- Research article
- Open Access
Identification of a predicted partner-switching system that affects production of the gene transfer agent RcGTA and stationary phase viability in Rhodobacter capsulatus
© Mercer and Lang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
- Received: 10 October 2013
- Accepted: 12 March 2014
- Published: 19 March 2014
Production of the gene transfer agent RcGTA in the α-proteobacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus is dependent upon the response regulator protein CtrA. Loss of this regulator has widespread effects on transcription in R. capsulatus, including the dysregulation of numerous genes encoding other predicted regulators. This includes a set of putative components of a partner-switching signaling pathway with sequence homology to the σ-regulating proteins RsbV, RsbW, and RsbY that have been extensively characterized for their role in stress responses in gram-positive bacteria. These R. capsulatus homologues, RbaV, RbaW, and RbaY, have been investigated for their possible role in controlling RcGTA gene expression.
A mutant strain lacking rbaW showed a significant increase in RcGTA gene expression and production. Mutation of rbaV or rbaY led to a decrease in RcGTA gene expression and production, and these mutants also showed decreased viability in the stationary phase and produced unusual colony morphologies. In vitro and in vivo protein interaction assays demonstrated that RbaW and RbaV interact. A combination of gene disruptions and protein-protein interaction assays were unsuccessful in attempts to identify a cognate σ factor, and the genetic data support a model where the RbaV protein that is the determinant regulator of RcGTA gene expression in this system.
These findings provide new information about RcGTA regulation by a putative partner-switching system and further illustrate the integration of RcGTA production into R. capsulatus physiology.
- Gene expression
- Protein-protein interactions
- Gene exchange
The α-proteobacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus is one of several known species of prokaryotes that produces a gene transfer agent , or GTA. GTAs are phage-like particles that contain small fragments of the producing cells’ genomes  that can then be transferred to other cells in a process similar to generalized transduction. Production of the R. capsulatus GTA, RcGTA, is regulated through multiple cellular signal transduction systems. These include the GtaRI quorum sensing system [3, 4] and the phosphorelay proteins CtrA and CckA [5, 6] and ChpT . These phosphorelay proteins are also involved in controlling R. capsulatus flagellar motility [6–8], and this role is widely conserved in the class α-proteobacteria [6, 9–13]. Of all RcGTA regulators identified to date, only loss of CtrA leads to a complete loss of the ability to make RcGTA particles, which is caused by the loss of transcription of most genes in the RcGTA gene cluster [5, 8]. However, there is no evidence that CtrA acts via direct regulation at the RcGTA promoter to control transcription of these genes and the mechanistic link between CtrA and RcGTA gene expression remains unknown.
Rsb and σB homologues have also been identified in various other species and found to play regulatory roles in the stress response and other cellular processes . Similar to B. cereus, these other species (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis) lack rsbRST genes encoding the stressosome proteins but the rsbV and rsbW orthologues are usually found together, alongside a gene encoding the cognate σ factor . In some other species, such as Streptomyces coelicolor, rsbV and rsbW homologues can be found at loci separate from their cognate σ factor or have these two genes in separate locations [16, 27–29]. Additionally, in both gram-positive and gram-negative species, rsb homologues have been identified with diverse functions and deviations from the Bacillus models. These include the presence of additional effector domains in the partner-switching proteins [30–32] and, although regulation of a σ factor is common, these systems can also control other targets including enzymes [22, 33]. The partner-switching regulatory systems can also be more complex, with multi-partner interactions involving multiple anti-anti-σ factor proteins that control one or more anti-σ factors [27, 34].
It is currently unknown which σ factor acts to recruit RNA polymerase to the promoter element of the RcGTA gene cluster, and what signal(s) might control this process. R. capsulatus encodes 7 identifiable putative σ factors in its genome: the major vegetative σ factor, RpoD; two σ32 family proteins, RpoHI and RpoHII; the nitrogen fixation σ54 factor, RpoN; two σ24 (RpoE-like) ECF σ factors; and a putative ECF-G σ factor [8, 14]. While the RpoHI, RpoHII and RpoE σ factors have been studied in Rhodobacter sphaeroides for their role in response to photooxidative and heat stress [35–40], the only well-studied σ factor in R. capsulatus is RpoN [41–43]. The finding that loss of CtrA affected expression of R. capsulatus rsbVW homologues, which we propose to rename as rbaVW, prompted us to investigate the role of the RbaV and RbaW proteins, along with another identified Rsb homologue, RbaY, in RcGTA production.
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
The experimental strains, plasmids, and PCR primers used for this study are listed in Additional file 1, Additional file 2, and Additional file 3, respectively. R. capsulatus was grown at 35°C under anaerobic photoheterotrophic conditions with YPS medium  or aerobically with RCV medium  supplemented with appropriate antibiotics when necessary: kanamycin (10 μg ml-1), spectinomycin (20 μg ml-1), and tetracycline (0.5 μg ml-1). Escherichia coli was grown using LB medium at 37°C and supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics when necessary: ampicillin (100 μg ml-1), kanamycin (25 μg ml-1), spectinomycin (50 μg ml-1), and tetracycline (10 μg ml-1).
Open reading frames (ORFs) of the Rba proteins and σ factors were amplified by PCR from the genome of R. capsulatus strain SB1003 and cloned into pGEM-T-Easy (Promega, Madison, USA) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The genes were disrupted by insertion of a ~1.4-kb SmaI fragment of the KIXX cartridge , which confers resistance to kanamycin and which has been found to rarely create polar mutations in R. capsulatus. The rbaV (rcc03323) and rbaW (rcc03324) ORFs were amplified using the primers VW-F and VW-R. The rbaV gene was disrupted by insertion at an NruI site located 76 bp into the 348-bp ORF. The rbaW gene was disrupted by insertion at a BlpI site blunted with T4 polymerase, located 274 bp into the 492-bp ORF. A disruption of both genes was created by replacing a 535-bp NruI/BlpI segment with the KIXX fragment. The ORF predicted to encode the rsbY homologue (rcc00181) was amplified using the primers Y-F and Y-R. The 1230-bp rbaY ORF was disrupted at an MscI site located 307 bp into the gene.
Amplicons of the R. capsulatus rpoHI (rcc02811) and rpoHII (rcc00458) genes were amplified using primers rpoHI-F and rpoHI-R, and rpoHII-F and rpoHII-R, respectively. The 900-bp rpoHI ORF was disrupted at a BamHI site located 323 bp from the start of the gene. A 507-bp StuI fragment of the 833-bp rpoHII ORF was replaced by the KIXX cartridge. The ORF encoding the putative ECF σ factor-encoding rcc02291 (570 bp) was amplified using primers 2291-F and 2291-R and disrupted by insertion at a StuI site located 133 bp into the gene. Also, the putative phyR orthologue (rcc02289) and potential anti-σ factor to the protein encoded by rcc02291, was amplified using primers phyR-F and phyR-R and subsequently disrupted by a KIXX cartridge insertion at a SmaI site located 150 bp into the 810 bp ORF. The 594-bp ORF rcc02724 encoding another putative ECF σ factor was amplified using primers 2724-F and 2724-R and disrupted by inserting KIXX into a BsaBI site located 221 bp from the start of the gene. The ORFs rcc00699 (545 bp) and rcc02637 (585 bp) encoding putative σ24 ECF sigma factors were amplified using primers 699-F and 699-R, and 2637-F and 2637-R, respectively. The KIXX cartridge was inserted into a StuI site 376 bp into rcc00699 and an AfeI site located 176 bp from the start of rcc02637. Disruptions were not attempted for the major vegetative σ factor, rpoD (rcc03054), or the nitrogen fixation σ factor, rpoN (rcc00568), genes. A separate rpoHI disruption using a 2-kb spectinomycin resistance-encoding omega cassette  was constructed to allow creation of an rpoHI-rpoHII double mutant strain.
All gene disruption constructs were sequenced and RcGTA-mediated transfer of disrupted versions of genes into R. capsulatus SB1003 were carried out as previously described . The resulting kanamycin and kanamycin/spectinomycin resistant strains (Additional file 1) were confirmed to contain the gene disruptions by PCR using the original amplification primers (Additional file 3) whereby replacement of the wild type gene by the disrupted version was indicated by amplification of a single product of the expected size.
In trans complementation was performed using wild type genes with their native upstream sequences placed on the low copy, broad host range plasmid, pRK767 . A wild type fragment of rbaV and rbaW was amplified using primers VcF and VW-R. Primers VcF and Anti-anti-R were used to amplify the wild type rbaV fragment. The rbaW complement sequence contained an in-frame deletion of the majority of rbaV, replacing bp 24 to bp 272 with a KpnI site. This was created by joining 2 fragments, amplified with VcF and VdR, and VdF and VW-R, via a primer-embedded KpnI site. The complementation vectors (Additional file 2) were conjugated into R. capsulatus using E. coli S17-1 .
Gene transfer bioassays
Gene transfer bioassays were used as previously described  to measure production and release of RcGTA particles. Stationary phase cultures were filtered using 0.45-μm PVDF syringe filters and filtrates assayed for RcGTA activity using the R. capsulatus puhA strain, DW5 , as the recipient cells. The samples were plated on YPS agar and incubated in anaerobic phototrophic conditions and colony numbers were counted after 48 hours. RcGTA activities in mutant strains were determined as ratios relative to SB1003 in 3 replicate experiments. Statistically significant differences in RcGTA activities were identified by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in R .
Western blots targeting the ~32 kDa RcGTA major capsid protein were performed on the same cultures used for RcGTA activity assays as described previously . Samples contained 5 μl of cells pelleted from cultures and re-suspended in an equal volume of TE buffer or 10 μl of the culture supernatants mixed with 3× SDS-PAGE sample buffer and heated for 5 minutes at 98°C. The proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by electro-blotting in transfer buffer [48 mM Tris Base, 39 mM glycine, 20% methanol (v/v)]. Total protein levels within supernatant and cell sample groups were verified to be approximately equivalent by staining the membranes with Ponceau-S. The membranes were rinsed and blocked with a 5% (w/v) skim milk solution in TBST [20 mM Tris, 137 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20 (v/v); pH 7.5] and incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-Rhodobacterales GTA major capsid protein primary antibody (Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden)  as a 1:1000 dilution in TBST. The membranes were then washed with TBST and incubated with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA) as a 1:5000 dilution in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature. The membranes were washed again in TBST and the bands were detected by chemiluminescence using the SuperSignal West Femto Reagent Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, Canada). Images were captured on an Alpha Innotech U400 camera, and then inverted and adjusted for brightness and contrast with image processing software.
Viable cell counts
Each culture used for gene transfer assays and western blotting was also assayed for viable cells as previously described . Serial dilutions were plated and colony-forming units (cfu) were calculated for the 3 biological replicates to determine the number of viable cells. The data were converted to a ratio relative to the parental strain. Statistically significant differences in viable cell numbers were identified by one-way ANOVA in R .
β-galactosidase reporter fusions
In-frame fusions of RcGTA orfg2 to the E. coli lacZ gene were constructed using PstI/BamHI fragments cloned into the promoter probe vector pXCA601 vector . Fragments 2 (pX2) and 2NP (pX2NP) were amplified by PCR using primers GTA-F1 and GTA-R1, and GTA-F2 and GTA-R1, respectively. Fragments 2.1 and 2.2 were amplified using primers GTA-F1 and GTA-DP-R, and GTA-DP-F and GTA-R1, respectively. Fragment g2Δp (pX2Δp) was created by ligating 2.1 and 2.2 via a primer-embedded KpnI restriction site, resulting in a deletion of the sequence from -129 to -100 5’ of RcGTA orfg1 (Additional file 2). Fragments 2.3 and 2.4 were amplified using GTA-F1 and GTA-DS-R, and GTA-DS-F and GTA-R1, respectively. The fragment g2Δs was made by combining 2.3 and 2.4 via a primer-embedded KpnI restriction site, resulting in a deletion of the sequence from -73 to -46 5’ of orfg1 (Additional file 2). All fusions were confirmed to be in-frame by sequencing, and the plasmids were transferred into R. capsulatus strains by conjugation using E. coli S17-1 .
Strains of R. capsulatus containing the fusion constructs listed in Additional file 2 were grown in conditions identical to those for RcGTA activity assays. Cells were permeabilized for 15 minutes using 15% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol and washed using Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 10 mM KCl, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol; pH 7) . The cells were resuspended in Z buffer and substrate, fluorescein di-β-D-galactopyranoside (FDG) (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in H2O:DMSO:ethanol (8:1:1), was added at a final concentration of 0.1 mg ml-1. The cells were then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature and diluted 1:200 in Z buffer before analysis by flow cytometry with recording of 105 events. The mean sample fluorescence was obtained from gated cells from two biological replicates.
Expression and purification of recombinant proteins from E. coli
For expression of recombinant N-terminal 6×-histidine tagged proteins, rbaW and rbaV were independently cloned as NdeI/BamHI fragments into the pET15b vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany), using primers Anti-S-F and Anti-S-R, and Anti-anti-F and Anti-anti-R, respectively. This resulted in the rbaW and rbaV sequences in-frame with an N-terminal 6x-histidine tag. A C-terminal 6×-histidine tagged sequence of RbaW was also created using the primers Anti-SC-F and Anti-SC-R, with the product cloned as an NcoI/XhoI fragment into the pET26b vector (Novagen). The plasmids, pET15W, pET15V and pET26W (Additional file 2), were sequenced to confirm the R. capsulatus sequences were in-frame with the histidine tags and then transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) (New England Biolabs, Whitby, Canada).
Overnight starter cultures were used to inoculate 200 ml of LB broth containing either ampicillin (pET15b derivatives) or kanamycin (pET26b derivative), followed by incubation for 1 hour at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm. Expression of the recombinant proteins was induced by addition of isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 1 mM followed by growth at 37°C for 4 hours with shaking at 250 rpm. Cell pellets of these induced cultures were resuspended in lysis buffer [50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 0.1% (v/v), Benzonase® nuclease (Qiagen, Toronto, Canada), 1 mg ml-1 lysozyme (w/v); pH 8] and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. The lysates were centrifuged at 14000 × g for 30 minutes at 4°C and supernatants were mixed 4:1 (v:v) with Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) and incubated at 4°C with shaking at 200 rpm for 1 hour. The samples were loaded into polypropylene columns, washed twice with wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole; pH 8) and the fusion proteins eluted in 1 ml aliquots of elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole; pH 8). The purified proteins were dialyzed into a coupling buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 500 mM NaCl; pH 7.5) and quantified using a ND-1000 Nanodrop spectrophotometer.
In-gel digestion and peptide extraction for LC-MS/MS sequencing
Purified recombinant protein samples were mixed with 3× SDS-PAGE sample buffer, heated for 5 minutes at 98°C, and run on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The gels were stained with Coomassie Blue [0.25% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 in methanol:H2O:acetic acid (5:4:1)] for 30 minutes, destained in methanol:H2O:acetic acid (5:4:1), and recombinant protein bands of predicted sizes were cut out using a clean scalpel. The gel slices were washed first with water, followed by 100 mM NH4HCO3, and finally acetonitrile, with samples being vortexed for 10 minutes, centrifuged at 3000 × g and supernatants decanted after each wash step. The samples were dried in a vacuum centrifuge for 5 minutes before adding a sufficient amount of 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in 100 mM NH4HCO3 to cover the gel slices. After incubation for 45 minutes at 56°C, the samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g and the supernatant decanted. The solution was replaced by 55 mM iodoacetamide in 100 mM NH4HCO3 and the samples incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 minutes with occasional vortexing. The samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g and all liquid was removed by aspiration. The samples were washed in 100 mM NH4HCO3 with vortexing for 10 minutes followed by centrifugation at 3000 × g and removal of the supernatant. This wash procedure was repeated once with acetonitrile and twice with 50% (v/v) acetonitrile. The samples were vacuum-centrifuged for 15 minutes before the addition of sequencing grade trypsin (12 ng μl-1) in trypsin digestion buffer (Promega). The tubes were sealed and incubated overnight at 37°C. After addition of formic acid (to 5% v/v) and vortexing, the samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g and supernatants collected in a separate tube. This extraction process was repeated sequentially with 1% formic acid-5% acetonitrile (v/v), 1% formic acid-60% acetonitrile (v/v), and 1% formic acid-99% acetonitrile (v/v). The supernatants from each of these extractions were collected together in one tube and vacuum centrifuged. The dried extracts were sequenced by LC-MS/MS at the Genomic and Proteomic (GaP) facility at Memorial University.
In vitroprotein interaction assays
In vitro interaction assays were carried out by separately conjugating 50 μg of recombinant RbaW protein, carrying a 6x-histidine tag on either the N- or C-terminus, to NHS-activated beads (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Baie d’Urfe, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The conjugated beads were washed several times with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) then resuspended as a 50% (v/v) slurry in the same solution. A sub-sample of conjugated bead slurry was resuspended in a binding buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 200 mM NaCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, and 0.5% (v/v) triton X-100] and either 6x-His-RbaV or chicken egg white lysozyme control protein (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Canada) was added to a final concentration of ~1 μM. The mixture was incubated on ice for 30 minutes with occasional agitation before adding 0.5 ml of binding buffer. The beads were allowed to sediment by gravity and the supernatant was removed. Washing with 0.5 ml of binding buffer was repeated 3 times to remove all non-bound protein. The beads were resuspended in 30 μl of 3× SDS-PAGE buffer, heated for 5 minutes at 98°C, and 20 μl of the sample run on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. To confirm specific interaction between recombinant fusion proteins, additional control reactions were performed. First, non-conjugated beads were treated with 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and then incubated with test proteins to ensure adequate blocking of bead active sites. Second, conjugated 6x-His-RbaW and RbaW-6x-His were independently incubated with chicken egg white lysozyme to ensure specific interactions between the experimental test proteins.
Bacterial two-hybrid assays
Bacterial two-hybrid analyses for determining protein interactions were carried out as described  using the bacterial adenylate cyclase-based two-hybrid, or BACTH, system (EUROMEDEX, Souffelweyersheim, France). Primers AS-AF and AS-AR, and AAS-AF and AAS-AR, were used to amplify rbaW and rbaV by PCR, respectively. The rpoD and rpoHI σ factor-encoding genes were amplified using rpoD-F/rpoD-R and rpoH-AF/rpoH-AR, respectively. Putative ECF σ factor-encoding genes rcc02637 and rcc00699 were amplified using 2637-AF and 2637-AR, and 699-AF and 699-AR, respectively. All amplicons were cloned as KpnI fragments into all 4 BACTH vectors: pKNT25, pKT25, pUT18 and pUT18c (Additional file 2). All pair-wise combinations of bait (rbaW) and prey (rbaV, rpoD, rpoHI, rcc02637 and rcc00699) recombinant vectors were co-transformed into cya - E. coli BTH101 and plated on LB agar supplemented with ampicillin, kanamycin, 40 μg ml-1 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) and 0.5 mM IPTG. Positive control plasmids encoding interacting fragments of a leucine zipper protein, pKT25-zip and pUT18C-zip (Additional file 2), were also co-transformed. Plates were incubated for 48 hours at 30°C.
For quantitative determination of β-galactosidase activity, 3 replicate co-transformants were picked for each interaction to inoculate fresh LB broth containing antibiotics and 0.5 mM IPTG. Cultures were grown overnight at 37°C and then diluted 1:5 in LB broth and the OD600 was determined. The cells were permeabilized with one drop of 0.1% SDS and 2 drops of chloroform and then mixed in a 1:1 ratio with PM2 buffer (70 mM Na2HPO4, 30 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.2 mM MnSO4; pH 7) containing 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The cells were incubated for 5 minutes at 28°C and one volume of 0.4% ο-nitrophenol-β-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) substrate in PM2 buffer was added to 4 volumes of cell suspension. After sufficient colour development, the reaction was stopped by addition of 2 volumes of 1 M NaHCO3. The OD420 and OD550 were obtained for each sample and β-galactosidase activity was calculated as units mg-1 dry weight bacteria .
Identification, sequence characteristics, and genomic contexts of rsb homologues in R. capsulatus
In addition to genes rcc03323 and rcc03324 encoding putative RsbV and RsbW orthologues, respectively, previously identified as affected by loss of CtrA , searching the R. capsulatus genome sequence by BLAST  for other Rsb-related sequences identified a gene (rcc00181) encoding a putative orthologue of the B. cereus RsbY. This gene also had lower transcript levels in the ctrA mutant . We propose to rename these genes as rbaV, rbaW and rbaY, where Rba is the 3-letter abbreviation for Rhodobacter. The RbaV and RbaW protein sequences contain conserved STAS and HATPase domains, respectively, and the RbaY protein possesses an N-terminal phosphorelay REC domain and a C-terminal PP2C phosphatase domain. The RbaV, RbaW and RbaY sequences were the reciprocal best BLAST matches with the respective B. cereus RsbV, RsbW and RsbY proteins. A BLAST search of the NCBI GenBank database revealed that highly similar homologues of the R. capsulatus rbaV, rbaW and rbaY genes were present in other members of the Rhodobacterales order in the class α-proteobacteria.
The R. capsulatus rbaV and rbaW genes are in a predicted two-gene operon (Figure 1) with the start of rbaW overlapping rbaV, suggesting possible translational coupling of the two genes. No predicted σ factor-encoding gene could be found near these genes . An analysis of orthologous neighbourhood regions using the IMG database (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/w/main.cgi; ) showed that this is different than what is found outside of the Rhodobacterales order (Figure 1). Some species, such as Rhodopseudomonas palustris, also have an rsbY homologue in a predicted 3-gene operon with rsbV and rsbW homologues (Figure 1), whereas gram-positive Bacillus (Figure 1) and Staphylococcus species have other genes associated with rsbVW, including sigB that encodes the cognate sigma factor.
The rbaV and rbaY mutants had similar phenotypes, with both strains having lower RcGTA activity (Figure 2A). The decreases in gene transfer activity and extracellular capsid protein were less in the rbaY mutant than for rbaV. Both strains showed a reproducible decrease in viable cells in the stationary phase cultures (Figure 3). Complementation of rbaY restored gene transfer activity and the number of viable cells in stationary phase to wild type levels (Figures 2 and 3). Complementation of the rbaV mutant with rbaV resulted in overproduction of RcGTA, similar to the rbaW and rbaW (pW) strains (Figure 2), while complementation with both the rbaV and rbaW genes restored the strain to wild type levels. This could reflect polarity of the rbaV mutation on rbaW expression. Increases in gene transfer activity and capsid levels were also observed in SB1003 carrying the rbaV gene on a plasmid (Figure 2). Heterogeneous colony morphologies were noted when stationary phase cultures of the rbaV and rbaY mutants were spread on agar plates, with ~25% of these colonies found to be undulate and flattened instead of the circular and slightly raised wild type phenotype (Figure 4). These unusual colonies could generate de novo photosynthetic cultures that gave rise to both normal and unusual colonies with approximately the same percentage. The strains rbaY (pY), rbaV (pV), and rbaV (pVW) also generated this sub-population of unusual colonies.
The rbaVW double mutant had a similar phenotype as found for the rbaY and rbaV mutants. RcGTA activity resembled that of the individual rbaV and rbaY mutants and not the rbaW mutant (Figure 2), and this strain showed a significant decrease in stationary phase viable cells (Figure 3). The strain also produced the unusual colony morphology phenotype (Figure 4), which remained when complemented with both genes on a plasmid (pVW). Introduction of pVW restored RcGTA activity and capsid levels to wild type, while complementation with only rbaW did not (Figure 2). The rbaVW (pV) strain had increased RcGTA activity and capsid protein levels, similar to the rbaV (pV) and SB1003 (pV) strains (Figure 2). Stationary phase viable cell numbers of rbaVW (pVW) and rbaVW (pV) were not significantly different from wild type (Figure 3).
Evaluation of RcGTA gene expression in rbamutant cells
Sigma factor gene disruptions
To try to determine which σ factor was responsible for targeting RNAP to the promoter of the RcGTA gene cluster, we attempted to make genetic disruptions of all putative R. capsulatus σ factor-encoding genes . Two exceptions were rpoN, encoding the nitrogen fixation σ54, and rpoD, encoding the major housekeeping σ70. Confirmed disruptions of ORFs rcc00458 (rpoHII), rcc02291 and rcc02724 produced viable strains that were not affected for RcGTA activity. The same was found for disruption of the putative anti-anti-σ factor phyR orthologue, rcc02289. Attempts to create mutants of rcc00699 and rcc02637 resulted in putative mutants that were resistant to kanamycin, however replacement of the wild type genes by the insertional disruptions could not be confirmed. A disruption of the ORF predicted to encode the RpoHI σ factor, rcc02811, was confirmed but this strain had properties that were indications of problems such as a prolonged lag phase before entering exponential growth in batch culture. In the related species R. sphaeroides, RpoHI has an overlapping regulon with RpoHII in response to photooxidative and heat stress [36, 39, 40], which prompted us to create a new rpoHI mutant strain that was created and maintained completely under anaerobic phototrophic conditions. The gene disruption was confirmed by PCR and this strain showed no differences in growth, RcGTA activity, or viable cell numbers in logarithmic or stationary phases. When the rbaV and rbaW mutants were generated under these same anaerobic phototrophic conditions and treated in the same way, there were no differences in phenotypes from the original mutant strains exposed to aerobic conditions.
Tests for RbaW-σ interactions
β-galactosidase activities (units mg -1 ) for bacterial two-hybrid analysis of RbaW interactions with other proteins
1440.0 ± 299.0
101.4 ± 53.7
131.9 ± 18.6
165.0 ± 70.6
212.7 ± 58.5
139.9 ± 32.2
310.7 ± 13.9
124.2 ± 22.9
181.7 ± 54.3
201.7 ± 72.2
147.0 ± 20.6
173.6 ± 23.7
129.4 ± 15.9
115.8 ± 32.2
236.0 ± 60.8
132.4 ± 47.1
161.0 ± 43.4
161.0 ± 6.6
220.5 ± 54.7
178.7 ± 28.3
182.3 ± 63.4
199.1 ± 80.0
130.4 ± 1.7
175.6 ± 9.1
7338.9 ± 1300.0
To further confirm the specific interaction between RbaV and RbaW, a bacterial two-hybrid analysis was used. The vectors pKNT-rbaV and pUT18c-rbaW were co-transformed into the E. coli reporter strain BTH101 and β-galactosidase activities were determined in triplicate transformants alongside controls (Table 1). The average β-galactosidase activity of the experimental pair was found to be 1440 units mg-1 while all negative controls had activities between 101 and 202 units mg-1 and the positive control with interacting leucine zipper fragments had an average activity of 7339 units mg-1 (Table 1).
A previous transcriptomic study of R. capsulatus identified a number of predicted regulatory protein-encoding genes that were affected by the loss of the response regulator protein CtrA . These included putative anti-σ and anti-anti-σ proteins with sequence homology to proteins in the Rsb system characterized in some species of Firmicutes as involved in response to both stress and entry into stationary phase via control of σB. Outside of the Firmicutes, homologues of the Rsb proteins have also been implicated in regulating diverse physiological processes, including production of type III secretion systems , biofilm formation  and swarming motility . All of the rsb gene homologues we have identified in R. capsulatus (rbaV, rbaW, and rbaY) have lower transcript levels in the absence of CtrA , and we have now shown these affect expression of the RcGTA gene cluster and thereby production of RcGTA. However, it remains to be determined if this regulation is direct or indirect. This is the first investigation of Rsb homologues in the α-proteobacteria. It has previously been hypothesized that R. capsulatus produces RcGTA in stationary phase as part of a stress response and we propose that one way in which RcGTA production is increased in stationary phase is through the actions of this Rba system.
The rbaY, rbaV and rbaVW mutants all had similar phenotypes, with effects on RcGTA gene expression, stationary phase cell viability, and colony morphology. The similarities in the rbaV and rbaY mutant phenotypes support the notion that these proteins are working in a common pathway and the decrease in RcGTA gene expression in these mutants indicate they are positive regulators of RcGTA production. Based on the Bacillus model, the predicted function of RbaY is to dephosphorylate RbaV-P, thereby allowing RbaV to interact with RbaW and promote target gene expression by the cognate σ factor . The R. capsulatus RbaV protein has two serine residues, S56 and S57, at approximately the same region as found in Bacillus RsbV where one of the two serves as the site of phosphorylation by RsbW [19, 65]. Removal of RbaY should result in an increase in RbaV-P and therefore allow unregulated inhibition of the cognate σ factor activity by RbaW; our data support this prediction but also cannot distinguish this from the possibility that RbaV is the controller of output from the pathway, as discussed further below.
Studies of RsbV orthologs in Pseudomonas and Vibrio species have demonstrated that the unphosphorylated version of the STAS domain-containing protein was the key regulator of output in those systems [30, 32]. In V. fischeri, a multi-domain protein, SypE, containing both an RsbW-like kinase domain and a PP2C (RsbU/Y-like) phosphatase domain controlled the phosphorylation of an RsbV ortholog, SypA . The results suggested SypA interacted with an additional unknown target to control biofilm production and thereby host colonization. Our data suggest that RbaV may similarly interact with other, as-of-yet unidentified, targets to affect RcGTA gene expression (Figure 8).
The general stress response in studied α-proteobacterial species is under the control of the ECF σG. This ECF is controlled by the anti-σ factor NepR, and the anti-anti-σ factor, PhyR [63, 66–70]. We found no support for involvement of this system in RcGTA production as separate mutants carrying disruptions of a putative phyR orthologue (rcc02289) and predicted cognate EcfG-like σ factor (rcc02291) demonstrated wild type RcGTA activity. Based on the phenotypes of strains with disruptions of the relevant genes, we have determined that individual knockouts of RpoHI (rcc02811), RpoHII (rcc00458), and putative ECF (rcc02724) σ factors have no effect on RcGTA production. In R. capsulatus, RpoHI shares the highest sequence homology with σB and this protein has been studied in the related species R. sphaeroides where it is involved in responding to heat and photooxidative stress [39, 40]. It was previously suggested that RpoHI is essential for growth at 32°C in R. capsulatus. There is no indication from the R. sphaeroides studies that its RsbV, W or Y homologues have any role related to RpoHI and RpoHII function.
The two-hybrid experiments did not provide any evidence of interactions between RbaW and the σ factor proteins tested. This could be due to experimental conditions as expression of R. capsulatus σ factors in E. coli may yield insoluble proteins as found with R. sphaeroides RpoD and RpoE [72, 73], subverting the two-hybrid assays. It is also possible that the R. capsulatus proteins interact with native E. coli proteins, which could also interfere with the two-hybrid assays. Structural interaction studies in E. coli have led to hypotheses that currently unknown small regulatory molecules affect the binding between the anti-σ factor Rsd and σ70. The interaction of R. capsulatus RbaW with a cognate σ factor may require co-factors and specific interactions might not occur without supplementing an experiment appropriately. It is also possible that RbaW may not function as an antagonist of σ factor activity, and that this system modulates RcGTA production in some other way (Figure 8), as found in other systems such as S. coelicolor and Bordetella where no cognate σ factor was identified and the regulatory activities were predicted to occur through unknown pathways.
We have identified a sequence in the RcGTA gene cluster promoter region that was required for expression of the tested RcGTA-lacZ fusion construct. The sequence is designated as an “rpoD17” site, which is the most common type of promoter sequence for RpoD in E. coli, but the specificity of conservation of these sites across proteobacterial lineages is unclear. A recent publication on regulation of RcGTA suggested the promoter for the gene cluster was located 215 bp upstream from the predicted orfg1 start codon . Our results with the targeted deletion of the predicted promoter sequence located ~100 bp upstream indicate this sequence is also important for expression of the RcGTA gene cluster. The “rpoD17” deletion construct on pX2Δp contains the more distal predicted promoter sequence , and so our results could reflect a requirement for this deleted sequence that is not related to transcription initiation for this fusion.
If the Rba proteins in R. capsulatus are indeed controlling the activity of a σ factor, the effect of the rbaV and rbaY mutations on colony morphology and culture viability may implicate these proteins as regulators of a σ factor with a large regulon, such as RpoD. However, the exact mechanistic functioning in this R. capsulatus Rba pathway is still unclear because of the dominant role of RbaV and in light of the diversity of similar partner-switching modules in other species that control downstream targets other than σ factors. Nevertheless, RbaV, RbaW and RbaY are linked by their phenotypes and do affect RcGTA gene expression and production in R. capsulatus.
We have identified a set of predicted regulatory proteins that function in a common pathway to affect production of RcGTA (Figure 8). Additionally, these proteins influence stationary phase viability and colony morphology, indicating this system also plays other regulatory roles in R. capsulatus. Based on their homology to other proteins and the presence of conserved domains, we hypothesize that these represent a partner-switching regulatory system that integrates control of RcGTA gene expression with other aspects of physiology in R. capsulatus. Whether or not this is mediated through the control of a cognate σ factor remains to be determined.
We thank S. MacLellan, N. Bykova, K. Tahlan and D. Bignell for help with the protein experiments. This research was funded by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/Index_eng.asp) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (http://www.innovation.ca/en) to ASL. RM was supported by fellowships from NSERC and the Memorial University School of Graduate Studies (http://www.mun.ca/sgs/).
- Marrs BL: Genetic recombination in Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1974, 71: 971-973. 10.1073/pnas.71.3.971.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang AS, Zhaxybayeva O, Beatty JT: Gene transfer agents: phage-like elements of genetic exchange. Nat Rev Micro. 2012, 10: 472-482.Google Scholar
- Leung MM, Brimacombe CA, Spiegelman GB, Beatty JT: The GtaR protein negatively regulates transcription of the gtaRI operon and modulates gene transfer agent (RcGTA) expression in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Mol Microbiol. 2012, 83: 759-774. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07963.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaefer AL, Taylor TA, Beatty JT, Greenberg EP: Long-chain acyl-homoserine lactone quorum-sensing regulation of Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent production. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 6515-6521. 10.1128/JB.184.23.6515-6521.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang AS, Beatty JT: Genetic analysis of a bacterial genetic exchange element: the gene transfer agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 859-864. 10.1073/pnas.97.2.859.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mercer RG, Quinlan M, Rose AR, Noll S, Beatty JT, Lang AS: Regulatory systems controlling motility and gene transfer agent production and release in Rhodobacter capsulatus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012, 331: 53-62. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02553.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang AS, Beatty JT: A bacterial signal transduction system controls genetic exchange and motility. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 913-918. 10.1128/jb.184.4.913-918.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mercer RG, Callister SJ, Lipton MS, Pasa-Tolic L, Strnad H, Paces V, Beatty JT, Lang AS: Loss of the response regulator CtrA causes pleiotropic effects on gene expression but does not affect growth phase regulation in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 2701-2710. 10.1128/JB.00160-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Belas R, Horikawa E, Aizawa S-I, Suvanasuthi R: Genetic Determinants of Silicibacter sp. TM1040 Motility. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 4502-4512. 10.1128/JB.00429-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greene SE, Brilli M, Biondi EG, Komeili A: Analysis of the CtrA pathway in Magnetospirillum reveals an ancestral role in motility in alphaproteobacteria. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194: 2973-2986. 10.1128/JB.00170-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller TR, Belas R: Motility is involved in Silicibacter sp. TM1040 interaction with dinoflagellates. Environ Microbiol. 2006, 8: 1648-1659. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01071.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quon KC, Marczynski GT, Shapiro L: Cell cycle control by an essential bacterial two-component signal transduction protein. Cell. 1996, 84: 83-93. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80995-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zan J, Heindl JE, Liu Y, Fuqua C, Hill RT: The CckA-ChpT-CtrA phosphorelay system is regulated by quorum sensing and controls flagellar motility in the marine sponge symbiont Ruegeria sp. KLH11. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e66346-10.1371/journal.pone.0066346.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strnad H, Lapidus A, Paces J, Ulbrich P, Vlcek C, Paces V, Haselkorn R: Complete genome sequence of the photosynthetic purple nonsulfur bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus SB 1003. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 3545-3546. 10.1128/JB.00366-10.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hecker M, Pané-Farré J, Völker U: SigB-dependent general stress response in Bacillus subtilis and related gram-positive Bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007, 61: 215-236. 10.1146/annurev.micro.61.080706.093445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mittenhuber G: A phylogenomic study of the general stress response sigma factor σB of Bacillus subtilis and its regulatory proteins. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002, 4: 427-452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wise AA, Price CW: Four additional genes in the sigB operon of Bacillus subtilis that control activity of the general stress factor σB in response to environmental signals. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 123-133.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benson AK, Haldenwang WG: Bacillus subtilis σB is regulated by a binding protein (RsbW) that blocks its association with core RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 2330-2334. 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2330.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dufour A, Haldenwang WG: Interactions between a Bacillus subtilis anti-σ factor (RsbW) and its antagonist (RsbV). J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 1813-1820.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alper S, Duncan L, Losick R: An adenosine nucleotide switch controlling the activity of a cell type-specific transcription factor in B. subtilis. Cell. 1994, 77: 195-205. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90312-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S, Haldenwang WG: Contributions of ATP, GTP, and redox state to nutritional stress activation of the Bacillus subtilis σB transcription factor. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 7554-7560. 10.1128/JB.187.22.7554-7560.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang X, Kang CM, Brody MS, Price CW: Opposing pairs of serine protein kinases and phosphatases transmit signals of environmental stress to activate a bacterial transcription factor. Genes Dev. 1996, 10: 2265-2275. 10.1101/gad.10.18.2265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staroń A, Mascher T: General stress response in α-proteobacteria: PhyR and beyond. Mol Microbiol. 2010, 78: 271-277. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07336.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pané-Farré J, Lewis RJ, Stulke J: The RsbRST stress module in bacteria: a signalling system that may interact with different output modules. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005, 9: 65-76. 10.1159/000088837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Schaik W, Tempelaars MH, Zwietering MH, de Vos WM, Abee T: Analysis of the role of RsbV, RsbW, and RsbY in regulating σB activity in Bacillus cereus. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 5846-5851. 10.1128/JB.187.16.5846-5851.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Been M, Tempelaars MH, van Schaik W, Moezelaar R, Siezen RJ, Abee T: A novel hybrid kinase is essential for regulating the σB-mediated stress response of Bacillus cereus. Environ Microbiol. 2010, 12: 730-745. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02116.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim ES, Song JY, Kim DW, Chater KF, Lee KJ: A possible extended family of regulators of sigma factor activity in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 7559-7566. 10.1128/JB.00470-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kormanec J, Ševčíková B, Halgašová N, Knirschová R, Řežuchová B: Identification and transcriptional characterization of the gene encoding the stress-response σ factor σH in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000, 189: 31-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee E-J, Cho Y-H, Kim H-S, Ahn B-E, Roe J-H: Regulation of σB by an anti- and an anti-anti-sigma factor in Streptomyces coelicolor in response to osmotic stress. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 8490-8498. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8490-8498.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhuwan M, Lee H-J, Peng H-L, Chang H-Y: Histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein-B (HptB) regulates swarming motility through partner-switching system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 strain. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287: 1903-1914. 10.1074/jbc.M111.256586.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez Martinez L, Bishop A, Parkes L, Del Sol R, Salerno P, Sevcikova B, Mazurakova V, Kormanec J, Dyson P: Osmoregulation in Streptomyces coelicolor: modulation of SigB activity by OsaC. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 71: 1250-1262. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06599.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris AR, Visick KL: The response regulator SypE controls biofilm formation and colonization through phosphorylation of the syp-encoded regulator SypA in Vibrio fischeri. Mol Microbiol. 2013, 87: 509-525. 10.1111/mmi.12109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quin MB, Berrisford JM, Newman JA, Baslé A, Lewis RJ, Marles-Wright J: The bacterial stressosome: a modular system that has been adapted to control secondary messenger signaling. Structure. 2012, 20: 350-363. 10.1016/j.str.2012.01.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parashar A, Colvin KR, Bignell DRD, Leskiw BK: BldG and SCO3548 interact antagonistically to control key developmental processes in Streptomyces coelicolor. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 2541-2550. 10.1128/JB.01695-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anthony JR, Newman JD, Donohue TJ: Interactions between the Rhodobacter sphaeroides ECF sigma factor, σE, and its anti-sigma factor, ChrR. J Mol Biol. 2004, 341: 345-360. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.018.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green HA, Donohue TJ: Activity of Rhodobacter sphaeroides RpoHII, a second member of the heat shock sigma factor family. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 5712-5721. 10.1128/JB.00405-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karls RK, Brooks J, Rossmeissl P, Luedke J, Donohue TJ: Metabolic roles of a Rhodobacter sphaeroides member of the σ32 family. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 10-19.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacGregor BJ, Karls RK, Donohue TJ: Transcription of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides cycA P1 promoter by alternate RNA polymerase holoenzymes. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 1-9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuss AM, Glaeser J, Berghoff BA, Klug G: Overlapping alternative sigma factor regulons in the response to singlet oxygen in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 2613-2623. 10.1128/JB.01605-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuss AM, Glaeser J, Klug G: RpoHII activates oxidative-stress defense systems and is controlled by RpoE in the singlet oxygen-dependent response in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 2009, 191: 220-230. 10.1128/JB.00925-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alias A, Cejudo FJ, Chabert J, Willison JC, Vignais PM: Nucleotide sequence of wild-type and mutant nifR4 (ntrA) genes of Rhodobacter capsulatus: identification of an essential glycine residue. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17: 5377-10.1093/nar/17.13.5377.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cullen PJ, Foster-Hartnett D, Gabbert KK, Kranz RG: Structure and expression of the alternative sigma factor, RpoN, in Rhodobacter capsulatus; physiological relevance of an autoactivated nifU2-rpoN superoperon. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 11: 51-65. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00289.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones R, Haselkorn R: The DNA sequence of the Rhodobacter capsulatus ntrA, ntrB and ntrC gene analogs required for nitrogen fixation. Mol Gen Genet. 1989, 215: 507-516. 10.1007/BF00427050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wall JD, Weaver PF, Gest H: Gene transfer agents, bacteriophages, and bacteriocins of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata. Arch Microbiol. 1975, 105: 217-224. 10.1007/BF00447140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beatty JT, Gest H: Generation of succinyl-coenzyme A in photosynthetic bacteria. Arch Microbiol. 1981, 129: 335-340. 10.1007/BF00406457.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barany F: Single-stranded hexameric linkers: a system for in-phase insertion mutagenesis and protein engineering. Gene. 1985, 37: 111-123. 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90263-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bollivar DW, Suzuki JY, Beatty JT, Dobrowski JM, Bauer CE: Directed mutational analysis of bacteriochlorophyll a biosynthesis in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Mol Biol. 1994, 237: 622-640. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prentki P, Krisch HM: In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene. 1984, 29: 303-313. 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90059-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gill PR, Warren GJ: An iron-antagonized fungistatic agent that is not required for iron assimilation from a fluorescent rhizosphere pseudomonad. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170: 163-170.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A: A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Bio/Technology. 1983, 1: 37-45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wong DK-H, Collins WJ, Harmer A, Lilburn TG, Beatty JT: Directed mutagenesis of the Rhodobacter capsulatus puhA gene and pleiotropic effects on photosynthetic reaction center and light-harvesting I complexes. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 2334-2342.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chambers JM, Freeny AE, Heiberger RM: Analysis of Variance; Designed Experiments. Statistical Models in S. Edited by: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ. 1993, New York: Chapman & Hall, 146-154.Google Scholar
- Fu Y, MacLeod D, Rivkin R, Chen F, Buchan A, Lang A: High diversity of Rhodobacterales in the subarctic North Atlantic Ocean and gene transfer agent protein expression in isolated strains. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2010, 59: 283-293. 10.3354/ame01398.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adams CW, Forrest ME, Cohen SN, Beatty JT: Structural and functional analysis of transcriptional control of the Rhodobacter capsulatus puf operon. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 473-482.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller JH: A short course in bacterial genetics: a laboratory manual and handbook for Escherichia coli and related bacteria. 1992, Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Karimova G, Pidoux J, Ullmann A, Ladant D: A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 5752-5756. 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5752.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imhoff JF, Madigan MT: International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the taxonomy of phototrophic bacteria. Minutes of the meetings, 27 August 2003, Tokyo, Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004, 54: 1001-1003. 10.1099/ijs.0.63086-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Markowitz VM, Chen I-MA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, Ratner A, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC: The integrated microbial genomes system: an expanding comparative analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: D382-D390. 10.1093/nar/gkp887.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robison K, McGuire AM, Church GM: A comprehensive library of DNA-binding site matrices for 55 proteins applied to the complete Escherichia coli K-12 genome. J Mol Biol. 1998, 284: 241-254. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hynes AP, Mercer RG, Watton DE, Buckley CB, Lang AS: DNA packaging bias and differential expression of gene transfer agent genes within a population during production and release of the Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent, RcGTA. Mol Microbiol. 2012, 85: 314-325. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08113.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pasternak C, Chen W, Heck C, Klug G: Cloning, nucleotide sequence and characterization of the rpoD gene encoding the primary sigma factor of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Gene. 1996, 176: 177-184. 10.1016/0378-1119(96)00243-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Francez-Charlot A, Frunzke J, Reichen C, Ebneter JZ, Gourion B, Vorholt JA: Sigma factor mimicry involved in regulation of general stress response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 3467-3472. 10.1073/pnas.0810291106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozak NA, Mattoo S, Foreman-Wykert AK, Whitelegge JP, Miller JF: Interactions between partner switcher orthologs BtrW and BtrV regulate type III secretion in Bordetella. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 5665-5676. 10.1128/JB.187.16.5665-5676.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eymann C, Becher D, Bernhardt J, Gronau K, Klutzny A, Hecker M: Dynamics of protein phosphorylation on Ser/Thr/Tyr in Bacillus subtilis. Proteomics. 2007, 7: 3509-3526. 10.1002/pmic.200700232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez-Martinez CE, Lourenço RF, Baldini RL, Laub MT, Gomes SL: The ECF sigma factor σT is involved in osmotic and oxidative stress responses in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 66: 1240-1255. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06005.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bastiat B, Sauviac L, Bruand C: Dual control of Sinorhizobium meliloti RpoE2 sigma factor activity by two PhyR-type two-component response regulators. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 2255-2265. 10.1128/JB.01666-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gourion B, Francez-Charlot A, Vorholt JA: PhyR is involved in the general stress response of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 1027-1035. 10.1128/JB.01483-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gourion B, Sulser S, Frunzke J, Francez-Charlot A, Stiefel P, Pessi G, Vorholt JA, Fischer H-M: The PhyR-σEcfG signalling cascade is involved in stress response and symbiotic efficiency in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 73: 291-305. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06769.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sauviac L, Philippe H, Phok K, Bruand C: An extracytoplasmic function sigma factor acts as a general stress response regulator in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 4204-4216. 10.1128/JB.00175-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emetz D, Klug G: Cloning and characterization of the rpoH gene of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Mol Gen Genet. 1998, 260: 212-217. 10.1007/s004380050888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anthony JR, Green HA, Donohue TJ: Purification of Rhodobacter sphaeroides RNA polymerase and its sigma factors. Methods Enzymol. 2003, 370: 54-65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newman JD, Falkowski MJ, Schilke BA, Anthony LC, Donohue TJ: The Rhodobacter sphaeroides ECF sigma factor, σE, and the target promoters cycA P3 and rpoE P1. J Mol Biol. 1999, 294: 307-320. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann N, Wurm R, Wagner R: The E. coli anti-sigma factor Rsd: studies on the specificity and regulation of its expression. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19235-10.1371/journal.pone.0019235.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bignell DRD, Warawa JL, Strap JL, Chater KF, Leskiw BK: Study of the bldG locus suggests that an anti-anti-sigma factor and an anti-sigma factor may be involved in Streptomyces coelicolor antibiotic production and sporulation. Microbiol. 2000, 146: 2161-2173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Westbye AB, Leung MM, Florizone SM, Taylor TA, Johnson JA, Fogg PC, Beatty JT: Phosphate concentration and the putative sensor kinase protein CckA modulate cell lysis and release of the Rhodobacter capsulatus gene transfer agent. J Bacteriol. 2013, 195: 5025-5040. 10.1128/JB.00669-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.