- Research article
- Open Access
Sca 1, a previously undescribed paralog from autotransporter protein-encoding genes in Rickettsia species
© Ngwamidiba et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 08 August 2005
Accepted: 20 February 2006
Published: 20 February 2006
Among the 17 genes encoding autotransporter proteins of the "surface cell antigen" (sca) family in the currently sequenced Rickettsia genomes, ompA, sca 5 (ompB) and sca 4 (gene D), have been extensively used for identification and phylogenetic purposes for Rickettsia species. However, none of these genes is present in all 20 currently validated Rickettsia species. Of the remaining 14 sca genes, sca 1 is the only gene to be present in all nine sequenced Rickettsia genomes. To estimate whether the sca 1 gene is present in all Rickettsia species and its usefulness as an identification and phylogenetic tool, we searched for sca 1genes in the four published Rickettsia genomes and amplified and sequenced this gene in the remaining 16 validated Rickettsia species.
Sca 1 is the only one of the 17 rickettsial sca genes present in all 20 Rickettsia species. R. prowazekii and R. canadensis exhibit a split sca 1 gene whereas the remaining species have a complete gene. Within the sca 1 gene, we identified a 488-bp variable sequence fragment that can be amplified using a pair of conserved primers. Sequences of this fragment are specific for each Rickettsia species. The phylogenetic organization of Rickettsia species inferred from the comparison of sca 1 sequences strengthens the classification based on the housekeeping gene gltA and is similar to those obtained from the analyses of ompA, sca 5 and sca4, thus suggesting similar evolutionary constraints. We also observed that Sca1 protein sequences have evolved under a dual selection pressure: with the exception of typhus group rickettsiae, the amino-terminal part of the protein that encompasses the predicted passenger domain, has evolved under positive selection in rickettsiae. This suggests that the Sca1 protein interacts with the host. In contrast, the C-terminal portion containing the autotransporter domain has evolved under purifying selection. In addition, sca 1 is transcribed in R. conorii, and might therefore be functional in this species.
The sca 1 gene, encoding an autotransporter protein that evolves under dual evolution pressure, is the only sca- family gene to be conserved by all Rickettsia species. As such, it is a valuable identification target for these bacteria, especially because rickettsial isolates can be identified by amplification and sequencing of a discriminatory gene fragment using a single primer pair. It may also be used as a phylogenetic tool. However, its current functional status remains to be determined although it was found expressed in R. conorii.
Members of the genus Rickettsia are obligate intracellular, Gram-negative, bacteria. These bacteria are surrounded by a crystalline proteic layer , also referred to as S-layer, which represents 10 to 15 % of their total protein mass  and is made of immunodominant surface protein antigens (SPA) [3–5]. Prior to Rickettsia genome sequencing, two SPAs, i.e. rOmpA [6, 7] and rOmpB [8, 9], were identified in Rickettsia species. These two high molecular weight proteins are major antigenic determinants eliciting an early and dominant immune response in patients infected with rickettsiae . Recent studies suggested that these two proteins are involved in adhesion to host cells [11, 12]. This assumption is supported by the presence of conserved repeated peptide motifs which are common in some adhesive proteins from other species .
rOmpA and rOmpB are encoded by the omp A  and sca 5 (or omp B)  genes, respectively. Sequence analyses readily identify the presence of a highly conserved autotransporter β-barrel domain (hereafter designated as "autotransporter domain") at the C-termini of the protein products. Proteins carrying this domain are collectively designated as "autotransporter proteins", and have been described in many Gram-negative bacteria . The autotransporter domain forms a β-barrel pore in the bacterial outer membrane, and allows the amino-terminal part ("passenger domain") of the precursor to be exported across the outer membrane of the bacterium, and later be released following cleavage of the autotransporter domain. Theoretical molecular masses of the predicted proteins derived from omp A and omp B genes exceed those experimentally measured for rOmpA and rOmpB, respectively [3, 4, 9, 17], implying the cleavage of the autotransporter domain from their precursors. Indeed, such a post-translational processing was demonstrated for rOmpB for which a ≈30-kDa peptide is cleaved from the C-terminus of the protein [3, 4, 9, 17, 18]. Another gene, annotated as sca 4 (surface cell antigen 4), previously named gene D  and known to encode a 120-kDa intracytoplasmic protein, has a passenger domain similar to those of ompA and ompB. However, it lacks the autotransporter domain .
Based on the sequences of nine Rickettsia genomes, we have recently identified another 14 autotransporter genes exhibiting structures similar to those of ompA and ompB . Members of the paralogous sca gene family are diversely degraded and distributed among Rickettsia species, with numbers of complete genes ranging from two in R. prowazekii to 10 in R. felis . Among the 17 sca genes, only three are present in all nine Rickettsia genomes, i.e., sca 1, sca 4, and sca 5 (ompB). However, we have previously demonstrated that sca 5 was not amplified in R. canadensis  and that sca 4 was fragmented in R. prowazekii and not amplifiable in R. canadensis . As a consequence, none of the previously studied sca genes, despite their demonstrated usefulness for identification of these bacteria, may serve to identify all rickettsial isolates. Likewise, no current phylogenetic study based on sca genes included all Rickettsia species.
Of the 17 rickettsial autotransporter proteins putatively encoded by the 17 sca genes, only rOmpA and rOmpB have been detected by SDS-PAGE or western-blotting in R. conorii  as well as Sca4 in R. japonica . Curiously, neither omp A nor omp B are conserved in all validated Rickettsia species, despite their seemingly important roles in adhesion to host cells . No protein product has been identified yet for the other sca genes, raising the question as to whether those genes are functional. By RT-PCR, we recently observed that sca 2 was transcribed in R. conorii . In this study, to further characterize the sca family of genes, we studied the sca 1 gene, the only gene together with ompB and sca 4 present in the nine Rickettsia genomes . By comparing sca 1 gene sequences from all 20 validated Rickettsia species, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of Rickettsia species and analyzed more precisely the evolutionary forces that acted on sca 1. In addition, as ompB and sca 4 are expressed, we also examined the transcriptional status of the sca 1 gene in R. conorii.
Sca 1 sequences
Orthologous genes of the R. conorii sca 1 gene in the genomes of R. prowazekii, R. typhi, and R. felis, were readily identified with the use of BLASTn, tBLASTn, and BLASTp homology searches. In R. prowazekii, the sca 1 gene was split into three consecutive ORFs (RP016 to RP018).
Rickettsial strains included in this study
sca 1 gene
Sca 1 gene GenBank accession number
Sca 1 488-bp variable fragment GenBank accession number
MK (ATCC VR-148T)
423, 2,331, and 948 ¶
R. conorii *
R. felis *
URRWXCal2 (ATCC VR-1525)
RB (ATCC VR-599)
R. prowazekii *
Brein1 (ATCC VR-142)
909, 1,884, and 1,044 ¶
R(Bitterroot) (ATCC VR-891T)
246 (ATCC VR-151T)
R. typhi *
Wilmington (ATCC VR-144)
Using the SVARAP software, we identified a 488-bp fragment at the 3'-end of the sca 1 gene, in the autotransporter domain. With regard to the R. japonica sca 1 sequence, this fragment was located between nucleotides 4,894 and 5,930. It was flanked by conserved sequences within which it was possible to identify the primer pair F1MAX: 5'-AAGAGGTYTRTGGATGCGT-3' and RMAX: 5'-GAYAATATATTATTYTCTTTC-3'. The specificity of these primers was confirmed by comparison with sequences available in the GenBank database. Each of the 20 Rickettsia species we studied had a specific fragment sequence, with pairwise nucleotide sequence identities varying from 78.5% between R. belli and R. prowazekii to 99.8 % between R. parkeri and R. africae. Fragment sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers reported in Table 1.
Study of evolutionary forces
Log-likelihood values and parameter estimates for the codon-based models of nucleotide substitutions
Estimates of Parameters*
Predicted positively selected sites¶
ω = 0.91
ω0 = 0 (p0 = 0.46)
ω1 = 1 (p1 = 0.54)
ω0 = 0 (p0 = 0.42)
ω1 = 1 (p1 = 0.48)
ω2 = 5.96 (p2 = 0.01)
ω0 = 0.06 (p0 = 0.56)
ω1 = 1.59 (p1 = 0.38)
ω2 = 7.61 (p2 = 0.06)
P = 0.024 q = 0.020
7M8 (beta + ω)
p = 0.024 q = 0.021 (p0 = 0.90)
ω = 5.75 (p1 = 0.10)
Likelihood Ratio Test Statistics
Comparison (H0 vs. H1)
M0 vs. M1
M0 vs. M2
M0 vs. M3
M1 vs. M2
M7 vs. M8
An RT-PCR product of 407-bp was obtained from R. conorii. Negative controls remained negative. The sequenced RT-PCR product was 100% identical to the sca1 sequence from R. conorii.
We obtained unique sca 1 sequences for each of the 20 studied species. We also observed that sca 1 sequences exhibit a greater level of interspecies variablity than previously studied sca genes, thus making sca 1 a potential identification tool for rickettsiae.Sca 1 loci exhibit diverse levels of conservation among Rickettsia species. It is present as a complete gene in all studied species except in R. prowazekii and R. canadensis, in which it is present as a pseudogene. Amiri et al. have previously demonstrated that the rate of gene degradation may vary among Rickettsia species, with typhus group rickettsiae exhibiting a higher rate than spotted fever group rickettsiae . In our study, we observed a higher degradation gradient in typhus group (R. prowazekii but not R. typhi) than in spotted fever group rickettsiae (none of 18 species studied). We have previously observed such variations for ompA, sca 2, sca 5, and sca 4 (Figure 3). ompA is present as a pseudogene in R. felis and R. akari, as fragments in R. bellii , and could not be amplified in R. helvetica, R. canadensis, and typhus group rickettsiae ; sca 2 is present as a pseudogene in R. helvetica and R. canadensis, and as remnants in typhus group rickettsiae ; sca 4 was split in R. prowazekii and could not be detected in R. canadensis ; and sca 5 was not found in R. canadensis . All other sca genes are even less conserved among Rickettsia species . Thus, sca 1 is the only sca family gene to be present in all 20 validated Rickettsia species. This specificity and the length of the gene prompted us to search for a gene fragment that could serve as an identification tool for all species. We identified a 488-bp fragment within the autotransporter domain whose sequence could distinguish all Rickettsia species. This sequence fragment has the advantage of being amplified using a single primer pair (F1MAX-RMAX), and thus may be a useful tool for both detection and identification of Rickettsia species.
Due to high levels of divergence between distant Rickettsia species in their passenger domains, we based our phylogenetic analysis on a polyphasic approach. The sca 1-based phylogenetic analysis of Rickettsia species was well supported for most species (Figure 1). Four clusters were identified and supported by elevated bootstrap values: one included the Rickettsia species previously classified within the R. rickettsii group ; a second was made of members of the R. massiliae group; a third incorporated members of the R. akari group; and the fourth group was made of members of the typhus group. By comparison with previous phylogenetic studies based on autotransporter genes or gltA, involved in a central metabolic pathway [14, 15, 22], we obtained similar organizations among SFG rickettsiae. Obtaining similar phylogenetic reconstructions from the analyses of different genes with different functions suggests that the true phylogenetic organization of members of the Rickettsia genus is close to that obtained in our study.
By comparing sca genes among nine Rickettsia genomes, we have previously observed that five of the 17 sca genes (ompA, sca 1, sca 2, sca 4 and sca 5) have evolved under positive selection . However, this analysis was global and based on a limited number of species. Herein, we conducted a detailed study using a sliding-window approach. This method showed that sca 1 is divided into two domains undergoing different selection pressure (Figure 2). The 3'-end of the gene, highly conserved among species and encoding the autotransporter domain, was found to evolve under purifying selection. This is likely due to the complex structure of the β barrel pore, which involves numerous specific interactions between amino acids. Amino acid replacements in the autotransporter domain may be more likely to be deleterious for the protein function. In contrast, the 5'-part of the gene, highly variable among species and encoding the secreted part of the protein, has evolved under weaker or neutral selection. In addition, we have shown here that some amino acid positions within the N-terminal domain have evolved under positive selection. The immune system of the host is known to drive positive Darwinian selection for diversity of immuno-exposed proteins such as the por B gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae . To date, only the rOmpA, rOmpB, and Sca4 proteins have evidence of expression and are known to induce an immune response in humans [14, 15, 20]. The functional status of the other sca genes is still uncertain. Several features of sca 1 evolution suggest that this gene is functional in most of the Rickettsia species belonging to the spotted fever group. First, if the process of degradation started before the separation of these species, we would expect the level of divergence to be homogeneous along the protein sequences. The fact that we could distinguish two regions with different levels of sequence divergence argues against the pseudogene hypothesis. In addition, the genic region corresponding to the autotransporter domain appeared to evolve mainly under purifying selection, which is characteristic of functional coding sequences. In addition, we observed that sca 1 has evolved under distinct evolutionary patterns depending on the phylogenetic branches. In typhus group rickettsiae, Sca1 has evolved under purifying selection whereas in other species, it has evolved under positive selection. Whether this is linked to a difference in vector or host is unknown.
Although sca 1, sca 4 and sca 5 are the most conserved sca genes among Rickettsia species (Figure 3), only the latter two genes are known to be expressed. Thus, we investigated the transcription of this gene, which is currently unknown. Chao et al. could not find sca 1 in the R. prowazekii proteome . However, this may be explained by the fact that sca 1 is a pseudogene in this species. Using RT-PCR, we demonstrated that sca 1 was transcribed at least in R. conorii. The molecular mass of the predicted mature Sca1 protein in R. conorii being 170 kDa, which is close to that of rOmpA, it is possible that the expression of Sca1 has not been detected previously because of the lack of resolution of SDS-PAGE analyses. Future efforts will be put to determine whether the transcription of sca 1 is followed by its translation into a protein.
We have demonstrated that the sca 1 gene, which encodes a putative autotransporter protein, is the only sca gene present in all Rickettsia species. We identified a 488-bp variable sca 1 fragment amplifiable using a pair of conserved primers that may be used as a detection and identification tool for Rickettsia species. Phylogenetic relationships obtained from the analysis of this gene are consistent with those obtained from the analyses of other genes, thus suggesting that this gene is undergoing similar evolutionary constraints. The sca 1 gene, which is partially degraded in certain species, is undergoing a dual selection pressure and is transcribed into mRNA in R. conorii, thus suggesting that it might be functional. However, as its putative protein product has not been detected as yet, further studies should aim at determining whether it plays a role in the immune response observed in patients with rickettsioses.
The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All rickettsiae were grown on Vero cell monolayers as previously described . When Gimenez staining  showed the cells to be heavily infected, they were harvested and centrifuged at 1,200 g for 10 min, resuspended in MEM (minimum essential medium, GIBCO) and stored at -70°C until DNA extraction was performed.
PCR amplification and DNA sequencing
Oligonucleotide primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing of rickettsial species. The position of the 5' nucleotide of each primer is numbered with respect to the sca 1 gene sequence of R. conorii.
Sequence in sca 1 (5' – 3')
5'Position in sca 1
For PCR, genomic DNA was extracted using the Chelex method as previously described . PCRs were carried out in a PTC-200 automated thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA) using the eLONGase DNA polymerase (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, USA). The 25 μl reaction mixture consisted of (final concentration): primers 12.5 pmol each, MgCl2 40 mM, dNTP 5 mM each, 2.5 μl of buffer 10×, 0.5 μl eLONGase DNA polymerase, 5 μl of DNA, and sterile water to a final volume of 25 μl. PCR amplification was performed under the following conditions: a 3-min denaturation step at 94°C followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 30 s at 50°C and extension for 90 s at 68°C. Holding for 7 min at 68°C to allow complete extension of the PCR products completed the amplification. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels, visualized by staining with ethidium bromide and then purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) as described by the manufacturer. PCR products were sequenced twice in both directions using the d-Rhodamine Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) as proposed by the manufacturer. Sequencing primers were the same as PCR primers. Sequencing products were resolved using an ABI 3100 automated sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems) following the manufacturer's instructions. For each species the sequence of both DNA strands was determined twice.
When primers failed to amplify a gene fragment, we used GenomeWalker DNA walking method. DNA was extracted using the FastDNA kit and the FastPrep instrument (Bio101, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing was performed using the Universal Genome Walker Kit (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) as proposed by the manufacturer. When GenomeWalker failed to provide sca 1 sequences, a mini shotgun assay was performed using the Eppendorf Perfectprep Plasmid 96 Vac Direct Bind kit (Brinkmann, Westbury, NY) as described by the manufacturer.
Sequence assembly was performed using the software package ABI Prism DNA sequencing analysis software version 3.0 (PE-Applied Biosystems). Sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers detailed in Table 1.
Identification of a molecular identification target
To identify sca 1 sequence fragments variable among Rickettsia species and useable as a PCR target, we used the Sequence Variability Analysis Program (SVARAP) software . This software determines the genetic diversity among sequences using a sliding window analysis, by moving a window of 50 nucleotide positions along the alignment with a step of one. We focused on fragments of a maximum size of 500-bp flanked by conserved sequences in which selection of primers was possible.
Sca 1 nucleic and amino acid sequences were aligned using the CLUSTALW software . Neighbor-Joining (NJ) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) phylogenetic reconstructions were carried out using the MEGA2 software (version 2.1) . Maximum Likelihood (ML) trees were performed using the programs PROTML (MOLPHY software package)  and PAUP  for the protein and nucleotide alignments, respectively. For the NJ and ML analyses, we used the JTT model of substitutions for proteins and the TN93 model for nucleotides. Statistical support for internal branches was assessed by bootstrap sampling for MP and NJ analyses and Resampling of Estimated Log-Likelihood (RELL) for ML analyses .
Analysis of evolutionary forces acting on sca 1
The G+C content statistics were obtained using FREQSQ on the Infobiogen website .
Alignments were manually corrected to remove gapped and ambiguous positions. The sliding-window analysis was carried out by moving a window of 50 amino acid positions along the alignment with a step of one. For each window, we recorded the percentage of positions with identical residues in all sequences. The passenger domains of the Sca1 proteins were difficult to align between distant Rickettsia owing to a high level of sequence divergence. We therefore restricted our analysis to the 12 Rickettsia species presented in Figure 1C to obtain a reliable multiple alignment.
To study the selective forces acting on sca 1 proteins, we determined the ratio ω = Ka/Ks where Ka and Ks are the rates of non-synonymous and synonymous substitution accumulations, respectively. In absence of codon utilization bias, as is the case for Rickettsia genes , synonymous substitutions are largely free from selection (neutral) and are accumulated at a rate similar to the mutation rate. Inversely, because natural selection mainly acts on protein sequences, non-synonymous substitution accumulation is correlated with selection. If amino acid changes are neutral, non-synonymous substitutions will be fixed at the same rate as synonymous mutations and therefore ω ≈ 1. If amino acid changes are deleterious, purifying selection will reduce their fixation rate so that ω < 1. Finally, when amino acid changes offer a selective advantage, they will be fixed at a higher rate than synonymous substitutions by positive Darwinian selection, with ω > 1. We analysed the aligned nucleotide sequences using six-codon-based models described by Yang et al. . These models explore whether, given a phylogenetic tree and a codon sequence alignment, variable selective constraints among amino acid sites (ω) are present. Model M0 assumes a single ω ratio estimated for the whole alignment. Model M1 (neutral) assumes two categories of sites in the protein: the conserved sites (w = 0) and the neutral sites (w = 1) and the proportion of sites distributed in the two classes (p0 and p1 = 1 - p0) are to be estimated from the data. Model M2 (selection) adds a third class of sites, with w2 freely estimated. Model M3 assumes 3 categories of sites with corresponding ω and proportion (p). Finally model M7 and M8 assume that ω ratios are distributed among sites according to a beta, which, depending on parameters p and q, can take different shapes in the interval (0,1). M7 does not allow for positively selected sites, whereas M8 can, by allowing an additional category of site with ω as free parameter. The ω ratio and the proportion of sites were estimated for each codon category by the maximum likelihood approach implemented in the codeml program from the paml package . We used the topology presented in Figure 1C as input tree for codeml. The goodness of fit of two nested models can be compared using the likelihood ratio test: twice the log-likelihood difference between the two models (2ΔlnL = 2 × [lnL1 - lnL0]) can be compared to a χ2 distribution, with the number of degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of free parameters between the two models. Then, to determine whether evolutionary forces acted differently on the different Rickettsia species, we compared the Ka/Ks ratios for the different branches in Figure 1A.
In an effort to determine whether sca 1 was transcribed into mRNA, we extracted RNA from R. conorii using the Rneasy Mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). A one-step RT-PCR was performed using the Superscript one-step with Platinum Taq (Gibco-Brl). Within a final volume of 25 μl, we incorporated 2 μl of template RNA, 0.7 μl RT polymerase, 12.5 2-X reaction buffer, 1 μl of each of the primers s1.conoF1 and s1.conoR1 (Table 2), and 7.8 RNAse-free distilled water. On a PTC-200 thermal cycler (MJ Research), cDNA synthesis was performed by a 30-min step at 50°C, followed by a step at 95°C. Then, PCR amplification was conducted using 40 cycles made of a denaturation step at 95°C for 30 sec, an annealing step at 50°C for 30 sec, and an elongation step at 72°C for 1 min. The amplification was completed by a final 7-min elongation at 72°C. RT-PCR products were resolved on a 1% agarose gel as described above. RT-PCR products were sequenced as described above using RT-PCR primers. Distilled sterile water, processed as described above, was used as negative control. In addition, PCR performed as described above using RT-PCR primers was performed on the RNA extract to detect the presence of contaminant DNA.
The authors are grateful to Deborah Byrne for reviewing the manuscript.
- Palmer EL, Martin ML, Mallavia L: Ultrastucture of the surface of Rickettsia prowazeki and Rickettsia akari. Appl Microbiol. 1974, 28: 713-716.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ching WM, Wang H, Jan B, Dasch GA: Identification and characterization of epitopes on the 120- kilodalton surface protein antigen of Rickettsiaprowazekii with synthetic peptides. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 1413-1419.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ching WM, Carl M, Dasch GA: Mapping of monoclonal antibody binding sites on CNBr fragments of the S- layerprotein antigens of Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia prowazekii. Molecular Immunology. 1992, 29: 95-105. 10.1016/0161-5890(92)90161-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ching WM, Dasch GA, Carl M, Dobson ME: Structural analyses of the 120-kDa serotype protein antigens of typhus group rickettsiae. Comparison with other S-layer proteins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990, 590: 334-351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dasch GA: Isolation of species-specific protein antigens of Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia prowazekii for immunodiagnosis and immunoprophylaxis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981, 14: 333-341.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anacker RL, McDonald GA, List RH, Mann RE: Neutralizing activity of monoclonal antibodies to heat-sensitive and heat-resistant epitopes of Rickettsia rickettsii surface proteins. Infect immun. 1987, 55: 825-827.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vishwanath S, McDonald GA, Watkins NG: A recombinant Rickettsia conorii vaccine protects guinea pigs from experimental boutonneuse fever and Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Infect Immun. 1990, 58: 646-653.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilmore RDJ, Joste N, McDonald GA: Cloning, expression and sequence analysis of the gene encoding the 120 kD surface-exposed protein of Rickettsia rickettsii. Mol Microbiol. 1989, 3: 1579-1586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilmore RD, Cieplak W, Policastro PF, Hackstadt T: The 120 kilodalton outer membrane protein (rOmpB) of Rickettsia rickettsii is encoded by an unusually long open reading frame. Evidence for protein processing from a large precursor. Mol Microbiol. 1991, 5: 2361-2370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teysseire N, Raoult D: Comparison of Western immunoblotting and microimmunofluoresence for diagnosis of Mediterranean spotted fever. J Clin Microbiol. 1992, 30: 455-460.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Walker DH: RompA is a critical protein for the adhesion of Rickettsia rickettsii to host cells. Microbial Pathogenesis. 1998, 24: 289-298. 10.1006/mpat.1997.0197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uchiyama T: Role of major surface antigens of Rickettsia japonica in the attachment to host cell. Rickettsiae and rickettsial diseases. Edited by: Kazar J and Raoult D. 1999, Bratislava, Publishing house of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, 182-188.Google Scholar
- Wren BW: A family of clostridial and streptococcal ligand-binding proteins with conserved C-terminal repeat sequences. Mol Microbiol. 1991, 5: 797-803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fournier PE, Roux V, Raoult D: Phylogenetic analysis of spotted fever group rickettsiae by study of the outer surface protein rOmpA. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998, 48: 839-849.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roux V, Raoult D: Phylogenetic analysis of members of the genus Rickettsia using the gene encoding the outer-membrane protein rOmpB (ompB). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000, 50: 1449-1455.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henderson IR, Navarro-Garcia F, Nataro JP: The great escape: structure and function of the autotransporter proteins. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6: 370-378. 10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01318-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hackstadt T, Messer R, Cieplak W, Peacock MG: Evidence for proteolytic cleavage of the 120-Kilodalton outer membrane protein of Rickettsiae : identification of an avirulent mutant deficient in processing. Infect Immun. 1992, 60: 159-165.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blanc G, Ngwamidiba M, Ogata H, Fournier PE, Claverie JM, Raoult D: Molecular Evolution of Rickettsia Surface Antigens: Evidence of Positive Selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2005, 22: 2073-2083. 10.1093/molbev/msi199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sekeyova Z, Roux V, Raoult D: Phylogeny of Rickettsia spp. inferred by comparing sequences of 'gene D', which encodes an intracytoplasmic protein. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001, 51: 1353-1360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uchiyama T, Zhao LC, Uchida T: Demonstration of a heat-stable 120-kilodalton protein of Rickettsia japonica as a spotted fever group-common antigen. Microbiol Immunol. 1996, 40: 133-139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ngwamidiba M, Blanc G, Ogata H, Raoult D, Fournier PE: Phylogenetic study of Rickettsia species using sequences of the autotransporter protein-encoding gene sca2. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005, in press:Google Scholar
- Roux V, Rydkina E, Eremeeva M, Raoult D: Citrate synthase gene comparison, a new tool for phylogenetic analysis, and its application for the rickettsiae. Int J Syst Bact. 1997, 47: 252-261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roux V, Raoult D: Phylogenetic analysis of the genusRickettsia by 16S rDNA sequencing. Res Microbiol. 1995, 146: 385-396. 10.1016/0923-2508(96)80284-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crocquet-Valdes PA, Weiss K, Walker DH: Sequence analysis of the 190 kDa antigen encoding gene of Rickettsia conorii (Malish 7 strain). Gene. 1994, 140: 115-119. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90740-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amiri H, Davids W, Andersson SG: Birth and death of orphan genes in Rickettsia. Mol Biol Evol. 2003, 20: 1575-1587. 10.1093/molbev/msg175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roux V: Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic relationships among the genus Rickettsia. Rickettsiae and Rickettsial diseases at the turn of the third millinium. Edited by: Raoult D and Brouqui P. 1999, Marseille, Elsevier, 52-66.Google Scholar
- Smith NH, Maynard Smith J, Spratt BG: Sequence evolution of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis : evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol. 1995, 12: 363-376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chao CC, Chelius D, Zhang T, Daggle L, Ching WM: Proteome analysis of Madrid E strain of Rickettsia prowazekii. Proteomics. 2004, 4: 1280-1292. 10.1002/pmic.200300775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gimenez DF: Staining rickettsiae in yolk-sac cultures. Stain Technol. 1964, 39: 135-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Lamballerie X, Zandotti C, Vignoli C, Bollet C, de Micco P: A rare step microbial DNA extraction method using Chelex 100 suitable for gene amplification. Res Microbiol. 1992, 143: 785-790. 10.1016/0923-2508(92)90107-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colson P, Tamalet C, Raoult D: SVARAP and aSVARAP: simple tools for quantitative analysis of nucleotide and amino acid variability and primer selection for Clinical Microbiology. BMC Microbiol. 2006, In press:Google Scholar
- Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M: MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 1244-1245. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adachi J, Hasegawa M: MOLPHY version 2.3: programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood. Computer Science Monographs 28. 1996, Tokyo, Institute of Statistical MathematicsGoogle Scholar
- PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). 1998, Sunderland, MA, SinauerGoogle Scholar
- Hasegawa M, Kishino H: Accuracies of the simple methods for estimating the bootstrap probability of a maximum-likelihood tree. Mol Biol Evol. 1994, 11: 142-145.Google Scholar
- FREQSQ: [http://www.infobiogen.fr/services/analyseq/cgi-bin/freqsq_in.pl]. 2006Google Scholar
- Andersson SGM, Sharp PM: Codon usage and base composition in Rickettsia prowazekii. J Mol Evol. 1996, 42: 525-536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AM: Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics. 2000, 155: 431-449.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang Z: PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997, 13: 555-556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.