- Research article
- Open Access
Influence of internalin a murinisation on host resistance to orally acquired listeriosis in mice
© Bergmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 November 2012
Accepted: 15 April 2013
Published: 23 April 2013
The bacterial surface protein internalin (InlA) is a major virulence factor of the food-born pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. It plays a critical role in the bacteria crossing the host intestinal barrier by a species-specific interaction with the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. In mice, the interaction of InlA with murine E-cadherin is impaired due to sequence-specific binding incompatibilities. We have previously used the approach of ‘murinisation’ to establish an oral listeriosis infection model in mice by exchanging two amino acid residues in InlA. This dramatically increases binding to mouse E-cadherin. In the present study, we have used bioluminescent murinised and non-murinised Listeria strains to examine the spatiotemporal dissemination of Listeria in four diverse mouse genetic backgrounds after oral inoculation.
The murinised Listeria monocytogenes strain showed enhanced invasiveness and induced more severe infections in all four investigated mouse inbred strains compared to the non-murinised Listeria strain. We identified C57BL/6J mice as being most resistant to orally acquired listeriosis whereas C3HeB/FeJ, A/J and BALB/cJ mice were found to be most susceptible to infection. This was reflected in faster kinetics of Listeria dissemination, higher bacterial loads in internal organs, and elevated serum levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF-α and CCL2 in the susceptible strains as compared to the resistant C57BL/6J strain. Importantly, murinisation of InlA did not cause enhanced invasion of Listeria monocytogenes into the brain.
Murinised Listeria are able to efficiently cross the intestinal barrier in mice from diverse genetic backgrounds. However, expression of murinized InlA does not enhance listerial brain invasion suggesting that crossing of the blood brain barrier and crossing of the intestinal epithelium are achieved by Listeria monocytogenes through different molecular mechanisms.
Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive, facultative intracellular pathogen that can infect humans and animals after ingestion of contaminated food. It is responsible for human listeriosis, a disease predominantly affecting immunocompromised individuals. It can manifest itself in a wide range of clinical symptoms including meningitis or meningoencephalitis, gastroenteritis, abortion, perinatal infection, and septicemia [1, 2]. Central to the pathogenesis of listeriosis is the ability of the bacterium to cross host epithelial barriers. After oral infection L. monocytogenes can breach the intestinal barrier via invasion of intestinal epithelial cells or via transcytosis of goblet cells  or microfold (M) cells in Peyer’s Patches [4, 5]. The pathogen is then able to spread systemically by the hematogenous and lymphatic route to internal organs. The ability of L. monocytogenes to cross the blood–brain and placental barriers to invade the central nervous system and the fetalplacental unit is associated with the most severe and often fatal forms of Listeria infections in immunocompromised patients and pregnant women .
Two bacterial surface proteins, Internalin A (InlA) and Internalin B (InlB) play a major role in the internalisation of L. monocytogenes into non-phagocytic cells and in the crossing of epithelial barriers [3, 7–9]. The molecular interaction of both internalins with their respective receptors is species-specific. InlA induces listerial internalisation into intestinal epithelial cells by binding to the N-terminal domain of the human E-cadherin (Cdh1) cell adhesion protein . It can also interact with Cdh1 from guinea pig, rabbit and gerbil but fails to bind to the corresponding domain of the murine and rat Cdh1. This species specificity is mostly determined by the presence of a proline at the 16th amino acid position of Cdh1 in permissive species and of a glutamic acid in non-permissive species [10–12]. InlB binds to the mouse, human, and gerbil Met receptor and can induce listerial uptake in a wide range of different mammalian cell types including hepatocytes and epithelial cells but cannot recognise the guinea pig and rabbit Met receptors [13, 14]. The species-specific receptor interactions of InlA and InlB have limited the development of small animal models to study mechanisms of L. monocytogenes dissemination and pathogenesis after oral infection. A major breakthrough was the generation of a transgenic mouse line which expresses the human E-cadherin (CDH1) gene under the control of the enterocyte specific promoter of intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein. This mouse model demonstrated for the first time that the interaction of InlA with Cdh1 is crucial for listerial intestinal invasion in vivo. More recently, a mouse E16P knockin model in which the glutamic acid at position 16 of the murine Cdh1 gene was replaced by a proline was used to show that InlA and InlB are synergistically required for the crossing of the pathogen through the placental barrier after oral inoculation . The ubiquitous expression of a ‘humanized’ Cdh1 in this mouse allows the investigation of InlA-Cdh1 and InlB-Met interactions in vivo.
We have previously taken a different route to generate an InlA and InlB permissive L. monocytogenes mouse infection model through an approach we call pathogen ‘murinisation’ . Based on structural information on the recognition complex of InlA with the N-terminal domain of Cdh1, two amino acids in InlA were replaced (Ser192Asn and Tyr369Ser), dramatically increasing the binding affinity of murine Cdh1 to InlA . By introducing these two mutations into the listerial inlA locus, a variant strain of L. monocytogenes EGD-e (Lmo-InlAm) was generated which was able to cross the murine intestinal barrier and to induce symptoms of listeriosis after oral inoculation . In contrast to the Cdh1 transgenic mouse models, this mouse model permits the analysis of orally acquired listeriosis without the need to cross in ‘humanized’ alleles of Cdh1.
In this study, we have employed a previously generated bioluminescent L. monocytogenes EGD-e strain (Lmo-InlA-mur-lux) ‘murinised’ for the two Ser192Asn and Tyr369Ser inlA mutations  and a ‘non-murinised’, isogenic control strain (Lmo-EGD-lux) to analyse host responses after oral infection in four different inbred strains of mice. C3HeB/FeJ, A/J, BALB/cJ, and C57BL/6J mice were intragastrically inoculated with Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux and bacterial dissemination to internal organs was analysed using bioluminescent in vivo imaging (BLI). These mouse inbred strains were chosen for the study as they represent priority strains for the mouse phenome project  and their degree of host resistance to oral L. monocytogenes infection has never been investigated and compared in a single study under identical infection challenge conditions. We report here that infection with murinised Listeria resulted in earlier onset of listeriosis compared to infections with the non-murinised Listeria strain in different mouse genetic backgrounds. BLI enabled accurate measurement of bacterial dissemination over consecutive days in the acute stage of disease and showed that Lmo-InlA-mur-lux disseminated earlier from the intestine to target organs in the C3HeB/FeJ, A/J, and BALB/cJ mice. However, no increase in dissemination to the brain was detected, revealing that Listeria uses different mechanisms to cross the intestinal epithelium and to cross the blood–brain barrier.
Dynamics of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux dissemination visualized by BLI
In summary, the whole animal BLI of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux infected C57BL/6J, C3HeB/FeJ, A/J, and BALB/cJ mice showed that infection with ‘murinised’ Listeria were associated with stronger and earlier bioluminescent signals compared to infections with the ‘non-murinised’ L. monocytogenes strain and enabled accurate and repeated tracking of bacterial dissemination. C57BL/6J mice were most resistant to orally acquired listeriosis whereas C3HeB/FeJ mice were most susceptible.
Quantification of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux tissue burden after oral infection in different inbred mouse strains
Similarly, in resistant C57BL/6J mice bacterial loads between Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux infected mice were not significantly different at 3 d.p.i., with exception of the gallbladder. However, at 5 d.p.i., higher Lmo-InlA-mur-lux CFU counts were found in MLNs, liver and spleen as compared to Lmo-EGD-lux organ loads. In comparison to the susceptible C3HeB/FeJ and A/J strains, bacterial loads in internal organs of C57BL/6J mice were in general 10-100 fold lower for both listerial strains. Thus, in comparison to the other investigated inbred strains, C57BL/6J mice have an enhanced capability to control L. monocytogenes dissemination and replication in target organs but still show the increased susceptibility to the murinised strain. BALB/cJ mice displayed an intermediate resistance to Listeria. Significant differences in bacterial burden between Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux infected BALB/cJ mice were detected at 3 d.p.i. in the liver, gallbladder, and brain. At 5 d.p.i., Lmo-InlA-mur-lux bacterial loads remained higher in the small intestine, liver, and spleen compared to Lmo-EGD-lux loads, however, no further CFU differences were detected in the brain for both L. monocytogenes strains.
Taken together, the analysis of bacterial replication kinetics in different internal organs demonstrated, in general, higher levels of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux bacterial loads compared to Lmo-EGD-lux loads across the different mouse inbred strains analysed. Host resistance of C57BL/6J mice against Listeria correlated with the ability to control L. monocytogenes replication in target organs whereas in susceptible C3HeB/FeJ, A/J, and BALB/cJ mice Listeria replication was less efficiently controlled. From all mouse inbred strains investigated, C3HeB/FeJ mice displayed the highest bacterial tissue burden and were thus found to be most susceptible to Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux infection.
Histopathological analysis of liver and spleen in Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux infected C3HeB/FeJ and C57BL/6J mice
We analysed histopathological changes in liver and spleen of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux infected C3HeB/FeJ and C57BL/6J mice at 3 and 5 days p.i. We focused this comparative analysis on C3HeB/FeJ and C57BL/6J mice since they represent the two extremes of host susceptibility and resistance, respectively.
Increased susceptibility of C3HeB/FeJ mice to oral Listeriachallenge correlates with elevated inflammatory responses
Oral infection with murinised Lmo-InlA-mur-lux is associated with increased induction of interferon-β
An important factor which determines the virulence of Listeria monocytogenes is the amount of type I interferons produced in the host during infection. High levels of interferon-β (IFN-β) have been demonstrated to be associated with host susceptibility to Listeria infection and mice deficient for IFN-β signalling components such as the type I interferon receptor (Ifnar) gene or the interferon regulatory factor 3 (Irf3) gene are more resistant to lethal L. monocytogenes infection [20–25]. Furthermore, variations in the induction of IFN-β responses in the host by different Listeria strains have been linked with differences in strain virulence [26–29]. To analyse and compare kinetics of Ifnb1 induction after intragastric infection challenge with Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux we developed a dual luciferase detection model. IFN-β-reporter mice were inoculated with 5 × 109 CFU bacteria of each listerial strain and monitored both bacterial and firefly luciferase activity by BLI over a time course of 8 days. Bacterial and firefly luciferases have different peak emission length of 410 nm and 610 nm, respectively . Importantly compared to the bacterial luciferase, the firefly luciferase has stronger light emitting activity and can be separately measured in vivo by BLI after systemic administration of its substrate luciferin. BLI signals from the bacterial luciferase can then be subtracted from firefly BLI signals for solely quantification of Ifnb1 induction levels.
Oral infection challenge with ‘murinised’ Listeriadoes not result in increased neuroinvasion into the brain
Neurological symptoms in mouse inbred strains after oral infection with Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux
L. monocytogenes strain
Mouse inbred strain
Total number of mice infected
Number of mice displaying neurological abnormalities
Symptoms occurrence time post infection [days]
In vivo bioluminescence imaging is an important technology for the spatial-temporal monitoring of infection processes that underlie microbial pathogenesis and host defence mechanisms [30, 36]. Importantly, BLI allows repeated non-invasive imaging of pathogen dissemination to target organs and was used to identify the murine gallbladder as a novel organ of infection and as a host reservoir for extracellular Listeria replication and pathogen shedding [19, 37]. In the present study, we have combined an InlA and InlB permissive mouse infection model of L. monocytogenes with BLI, bacterial growth, and histopathology. We accurately compared resistance of mouse strains of different genetic backgrounds to orally acquired murinised and non-murinised Listeria. We identified the C3HeB/FeJ, A/J, and BALB/cJ strains as being susceptible to oral L. monocytogenes challenge whereas C57BL/6J mice were resistant. BLI analysis was more sensitive than bacterial culture or histopathology at detecting differences in pathogenesis between the murinised and non-murinised Listeria strains, and demonstrated that in the susceptible mouse inbred strains Lmo-InlA-mur-lux spread to internal organs more quickly and in higher numbers when compared to Lmo-EGD-lux infected animals. Thus, murinised Listeria can efficiently be used with mice of different genetic backgrounds for studies on mechanisms of orally acquired listeriosis. Importantly, once the intestinal barrier has been overcome by the pathogen, patterns of L. monocytogenes host resistance that have been previously determined by using systemic infection models are very similar to those that were observed in our present study. C57BL/6J mice are resistant to both oral and intravenous L. monocytogenes infection challenge, whereas C3HeB/FeJ, A/J and BALB/cJ mice are highly susceptible in both mouse infection models [38–42]. We show here that the host resistance of C57BL/6J mice to intragastric L. monocytogenes infection correlates with moderate losses in body weight, increased survival, lower bacterial loads in internal target organs, and low levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and CCL2 production as compared to the other inbred mouse strains investigated. The wide spectrum of L. monocytogenes host resistance in different inbred mouse strains is controlled by multiple genetic loci and complex interactions of different alleles impact on the overall phenotype of resistance or susceptibility towards Listeria. Importantly, the differences in host resistance to oral Lmo-InlA-mur-lux infection, that have been investigated in this study across the four inbred strains, are unlikely to be causatively linked to polymorphisms in the E-cadherin gene. Although A/J and BALB/cJ mice carry private missense polymorphisms in Cdh1, the underlying coding changes (R6H, P267A, P267Q, F272S, A636G) are unlikely to impact on the function of the protein. Provean predictions indicated that these changes would be well tolerated and would not alter the function of the protein .
Classic genetic studies carried out almost 30 years ago by using recombinant inbred mouse strains identified the Hc locus as a contributor to listeriosis susceptibility in A/J mice. The Hc locus encodes the C5 complement protein and A/J mice have a C5 deficiency due to a two base pair intragenic deletion in the Hc hemolytic complement gene [41, 45, 46]. Consequently, A/J mice are relatively inefficient at recruiting inflammatory effector cells such as neutrophils and macrophages to the site of infection [47, 48]. Differential host resistance to L. monocytogenes infection in BALB/cByJ and C57BL/6ByJ mice has been found to be genetically controlled by the Listr1 and Listr2 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) on mouse chromosomes 5 and 13, respectively . Although, the underlying genes and molecular mechanisms of these QTLs in controlling L. monocytogenes host resistances have not been unravelled yet, it has been demonstrated recently that a polymorphism in intron 5 of the interferon regulatory factor 3 gene (Irf3) on mouse chromosome 7 in the ByJ substrain of the C57BL/6 inbred strains contributes to Listeria host resistance of C57BL/6ByJ mice .
We have identified C3HeB/FeJ mice to be extremely susceptible to oral L. monocytogenes infection. C3HeB/FeJ were found to be sensitive to Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGDx-lux infections, although Lmo-InlA-mur-lux showed also enhanced virulence in this mouse strain. The increased host susceptibility of C3HeB/FeJ mice correlated with high bacterial burdens in the small intestine, MLNs and deep organs and was associated with massively elevated inflammatory responses when compared to the other investigated inbred mouse strains. C3HeB/FeJ mice developed necrotic lesions in the spleen and liver in the early phase of the infection, and the size and number of these lesions correlated with listeriosis severity and mortality. Compared to the other inbred mouse strains investigated, C3HeB/FeJ mice displayed elevated serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α and extremely high levels of the chemokine CCL2 at 3 and 5 days post infection. CCL2 has been demonstrated to have an important role in defence against L. monocytogenes infection. It is highly upregulated during the early phase of L. monocytogenes infection and attracts inflammatory monocytes, T lymphocytes, and natural killer cells to the site of microbial infection [49–51]. In the spleen, CCL2 is produced by ERTR-9+ marginal zone macrophages which are early targets of L. monocytogenes infection and are crucial for innate immune defence . High levels of CCL2, as for example induced by over expression in transgenic mice, have been demonstrated to be associated with increased sensitivity to L. monocytogenes infection . Thus, elevated CCL2 levels in C3HeB/FeJ mice are likely to contribute to the overall increased detrimental inflammatory response that we have observed in these mice. However, this cannot explain the general host susceptibility of this mouse strain. Importantly, C3HeB/FeJ mice are susceptible to many pathogens including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Salmonella Typhimurium [55, 56], Plasmodium chabaudi, Trypanosoma rhodesiense, Listeria monocytogenes, and Streptococcus pyogenes[60, 61]. Susceptibility to M. tuberculosis and L. monocytogenes infection in C3HeB/FeJ mice correlates with induction of severe necrotic lesions in the lung or liver and spleen, respectively [54, 59]. The multifocal abscess formation in both mouse infection models is controlled by the sst1 (supersusceptibility to tuberculosis) locus on mouse chromosome 1. Sst1 encodes the Sp110/Ipr1 nuclear body protein which belongs to the SP100/SP140 family of nuclear body proteins [54, 62]. The type I and II interferon inducible Sp110/Ipr1 gene is not expressed in C3HeB/FeJ mice due to a complex structural rearrangement at the Sst1 locus which left incomplete copies of the Sp110/Ipr1 gene in this mouse strain [54, 62]. Consequently, mice which carry the Sst1 susceptibility allele are impaired in their innate immune response against intracellular pathogens such as M. tuberculosis and L. monocytogenes.
Another host factor which greatly influences susceptibility to L. monocytogenes infection is the amount of interferon-β produced in response to infection [20, 21, 23, 28, 31, 32]. Production of interferon-β induces further release of type I interferons via autocrine and paracrine loops which can be detrimental due to induction of apoptosis in T cells and macrophages . In addition, interferon-β is a major driver of TNF-α induced lethal shock by enhancing apoptosis of enterocytes and hepatocytes which results in bowel and liver damage . We have compared induction of interferon-β responses in Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux infected mice by using a luciferase reporter system and BLI in vivo imaging. Although we used Infb1-reporter mice on the L. monocytogenes resistant C57BL/6J genetic background we detected stronger signals of Infb induction in Lmo-InlA-mur-lux infected reporter mice as compared to Lmo-EGD-lux infected animals at days 4 and 5 post infection. The induction of Infb1 correlated with the systemic dissemination of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux bacteria from the intestine to internal organs as these were detected earlier by BLI analysis of the bacterial luciferase reporter gene in Lmo-InlA-mur-lux infected animals compared to Lmo-EGD-lux infected mice.
In the present study we were not able to detect differences in the Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux invasion of the brain amongst the different mouse inbred strains investigated. Invasion of the CNS after oral infection with L. monocytogenes is still poorly understood despite the importance of neurological complications in fatal cases of listeriosis . Different hypotheses for routes of listerial neuroinvasion have been suggested including a retrograde transport of the L. monocytogenes from the oral epithelium to the rhombencephalon in cranial nerves [64, 65] or dissemination of bacteria by the hematogenous route across the blood–brain barrier (BBB), either directly by extracellular bacteria in the blood  or via a Trojan horse mechanism by which intracellular bacteria are transported by infected leukocytes across the BBB [67–69]. Within the BBB, cells of the microvascular endothelium and the choroid plexus epithelium express both host receptors, Cdh1 and Met, for InlA and InlB, respectively . Thus, theoretically these cells should be accessible for InlA- and InlB-mediated L. monocytogenes invasion. However, in our study we did not find any evidence for an InlA-dependent brain invasion mechanism. The occurrence of neurolisteriosis as indicated by abnormal neurological behaviour of mice after oral infection with Lmo-InlA-mur-lux or Lmo-EGD-lux was an extremely rare event. From a total of 290 analysed animals, only three mice displayed ataxia or circling behaviour after infection. Two of these animals had been infected with Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and one mouse with Lmo-EGD-lux. All three affected animals were from different inbred mouse strains. Furthermore, our analysis of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux and Lmo-EGD-lux bacterial loads in the brain did not detect major differences between both listerial strains. Although, BALB/cJ mice did show higher bacterial loads for Lmo-InlA-mur-lux at 3 d.p.i. in the brain, they were not longer detectable by 5 and 7 d.p.i., and had no effect on the prevalence of neurological symptoms in this mouse strain. Therefore, we conclude that at least in our murinised L. monocytogenes infection model, InlA-Cdh1 interactions do not play a role in Listeria CNS neuroinvasion.
By using a new, natural L. monocytogenes infection model which involved feeding of contaminated food to mice, Bou Ghanem and colleagues have very recently shown that InlA is not required for the initial establishment of intestinal infection in mice . However, expression of the murinised InlAm was demonstrated to be associated with increased bacterial persistence in the lamina propria and enhanced dissemination to mesenteric lymph nodes . This new finding suggests that InlA is important for overcoming a bottleneck in the gut that then leads to the systemic spread of the pathogen. The E-cadherin expressing host cells that are used by Listeria to overcome this bottleneck have not yet been identified. Although, preliminary finding suggest that these cells might be monocyte-derived migratory phagocyte that express E-cadherin. Future experiments incorporating conditional ablation of E-cadherin in different cells types (e.g. in enterocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells) with murinised L. monocytogenes will help verify the existence of this hypothetical cell population.
In summary, we conclude that the murinised, bioluminescent L. monocytogenes strain provides a versatile tool to analyse the pathogenesis of listeriosis in a range of different mouse model systems. By comparing the host resistance to orally acquired listeriosis in four inbred strains of mice we identified C57BL/6J mice to be most resistant to infections whereas BALB/cJ, A/J and C3HeB/FeJ were identified to be susceptible. Importantly, we did not find evidence in any of the investigated diverse mouse genetic backgrounds that expression of murinised InlA enhanced listerial invasion into the brain, revealing that Listeria uses a different invasion mechanism in different target organs. It is unlikely that InlA-Cdh1 interactions are a major driver of neurolisteriosis.
Female inbred A/J OlaHsd (Harlan-Winkelmann, Venray, Netherland), BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J (Janvier, St. Berthevin Cedex, France) and C3HeB/FeJ (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) mice were obtained at 9-10 weeks of age. IFN-β-reporter mice (Ifnb1 tm2.2Lien ) on an albino C57BL/6 (B6(Cg)-Tyr c-2J /J) genetic background have been described previously [24, 71]. Briefly, in this transgenic mouse the firefly luciferase reporter gene is under the control of the Ifnb promoter. This allows the detection of Ifnb induction in vivo with BLI after intravenous injection of D-luciferin (see below). All mice were housed under specific-pathogen-free conditions at the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (Braunschweig, Germany). Mice were acclimatised for 1 to 2 weeks in the facility before being used in infection challenge studies. All experiments were performed in accordance to German laws and animal welfare regulations after approval was granted from the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LAVES) as the local authority. The license number for this study was 33.11.42502-04-098/07.
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Listeria monocytogenes EGDe-lux (Lmo-EGD-lux) and L. monocytogenes EGDe-InlA-mur-lux (Lmo-InlA-mur-lux) have been described previously . Both strains are isogenic and have been tagged with the constitutive bioluminescent lux marker pIMK2lux. The inlA of Lmo-InlA-mur-lux was modified by site directed mutagenesis to express the murinised form of InlA with codon changes Ser192Asn and Tyr369Ser . Listerial strains were grown in an overnight culture of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) medium with shaking at 37°C. The next morning, bacterial cultures were diluted 1:10 and grown in BHI broth at 37°C until mid-log phase was reached. Bacteria were then harvested by centrifugation, washed several times and resuspended in sterile PBS. The numbers of colony forming units (CFU) of L. monocytogenes were determined by counting cells in a THOMA-chamber and by calculating the appropriate number of bacteria for infection. Plating bacteria on BHI agar plates verified the actual number of CFU in the inoculum.
Age matched groups of female mice (10-12 weeks), were prepared for infection challenge by withheld of food for 12 h; drinking water was replaced by carbonate buffered water (2,6% NaHCO3). Bacteria were prepared as described . Briefly, a total of 0.2 ml of the desired inoculum of either strain was mixed with 0.3 ml PBS containing 50 mg CaCO3. A suspension of 5 × 109 CFU was inoculated intragastrically into mice using a 21-gauge feeding needle attached to a 1 ml syringe. After infection mice were given access to food and water ad libitum. For CFU determination, small intestines, mesenteric lymph nodes, spleens, livers, gallbladders and brain of sacrificed mice were aseptically removed. To determine only intracellular bacterial load in small intestines, organs were washed with PBS and incubated in DMEM containing 100 μg/ml gentamicin for 2 h to kill extracellular bacteria. Serial dilutions of homogenates were plated on BHI agar plates and colonies were counted after overnight incubation at 37°C. All samples were weighted and homogenized in pre-cooled PBS.
For histopathological analysis of liver and spleen, organs were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 4 μm were cut and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), and assessed blind by one researcher (PB) for evaluation of pathologic changes.
For detection of bioluminescence, mice were anesthetized using isoflurane (Abbott Animal Health). Isoflurane gas anesthetic was administered at 2% in oxygen, which enables mild anaesthesia. BLI images were obtained using an IVIS 200 imaging system (CaliperLS) with integration time of 4 min at a binning of 8 and F/stop of 1. For the detection of in vivo enzymatic activity of the firefly luciferase, IFN-β-reporter mice were injected intravenously (i.v.) with 150 mg/kg of D-Luciferin (Synchem) in PBS, 5-10 min prior to imaging. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and monitored using the IVIS 200 imaging system according to manufactures instructions. Camera settings and exposure time were identical for all images. Photon flux was quantified by using the Living Image 3.1 software (CaliperLS).
Luminex measurements of cytokines and chemokines
Cytokine and chemokine measurements were performed with a Luminex xMAP System using a Mouse Cytokine Twenty-Plex Antibody Bead Kit (Invitrogen). The following cytokines and chemokines were simultaneous quantified in single samples: IFN-γ, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-6, CCL2, IL-5 und IL-1β. Serum from indicated timepoints were collected and stored at -80°C. Cytokine and chemokine concentrations were determined in triplicates from at least 3 individuals of each mouse inbred strain. All procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Invitrogen).
Bacterial loads and cytokine/chemokine concentrations are depicted as mean +/- SEM. Statistical analysis of these data was performed using the Mann–Whitney U non-parametic test and the GraphPad Prism 5 (version 5.01) analysis software (GraphPad Software Inc.). Significance levels are depicted in figures as: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
We thank the technicians of the central HZI animal facility for their excellent support in animal maintenance and animal care taking. This study was supported by grants from the National German Genome Network (NGFN-Plus, grant number 01GS0855) by the European Commission under the EUMODIC project (Framework Programme 6: LSHG-CT-2006-037188) and the European COST action ‘SYSGENET’ (BM901), and Institute Strategic Grant funding from the BBSRC and the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI).
- Barbuddhe SB, Chakraborty T: Listeria as an enteroinvasive gastrointestinal pathogen. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009, 337: 173-195. 10.1007/978-3-642-01846-6_6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swaminathan B, Gerner-Smidt P: The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microb Infect. 2007, 9 (10): 1236-1243. 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.05.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nikitas G, Deschamps C, Disson O, Niault T, Cossart P, Lecuit M: Transcytosis of Listeria monocytogenes across the intestinal barrier upon specific targeting of goblet cell accessible E-cadherin. J Exp Med. 2011, 208 (11): 2263-2277. 10.1084/jem.20110560.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Corr S, Hill C, Gahan CG: An in vitro cell-culture model demonstrates internalin- and hemolysin-independent translocation of Listeria monocytogenes across M cells. Microb Pathog. 2006, 41 (6): 241-250. 10.1016/j.micpath.2006.08.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jensen VB, Harty JT, Jones BD: Interactions of the invasive pathogens Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Shigella flexneri with M cells and murine Peyer's patches. Infect Immun. 1998, 66 (8): 3758-3766.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lecuit M: Human listeriosis and animal models. Microb Infect. 2007, 9 (10): 1216-1225. 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.05.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dramsi S, Biswas I, Maguin E, Braun L, Mastroeni P, Cossart P: Entry of Listeria monocytogenes into hepatocytes requires expression of inIB, a surface protein of the internalin multigene family. Mol Microbiol. 1995, 16 (2): 251-261. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02297.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gaillard JL, Berche P, Frehel C, Gouin E, Cossart P: Entry of L. monocytogenes into cells is mediated by internalin, a repeat protein reminiscent of surface antigens from gram-positive cocci. Cell. 1991, 65 (7): 1127-1141. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90009-N.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mengaud J, Ohayon H, Gounon P, Mege RM, Cossart P: E-cadherin is the receptor for internalin, a surface protein required for entry of L. monocytogenes into epithelial cells. Cell. 1996, 84 (6): 923-932. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81070-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schubert WD, Urbanke C, Ziehm T, Beier V, Machner MP, Domann E, Wehland J, Chakraborty T, Heinz DW: Structure of internalin, a major invasion protein of Listeria monocytogenes, in complex with its human receptor E-cadherin. Cell. 2002, 111 (6): 825-836. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01136-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lecuit M, Dramsi S, Gottardi C, Fedor-Chaiken M, Gumbiner B, Cossart P: A single amino acid in E-cadherin responsible for host specificity towards the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. EMBO J. 1999, 18 (14): 3956-3963. 10.1093/emboj/18.14.3956.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wollert T, Pasche B, Rochon M, Deppenmeier S, van den Heuvel J, Gruber AD, Heinz DW, Lengeling A, Schubert WD: Extending the host range of Listeria monocytogenes by rational protein design. Cell. 2007, 129 (5): 891-902. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.049.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khelef N, Lecuit M, Bierne H, Cossart P: Species specificity of the Listeria monocytogenes InlB protein. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8 (3): 457-470. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00634.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shen Y, Naujokas M, Park M, Ireton K: InIB-dependent internalization of Listeria is mediated by the Met receptor tyrosine kinase. Cell. 2000, 103 (3): 501-510. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00141-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lecuit M, Vandormael-Pournin S, Lefort J, Huerre M, Gounon P, Dupuy C, Babinet C, Cossart P: A transgenic model for listeriosis: role of internalin in crossing the intestinal barrier. Science. 2001, 292 (5522): 1722-1725. 10.1126/science.1059852.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Disson O, Grayo S, Huillet E, Nikitas G, Langa-Vives F, Dussurget O, Ragon M, Le Monnier A, Babinet C, Cossart P: Conjugated action of two species-specific invasion proteins for fetoplacental listeriosis. Nature. 2008, 455 (7216): 1114-1118. 10.1038/nature07303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monk IR, Casey PG, Hill C, Gahan CG: Directed evolution and targeted mutagenesis to murinize Listeria monocytogenes internalin A for enhanced infectivity in the murine oral infection model. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10: 318-10.1186/1471-2180-10-318.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bogue MA, Grubb SC: The mouse phenome project. Genetica. 2004, 122 (1): 71-74. 10.1007/s10709-004-1438-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hardy J, Francis KP, DeBoer M, Chu P, Gibbs K, Contag CH: Extracellular replication of Listeria monocytogenes in the murine gall bladder. Science. 2004, 303 (5659): 851-853. 10.1126/science.1092712.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Auerbuch V, Brockstedt DG, Meyer-Morse N, O’Riordan M, Portnoy DA: Mice lacking the type I interferon receptor are resistant to Listeria monocytogenes. J Exp Med. 2004, 200 (4): 527-533. 10.1084/jem.20040976.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carrero JA, Calderon B, Unanue ER: Type I interferon sensitizes lymphocytes to apoptosis and reduces resistance to Listeria infection. J Exp Med. 2004, 200 (4): 535-540. 10.1084/jem.20040769.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garifulin O, Qi Z, Shen H, Patnala S, Green MR, Boyartchuk V: Irf3 polymorphism alters induction of interferon beta in response to Listeria monocytogenes infection. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3 (9): 1587-1597.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Connell RM, Saha SK, Vaidya SA, Bruhn KW, Miranda GA, Zarnegar B, Perry AK, Nguyen BO, Lane TF, Taniguchi T: Type I interferon production enhances susceptibility to Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Exp Med. 2004, 200 (4): 437-445. 10.1084/jem.20040712.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Solodova E, Jablonska J, Weiss S, Lienenklaus S: Production of IFN-beta during Listeria monocytogenes infection is restricted to monocyte/macrophage lineage. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (4): e18543-10.1371/journal.pone.0018543.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stockinger S, Kastner R, Kernbauer E, Pilz A, Westermayer S, Reutterer B, Soulat D, Stengl G, Vogl C, Frenz T: Characterization of the interferon-producing cell in mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5 (3): e1000355-10.1371/journal.ppat.1000355.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aubry C, Corr SC, Wienerroither S, Goulard C, Jones R, Jamieson AM, Decker T, O’Neill LA, Dussurget O, Cossart P: Both TLR2 and TRIF contribute to interferon-beta production during Listeria infection. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (3): e33299-10.1371/journal.pone.0033299.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boneca IG, Dussurget O, Cabanes D, Nahori MA, Sousa S, Lecuit M, Psylinakis E, Bouriotis V, Hugot JP, Giovannini M: A critical role for peptidoglycan N-deacetylation in Listeria evasion from the host innate immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (3): 997-1002. 10.1073/pnas.0609672104.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reutterer B, Stockinger S, Pilz A, Soulat D, Kastner R, Westermayer S, Rulicke T, Muller M, Decker T: Type I IFN are host modulators of strain-specific Listeria monocytogenes virulence. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10 (5): 1116-1129. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01114.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz KT, Carleton JD, Quillin SJ, Rollins SD, Portnoy DA, Leber JH: Hyperinduction of host beta interferon by a Listeria monocytogenes strain naturally overexpressing the multidrug efflux pump MdrT. Infect Immun. 2012, 80 (4): 1537-1545. 10.1128/IAI.06286-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doyle TC, Burns SM, Contag CH: In vivo bioluminescence imaging for integrated studies of infection. Cell Microbiol. 2004, 6 (4): 303-317. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00378.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huys L, Van Hauwermeiren F, Dejager L, Dejonckheere E, Lienenklaus S, Weiss S, Leclercq G, Libert C: Type I interferon drives tumor necrosis factor-induced lethal shock. J Exp Med. 2009, 206 (9): 1873-1882. 10.1084/jem.20090213.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mahieu T, Park JM, Revets H, Pasche B, Lengeling A, Staelens J, Wullaert A, Vanlaere I, Hochepied T, van Roy F: The wild-derived inbred mouse strain SPRET/Ei is resistant to LPS and defective in IFN-beta production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (7): 2292-2297. 10.1073/pnas.0510874103.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Disson O, Lecuit M: Targeting of the central nervous system by Listeria monocytogenes. Virulence. 2012, 3 (2): 213-221.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greiffenberg L, Goebel W, Kim KS, Weiglein I, Bubert A, Engelbrecht F, Stins M, Kuhn M: Interaction of Listeria monocytogenes with human brain microvascular endothelial cells: InlB-dependent invasion, long-term intracellular growth, and spread from macrophages to endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 1998, 66 (11): 5260-5267.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Madarame H, Seuberlich T, Abril C, Zurbriggen A, Vandevelde M, Oevermann A: The distribution of E-cadherin expression in listeric rhombencephalitis of ruminants indicates its involvement in Listeria monocytogenes neuroinvasion. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011, 37 (7): 753-767. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01183.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gahan CG: The bacterial lux reporter system: applications in bacterial localisation studies. Curr Gene Ther. 2012, 12 (1): 12-19. 10.2174/156652312799789244.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hardy J, Margolis JJ, Contag CH: Induced biliary excretion of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (3): 1819-1827. 10.1128/IAI.74.3.1819-1827.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boyartchuk VL, Broman KW, Mosher RE, D’Orazio SE, Starnbach MN, Dietrich WF: Multigenic control of Listeria monocytogenes susceptibility in mice. Nature Genet. 2001, 27 (3): 259-260. 10.1038/85812.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheers C, McKenzie IF: Resistance and susceptibility of mice to bacterial infection: genetics of listeriosis. Infect Immun. 1978, 19 (3): 755-762.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Czuprynski CJ, Brown JF: The relative difference in anti-Listeria resistance of C57BL/6 and A/J mice is not eliminated by active immunization or by transfer of Listeria-immune T cells. Immunology. 1986, 58 (3): 437-443.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gervais F, Stevenson M, Skamene E: Genetic control of resistance to Listeria monocytogenes: regulation of leukocyte inflammatory responses by the Hc locus. J Immunol. 1984, 132 (4): 2078-2083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pasche B, Kalaydjiev S, Franz TJ, Kremmer E, Gailus-Durner V, Fuchs H, Hrabe de Angelis M, Lengeling A, Busch DH: Sex-dependent susceptibility to Listeria monocytogenes infection is mediated by differential interleukin-10 production. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (9): 5952-5960. 10.1128/IAI.73.9.5952-5960.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garifulin O, Boyartchuk V: Listeria monocytogenes as a probe of immune function. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2005, 4 (3): 258-269. 10.1093/bfgp/4.3.258.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monk IR, Gahan CG, Hill C: Tools for functional postgenomic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74 (13): 3921-3934. 10.1128/AEM.00314-08.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nilsson UR, Muller-Eberhard HJ: Deficiency of the fifth component of complement in mice with an inherited complement defect. J Exp Med. 1967, 125 (1): 1-16. 10.1084/jem.125.1.1.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wetsel RA, Fleischer DT, Haviland DL: Deficiency of the murine fifth complement component (C5). A 2-base pair gene deletion in a 5′-exon. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265 (5): 2435-2440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Czuprynski CJ, Canono BP, Henson PM, Campbell PA: Genetically determined resistance to listeriosis is associated with increased accumulation of inflammatory neutrophils and macrophages which have enhanced listericidal activity. Immunology. 1985, 55 (3): 511-518.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Czuprynski CJ, Faith NG, Steinberg H: A/J mice are susceptible and C57BL/6 mice are resistant to Listeria monocytogenes infection by intragastric inoculation. Infect Immun. 2003, 71 (2): 682-689. 10.1128/IAI.71.2.682-689.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deshmane SL, Kremlev S, Amini S, Sawaya BE: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009, 29 (6): 313-326. 10.1089/jir.2008.0027.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jia T, Leiner I, Dorothee G, Brandl K, Pamer EG: MyD88 and Type I interferon receptor-mediated chemokine induction and monocyte recruitment during Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Immunol. 2009, 183 (2): 1271-1278. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900460.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Serbina NV, Pamer EG: Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat Immunol. 2006, 7 (3): 311-317. 10.1038/ni1309.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jablonska J, Dittmar KE, Kleinke T, Buer J, Weiss S: Essential role of CCL2 in clustering of splenic ERTR-9+ macrophages during infection of BALB/c mice by Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (1): 462-470. 10.1128/IAI.00443-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rutledge BJ, Rayburn H, Rosenberg R, North RJ, Gladue RP, Corless CL, Rollins BJ: High level monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in transgenic mice increases their susceptibility to intracellular pathogens. J Immunol. 1995, 155 (10): 4838-4843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan H, Yan BS, Rojas M, Shebzukhov YV, Zhou H, Kobzik L, Higgins DE, Daly MJ, Bloom BR, Kramnik I: Ipr1 gene mediates innate immunity to tuberculosis. Nature. 2005, 434 (7034): 767-772. 10.1038/nature03419.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eisenstein TK, Deakins LW, Killar L, Saluk PH, Sultzer BM: Dissociation of innate susceptibility to Salmonella infection and endotoxin responsiveness in C3HeB/FeJ mice and other strains in the C3H lineage. Infect Immun. 1982, 36 (2): 696-703.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien AD, Rosenstreich DL: Genetic control of the susceptibility of C3HeB/FeJ mice to Salmonella typhimurium is regulated by a locus distinct from known salmonella response genes. J Immunol. 1983, 131 (6): 2613-2615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laroque A, Min-Oo G, Tam M, Radovanovic I, Stevenson MM, Gros P: Genetic control of susceptibility to infection with Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi AS in inbred mouse strains. Genes Immun. 2012, 13 (2): 155-163. 10.1038/gene.2011.67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levine RF, Mansfield JM: Genetics of resistance to African trypanosomes: role of the H2 locus in determining resistance to infection with Trypanosoma rhodesiense. Infect Immun. 1981, 34 (2): 513-518.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boyartchuk V, Rojas M, Yan BS, Jobe O, Hurt N, Dorfman DM, Higgins DE, Dietrich WF, Kramnik I: The host resistance locus sst1 controls innate immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection in immunodeficient mice. J Immunol. 2004, 173 (8): 5112-5120.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldmann O, Chhatwal GS, Medina E: Immune mechanisms underlying host susceptibility to infection with group A streptococci. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187 (5): 854-861. 10.1086/368390.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medina E, Goldmann O, Rohde M, Lengeling A, Chhatwal GS: Genetic control of susceptibility to group A streptococcal infection in mice. J Infect Dis. 2001, 184 (7): 846-852. 10.1086/323292.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kramnik I: Genetic dissection of host resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: the sst1 locus and the Ipr1 gene. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2008, 321: 123-148. 10.1007/978-3-540-75203-5_6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stockinger S, Decker T: Novel functions of type I interferons revealed by infection studies with Listeria monocytogenes. Immunobiology. 2008, 213 (9–10): 889-897.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Antal EA, Loberg EM, Bracht P, Melby KK, Maehlen J: Evidence for intraaxonal spread of Listeria monocytogenes from the periphery to the central nervous system. Brain Pathol. 2001, 11 (4): 432-438. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2001.tb00411.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oevermann A, Di Palma S, Doherr MG, Abril C, Zurbriggen A, Vandevelde M: Neuropathogenesis of naturally occurring encephalitis caused by Listeria monocytogenes in ruminants. Brain Pathol. 2010, 20 (2): 378-390. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2009.00292.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lecuit M: Understanding how Listeria monocytogenes targets and crosses host barriers. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005, 11 (6): 430-436. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01146.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Drevets DA, Dillon MJ, Schawang JS, Van Rooijen N, Ehrchen J, Sunderkotter C, Leenen PJ: The Ly-6Chigh monocyte subpopulation transports Listeria monocytogenes into the brain during systemic infection of mice. J Immunol. 2004, 172 (7): 4418-4424.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Drevets DA, Jelinek TA, Freitag NE: Listeria monocytogenes-infected phagocytes can initiate central nervous system infection in mice. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (3): 1344-1350. 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1344-1350.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Join-Lambert OF, Ezine S, Le Monnier A, Jaubert F, Okabe M, Berche P, Kayal S: Listeria monocytogenes-infected bone marrow myeloid cells promote bacterial invasion of the central nervous system. Cell Microbiol. 2005, 7 (2): 167-180.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bou Ghanem EN, Jones GS, Myers-Morales T, Patil PD, Hidayatullah AN, D’Orazio SE: InlA promotes dissemination of Listeria monocytogenes to the mesenteric lymph nodes during food borne infection of mice. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8 (11): e1003015-10.1371/journal.ppat.1003015.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lienenklaus S, Cornitescu M, Zietara N, Lyszkiewicz M, Gekara N, Jablonska J, Edenhofer F, Rajewsky K, Bruder D, Hafner M: Novel reporter mouse reveals constitutive and inflammatory expression of IFN-beta in vivo. J Immunol. 2009, 183 (5): 3229-3236. 10.4049/jimmunol.0804277.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.