/z values that were identical to that of standard azelaic acid. Performing the quantification of azelaic acid from the HPLC purified peaks/fractions using LC-MS proved that PSA spent culture supernatants contained approximately 20 μg/L (Additional file 4).

Fig. 1
figure1

Representative HPLC and GC-MS chromatograms of standard azelaic acid and azelaic acid isolated from PSA. The presence of azelaic acid in the PSA extracellular metabolome was determined in comparison with standard azelaic acid. Using HPLC on C18 reverse phase column compounds were analyzed and they collectively retained at similar retention time (RT) 13 min (a). GC-MS analysis of HPLC collected fraction at RT 13, showing similar mass fragmentation pattern with standard azelaic acid, confirms the presence of azelaic acid (b)

Structure elucidation of azelaic acid by NMR spectroscopy

The structure determination of the putative azelaic acid extracted from the PSA spent supernatants, NMR spectroscopy was carried out comparing the extracted sample with a commercially available azelaic acid standard. The 1H NMR spectrum of the standard sample in CDCl3 is shown in Fig. 2a, with the relative peak assignment. The putative azelaic acid sample, was dissolved in CDCl3 and the obtained spectrum was compared with that from the standard. Apart from spurious signals due to PSA extraction contaminants, all the relevant resonance peaks of the standard azelaic acid are present in the spectrum and they are indicated in Fig. 2b between vertical markers. It is also worth noting that the signals of the spectra in Fig. 2a and b exhibit the identical proper multiplicity due to J coupling between vicinal hydrogen atoms.

Fig. 2
figure2

1H-NMR studies of Azelaic acid. Spectra of a solution of standard azelaic acid (a) and of the azelaic acid extracted and purified from PSA (b) recorded at 25 °C in CD3Cl

To better characterize the PSA extracted azelaic acid, COSY 2D-NMR spectra were obtained for both standard and the extracted samples. The two spectra are shown in Fig. 3a (standard) and Fig. 3b (extracted sample). Again, the relevant cross-peaks, indicating the structural proximity of specific hydrogen atoms connected with dashed lines, are identical in the standard sample and in the extracted sample. In conclusion, both NMR analyses confirmed that the purified compound was azelaic acid.

Fig. 3
figure3

Depicts COSY 2-D spectrum of standard and azelaic acid isolated from PSA. The relevant cross-peaks, connected with dashed lines, are identical in the standard sample and in the extracted sample (a and b)

Azelaic acid production when PSA is grown in different carbon sources

It was of interest to assess the presence of azelaic acid at different phases of the growth of PSA and using different sources of carbon. PSA was cultured in M9 medium replacing glucose with different carbohydrates like fructose, sucrose, maltose, xylose and sorbitol as sole carbon source. Fructose, sucrose, maltose, xylose and sorbitol all supported growth of PSA and resulted in the presence of azelaic acid in spent supernatants. The use of sucrose enhanced the production by 1.6 fold compared to glucose (Fig. 4). Azelaic acid production was then assessed in the different phases of growth. The highest levels of azelaic acid (36 μg/L) accumulated during the mid-exponential phase of growth (Table 1; Additional file 5).

Fig. 4
figure4

Represents PSA azelaic acid production efficiency in different sugars. Production of azelaic acid by PSA grown in M9 minimal medium with respective sugars as the sole carbon source. Azelaic acid from spent medium was extracted and quantified at 70 h. Bar indicates the means and standard deviation of experiment performed in three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference between the azelaic acid production in glucose and other carbon sources (P < 0.05)

Table 1 Represents the detection of azelaic acid at different growth phase

Pseudomonas syringae pathovars also produce azelaic acid

In order to investigate whether other members of the P. syringae pathovar group also contained azelaic acid in their spent supernatants, we tested 8 strains belonging to 8 different P. syringae pathovars. Importantly, all 8 strains appeared to be able to putatively produce azelaic acid and furthermore it was established that PSV produced 2-fold higher amounts of azelaic acid compared to the other strains tested (Fig. 5). On the contrary, we also tested for azelaic acid accumulation in a few other more distant species like E. coli, B. subtilis and Rhizobium sp.; and no traces of azelaic acid was detected in their spent supernatants (data not shown).

Fig. 5
figure5

Production of azelaic acid from different P. syringae pathovars. Strains belonging to different P. syringae pathovars were cultured in M9 sucrose medium for 42 h and azelaic acid from spent medium was extracted and quantified. Bar indicates the mean and standard deviation of experiment performed in three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate significant difference between the azelaic acid production by PSA and different P. syringae pathovars (P < 0.05)

Studies on azelaic acid acting as an intra-species signaling molecule

It was established from our previous studies that PSA does not produce AHL QS signaling molecules and to our knowledge, no signal involved in intraspecies signaling has been reported. Since azelaic acid was detected in the supernatants at concentration levels typical of QS signaling molecules (see above), it was of interest to determine whether azelaic acid could behave as a QS signal. We therefore performed a transcriptome analysis via an RNA seq experiment with the following rationale. Our hypothesis is that if azelaic acid behaves as a QS signal and is affecting gene expression in a cell-density dependent way, by providing it to an early logarithmic phase PSA culture this will probably result in a change of gene expression of target genes. This experiment was performed in LB medium since we determined that in PSA LB spent supernatants no azelaic could be detected (data not shown). RNAseq experiments were therefore performed in biological triplicates in the following two growth conditions. Firstly in PSA LB cultures supplemented at early logarithmic phase with 25 μM azelaic acid and secondly in PSA grown in LB supplemented at early logarithmic phase with only methanol since it was the solvent used to dissolve azelaic acid. After addition of these compounds in the two different set-ups, PSA was allowed to grow for 6 h and RNA was then purified at approximately mid-exponential phase. Comparing the RNAseq data with PSA supplemented with only methanol, the RNAseq data of PSA supplemented with azelaic acid resulted in the significant but rather low differential expression of 6 target loci (Additional file 6, namely: gene 1818, gene3474, gene 3774, gene4120, gene4321, gene 4820). As validation of the RNAseq data, the gene promoters of all the 6 loci were cloned in a promoter probe vector harboring a promoterless GFP reporter as described in the Methods section and gene promoter activity were determined in PSA with and without the exogenous addition of azelaic acid. With the exception of one locus (encoding a putative peptidase C1 protease) which responded to the presence of azelaic acid, all other gene promoters did not display altered expression under the different conditions tested (Additional file 7). It was concluded that azelaic acid did not show a role in intra-species signaling in this experimental set-up. It cannot be excluded that since in LB there is no production of azelaic acid by PSA, this growth condition could block or interfere with a putative signaling pathway.

Discussion

Azelaic acid has been reported to have a biological role as a mobile signal in plants that induces systemic acquired resistance (SAR) upon P. syringae pathogen infection [30]. Upon infection by P. syringae on the model plant A. thaliana, the plant produces elevated levels of azelaic acid as detected in its vascular sap [30, 35]. Data presented in our study show that highest levels of in vitro production of azelaic acid occur in the presence of sucrose, this suggests that elevated levels of azelaic acid previously observed in A. thaliana may also be due to P. syringae. The sugars synthesized through photosynthesis are transported via the phloem and the total solute concentration is approximately 20% wt/wt consisting of approximately 80% sucrose [36]. We have however not presented any evidence showing that bacteria produce azelaic acid in planta as all our data is in vitro. Nevertheless, we can postulate that as sucrose is the most abundant carbon source available in the vascular sap, bacteria may utilize it to synthesize azelaic acid that could then have a role in plant defense responses. Therefore, it remains unclear how azelaic acid is synthesized in planta [37]. Lipid peroxidation (LPO), which is triggered by lipoxygenases (LOX) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), is a response to plant pathogen attack and has been proposed to be responsible for the presence of azelaic acid in plants. Lipidomics analysis of LPO in the plant-bacteria interaction of A. thaliana with P. syringae revealed a free radical catalyzed galactolipid fragmentation mechanism potentially responsible for the formation of azelaic acid and the biotin precursor pimelic acid [36]. Azelaic acid has therefore been proposed as a marker for LPO [37].

Our findings here raise the question on why P. syringae pathovars produces azelaic acid since it induces a defense response against the pathogen. Future work needs to clarify the possible biosynthesis of this molecule by P. syringae in planta and the potential role of azelaic acid in plant immunity in kiwifruit. In planta studies using azelaic acid production null mutants of P. syringae will be instrumental in understanding the role of azelaic acid in P. syringae and in plant-bacteria interaction. Furthermore, in this study we verified the extracellular presence of azelaic in P. syringae cultures and we did not test whether it is present intracellularly.

Our experiments unveiled that PSA and other P. syringae pathovars, were not utilizing azelaic acid as a carbon source (data not shown) and in addition do not indicate that it is a quorum sensing signal molecule. It cannot be excluded however that our experimental set-up used here in order to determine if azelaic acid could anticipate a quorum sensing response and activate gene expression could have its limitation. It must also be noted that we performed the RNAseq experiment in LB supplemented with azelaic acid in order to determine if the activation or repression of gene expression took place. It was established that PSA could not produce azelaic acid in LB media thus there is a possibility that the putative azelaic acid activated signal pathway might be blocked in LB medium. Secondly, anticipating the quorum by providing large quantities of signal at early phases of growth does not always lead to activation or repression of target genes [38, 39]. It cannot be unequivocally excluded therefore that azelaic acid is not a quorum sensing signal molecules and studies with a non-azelaic producing strain are necessary to support this conclusion. It is currently unknown whether PSA and other P. syringae pathovars possess a biosynthesis pathway for azelaic acid, if so, it is very laborious at this present time to isolate azelaic acid production mutants. It is well established that bacteria live as part of multispecies consortiums and most probably communicate with other species; a process called interspecies signaling [40, 41]. It is therefore also possible that azelaic acid could be an interspecies signal. Finally as mentioned above, it could also have a role as a defense molecule since it displays anti-microbial properties at certain concentrations [42, 43].

Industrially, azelaic acid is chemically synthesized and is used in the synthesis of many compounds such as polyamides, fragrances, adhesives, lubricants and polyesters [44,45,46]. The chemical synthesis of azelaic acid is currently performed in bulk by ozonolysis of oleic acid and this process has considerable drawbacks due to its non-eco-friendly nature [47,48,49,50]. Results presented here merit further investigations in order to explore possible bio-based production of azelaic acid by bacteria. It must be noted however that production levels by the wild type strains are extremely low; it cannot be excluded however that the production levels can considerably be increased via the identification and characterization of the putative biosynthesis pathway. Interestingly, a recent study also detected the presence of azelaic acid in the spent supernatants of lactic acid bacteria indicating that this feature could be common in bacteria [51].

Conclusions

This work has shown the presence of azelaic acid in spent supernatants of P. syringae cultures and therefore calls for further investigations in order to determine its possible function as an bacterial or plant signal, as a secondary metabolite or as a byproduct of metabolism/transformation that ends up in the extracellular metabolome.

Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

P. syringae pathovars used in this study are listed in Table 2 and were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or in M9 minimal medium (5.64 g Na2HPO4, 3 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g NaCl, 1 g NH4Cl, MgSO4 2 mM and CaCl2 0.1 mM) with 0.2% of the carbon source chosen among glucose, sucrose, fructose, maltose, xylose, or sorbitol [52]. The cultures were then incubated at room temperature with continuous shaking to reach saturation for up to 72 h. E. coli DH5α was grown in M9 medium with 0.2% glucose and 0.1 ml of a 0.5% vitamin B12 (thiamine) solution, 5 mL of a 20% casamino acids solution and incubated at 37 °C. Bacillus subtilis was grown in M9 medium comprising of 0.2% glucose with the addition of 10 mL of a trace element solution containing (per liter) 1.35 g FeCl26H2O, 0.1 g MnCl2·H2O, 0.17 g ZnCl2, 0.043 g CuCl2·2H2O, 0.06 g CoCl2·6H2O, 0.06 g Na2MO4·2H2O [53]. Rhizobium sullae sp. nov HCNT1 was grown in a similar medium as of E. coli DH5α at 30 °C except that thiamine was replaced with biotin (1 mg/L) as indicated [54]. For cloning and promoter activity studies, E. coli DH5α and PSA were cultured using the antibiotics ampicillin 20 μg/mL and gentamycin 30 μg/mL.

Table 2 Bacterial strains used in this study

Extraction of the extracellular metabolome and azelaic acid from spent supernatants

The bacterial cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,816 x g for 10 min and the cell free supernatant was then collected and processed further as described [55]. Briefly, the cell free supernatant was acidified to pH 1 to 2 with conc. H2SO4 and extracted twice by adding an equal volume of diethyl ether (for the total extracellular metabolome, extraction was performed with ethyl acetate). The collected ether layers were combined, washed with distilled water (1 volume), and evaporated to dryness in rotary evaporation at 40 °C. A fraction of dried residue was dissolved in methanol (3 mL) and then subjected to HPLC and GC-MS analysis.

GC-MS analysis

BF3 methanol derivatization

For total metabolome and azelaic acid analysis on GC-MS, a fraction of the dried residual samples were subjected to BF3 methanol derivatization prior to injection as follows: 2 mL of 10% BF3 methanol solution (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to approximately 1 mg of the dried sample and incubated in a boiling water bath for 60 min. Subsequently, 2 mL of n-hexane was added and washed with milli-Q water (Millipore) at room temperature. The supernatant solvent was then separated by centrifugation.

GC-MS analysis of total extracellular metabolome

It was performed on Agilent technologies 6890 gas chromatography coupled to an Agilent technologies 5975B mass spectrometer. Compounds were eluted by a constant helium gas flow of 1.6 ml/min. With a split ratio of 4:1 and separated on a 60 m DB-WAX capillary column (0.25 film thickness, 0.25 mm internal diameter; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). The temperature program was set at 100 °C for 2 min, followed by a ramp of 5 °C/min to the final temperature of 240 °C hold for 20 min. Mass spectra were acquired in the full scan mode collecting ions from 39 to 500 m/z using the electron impact ionization mode (e.i.) with electron energy of 70 eV. The acquired spectra were then compared with the spectra in the NIST-05 (NIST, Gaithersburg, USA) and in the WILEY 11 (Wiley, Hoboken, USA) libraries.

GC-MS analysis of HPLC purified fractions

It was carried out on Agilent technologies 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent Technologies 5975C VL MSD equipped with an HP-1 capillary column (Agilent Technologies, 30 m). The temperature program used was as follows: at 70 °C for 2 min, 70–230 °C at 20 °C/ min. The MS data (total ion chromatogram TIC) were acquired in the full scan mode (m/z of 50–500) at a scan rate of 1000 amu using the electron impact ionization (e.i.) with an electron energy of 70 eV. The acquired spectrum was searched against the standard NIST-05 library/ WILEY 7 library.6 [56, 57].

HPLC analysis

The crude extract (obtained as described above) was analyzed with a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (using a Varian 9050/9010 machine) equipped with an UV-visible detector. The separation was carried out using a 5 μm C18 reverse phase column (Agilent) and eluted with a gradient of water with 0.1% TFA as (A) and methanol with 0.1%TFA as (B) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 25 °C for 30 min. The gradient was created starting with 30% eluent B for 5 min, rising to 70% eluent B within 10 min, and returning to 30% eluent B within 5 min, followed by an equilibration of 10 min. The sample injected was 25 μL and the separated components were monitored by a UV detector at a range of 220 nm as described [56]. The data recording and processing was performed using a star chromatography workstation software. A standard curve was constructed ranging from 50 μg to 200 μg of azelaic acid. It was decided to use these concentrations since they were in the range of the concentrations present in the samples that were tested/prepared.

Liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry (LC-MS)

Analyses were carried out using a Gilson 306 HPLC system equipped with an auto sampler. An Agilent Poroshell C18 (2.1 × 50 mm) column thermostatically controlled at 30 °C was used and the injected volume was 5 μL (3x full loop fill). The elution gradient was carried out with a binary solvent system consisting of 0.05% formic acid in H2O (solvent A) and MeCN (solvent B) at a constant flow-rate of 250 μL/min using a linear gradient profile from 0% B to 100% B in 30 min.

Mass spectrometry

Electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis was performed with an ion trap mass spectrometer (amazonSL, Bruker Daltonics). Samples were diluted 20 times in 10 mM ammonium acetate buffer pH 6.0 and 5 μL were analyzed by LC (see above). Mass spectra were acquired monitoring the 189/171 and 189/153 transitions in positive mode or the 187/125 transition in negative mode.

NMR analysis

Azelaic acid standard and samples extracted from P. syringae pathovars were dissolved in 0.7 mL of CDCl3. Spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz VARIAN spectrometer operating at 25 °C, and subsequently processed using Mestre Nova software. Chemical shifts were referred to residual CHCl3 (at 7.26 ppm).

Total RNA extraction, RNAseq experiment and analysis

Isolation of total RNA was carried out from three independent biological replicate cultures in two growth conditions of the wild type PSA strain; in one case a PSA culture was supplemented with methanol and in the other, PSA was supplemented with methanol containing azelaic acid. The methanol (20 μL) and methanol+azelaic acid (20 μL) were added to an equal number of PSA cells of (OD600 0.04) in 25 mL LB medium. Growth parameters were set to 25 °C and 180 rpm of continuous shaking. After 2 h of incubation, which corresponds to early exponential phase, in one of the flasks a final concentration of 25 μM azelaic was added to the medium, and in other flask the same volume of methanol used to dissolve the azelaic acid was added as control. Thereafter cells were harvested from all the samples after 6 h of growth having similar cell number (OD600 0.8) which corresponds to a mid-exponential growth phase. RNA was extracted and purified from the cells using the Ribopure bacteria RNA isolation kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, U.S.A.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Ambion, Life Technologies, and U.S.A.) and the purity of RNA was assessed by PCR on total RNA with GoTaq polymerase (Promega Corp.) using PSAR1 Fw and PSAR1 Rev. primers. rRNA depletion was performed and RNAseq was performed by IGA Technology Services Srl (Udine, Italy) where Illumina103 HiSeq2000 (Illumina Inc.) was used for sequencing. Resulting sequences were mapped against RefSeq assembly accession: AFTG00000000 [1] PSA CRAFRU 8.43 (cite PMID: 22535942 PMCID) using the BWA software (cite PMID: 20080505). Bioconductor libraries Genomic Features and DESeq2 (cite PMID 23950696 and 25,516,281) have been used to calculate gene expression levels and fold-changes between samples. The cutoff FDR-adjusted P value was 0.01, with a minimum two-fold change.

Accession number(s)

The original RNA-seq data have been submitted to the NCBI database under BioProject accession number PRJNA436767.

Gene promoter studies

Transcriptional gene promoter activity studies of six promoters were performed in PSA. All constructs were made in the promoter probe plasmid vector pBBRGFPGm [58] which harbors the gene for gentamycin resistance and a promoterless gfp gene. The following gene promoters were used: gene1818 encoding for a putative peptidase C1, gene4120 encoding for a sugar ABC transporter, gene 4321 coding for twitching motility protein, gene4820 encoding for two component sensor histidine kinase protein, gene3774 encoding for a histidine kinase, and gene3474 encoding for a L-aspartate oxidase (Additional file 6). Promoter regions were amplified using primers listed in (Table 3) and were then transcriptionally fused to a promoterless gfp gene in vector pBBRGFP (Table 4). The gene promoter constructs pBBR-promoters-GFP were then electroporated into PSA WT as previously described [53]. Using the same growth conditions of the RNAseq experiment as described above, gene promoter activity was determined as a measurement of the intensity of GFP fluorescence at 510 nm on a Perkin Elmer EnVision 2104 micro plate reader.

Table 3 List of primers used in this study
Table 4 List of plasmids used in this study

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the PRISM 5.0 software and that includes unpaired student’s t test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Abbreviations

1H-NMR:

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

COSY 2-D:

Correlational two dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

FDR:

False discovery rate

GC-MS:

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

GFP:

Green fluorescent protein

HPLC:

High performance liquid chromatography

NIST:

National institute of standards and technology

NMR:

Nuclear Magnetic resonance spectroscopy

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PSA:

Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae

PSV:

Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi

RefSeq:

Reference sequence

RNAseq:

RNA sequencing

BWA:

Burrows-Wheeler Aligner

References

  1. 1.

    Demain AL, Adrio JL. Contributions of microorganisms to industrial biology. Mol Biotechnol. 2008;38:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-007-0035-z.

  2. 2.

    Singh R, Kumar M, Mittal A, Mehta PK. Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century. 3 Biotech 6. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0485-8.

  3. 3.

    Bassler BL. Small talk. Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell. 2002;109:421–4.

  4. 4.

    Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:269–75.

  5. 5.

    Hosni T, Moretti C, Devescovi G, Suarez-Moreno ZR, Fatmi MB, Guarnaccia C, et al. Sharing of quorum-sensing signals and role of interspecies communities in a bacterial plant disease. ISME J. 2011;5:1857–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.65.

  6. 6.

    Ng W-L, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:197–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134304.

  7. 7.

    Venturi V, Fuqua C. Chemical signaling between plants and plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102239.

  8. 8.

    Cheng F, Ma A, Zhuang G, Fray RG. Exogenous N-acyl-homoserine lactones enhance the expression of flagella of Pseudomonas syringae and activate defence responses in plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:104–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12502.

  9. 9.

    Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Greenberg EP. Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:439–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090913.

  10. 10.

    Quiñones B, Dulla G, Lindow SE. Quorum sensing regulates exopolysaccharide production, motility, and virulence in Pseudomonas syringae. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2005;18:682–93. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-18-0682.

  11. 11.

    Reen FJ, Mooij MJ, Holcombe LJ, McSweeney CM, McGlacken GP, Morrissey JP, et al. The Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS), and its precursor HHQ, modulate interspecies and interkingdom behaviour. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;77:413–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01121.x.

  12. 12.

    Williams P. Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. Microbiol Read Engl. 2007;153:3923–38. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2007/012856-0.

  13. 13.

    Deng Y, Boon C, Chen S, Lim A, Zhang L-H. Cis-2-dodecenoic acid signal modulates virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa through interference with quorum sensing systems and T3SS. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-231.

  14. 14.

    He Y-W, Zhang L-H. Quorum sensing and virulence regulation in Xanthomonas campestris. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:842–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00120.x.

  15. 15.

    Williams P, Winzer K, Chan WC, Cámara M. Look who’s talking: communication and quorum sensing in the bacterial world. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1119–34. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2039.

  16. 16.

    Flavier AB, Clough SJ, Schell MA, Denny TP. Identification of 3-hydroxypalmitic acid methyl ester as a novel autoregulator controlling virulence in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:251–9.

  17. 17.

    Barnard AML, Bowden SD, Burr T, Coulthurst SJ, Monson RE, Salmond GPC. Quorum sensing, virulence and secondary metabolite production in plant soft-rotting bacteria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1165–83. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2042.

  18. 18.

    Von Bodman SB, Bauer WD, Coplin DL. Quorum sensing in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003;41:455–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095652.

  19. 19.

    White CE, Winans SC. Cell–cell communication in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1135–48. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2040.

  20. 20.

    Ferluga S, Venturi V. OryR is a LuxR-family protein involved in interkingdom signaling between pathogenic Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and Rice. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:890–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01507-08.

  21. 21.

    González JF, Venturi V. A novel widespread interkingdom signaling circuit. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:167–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.09.007.

  22. 22.

    Subramoni S, Venturi V. LuxR-family “solos”: bachelor sensors/regulators of signalling molecules. Microbiol Read Engl. 2009;155:1377–85. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.026849-0.

  23. 23.

    Scortichini M, Marcelletti S, Ferrante P, Petriccione M, Firrao G. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: a re-emerging, multi-faceted, pandemic pathogen. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012;13:631–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00788.x.

  24. 24.

    Koh YJ, Kim GH, Lee YS, Hur JS. Outbreak of bacterial canker on Hort16A (Actinidia chinensis Planchon) caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in Korea. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci. 2010;38(4):275–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2010.512624.

  25. 25.

    Scortichini M. Occurrence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae on kiwifruit in Italy. Plant Pathol. 1994;43:1035–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1994.tb01654.x.

  26. 26.

    Ferrante P, Scortichini M. Molecular and phenotypic features of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae isolated during recent epidemics of bacterial canker on yellow kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in Central Italy. Plant Pathol. 2010;59:954–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02304.x.

  27. 27.

    Dulla GFJ, Lindow SE. Acyl-homoserine lactone-mediated cross talk among epiphytic bacteria modulates behavior of Pseudomonas syringae on leaves. ISME J. 2009;3:825–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.30.

  28. 28.

    Dow M. Virulence mechanisms of plant-pathogenic bacteria: Issuu; 2017. Available at: https://issuu.com/scisoc/docs/flipbook_844bc1085c200a.

  29. 29.

    Quiñones B, Pujol CJ, Lindow SE. Regulation of AHL production and its contribution to epiphytic fitness in Pseudomonas syringae. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004;17:521–31. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.5.521.

  30. 30.

    Jung HW, Tschaplinski TJ, Wang L, Glazebrook J, Greenberg JT. Priming in systemic plant immunity. Science. 2009;324:89–91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170025.

  31. 31.

    Wittek F, Hoffmann T, Kanawati B, Bichlmeier M, Knappe C, Wenig M, et al. Arabidopsis enhanced disease susceptibility1 promotes systemic acquired resistance via azelaic acid and its precursor 9-oxo nonanoic acid. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:5919–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru331.

  32. 32.

    Walley JW, Kliebenstein DJ, Bostock RM, Dehesh K. Fatty acids and early detection of pathogens. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16(4):520–26. http://0-dx.doi.org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.011.

  33. 33.

    Khakimov B, Jespersen BM, Engelsen SB. Comprehensive and comparative metabolomic profiling of wheat, barley, oat and rye using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and advanced chemometrics. Foods Basel Switz. 2014;3:569–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods3040569.

  34. 34.

    Quesada JM, Penyalver R, Pérez-Panades J, Salcedo CI, Carbonell EA, Lopez MM. Dissemination of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi populations and subsequent appearance of olive knot disease. Plant Pathol. 2010;59:262–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02200.x.

  35. 35.

    Pitzschke A, Xue H, Persak H, Datta S, Seifert GJ. Post-translational modification and secretion of azelaic acid induced 1 (AZI1), a hybrid proline-rich protein from Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17010085.

  36. 36.

    Jense KH, Savage JA, Holbrook N m. Optimal concentration for sugar transport in plants. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10:20130055. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0055.

  37. 37.

    Zoeller M, Stingl N, Krischke M, Fekete A, Waller F, Berger S, et al. Lipid profiling of the Arabidopsis hypersensitive response reveals specific lipid peroxidation and fragmentation processes: biogenesis of pimelic and azelaic acid. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:365–78. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.202846.

  38. 38.

    Pearson JP. Early activation of quorum sensing. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:2569–71. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.184.10.2569-2571.2002.

  39. 39.

    Schuster M, Greenberg EP. Early activation of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa reveals the architecture of a complex regulon. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:287. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-287.

  40. 40.

    Buonaurio R, Moretti C, da Silva DP, Cortese C, Ramos C, Venturi V. The olive knot disease as a model to study the role of interspecies bacterial communities in plant disease. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00434.

  41. 41.

    Federle MJ, Bassler BL. Interspecies communication in bacteria. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1291–9. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI20195.

  42. 42.

    Bojar RA, Holland KT, Cunliffe WJ. The in-vitro antimicrobial effects of azelaic acid upon Propionibacterium acnes strain P37. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991;28:843–53.

  43. 43.

    Leeming JP, Holland KT, Bojar RA. The in vitro antimicrobial effect of azelaic acid. Br J Dermatol. 1986;115:551–6.

  44. 44.

    Baharu MN, Kadhum AAH, Al-Amiery AA, Mohamad AB. Synthesis and characterization of polyesters derived from glycerol, azelaic acid, and succinic acid. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2015;8:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2014.991810.

  45. 45.

    Fitton A, Goa KL. Azelaic acid. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in acne and hyperpigmentary skin disorders. Drugs. 1991;41:780–98.

  46. 46.

    Huf S, Krügener S, Hirth T, Rupp S, Zibek S. Biotechnological synthesis of long-chain dicarboxylic acids as building blocks for polymers. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2011;113:548–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201000112.

  47. 47.

    Ackman RG, Retson ME, Gallay LR, Vandenheuvel FA. Ozonolysis of unsaturated fatty acids: I. Ozonolysis of oleic acid. Can J Chem. 1961;39:1956–63. https://doi.org/10.1139/v61-262.

  48. 48.

    Hung H-M, Katrib Y, Martin ST. Products and mechanisms of the reaction of oleic acid with ozone and nitrate radical. J Phys Chem A. 2005;109:4517–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0500900.

  49. 49.

    Köckritz A, Martin A. Synthesis of azelaic acid from vegetable oil-based feedstocks. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2011;113:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201000117.

  50. 50.

    Polen T, Spelberg M, Bott M. Toward biotechnological production of adipic acid and precursors from biorenewables. J Biotechnol. 2013;167:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.07.008.

  51. 51.

    Lay CL, Coton E, Le Blay G, Chobert J-M, Haertlé T, Choiset Y, Nguyen N, Long V, Meslet-Cladière V, Mounier J. Identification and quantification of antifungal compounds produced by lactic acid bacteria and propionibacteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;239:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.020.

  52. 52.

    Bertani G. Studies on lysogenesis. I The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1951;62:293–300.

  53. 53.

    Harwood CR. Bacillus subtilis and its relatives: molecular biological and industrial workhorses. Trends Biotechnol. 1992;10:247–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(92)90233-L.

  54. 54.

    Wilson JB, Wilson PW. Biotin as a growth gactor for Rhizobia1. J Bacteriol. 1942;43:329–41.

  55. 55.

    Broadway NM, Dickinson FM, Ratledge C. The enzymology of dicarboxylic acid formation by Corynebacterium sp. strain 7E1C grown on n-alkanes. Microbiology. 1993;139:1337–44. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-139-6-1337.

  56. 56.

    Jham GN, Fernandes SA, Garcia CF, da Silva AA. Comparison of GC and HPLC for the quantification of organic acids in coffee. Phytochem Anal. 2002;13:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.629.

  57. 57.

    Cunha SC, Fernandes JO, Ferreira IM. HPLC/UV determination of organic acids in fruit juices and nectars. Eur Food Res Technol. 2002;214:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170100412.

  58. 58.

    Uzelac G, Patel HK, Devescovi G, Licastro D, Venturi V. Quorum sensing and RsaM regulons of the rice pathogen Pseudomonas fuscovaginae. Microbiol Read Engl. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000454.

  59. 59.

    Moretti C, Cortese C, Passos da Silva D, Venturi V, Ramos C, Firrao G, et al. Draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi strain DAPP-PG 722, isolated in Italy from an olive plant affected by knot disease. Genome Announc. 2014c;2:e00864–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00864-14.

  60. 60.

    Feil H, Feil WS, Chain P, et al. Comparison of the complete genome sequences of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a and pv. Tomato DC3000. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(31):11064–9.

  61. 61.

    Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini AM, Alloni G, Azevedo V, et al. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1997;390:249–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/36786.

  62. 62.

    Hanahan D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983;166:557–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8.

  63. 63.

    Squartini A, Struffi P, Döring H, Selenska-Pobell S, Tola E, Giacomini A, et al. Rhizobium sullae sp. nov. (formerly ‘Rhizobium hedysari’), the root-nodule microsymbiont of Hedysarum coronarium L. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1267–76. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-4-1267.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Iris Bertani and Giulia Devescovi for their technical help and valuable suggestions, as well Dr. Michael P. Myers for his critical comments in the final stage of this project.

Funding

This work was funded to SGJ by an Arturo Falaschi Fellowship ICGEB, Italy. This funding allowed the full-time commitment of SGJ to this work and he was involved in the design of the experiments, in all the practical methods and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Author information

SGJ was involved in the design of the experiments, in all the practical methods and in writing the manuscript; PC and RR in the NMR and GC-MS analysis; VL and LN in the GC-MS analysis; DL in the RNAseq experiment and analysis; CG in LC-MS analysis and VV in the supervision, design of the experiments and in the writing of the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Vittorio Venturi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Table showing list of compounds identified by NIST library search of PSA metabolome cultured in M9 glucose medium. (DOCX 24 kb)

Additional file 2:

Table showing list of compounds identified by NIST library search of PSV metabolome cultured in M9 glucose medium. (DOCX 21 kb)

Additional file 3:

Table showing list of compounds identified by NIST library search of M9 glucose medium Control. (DOCX 25 kb)

Additional file 4:

Figure showing Quantification of azelaic acid by LC-MS. LC-MS profile of standard azelaic acid and putative azelaic acid collected at RT 13 from HPLC (A). Quantification of isolated and purified azelaic acid by standard curve (B). In 5 μl of RT 13 sample injected, there is 0.476 μg of azelaic acid which can be translated to 19.992 μg/L. (PPTX 69 kb)

Additional file 5:

Figure showing quantification of azelaic acid by HPLC on C18 reverse phase column. Quantification of azelaic acid (PSA produced) by standard curve A&B. (PPTX 51 kb)

Additional file 6:

Table representing RNAseq expressed genes upon induction of azeliac acid. (DOCX 15 kb)

Additional file 7:

Figure showing validation of the RNAseq-based expression by gene promoter studies. Promoters of selected gene were fused with promoter probe vector pBBRGFP-Gm and tested with similar concentration of azelaic acid which was used in RNAseq expression studies. Significant fold change from selected genes was observed only between pBGFPgene 1818/methanol and pBGFPgene 1818/azelaic acid. Data shown are the mean and standard deviation of experiment performed thrice in triplicate. (PPTX 99 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javvadi, S.G., Cescutti, P., Rizzo, R. et al. The spent culture supernatant of Pseudomonas syringae contains azelaic acid. BMC Microbiol 18, 199 (2018) doi:10.1186/s12866-018-1352-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quorum sensing
  • Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae
  • Metabolomics
  • Azelaic acid