- Research article
- Open Access
Multiplex PCR for detection of the Vibrio genus and five pathogenic Vibrio species with primer sets designed using comparative genomics
© Kim et al. 2015
- Received: 8 January 2015
- Accepted: 19 October 2015
- Published: 26 October 2015
The genus Vibrio is clinically significant and major pathogenic Vibrio species causing human Vibrio infections are V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus and V. mimicus. In this study, we screened for novel genetic markers using comparative genomics and developed a Vibrio multiplex PCR for the reliable diagnosis of the Vibrio genus and the associated major pathogenic Vibrio species.
A total of 30 Vibrio genome sequences were subjected to comparative genomics, and specific genes of the Vibrio genus and five major pathogenic Vibrio species were screened. The designed primer sets from the screened genes were evaluated by single PCR using DNAs from various Vibrio spp. and other non-Vibrio bacterial strains. A sextuplet multiplex PCR using six primer sets was developed to enable detection of the Vibrio genus and five pathogenic Vibrio species.
The designed primer sets from the screened genes yielded specific diagnostic results for target the Vibrio genus and Vibrio species. The specificity of the developed multiplex PCR was confirmed with various Vibrio and non-Vibrio strains. This Vibrio multiplex PCR was evaluated using 117 Vibrio strains isolated from the south seashore areas in Korea and Vibrio isolates were identified as Vibrio spp., V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus and V. alginolyticus, demonstrating the specificity and discriminative ability of the assay towards Vibrio species.
This novel multiplex PCR method could provide reliable and informative identification of the Vibrio genus and major pathogenic Vibrio species in the food safety industry and in early clinical treatment, thereby protecting humans against Vibrio infection.
- V. cholerae
- V. parahaemolyticus
- V. vulnificus
- V. alginolyticus
- V. mimicus
- Comparative genomics
The Vibrio genus, which consists of more than 30 species, includes a number of major foodborne pathogens. Eleven of these Vibrio species are known to be human pathogens causing toxigenic cholera and other infections (vibriosis). V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus and V. mimicus are pathogens of note in the clinical microbiology and food safety fields [1–6]. Vibrio are ubiquitous in halophilic marine environments and the consumption of raw or undercooked contaminated seafood causes human infections worldwide [4, 6–8]. The Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance System (COVIS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) considers pathogenic Vibrio species to be a public health threat and annually reports the number of human infections during Vibrio outbreaks (vibriosis by pathogenic Vibrio species including V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus, V. mimicus and other Vibrio species; Cholera due to toxigenic V. cholerae) [2, 9, 10].
Molecular biological DNA-based diagnostic methods, especially polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have been studied and developed for accurate and rapid identification of Vibrio spp. These methods provide advantages relative to and/or that complement standard microbiological culture-based methods [8, 11]. In early studies, PCR diagnostic methods were developed separately for each Vibrio species using specific expected virulence factor genes as genetic markers, including the cholera toxin (ctx) gene for V. cholerae and V. mimicus [8, 12], the thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) gene and the thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin (trh) gene for V. parahaemolyticus [13–15], and the cytotoxin-haemolysin (vvhA) gene for V. vulnificus [16, 17]. Recently, several genes, such as the regulatory gene toxR and the housekeeping genes atpA, rpoB, and dnaJ, have been suggested as novel genetic markers for use in PCR methods to complement the diagnosis of Vibrio species [3, 18–21]. Multiplex PCR methods for diagnosis of major pathogenic Vibrio species have also been developed [3, 21–25], and modified PCR methods with DNA-DNA hybridization or other technologies have been attempted for the accurate and rapid detection of Vibrio species [26–28].
In our previous studies, comparative genomics was used to screen for genetic markers for designing specific primer sets for Salmonella spp. and other pathogenic bacteria. The selected genetic markers were successfully used in the identification of Salmonella enterica serovars and other pathogenic bacteria, reflecting the potential application of genomics and bioinformatics for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens [29–32]. Through the Vibrio genome projects, 21 Vibrio genomes have been completely sequenced and were available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) in 2012 (more than 100 draft Vibrio genome projects are also available or in progress). The original purpose of this study was to develop novel genetic markers, which would enable reliable and comprehensive diagnostics for Vibrio species. We employed an ‘in silico’ approach utilizing comparative genomics between genome sequences of Vibrio spp., thereby differentiating our method from previously reported Vibrio PCR methods. Specific expected genes for the Vibrio genus and 5 Vibrio species, which were chosen based on their significance as human pathogens as well as based on sequences being available through the NCBI, were screened using comparative genomics. Ultimately, a sextuplet Vibrio multiplex PCR was developed from the screened specific genes and the utility of this assay was evaluated.
Screening of Vibrio genus- and species-specific genes using comparative genomics and the design of primer sets
To screen for Vibrio genus-specific genes, a total of 4832 gene sequences from V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 [GenBank: NC_004603.1, NC_004605.1] were compared with each representative genome sequence (fna file) from 4 Vibrio species. Ultimately, 1256 genes expected to be present in the Vibrio genus were selected based on the outputs of the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program that indicated their relatively high matched DNA length (bp), thereby eliminating genes of low homology within the Vibrio genus. These genes were also compared to the non-redundant (nr) database of NCBI to eliminate genes that were highly matched with other biological sources. A total of 38 genes, which resulted low homology (less than 30 bp size that matched sequences in the nr database), were chosen and were compared individually to the nr and the microbial genome databases of the NCBI BLAST web site to again confirm their specificity in the Vibrio genus . Finally, 2 genes (ATP synthase subunit alpha, C3281450-3279879 [GenBank: NC_004603.1] and recombinase A, C2694352-2693309 [GenBank: NC_004603.1]) were selected for the design and evaluation of primer sets for Vibrio genus-specific detection.
To screen for specific genes in each of the Vibrio species, the coding region sequences representing each of 5 Vibrio species were analyzed using the BLAST program to compare them against Vibrio genome sequences without the genome sequences of the targeted Vibrio species. The outputs of the BLAST program were analyzed by screening a number of genes (between 400 ~ 650 genes) to eliminate highly homologous genes within the Vibrio genus and to select those with matching under <100 (or 50) bp. The screened genes were then compared to the nr database of NCBI to select genes specific to the targeted Vibrio species with relatively low homology matching a length < 22 (or 23) bp of DNA. An appropriate number of specific expected genes (or DNA fragments) within the target Vibrio species were selected as follows: 59 genes from V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633, 94 genes from V. cholerae O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961, 134 genes from V. vulnificus YJ016, 23 genes from V. alginolyticus 12G01 and 39 genes from V. mimicus MB-451. These selected genes were evaluated for their gene sizes and also were individually compared using the microbial genome database (complete and draft genome) on the NCBI BLAST web site . In total, 15 primer sets (3 primer sets of each Vibrio species) expected to be specific for each species were designed. The designing of primers sets was considered by melting temperature (Tm), PCR product size and the regions of conserved (or varied) sequence in the target genes within Vibrio species.
The specificity of designed primer sets for the Vibrio genus and species
Bacterial strains used in this study
Escherichia coli EHEC (O157:H7)
Escherichia coli O157:H7
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi
Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis
Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum
Salmonella enterica serovar Pullorum
Shigella flexneri 2a strain 2457 T
enteroinvensive E. coli (EIEC)
enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC)
enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC)
enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC)
Specificity, sensitivity and multi-detection ability of Vibrio multiplex PCR
Primer pairs for Vibrio multiplex PCR designed and used in this study and their sources
Source of genea
Target genus or species
PCR product size (bp)
Final primer Conc. (μM)
Primer sequences (5’-3’)b
Protein of target gene
VP 1155272 F
5’ AGCTT ATTGG CGGTT TCTGT CGG
hypothetical protein VPA1095
VP 1155272 R
5’ CKCAA GACCA AGAAA AGCCG TC
VC C634002 F
5’ CAAGC TCCGC ATGTC CAGAA GC
hypothetical protein VCA0694
VC C634002 R
5’ GGGGC GTGAC GCGAA TGATT
VV 2055918 F79
5’ CAGCC GGACG TCGTC CATTT TG
hypothetical protein VV2055
VV 2055918 R
5’ ATGAG TAAGC GTCCG ACGCG T
VA 1198230 F
5’ ACGGC ATTGG AAATT GCGAC TG
whole genome shotgun sequence
VA 1198230 R
5’ TACCC GTCTC ACGAG CCCAA G
5’ ATAAA GCGGG CTTGC GTGCA
contig43, whole genome shotgun sequence
5’ GATTT GGRAA AATCC KTCGT GC
VG C2694352 F46
5’ GTC ARA TTG AAA ARC ART TYG GTA AAG G
VG C2694352 R734
5’ ACY TTR ATR CGN GTT TCR TTR CC
Evaluation of multiplex PCR with Vibrio isolates from seashore areas in Korea
Number of isolated Vibrio strains from local areas of Korea and their multiplex PCR results
Area of sampling
# of sample
Results of each specific primer set in multiplex PCRa
VP C1155272 F-R
VC C634002 F-R
VV 2055918 F79-R
VA 1198230 F-R
VM C727581 F-R
VG C2694352 F46-R734
Yeosu (by MFDSb)
Busan (by BMIHEc)
Identification results of representative Vibrio isolates between Vibrio multiplex PCR and MALDI-TOF MS system
Identification of Vibrio isolates by Vibrio multiplex PCR
Identification of Vibrio isolates by MALDI-TOF MS analysis
Lane No. in Fig. 2 a
MALDI-TOF MS results
log score valueb
Vibrio alginolyticus DSM 2171 T
Vibrio mytili DSM 19137 T
Vibrio alginolyticus DSM 2171 T
Vibrio parahaemolyticus DSM 11058
Vibrio mytili DSM 19137 T
Vibrio alginolyticus DSM 2171 T
Vibrio fortis DSM 19133 T
Vibrio vulnificus DSM 10143 T
Vibrio alginolyticus CCM 2578 T
Vibrio parahaemolyticus DSM 11058
Vibrio vulnificus CCUG 38429
The reliability of phenotype-based identification methods, which are laborious and time-consuming procedures that include microbiological culture-based identification, for detection of the Vibrio genus and specific Vibrio species has been questioned due to variations in the biochemical characteristics within the genus [4, 34]. In particular, the rapid differential diagnosis of clinically important V. cholerae from other Vibrio species is essential and economical and rapid diagnosis of V. cholerae is critical in mitigating the spread of Vibrio during an outbreak, as well as aiding in epidemic-preventing surveillance [12, 35–37]. Also, the current gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of cholera has been issued due to the lengthy culturing time required on selective growth media (TCBS is the only proven selective and ideal media for selective isolation and purification of Vibrio spp.) [4, 8, 12]. As an alternative to culture-based identification, molecular biological methods, especially PCR, have been developed for the detection and identification of pathogenic Vibrio species in the food and clinical microbiology fields. These methods aim to overcome the disadvantages of phenotype-based biochemical identification and to allow for reliable identification .
Genome sequences of Vibrio strains used in this studya
Genome size (Mb)
Number of genes used in this study (on ffn file)
Status of genome project
V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633
V. cholerae O1 biovar EI Tor str. N16961
V. cholerae M66
V. cholerae MJ 1236
V. cholerae O395
V. vulnificus CMCP6
V. vulnificus MO6 24 O
V. vulnificus YJ016
V. fischeri MJ11
V. fischeri ES114
V. anguillarum 775
V. species Ex25
V. harveyi ATCC BAA-1116
V. splendidus LGP32
V. alginolyticus 12G01
NZ_CH902589 ~ NZ_CH902598c
V. mimicus MB-451
NZ_ADAF01000001 ~ NZ_ADAF01000003C
Our approach using an improved multiplex PCR assay along with comparative genomics for Vibrio identification differentiates our study from previously reported PCR methods. Recently, many Vibrio multiplex PCR assays have been reported for the identification of the major pathogenic Vibrio species; however, these multiplex PCR assays do not provide the diagnostic level required to be inclusive of the Vibrio genus [3, 21–26]. Our Vibrio multiplex PCR assay consists of two diagnostic levels for 1) the Vibrio genus and 2) five pathogenic Vibrio species. The reliable diagnosis of the Vibrio genus is important because the Vibrio genus consists of more than 30 species, including 11 reported human pathogenic Vibrio species [1, 4]. In addition to being able to diagnose the Vibrio genus, this multiplex PCR allows for the identification of the five major pathogenic Vibrio species: V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus and V. mimicus. The ability to simultaneously identify the five major pathogenic Vibrio species in single reaction is valuable in the clinical and food microbiology fields in that it provides informative diagnostics at the Vibrio genus level as well as at the species level. Another distinct feature of our Vibrio multiplex PCR is the novel genetic markers for the five major pathogenic Vibrio species that were derived through the use of comparative genomics. These genetic markers are different from those in other previous reports in which marker gene selection was based on the functional qualities of the proteins encoded by their virulence-related/regulatory genes, or on phylogenetic classification of the housekeeping genes within Vibrio spp. [3, 8, 12–22]. We sought to acquire highly specific genetic marker genes for the diagnosis of Vibrio species by considering their presence/absence in the Vibrio genus and other closely related bacteria. We also considered the variable/conserved regions (sequence variation) in the genetic marker genes within Vibrio species. Furthermore, our screening approach for novel genetic markers was based purely on gene sequence comparisons using comparative genomics and was therefore not tied to the functions of genes and consequently the selected genetic markers were hypothetical proteins or proteins with other functions, as presented in Table 2. To give more objective validation on the presence of our screened genetic marker genes in each target Vibrio species (genus), each marker gene was compared and confirmed with each available Vibrio genome sequence of NCBI microbial genome database (Additional file 3). All each marker gene of Vibrio multiplex PCR was present in all available Vibrio genome sequences of NCBI microbial genome database (Complete Genome, Chromosome, Scaffold levels).
While screening marker genes of the Vibrio genus present in all Vibrio genome sequences (core genome of Vibrio genus), most of the Vibrio genes were eliminated. Ultimately, we were left with two genes specific to the Vibrio genus, despite the fact that they are present not only in Vibrio spp., but also in closely related bacteria: recombinase A, C2694352-2693309 [GenBank: NC_004603.1] and ATP synthase subunit alpha (atpA), C3281450-3279879 [GenBank: NC_004603.1] of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633. Interestingly, the atpA gene has already been reported in multiplex PCR assays for Vibrio species . This supports the reliability of our genetic marker screening procedure using comparative genomics. Also, based on our screening results, we noted that the atpA gene is a more useful genetic marker for the Vibrio genus than for the Vibrio species.
The authors acknowledge that a more comprehensive panel of Vibrio strains will be required for the validation of this multiplex PCR. However, our study is extensive in that a large sample set of Vibrio isolates was sampled from seashore areas in Korea by MFDS, BMIHE and our laboratory. A total of 117 strains were evaluated by multiplex PCR and all isolates were determined to be Vibrio spp., as described in Table 3 and Fig. 2. Interestingly, while 94 isolates were identified as V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus and V. alginolyticus, no isolates of V. cholerae or V. mimicus, which are considered to be more closely related to each other that to other Vibrio species [35, 37], were found. The results of the multiplex PCR assay that identified non-V. cholerae from seashore environmental samples are identical and comparable with those from a Vibrio monitoring study in live oysters by DePaola et al. , thereby supporting the specificity of our Vibrio multiplex PCR. Lastly, 23 isolates from among the 117 were identified as Vibrio spp., but were not among the 5 target Vibrio species used in this multiplex PCR, suggesting more informative diagnostics results with respect to other Vibrio species. Also, the identification of the representative Vibrio isolates using MALDI-TOF MS additionally supported the reliability of this Vibrio multiplex PCR as shown in Table 4.
The present study selected novel genetic marker genes for the Vibrio genus and five other Vibrio species using comparative genomics and developed a sextuplet multiplex PCR assay using designed primer sets that allows for informative identification of Vibrio, thereby enabling rapid and specific diagnostics. We utilized this Vibrio multiplex PCR to demonstrate its discriminative ability for the Vibrio genus and each of five major pathogenic Vibrio species through the evaluation of Vibrio strains and isolates. However, despite the fact that additional validation will be needed with various Vibrio strains in order to establish the reliability of this Vibrio multiplex PCR, we suggest that our results with respect to the reliable performance of this assay should be of sufficient impact to recommend application of the assay as a useful diagnostic for pathogenic Vibrio species.
The Vibrio strains used in this study were collected from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), the Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms (KCCM), and the National Culture Collection for Pathogens (NCCP) of Korea as shown in Table 1. The Vibrio strains were inoculated in tryptic soy broth (BD, Sparks, MD, USA) containing 3 % NaCl and incubated using the recommended culture conditions for genomic DNA extraction. Various non-Vibrio type strains, including food-borne pathogens and other closely related bacterial type strains, were collected from the ATCC and NCCP, and incubated using the recommended culture conditions.
Genome sequences of Vibrio species
Genome sequences and their Vibrio strain references used in this study are shown in Table 5 (14 uncompleted genome shotgun sequences of Vibrio strains are not shown in this table). A total of 14 completed genome sequences and 16 whole genome shotgun sequences (Scaffolds or contigs) of Vibrio strains, including V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus and V. mimicus, were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) web site  between December 2011 and April 2012.
Comparative genomics for screening each Vibrio species-specific gene sequence
One representative genome sequence of each target Vibrio species was used for species-specific gene screening. These included: Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 [GenBank: NC_004603.1, NC_004605.1] , Vibrio cholerae O1 biovar EI Tor str. N16961 [GenBank: NC_002505.1, NC_002506.1] , Vibrio vulnificus YJ016 [GenBank: NC_005139.ffn, NC_005140.ffn], Vibrio alginolyticus 12G01 [GenBank: NZ_CH902589 ~ NZ_CH902598] and Vibrio mimicus MB-451 [GenBank: NZ_ADAF01000001 ~ NZ_ADAF01000003] . Scaffold sequences of V. alginolyticus and V. Mimicus, whose genome projects are not completed, were used for comparative genomics. To screen a specific gene (or DNA sequence) from each Vibrio species, the coding region sequences (ffn file) of each Vibrio species (target-Vibrio species) were compared against the genomic DNA sequences (fna file), which consist of Vibrio species excluding the genome sequence of the particular target Vibrio species, using the BLAST program (version 2.2.13) . Based on BLAST analysis, we selected genes for each target Vibrio species that had low homology scores relative to the genomes of other Vibrio species and then re-compared them against the non-redundant (nr) DNA sequence NCBI database. Final candidate genes of each Vibrio species-specific were used for the design of primer sets.
Comparative genomics for screening Vibrio genus-specific gene sequences
For screening Vibrio genus-specific genes, the coding region sequences of Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 [GenBank: NC_004603.1, NC_004605.1] were used as the representative genome sequence of the Vibrio genus. The coding region sequences of Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 (ffn file) were compared to each genome sequence of V. cholerae, V. vulnificus, V. mimicus and V. alginolyticus in order using the BLAST program and highly homologous genes expected to be present in all Vibrio species were screened. The screened genes were compared against the nr database and the microbial genomic database (representing complete and draft genome databases of microbes, respectively) on the NCBI web site. Vibrio genus-specific genes, which resulted in low homology (low sequence match)  considering their matched size and score of BLAST output, were selected for the design of Vibrio genus-specific primer sets.
Genomic DNA extraction
Cultured media from each bacterial strain was harvested in microtubes and the genomic DNA of each strain was extracted using the Genomic DNA extraction kit for bacteria (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea), according to the manufacturers instructions. Genomic DNA concentration was measured using a UV-spectrophotometer (Model UV-1700, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) and genomic DNAs with spectrophotometric ratios of 1.8 to 2.0 (A260/A280) were used. Genomic DNAs were stored at −20 °C.
Primer construction and PCR conditions
Primer sets, expected to be specific to the Vibrio genus and/or species, were designed from each of the screened candidate genes and were evaluated using genomic DNAs of Vibrio and other type strains listed in Table 1. PCR amplifications were carried out with 200 μM of each dNTP, 0.5 unit of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 1× Ex Taq buffer, 25 ng of template DNA and the adjusted concentration of each primer in a final reaction volume of 25 μl. PCR amplification was performed in a thermocycler (Model PC 808, ASTEC, Fukuoka, Japan) with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, finishing with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min and storage at 4 °C thereafter. Amplified products were electrophoresed on a 3 % agarose gel in 0.5× Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer, stained with ethidium bromide, visualized under UV-irradiation and photographed with a digital camera (Model COOLPIX 4300, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Multiplex PCR of Vibrio and construction of the internal amplification control (IAC)
The multiplex PCR was designed to include six sets of screened primers, which targeted the Vibrio genus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus and V. mimicus. The sequences of these primer sets along with their concentrations are shown in Table 2. In contrast to the single PCR reactions, one unit of Ex Taq DNA polymerase and 3 pg (around 106 copies) of IAC template were used in a single multiplex PCR reaction. The IAC template was constructed using the sequence of the target gene, c1155272-1154856 [GenBank: NC_004605.1] in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. A primer set was designated as VP c1155272 IAC F (5’- AGCTTATTGGCGGTTTCTGTCGG CTACACCGTCGGCAGTGTGT -3’) and VP c1155272 IAC R (5’- CGCAAGACCAAGAAAAGCCGTC CTAGTGGCGTTTCGGAAAC -3’), which were flanked with the primer sequence of 1155272 F-R at the 5’ end, resulting in amplification of a 104-bp DNA fragment including the partial gene sequence of c1155272-1154856 of V. parahaemolyticus. The amplified DNA fragment was inserted into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) to generate the IAC template plasmid enabling the amplification of the 104 bp-PCR product with this internal control sequence by the 1155272 F-R primer set as a positive control for the Vibrio multiplex PCR.
Limit of detection (LOD) and multi-detection ability for Vibrio species
For the LOD experiment using the Vibrio multiplex PCR, the quantity of Vibrio genomic DNAs was calculated as the copy number by genome size. As an example, for Vibrio parahaemolyticus (genome size of Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633: 5.17 Mb), 56.7 ng was considered to be 107 copies of genomic DNA and was diluted from 106 to 100 copies per microliter. Diluted genomic DNA was added from 5 × 106 copies to 5 × 100 copies in each reaction and 5 μl of the 25 μl-PCR products was loaded for 3 % agarose gel electrophoresis. The multi-detection ability of the Vibrio multiplex PCR was also evaluated with various combinations of genomic DNAs from the five Vibrio species (1 ng per each Vibrio species sample).
Collection and isolation of Vibrio isolates from the south seashore areas in Korea and evaluation of multiplex PCR
The isolated strains of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus sampled from the seashore of Busan and Yeosu in South Korea were obtained from BMIHE and MFDS in South Korea, respectively. Other Vibrio strains were isolated from 4 south seashore areas, Busan, Geoje, Jinhae, and Chungmu, in Korea, using isolation methods recommended by the bacteriological analytical manual from the FDA . In brief, samples from each local area were kept at 7 to 10 °C until delivered to the laboratory. Then, 25 g (or 50 ml of liquid) of sample was placed into a stomacher bag and 225 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was added. Samples were homogenized for 1 min at maximum RPM using a stomacher (Seward Stomachers® 400 Circulator, Manchester, UK). One milliliter of homogenized sample was inoculated into 10 ml of alkaline peptone water (APW) and was incubated overnight at 35 °C. An inoculating loop was used to streak bacteria from the top of the APW onto thiosulfate-citrate-bile salt-sucrose Agar (TCBS agar, BD, Sparks, MD, USA) and the plate was incubated overnight at 35 °C. Vibrio positive colonies, which were yellow or green to bluish-green colonies on TCBS agar, were sampled and cultured in TSB media containing 3 % NaCl for isolation of stock or genomic DNA extraction allowing for use in multiplex PCR.
PCR product sequencing
Each amplified PCR product was purified from agarose gels using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and by QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The sequencing of purified PCR products was performed using an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the forward and reverse primers used in the Vibrio multiplex PCR. The sequencing data was compared with the known targeted gene sequences which were originally used for specific-primer design for each Vibrio species.
MALDI-TOF MS analysis
For the identification of Vibrio isolates by means of MALDI-TOF MS, an individual colony were deposited directly on a target polished steel microscout target plate (MSP 96; Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) overlaid with 1 μl of 70 % formic acid and 1 μl of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution in acetonitrile : water : trifluoro acetic acid (TFA) (ratio 50:47.5:2.5, v/v) and then air-dried. After crystallization, measurements were performed on a microflex LT bench-top mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH) with a smart beam laser. The parameter conditions were as follows: ion source 1, 20.0 kV; ion source 2, 18.2 kV; lens, 6.0 kV; initial laser power; 25 %; maximal laser power; 35 %. Ionization was performed with laser irradiation. Raw spectra data were imported into Biotyper software 3.0 (Bruker Daltonik GmbH). Mass spectra were collected within a mass range of 2000–20,000 m/z, with 1200 satisfactory laser shots in 240 shot steps. Prior to analysis, the reference strain Escherichia coli DH5α was used as a standard for calibration and as reference for quality control. Each sample was matched to a reference library in the Biotyper software database, which contains spectra of approximately 5627 species.
This work was supported by a grant from the Agenda Program (PJ009237) of the Rural Development Administration in the Republic of Korea.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Janda JM, Powers C, Bryant RG, Abbott SL. Current perspectives on the epidemiology and pathogenesis of clinically significant Vibrio spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988;1:245–67.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the united states-major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:7–15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Izumiya H, Matsumoto K, Yahiro S, Lee J, Morita M, Yamamoto S, et al. Multiplex PCR assay for identification of three major pathogenic Vibrio spp., Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio vulnificus. Mol Cell Probes. 2011;25:174–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J. Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:403–31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iwamoto M, Ayers T, Mahon BE, Swerdlow DL. Epidemiology of seafood-associated infections in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:399–411.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DePaola A, Jones JL, Woods J, Burkhardt 3rd W, Calci KR, Krantz JA, et al. Bacterial and viral pathogens in live oysters: 2007 United States market survey. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2754–68.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Espiñeira M, Atanassova M, Vieites JM, Santaclara FJ. Validation of a method for the detection of five species, serogroups, biotypes and virulence factors of Vibrio by multiplex PCR in fish and seafood. Food Microbiol. 2010;27:122–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaysner CA, DePaola A: Vibrio cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and other Vibrio spp., Bacteriological analytical manual, 8th edition, revision A, 1998. [http://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/laboratorymethods/ucm070830.htm]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Cholera and Vibriosis Surveillance: Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance (COVIS) Annual Summary, 2012. [http://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/cholera-vibrio-surveillance.html]
- World Health Organization (WHO). Cholera, 2013. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2014;89:345–56 [http://www.who.int/cholera/statistics/en/].Google Scholar
- Jones JL, Hara-Kudo Y, Krantz JA, Benner RA, Smith AB, Dambaugh TR, et al. Comparison of molecular detection methods for Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus. Food Microbiol. 2012;30:105–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dick MH, Guillerm M, Moussy F, Chaignat CL. Review of two decades of cholera diagnostics - How far have we really come? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1845.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nordstrom JL, Vickery MCL, Blackstone GM, Murray SL, DePaola A. Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay with an internal amplification control for the detection of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus bacteria in oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5840–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishibuchi M, Kaper JB. Nucleotide sequence of the thermostable direct hemolysin gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Bacteriol. 1985;162:558–64.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bej AK, Patterson DP, Brasher CW, Vickery MCL, Jones DD, Kaysner CA. Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tlh, tdh and trh. J Microbiol Meth. 1999;36:215–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hill WE, Keasler SP, Trucksess MW, Feng P, Kaysner CA, Lampel KA. Polymerase chain reaction identification of Vibrio vulnificus in artificially contaminated oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:707–11.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Panicker G, Bej AK. Real-Time PCR detection of Vibrio vulnificus in oysters: comparison of oligonucleotide primers and probes targeting vvhA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:5702–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim YB, Okuda J, Matsumoto C, Takahashi N, Hashimoto S, Nishibuchi M. Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains at the species level by PCR targeted to the toxR gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1173–7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi H, Hara-Kudoa Y, Miyasaka J, Kumagaid S, Konuma H. Development of a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction targeted to the toxR for detection of Vibrio vulnificus. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;61:77–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto C, Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Iwanaga M, Garg P, Rammamurthy T, et al. Pandemic spread of an O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and emergence of related strains evidenced by arbitrarily primed PCR and toxRS sequence analyses. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:578–85.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nhunga PH, Ohkusua K, Miyasakab J, Suna XS, Ezakia T. Rapid and specific identification of 5 human pathogenic Vibrio species by multiplex polymerase chain reaction targeted to dnaJ gene. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;59:271–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tarr CL, Patel JS, Puhr ND, Sowers EG, Bopp CA, Strockb NA. Identification of Vibrio isolates by a multiplex PCR assay and rpoB sequence determination. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:134–40.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bauer A, Rørvik LM. A novel multiplex PCR for the identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007;45:371–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neogi SB, Chowdhury N, Asakura M, Hinenoya A, Haldar S, Saidi SM, et al. A highly sensitive and specific multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;51:293–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vinothkumar K, Bhardwaj AK, Ramamurthy T. Triplex PCR assay for the rapid identification of 3 major Vibrio species, Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Vibrio fluvialis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:526–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang R, Huang J, Zhang W, Lin G, Lian J, Jiang L, et al. Detection and identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by multiplex PCR and DNA-DNA hybridization on a microarray. J Genet Genomics. 2011;38:129–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dalmasso A, Civera T, Bottero MT. Multiplex primer-extension assay for identification of six pathogenic vibrios. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;129:21–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tracz DM, Backhouse PG, Olson AB, McCrea JK, Walsh JA, Ng LK, et al. Rapid detection of Vibrio species using liquid microsphere arrays and real-time PCR targeting the ftsZ locus. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:56–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HJ, Park SH, Kim HY. Genomic sequence comparison of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 with Salmonella genomic sequences, and genotyping of Salmonellae by using PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:6142–51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HJ, Park SH, Lee TH, Nahm BH, Chung YH, Seo KH, et al. Identification of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium using specific PCR primers obtained by comparative genomics in Salmonella serovars. J Food Protect. 2006;69:1653–61.Google Scholar
- Park SH, Kim HJ, Cho WH, Kim JH, Oh MH, Kim SH, et al. Identification of Salmonella enterica subspecies I, Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis and Typhi using multiplex PCR. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;301:137–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HJ, Park SH, Lee TH, Nahm BH, Kim YR, Kim HY. Microarray detection of food-borne pathogens using specific probes prepared by comparative genomics. Biosens Bioelectron. 2008;24:238–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- NCBI BLAST web site [http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?CMD=Web&PAGE_TYPE=BlastHome]
- Yeung PS, Boor KJ. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention of foodborne Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2004;1:74–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis BR, Fanning GR, Madden JM, Steigerwalt AG, Bradford Jr HB, Smith Jr HL, et al. Characterization of biochemically atypical Vibrio cholerae strains and designation of a new pathogenic species, Vibrio mimicus. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;14:631–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makino K, Oshima K, Kurokawa K, Yokoyama K, Uda T, Tagomori K, et al. Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V. cholerae. Lancet. 2003;361:743–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hasan NA, Grima CJ, Haleya BJ, Chunc J, Alame M, Taviania E, et al. Comparative genomics of clinical and environmental Vibrio mimicus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:21134–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Genome database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/genome/]
- Heidelberg JF, Eisen JA, Nelson WC, Clayton RA, Gwinn ML, Dodson RJ, et al. DNA sequence of both chromosomes of the cholera pathogen Vibrio cholera. Nature. 2000;406:477–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–402.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar