Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

Open Access

Comparison of antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli obtained from drinking water sources in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study

  • Beatus Lyimo1Email author,
  • Joram Buza1,
  • Murugan Subbiah2,
  • Woutrina Smith3 and
  • Douglas R. Call1, 2
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:254

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0870-9

Received: 29 June 2016

Accepted: 26 October 2016

Published: 3 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing and significant threat to public health on a global scale. Escherichia coli comprises Gram-negative, fecal-borne pathogenic and commensal bacteria that are frequently associated with antibiotic resistance. AMR E. coli can be ingested via food, water and direct contact with fecal contamination.

Methods

We estimated the prevalence of AMR Escherichia coli from select drinking water sources in northern Tanzania. Water samples (n = 155) were collected and plated onto Hi-Crome E. coli and MacConkey agar. Presumptive E. coli were confirmed by using a uidA PCR assay. Antibiotic susceptibility breakpoint assays were used to determine the resistance patterns of each isolate for 10 antibiotics. Isolates were also characterized by select PCR genotyping and macro-restriction digest assays.

Results

E. coli was isolated from 71 % of the water samples, and of the 1819 E. coli tested, 46.9 % were resistant to one or more antibiotics. Resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim was significantly higher (15–30 %) compared to other tested antibiotics (0–6 %; P < 0.05). Of the β-lactam-resistant isolates, bla TEM-1 was predominant (67 %) followed by bla CTX-M (17.7 %) and bla SHV-1 (6.0 %). Among the tetracycline-resistant isolates, tet(A) was predominant (57.4 %) followed by tet(B) (24.0 %). E. coli isolates obtained from these water sources were genetically diverse with few matching macro-restriction digest patterns.

Conclusion

Water supplies in northern Tanzania may be a source of AMR E. coli for people and animals. Further studies are needed to identify the source of these contaminants and devise effective intervention strategies.

Keywords

Antibiotic resistanceWater qualityLow-income countryTanzania

Background

Despite meeting the Millennium Development Goals for drinking water [1], 748 million mostly poor and marginalized people still lack access to quality drinking water. Of these almost a quarter (173 million) rely on untreated surface water on a daily basis and over 90 % live in rural areas [1]. Fecal waste from people and animals is a major source for water pollution, particularly in low-income countries. For instance, in 2012 approximately 1 billion people in the world did not have access to toilet facilities and instead used open and unsanitary places for defecation [1]. These communities also lack proper water supplies and depend heavily on untreated surface or shallow, unprotected water (river, ponds, and lakes) sources for consumption [2, 3]. These water sources run through agricultural lands and open places and thus are frequently exposed to human and animal wastes. Consuming these contaminated water increases the risk of exposure to enteric bacterial, viral and protozoan pathogens that could cause severe diseases in people [4]. Notably, there are several strains of E. coli that are pathogenic to both people and animals and that can cause disease ranging from self-limiting diarrhea to life-threatening hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and hemorrhagic colitis [5, 6].

Emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria is considered the third-largest threat to global public health in the 21st century [7]. AMR reduces the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment and thus leads to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures [8]. Commensal E. coli found in people and animals is considered a potential reservoir for AMR genes [9] and these genetic traits can be transferred to E. coli or to other bacteria found in people, animals, and in the environment [10]. Presumably, water sources contaminated with AMR bacteria is one contributing factor for the higher prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria from people living in low-income countries [11]. For instance, studies conducted in South Africa reported a high prevalence of antibiotic resistant E. coli from both “safe” (treated and closed) and unsafe (untreated and open) water sources [9, 12].

Tanzania is a low-income country in East Africa that is experiencing an exponential increase of human settlements around water sources [13]. A relatively small proportion of people living in the urban and peri-urban areas have access to what are considered safe (bore-well and taps) drinking water facilities. Consumption of water containing AMR bacteria is likely to increase the risk of disseminating antibiotic resistance and pathogenic bacteria. Nevertheless, the extent of this risk, if any, has not been well described.

In this study we assessed the prevalence of antibiotic resistant E. coli from surface waters in northern Tanzania. We also characterized a panel of isolates for the presence of select antibiotic resistance genes and assessed genetic diversity by using a macro-restriction assay with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. In the long term, understanding the degree that surface waters are contaminated will help guide intervention strategies to reduce the risk of water-borne dissemination of pathogens and the dissemination of antibiotic resistance.

Methods

Study design

The study was cross-sectional and convenience sampling was used to collect 155 water samples in select water sources in northern Tanzania between March and September 2014 (Fig. 1). Permission was sought from the local authorities before collecting water from open (rivers, lakes, streams and ponds) and closed (taps and bore-wells) water resources located in two geographically and climatically distinct areas (dry-arid; Longido, Monduli and Simanjiro districts and lush-mountainous; Moshi, Arumeru and Arusha districts; Fig. 1). Ponds (surface rain water collected in manmade reservoirs) are shallow open bodies of water that are shared between animals (livestock and wildlife) and people living in the dry-arid regions. Rivers are the primary open surface waters that are used by people and animals living in the lush-mountainous regions. The number of households that use tap and bore-well water is relatively high in lush-mountainous compared to dry-arid regions. Water samples from the ponds were collected from localities near Maasai villages while the samples from rivers were collected from low risk-, moderate risk-, and high risk-stream segments of the same river in the vicinity of Arumeru (Nduruma, Tengeru) and Arusha (Temi) regions. The distance between the point where water was sampled and apparent human activities defined relative risk. If activities were observed >300 m from the sample collection point this was considered a “low risk” segment while moderate and high risk corresponded to within 50–300 m or within 50 m, respectively. Convenience sampling was used to collect tap water from Arusha, Arumeru, Longido, Moshi, and Monduli districts. Bore-well water samples were collected from Arusha, Arumeru, Monduli, and Simanjiro (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Distribution of water sampling locations in northern Tanzania

Sample collection and processing for the isolation of E. coli

Water samples were collected in 500-ml sterile bottles and transported in cooler boxes with ice packs to the laboratory for processing within 6 h (h) of collection. Water samples were analyzed using a standard membrane filtration technique with slight modification [14]. Briefly, 100 ml of each water sample from tap and well was filtered using a 47 mm membrane filter (Cellulose Nitrate filter, Sartorius Stedium Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) with a nominal pore size of 0.45 μm using a vacuum filtration system. To avoid clogging of membrane pores water samples (especially turbid) from pond, river and stream were serially diluted 1:100 before filtered using the standard membrane filtration technique as above. Following filtration each filter membrane was placed on a Chromogenic selective agar plate (Hi-Crome E. coli agar, Hi Media Laboratories Prt. Ltd, Mumbai, India) [15]. The agar plates were initially incubated at 37 °C for 4 h, followed by incubation for 16–22 h at 44 °C. In addition, the water samples (100 μl; undiluted) were directly plated onto MacConkey agar (Thermo Oxoid Remel, Lenexa, USA) using sterile glass beads and incubated overnight (~18 h) at 37 °C.

Isolation and storage of E. coli

To determine the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of E. coli found in the water samples, up to 24 colonies/sample with morphology consistent with E. coli were picked from MacConkey agar plates using sterile toothpicks and inoculated into 96-well plates containing 150 μl of Luria-Bertani broth (DifcoTM LB Broth Lennox, Sparks, MD USA) per well. The plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C. After incubation sterile phosphate buffered glycerol was added into each well (15 % vol/vol, final volume of glycerol) and the plates were stored at -80 °C until shipping. For shipping, using a sterile 96-pin replicator (Boekel Scientific, Feasterville, USA), the pre-thawed 96-well plates containing cultures were sub-cultured into another 96-well plate containing 40 μl LB per well. These plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C. After incubation the plates were left open in a sterile incubator for drying between 32–35 °C for up to 24 h or until the cultures are completely desiccated. The completely desiccated plates were examined to confirm the absence of condensation and were then shipped to the Paul G. Allen School of Global Animal Health (Washington State University, Pullman, WA) for further analysis. Upon receipt 150 μl of LB broth was added to the desiccated wells and incubated overnight at 37 °C to recover the isolates. All the recovered isolates were tested for the presence of uidA gene specific for E. coli using a PCR [16].

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

An antibiotic susceptibility breakpoint assay was used to estimate the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli from the study collection. For this assay, the following concentrations of antibiotics were used: amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium (AMC), 32/16 μg/ml (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France and Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, respectively); ampicillin (Amp), 32 μg/ml (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, New Jersey); ceftazidime (Cfz), 8 μg/ml (Sigma-Aldrich); chloramphenicol (Chl), 32 μg/ml (Sigma-Aldrich); ciprofloxacin (Cip), 4 μg/ml (LKT Laboratories, Inc., St. Paul, MN); kanamycin (Kan), 64 μg/ml (Sigma-Aldrich); streptomycin (Str), 16 μg/ml (Fisher Scientific); sulfamethoxazole (Sul), 512 μg/ml (MP Biomedicals); tetracycline (Tet), 16 μg/ml (GTS, San Diego, CA); and trimethoprim (Tri), 8 μg/ml (MP Biomedicals). Selection of antibiotic concentrations was guided by the CLSI minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for Enterobacteriaceae, except for streptomycin. The streptomycin concentration was determined by estimating the MIC for a susceptible K-12 strain of E. coli strain.

Breakpoint assays were conducted by preparing MacConkey agar with the indicated concentration of an antibiotic (one antibiotic per 150 mm plate). E. coli isolates were transferred onto the antibiotic containing media using a 96-pin replicator (Boekel Scientific, Fisher Scientific) from overnight culture in LB broth. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, growth was interpreted as resistant and no growth was interpreted as susceptible [17, 18]. E. coli strains K-12 (negative control, susceptible to all antibiotics tested) and H4H (positive control, E. coli strain harboring a ~148 kb plasmid that encodes resistance to 13 antibiotics including all of the antibiotics tested [19]) were used as reference strains for antibiotic susceptibility testing. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance was estimated by dividing the number of isolates resistant to a given antibiotic with the total number of isolates.

Macro-restriction digest and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

Thirty-seven E. coli isolates with >2 antibiotic resistance phenotypes from each water source were characterized by using Xbal macro-restriction digest assays with slight modifications from the PulseNet protocol [20]. Briefly, overnight culture was adjusted to an optical density of 1.4 using a spectrophotometer (610 nm) and 200 μl of the adjusted culture was augmented with proteinase K (10 μl at 20 mg/ml). Melted SeaKem Gold agarose (FMC, Rockland, ME, USA) was added and gently mixed before dispensing into plug molds (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) for 15 min. Plugs were incubated in ES buffer (0.5 M EDTA, pH 9.0, 1 % sodium lauroyl sarcosine) with proteinase K at 54 °C for 1 h and then washed 3X for 1 h in 1 M TE and 0.5 M EDTA buffer. Plugs were then treated with Xbal for 3 h in a water bath at 37 °C. Restriction fragments were then resolved by electrophoresis after inserting into 1 % SeaKem Gold agarose gels by using a CHEF DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Gels were immersed in 0.5X Tris-borate–EDTA buffer and electrophoresis included initial switching time of 2.2 s and a final switching time of 54.2 s, 6 V and 120° angle. Fragments were resolved at 14 °C for 18 h. Control strains of E. coli O157:H7 and Shigella were included on every gel to improve accuracy of fragment size estimates. After electrophoresis the gels were stained with ethidium bromide for 20 min and destained 3X for 20 min each with deionized water. Gel images were collected using ChemiDoc XRS Gel Photo Documentation System (Bio-Rad) and analyzed using BioNumerics software version 4.0 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Cluster analysis was used to compare isolates by using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Averages (UPGMA) with 1 % tolerance and a 0.5 % optimization setting based on Dice coefficients.

Determining the prevalence of beta-lactam and tetracycline resistant E. coli genotypes

To estimate the prevalence of select antibiotic resistance genes, DNA templates of beta-lactam (Amp, AMC and Cfz) and tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates were prepared by pelleting 2 ml of overnight culture at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The pellets were then re-suspended with 200 μl of nanopure water and boiled for 10 min in a heat block. The boiled suspensions were centrifuged briefly and 2 μl of the supernatant was used as DNA template for PCR assays. PCR assays were used to test for beta-lactamase encoding gene (bla TEM-1, bla SHV-1, and bla CTX-M) and two tetracycline resistance genes [tet(A) and tet(B)]. A total of 143 and 364 isolates (from both open and closed water sources) were tested for bla TEM-1, bla SHV-1, and bla CTX-M and two tetracycline resistance genes tet(A) and tet(B), respectively. Positive (E. coli H4H) and negative (E. coli K12) control strains were included with each set of PCR tests. Reactions were performed using a DNA thermocycler (C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad) with specific primers (Table 1).
Table 1

Primers sequences used in this study

Primer

Nucleotide sequence

Reference

uidA

LGO_uidA F-5′-GACCCACACTTTGCCGTAAT-3′

This study

LGO_uidA R-5′-AGTCTGGATCGCGAAAACTG-3′

CTX-M

F- 5′-TTTGCGATGTGCAGTACCAGTAA-3′

[22]

R-5′-CGATATCGTTGGTGGTGCCATA-3′

CTX-M-1 group

F-5′-GGT TAA AAA ATC ACT GCG TC-3′

[22]

R-5′-TTG GTG ACG ATT TTA GCC GC-3′

CTX-M-2 group

F- 5′-ATG ATG ACT CAG AGC ATT CG-3′

[22]

R-5′-TGG GTT ACG ATT TTC GCC GC-3′

CTX-M-9, Toho-2 group

F-5′-ATG GTG ACA AAG AGA GTG CA-3′

[22]

R-5′-CCC TTC GGC GAT GAT TCT C-3′

bla SHV

F-5′-AGGATTGACTGCCTTTTTG-3′

[41]

R-5′-ATTTGCTGATTTCGCTCG-3′

bla TEM

F-5′-ATCAGCAATAAACCAGC-3′

[41]

R-5′-CCCCGAAGAACGTTTTC-3′

tet(A)

F-5′-GAAACCCAACATACCCCTGA-3′

This study

R-5′-GAAGCTGAGCGGGTTGAGAG-3′

tet(B)

F-5′-GTTCGACAAAGATCGCATTG-3′

This study

R-5′-TCTGTATTATCACGTGTATTTTTGG-3′

PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 μl that included 2 μl DNA template, 12.5 μl master mix (ThemoFisher Scientific), 2 μl of each primer (10 μM) and 8.5 μl of PCR grade water. The following PCR running conditions were used for bla TEM-1: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 63 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. For bla SHV-1 PCR the conditions included initial denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, followed by 32 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. For tet(A) and tet(B) PCR the conditions included denaturation was at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 2 min [21, 22]. For CTX-M PCR the conditions included initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 52 °C for 15 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min [21]. Gel electrophoresis (1.5 % agarose) was used to analyze PCR products and a 1-kb DNA ladder (Gene ruler 1 Kb, Life Technologies) was used as a size standard. CTX-M grouping (group 1, group 2 and group 9) [22] was evaluated for all isolates that were positive for the CTX-M marker by using bi-directional DNA sequencing of CTX-M PCR amplicons (Functional Bioscience, Madison, WI). Sequencher (ver 5.0) software was used to process DNA traces, and the sequences were then compared with the reported sequences from GeneBank by using the BLAST utility (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to estimate the prevalence of antibiotic resistance and a student’s t-test was used to analyze the mean of resistant isolates and resistance genes. MANOVA was used to compare the prevalence within and between groups where P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Between-group statistical comparisons were adjusted for compounding error by using a Bonferroni adjustment to assess significance [P ≤ 0.05/(number of tests)]. CLC Main Workbench (CLC Bio Aarhus, Denmark) was used for sequence alignment.

Results

A total of 155 water samples were collected from open (n = 93) and closed (n = 62) drinking water sources in dry-arid (n = 40) and lush-mountainous (n = 115) regions of northern Tanzania (Table 2). Presumptive E. coli was detected from 110 of 155 (71 %) water samples and 100 % of 1819 tested isolates were positive for the uidA PCR marker. Between dry-arid and lush-mountainous areas, we recovered an average of 11.2 and 11.9 E. coli isolates per sample, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Distribution of samples and antimicrobial resistant (AMR) E. coli in two different regions of northern Tanzania

Regions

District

Source

Nature

Samples

Number of E. coli isolates

AMR E. coli

% AMR E. coli

Dry-arid

      
 

Longido

Tap

Closed

7

9

5

55

 

Monduli

Pond

Open

11

220

64

29

  

River

Open

2

12

5

41

  

Tap

Closed

8

44

30

68

 

Simanjiro

Pond

Open

6

83

21

25

  

River

Open

2

36

11

30.5

  

Stream

Open

1

1

1

100

  

Well

Closed

3

42

24

57

  

Total

 

40

447

161

 

Lush-mountainous

      
 

Arumeru

River

Open

39

672

378

56

  

Stream

Open

1

26

25

96

  

Tap

Closed

6

109

33

30

  

Well

Closed

1

2

0

0

 

Arusha

Pond

Open

2

6

5

83

  

River

Open

12

190

70

37

  

Stream

Open

7

71

41

58

  

Tap

Closed

15

196

91

46

  

Well

Closed

4

10

4

40

 

Moshi

Pond

Open

3

4

1

25

  

River

Open

4

10

2

20

  

Stream

Open

3

24

16

66

  

Tap

Closed

18

52

28

54

  

Total

 

115

1,372

694

 

Distribution of samples and antimicrobial resistant (AMR) E. coli isolated from open- and closed-water sources located in two different regions of northern Tanzania

Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli

Antibiotic susceptibility testing demonstrated that at least 46.9 % (854 of 1819) of E. coli were resistant to one or more antibiotics. With ten antibiotics tested there was a possibility of detecting 210 = 1024 different combinations of resistant phenotypes, of which we detected 104 with 99 including >1 resistance phenotype (Table 3, Additional file 1: Table S1). Isolates that were resistant to nine out of ten antibiotics were found in pond water from the dry-arid region (AmpAMCCfzCipChlStrSulTetTri) and one isolate that was resistant to seven antibiotics was found from a lush-mountainous tap water sample (Table 3).
Table 3

Percentage of multidrug resistant E. coli isolates obtained from drinking-water sources

Sources (number of isolates tested)

Number and (%) of resistance for multiple antibiotics

 

2–3

4–6

≥7 P

Dry-arid (447)

38 (8.5)

48 (10.7)

10 (2.2)

Open sources (352)

27 (7.6)

39 (11.2)

9 (2.5) 0.199

Closed sources (95)

15 (15.38)

7 (7.7)

0

Lush-mountainous (1,372)

182 (13.3)

189 (13.8)

23 (1.7)

Open sources (1,010)

147 (14.6)

145 (14.4)

9 (0.9) 0.17

Closed sources (362)

38 (10.6)

44 (12.04)

15 (4.2)

Antibiotics tested included ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and trimethoprim

The mean proportion of E. coli isolates resistant to ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline and trimethoprim was significantly higher (15–30 %) compared to other tested antibiotics (0–6 %; P < 0.05). Resistance to these antibiotics occurred alone or in association with other antibiotics for all of the tested waters. There was no statistical difference between the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in closed and open water sources, with the exception of the prevalence of trimethoprim resistance (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Proportion of antibiotic-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from closed (white) and open (black) water sources

Prevalence of β-lactam and tetracycline resistance genes

Out of 143 Amp-resistant E. coli isolates, there was no significant difference in the distribution between open and closed water isolates for bla TEM -1, bla CTX-M and bla SHV-1 (Kruskal-Wallis test, P > 0.05) (Fig. 3). Among the 16 isolates positive for bla CTX-M, fifteen were bla CTX-M15 and one was bla CTX-M79 (all from open water sources). Among the β-lactam-resistant isolates, bla TEM-1 was predominant (67 %) followed by bla CTX-M (17.7 %) and bla SHV-1 (6.0 %). Among the 364 tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates, the prevalence of tet(A) and tet(B) genotypes was equal for both open and closed water, respectively (Wilk’s Lambda = 0.95, F = 0.72, P = 0.54) (Fig. 3). Overall prevalence in tetracycline-resistant isolates, tet(A) was predominant (57.4 %) followed by tet(B) (24.0 %).
Fig. 3

Proportion of antibiotic resistance genes in open (white) and closed (black) water sources

Macro-restriction enzyme results

Thirty-seven E. coli isolates with >2 antibiotic resistance phenotypes obtained from different water sources were genotyped by macro-restriction assays. A significant degree of genetic diversity was evident from these assays (Fig. 4). There were a few isolates (4 %) from the same water source that clustered into one group or in adjacent clusters. For instance, isolates #3 and #16 (pond water isolates from Simanjiro district) were clustered in the same group, while isolates #11, #25 and #13 (tap water isolates from Moshi urban area) were clustered together (Fig. 4) consistent with genetic similarity (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Dendrogram from macro-restriction digest assays for multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates from different surface water

Discussion

We assessed the presence, genetic similarity, and distribution of AMR E. coli to determine if there might be a risk of transmission to people and animals. E. coli was isolated from 71 % of the water samples, and of 1819 E. coli tested, 46.9 % were resistant to one or more antibiotic. Some of the sampled waters are shared between people and animals and can easily be contaminated with fecal bacteria. Other studies have reported the presence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli from surface waters. For example, Nontongana et al., [23] reported that E. coli recovered from the Kat river in South Africa were resistant to ampicillin (98 %), tetracycline (13 %) and streptomycin (8 %). Dolejská et al., [24] reported that, on average, 17 % of surface water E. coli isolates were resistant to one or more antibiotics in the Czech Republic.

For the present study, the prevalence of resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline and trimethoprim was significantly higher than other tested antibiotics in both open and closed water sources. These five resistance phenotypes have been reported as relatively prominent for clinical isolates obtained from children (<5 years of age) in Tanzania [25] and this pattern of multidrug resistance has been reported elsewhere in both hospital and environmental settings [23, 2628]. Presumably, the dissemination of these resistance traits is related to the spread of mobile genetic elements such as plasmids that are widely distributed among enteric bacteria [29]. In a separate study we characterized the plasmids from a panel of 31 isolates that were isolated from our water sample survey [15]. Plasmid typing (PCR) showed that these isolates harbored at least eleven plasmid replicon types (IncI1, FIC, P, FIIA, A/C, FIB, FIA, H12, K/B B/O, and N) and the filter-mating conjugation experiments indicated that these plasmids were transmitted to the recipient hosts at a rate ranged between 10−1 and 10−7 [15].

We detected considerable genetic variation among antibiotic-resistant isolates of E. coli from multiple water sources, which probably should not be unexpected given the degree of genetic resolution that is afforded by macro-restriction digest assays. Nevertheless, two isolates were indistinguishable (#3 and #16) suggesting that clonal dissemination may contribute to the dissemination of resistant bacteria and resistance genes.

Importantly, we found isolates that are resistant to ciprofloxacin from all types of water sources, although the prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli (5.3 %) was less than other studies that isolated E. coli from sewage and treatment ponds [30]. Ciprofloxacin, like other antibiotics in Tanzania, can be purchased easily from many drug shops without a prescription. This broad-spectrum antibiotic is frequently used to treat urinary-tract infections that are also commonly resistant to the first line of antibiotics such as amoxicillin, cotrimoxazole [31]. In Tanzania, resistance to members of first and second-line antibiotics has been documented in children and pregnant women with E. coli infection [31]. Therefore, caution should be taken to avoid indiscriminate and inappropriate use of antibiotics especially in developing countries like Tanzania where these drugs are often sold without prescription, contrary to drug regulation [32].

We also documented a high prevalence of the bla TEM-1 and tet(A) genes, which is similar to reports from India and Thailand [33, 34]. Bla TEM-1 is widely distributed by plasmids and encodes a clinically significant, broad spectrum β-lactamase that hydrolyzes many β-lactams in addition to many penicillins. Christopher et al., [25] reported that 100 % of E. coli clinical isolates from children in Tanzania were resistant to ampicillin and these may have harbored bla TEM-1. The high prevalence could also be due to higher utilization of beta-lactams antibiotic classes in many areas in Tanzania [35]. Moreover tet(A), which is plasmid mediated, encodes an active efflux pump that functions against all tetracycline drugs.

We found that E. coli collected from both closed and open water sources harbored tet(B) resistance genes, but we only detected bla CTX-M79 and bla CTX-M15 genes from open water sources. Tet(B) confers resistance to the second generation of tetracycline (e.g., minocycline) [36] while bla CTX-M15 exerts hydrolytic activity against ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin that is frequently used in people [37]. The detection of bla CTX-M15 in water sources in northern Tanzania is consistent with previous reports of its widespread distribution [38]. Bla CTX-M79 has been isolated from people and farmed fish in China, and from cattle in the USA [39]. In Tanzania, we believe that this is the first report of bla CTX-M79 from E. coli water isolates. Emergence and dissemination of resistant bacteria for extended-spectrum cephalosporins in drinking water should be a point of concern to physicians and health officers who manage infections in both hospital and community settings [40].

Conclusion

We report detection of a relatively high prevalence of ampicillin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, sulpamethoxazole and streptomycin resistant E. coli (15–30 %) in all sources of water commonly used by people in northern Tanzania. Because of shared-access, it is likely that livestock and people are exposed to AMR bacteria on a daily basis in communities where water treatment options are limited. Further work is needed to determine if these exposures lead to negative health outcomes.

Abbreviations

AMR: 

Antimicrobial resistance

CLSI: 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

CTX-M: 

Cefotaxime- Munich

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

ESBL: 

Extended spectrum β-lactamase

MANOVA: 

Multivariate Analysis of Variance

MDR: 

Multidrug resistance

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PFGE: 

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Lisa Orfe, Lisa Jones, Deogratius Mshanga and Sylivester Temba provided technical assistance. Dr. Francis Shahada (deceased) helped with in the study design.

Funding

This work was funded in part by the COSTECH through the Nelson Mandela Africa Institution of Science and Technology Arusha Tanzania, the Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health and the National Science Foundation (DEB1216040). Additional support was provided by the Prof Woutrina Smith.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data is reported in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

BL developed the study design; BL collected, processed samples; BL, SM analyzed samples; BL, SM, JB, WS and DRC prepared, read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the submitted version of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No human subjects samples or data was used in this study and so no Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval or participants consent were needed.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania
(2)
Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, USA
(3)
One Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, USA

References

  1. WHO. Progress on drinking water and sanitation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2014/jmp-report/en/.Google Scholar
  2. Jenkins M. Gross Fecal Pollution of a Rural Watershed in Kenya: Research Identifying Cattle as a Major Source in the River Njoro Watershed. Research Brief. 08-01 SUMAWA 2008. http://glcrsp.ucdavis.edu/publications/SUMAWA/08-01-SUMAWA.pdf.
  3. WHO and Unicef. WHO and Unicef, 2006. Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: the urban and rural challenge of the decade. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
  4. WHO. Waterborne zoonoses. Identification, causes, and control. 2004. www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/diseases/zoonoses.pdf.Google Scholar
  5. The Center for Food Security and Public health. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections. 2009. http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/e_coli.pdf.Google Scholar
  6. Orth D, Grif K, Zimmerhackl LB, Wurzner R. Prevention and treatment of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections in humans. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:101–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. 2014. http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/surveillancereport/en/.Google Scholar
  8. Roberts RR, Hota B, Ahmad I, Scott RD, Foster SD, Abbasi F, Schabowski S, Kampe LM, Ciavarella GG, Supino M, Naples J, Cordell R, Levy SB, Weinstein RA. Hospital and societal costs of antimicrobial-resistant infections in a Chicago teaching hospital: implications for antibiotic stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1175–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wose Kinge CN, Ateba CN, Kawadza DT. Antibiotic resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolated from different water sources in the Mmabatho locality, Northwest Province, South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2010;106:44–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Balasubramaniam A, Eswaran MA, Suresh P, Sukumar K. Detection of tetracycline resistance determinant tet A gene and antimicrobial resistance pattern in Escherichia coli isolates recovered from healthy layer chickens. Vet World. 2014;7:635–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Okeke IN, Lamikanra A, Edelman R. Socioeconomic and behavioral factors leading to acquired bacterial resistance to antibiotics in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:18–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Dekker D, Krumkamp R, Sarpong N, Frickmann H, Boahen K, Frimpong M, Asare R, Larbi R, Hagen R, Poppert S, Rabsch W, Marks F, Adu-Sarkodie Y, May J. Drinking water from dug wells in rural Ghana — salmonella contamination, environmental factors, and genotypes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:3535–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministry of Lands and Human Settlements Development. Tanzania National Human Settlements Development Policy. 2000. http://www.tanzania.go.tz/egov_uploads/documents/nationalhumansettlements_en.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. EPA. Method 1604: total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water by membrane filtration using a simultaneous detection technique (MI medium). 2002.Google Scholar
  15. Lyimo B, Buza J, Subbiah M, Temba S, Kipasika H, Smith W, Call DR. IncF Plasmids Are Commonly Carried by Antibiotic Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Drinking Water Sources in Northern Tanzania. Int J Microbiol. 2016;2016:7. Article ID 3103672.Google Scholar
  16. Iqbal S, Robinson J, Deere D, Saunders JR, Edwards C, Porter J. Efficiency of the polymerase chain reaction amplification of the uid gene for detection of Escherichia coli in contaminated water. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997;24:498–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Subbiah M, Top EM, Shah DH, Call DR. Selection pressure required for long-term persistence of blaCMY-2-positive IncA/C plasmids. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:4486–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Approved standard. In twenty fourth edition document M100-S24. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); 2014.Google Scholar
  19. Call DR, Singer RS, Meng D, Broschat SL, Orfe LH, Anderson JM, Herndon DR, Kappmeyer LS, Daniels JB, Besser TE. blaCMY-2-positive IncA/C plasmids from Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica are a distinct component of a larger lineage of plasmids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:590–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. CDC. Standard Operating Procedure for PulseNet PFGE of Escherichia coli O157 : H7, Escherichia coli non - O157 (STEC), Salmonella serotypes, Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri. 2013. 157:1–13. https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pdf/ecoli-shigella-salmonella-pfge-protocol-508c.pdf.
  21. Eckert C, Gautier V, Arlet G. DNA sequence analysis of the genetic environment of various blaCTX-M genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:14–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Saladin M, Cao VTB, Lambert T, Donay JL, Herrmann JL, Ould-Hocine Z, Verdet C, Delisle F, Philippon A, Arlet G. Diversity of CTX-M β-lactamases and their promoter regions from Enterobacteriaceae isolated in three Parisian hospitals. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;209:161–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nontongana N, Sibanda T, Ngwenya E, Okoh AI. Prevalence and antibiogram profiling of Escherichia coli pathotypes isolated from the Kat river and the fort Beaufort abstraction water. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:8213–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Dolejská M, Bierosová B, Kohoutová L, Literák I, Cízek A. Antibiotic-resistant Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates with integrons and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in surface water and sympatric black-headed gulls. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106:1941–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Christopher A, Mshana SE, Kidenya BR, Hokororo A, Morona D. Bacteremia and resistant gram-negative pathogens among under-fives in Tanzania. Ital J Pediatr. 2013;39:27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang C, Gu X, Zhang S, Wang P, Guo C, Gu J, Hou J. Characterization of antibiotic-resistance genes in antibiotic resistance Escherichia coli isolates from a lake. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;65:635–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lima AA, Lima NL, Pinho MC, Barros Junior EA, Teixeira MJ, Martins MC, Guerrant RL. High frequency of strains multiply resistant to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline isolated from patients with shigellosis in northeastern Brazil during the period 1988 to 1993. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:256–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Blomberg B, Mwakagile DSM, Urassa WK, Maselle SY, Mashurano M, Digranes A, Harthug S, Langeland N. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Berglund B. Environmental dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes and correlation to anthropogenic contamination with antibiotics. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2015;5:28564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Amaya E, Reyes D, Paniagua M, Calderón S, Rashid M-U, Colque P, Kühn I, Möllby R, Weintraub A, Nord CE. Antibiotic resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from different aquatic environmental sources in León, Nicaragua. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:E347–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Global Antibiotic Resistance Partnership—Tanzania Working Group. Situation Analysis and Recommendations: Antibiotic Use and Resistance in Tanzania. Washington, DC and New Delhi: Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy; 2015.Google Scholar
  32. Rahman MM, Haq JA, Hossain MA, Sultana R, Islam F, et al. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in an urban hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24:508–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Diwan V, Chandran SP, Tamhankar a J, Stålsby Lundborg C, Macaden R. Identification of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and quinolone resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from hospital wastewater from central India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67:857–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Changkaew K, Utrarachkij F, Siripanichgon K, Nakajima C, Suthienkul O, Suzuki Y. Characterization of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from shrimps and their environment. J Food Prot. 2014;77:1394–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. van den Boogaard J, Semvua HH, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse RE, Kibiki GS. Sale of fluoroquinolones in northern Tanzania: a potential threat for fluoroquinolone use in tuberculosis treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;65:145–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Vilacoba E, Almuzara M, Gulone L, Traglia GM, Figueroa S a, Sly G, Fernández A, Centrón D, Ramírez MS. Emergence and spread of plasmid-borne tet(B)::ISCR2 in minocycline- resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:651–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Baraniak A, Fiett J, Hryniewicz W, Nordmann P, Gniadkowski M. Ceftazidime-hydrolysing CTX-M-15 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in Poland. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50:393–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Park SH, Byun J-H, Choi S-M, Lee D-G, Kim S-H, Kwon J-C, Park C, Choi J-H, Yoo J-H. Molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in the community and hospital in Korea: emergence of ST131 producing CTX-M-15. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:149.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Su Fei T, Bai Yi C, Yun Zhuo Chu SW. Prevalence of rectal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli among elderly people in community settings in China. Can J Microbiol. 2008;54:781–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Pitout JDD, Gregson DB, Church DL, Laupland KB. Population-based laboratory surveillance for AmpC β-lactamase- producing Escherichia coli, Calgary. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:443–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Colom K, Pérez J, Alonso R, Fernández-Aranguiz A, Lariño E, Cisterna R. Simple and reliable multiplex PCR assay for detection of blaTEM, blaSHV and blaOXA-1 genes in Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;223:147–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement