- Research article
- Open Access
Zoospore interspecific signaling promotes plant infection by Phytophthora
© Kong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 1 September 2010
- Accepted: 7 December 2010
- Published: 7 December 2010
Oomycetes attack a huge variety of economically and ecologically important plants. These pathogens release, detect and respond to signal molecules to coordinate their communal behaviors including the infection process. When signal molecules are present at or above threshold level, single zoospores can infect plants. However, at the beginning of a growing season population densities of individual species are likely below those required to reach a quorum and produce threshold levels of signal molecules to trigger infection. It is unclear whether these molecules are shared among related species and what their chemistries are.
Zoospore-free fluids (ZFF) from Phytophthora capsici, P. hydropathica, P. nicotianae (ZFFnic), P. sojae (ZFFsoj) and Pythium aphanidermatum were cross tested for stimulating plant infection in three pathosystems. All ZFFs tested significantly increased infection of Catharanthus roseus by P. nicotianae. Similar cross activities were observed in infection of Lupinus polyphyllus and Glycine max by P. sojae. Only ZFFnic and ZFFsoj cross induced zoospore aggregation at a density of 2 × 103 ml-1. Pure autoinducer-2 (AI-2), a component in ZFF, caused zoospore lysis of P. nicotianae before encystment and did not stimulate plant infection at concentrations from 0.01 to 1000 μM. P. capsici transformants with a transiently silenced AI-2 synthase gene, ribose phosphate isomerase (RPI), infected Capsicum annuum seedlings at the same inoculum concentration as the wild type. Acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) were not detected in any ZFFs. After freeze-thaw treatments, ZFF remained active in promoting plant infection but not zoospore aggregation. Heat treatment by boiling for 5 min also did not affect the infection-stimulating property of ZFFnic.
Oomycetes produce and use different molecules to regulate zoospore aggregation and plant infection. We found that some of these signal molecules could act in an inter-specific manner, though signals for zoospore aggregation were somewhat restricted. This self-interested cooperation among related species gives individual pathogens of the same group a competitive advantage over pathogens and microbes from other groups for limited resources. These findings help to understand why these pathogens often are individually undetectable until severe disease epidemics have developed. The signal molecules for both zoospore aggregation and plant infection are distinct from AI-2 and AHL.
- Plant Infection
- Phytophthora Species
- Pythium Species
- Pythium Aphanidermatum
- Zoospore Suspension
Zoosporic plant pathogens in the phylum Oomycota of the Stramenopila kingdom include hundreds of devastating species that attack a broad range of economically important agricultural and ornamental crops as well as forest tree species [1, 2]. These oomycetes, including Phytophthora and Pythium species, use motile zoospores for dispersal and plant infection [3–5]. Plant infection by zoosporic pathogens is often effective in nature despite the fact that the population density in primary inoculum sources is relatively low [6–9]. This has led to differing theories with regard to density-dependent zoospore behaviors and plant infection [10–17]. A recent study with Phytophthora nicotianae showed that plant infection may be regulated through zoosporic extracellular products in zoospore-free fluid (ZFF) which can promote infection by a single zoospore . This indicates that the physical presence of the threshold density of zoospores at an infection site is not strictly required, and plant infection can be initiated efficiently through chemical communication by the population. However, it is not clear how such a process is carried out by a pathogen at its naturally occurring low population density, which would be unlikely to produce adequate levels of functional signals unless these signals were also produced by other organisms and readily accessible in the environment.
Ca2+ and autoinducer 2 (AI-2), two widespread and non-specific signaling molecules, are known to be produced by zoosporic oomycetes [19–21]. Ca2+ plays a central role in autonomous encystment, adhesion and germination of cysts in zoosporic oomycetes [3, 10, 14, 22–24]. However, it is not considered to be an autoinducer because Ca2+ does not directly trigger cooperative behaviors of zoospores and acts more like a secondary messenger . AI-2 was first detected in bacteria and is utilized for metabolism and quorum sensing in bacteria [25–27]. In the latter process, bacteria respond to these released signaling molecules or autoinducers to coordinate their communal behavior. Eukaryotes including oomycetes can also produce AI-2 or AI-2-like activities [21, 28–30] although they do not use the LuxS pathway that most bacteria use [31, 32]. Instead, AI-2 is formed spontaneously from D-ribulose-5-phosphate that is synthesized in these eukaryotes from pentose-phosphates by ribose phosphate isomerase (RPI) in the pentose-phosphate pathway . AI-2 has been proposed as a universal signaling molecule in bacteria based on its role in inter-species signaling and postulated cross-kingdom communication [33–40]. However, the function of AI-2 in eukaryotes has not been established.
The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of signal molecules in ZFF. Specifically, we identified inter-specific signaling activities of ZFF from four Phytophthora species and one Pythium species. We also assessed the potential of AI-2 along with another known bacterial autoinducer as signal molecules for communication among zoosporic species.
ZFF interspecific stimulation of zoosporic infection
Many plants are attacked by multiple oomycete species . The ability of oomycete pathogens to benefit from the presence of related (or unrelated) species is presumably a selective advantage, especially if the diverse pathogens are competing for a limited resource (i.e. the host plant tissue) and/or the initial population density of each individual pathogen population is low. Such self-interested cooperation may have further advantages if the effector molecules released by each pathogen species have complementary or synergistic capabilities for suppressing plant defenses.
ZFF inter-specific regulation of zoospore aggregation
AI-2 is not involved in zoospore communication and promotion of plant infection
Effect of purified AI-2 on encystment and germination of P. nicotianae zoospores after overnight incubation at 23°C
No. of cysts
No. of empty
No. of lysed
The function of AI-2-like activities produced by zoosporic oomycetes remains unclear although it regulates bacteria quorum sensing . Two-way communication has been observed between eukaryotes and bacteria such as Leguminosae and bacterial rhizobia  and between mycorrhiza and Streptomyces. In the former case, plants release flavonoids that bind LysR-family transcriptional regulators in the bacteria, leading to the production of Nod factor that facilitates nitrogen fixation. In the latter case, fungal metabolites stimulate the bacteria to produce auxofuran which promotes growth of both the fungus and the host plants. Perhaps zoosporic oomycetes utilize AI-2 to attract quorum sensing bacteria which subsequently release factors that facilitate plant infection. Indeed, bacteria have been shown to benefit sporangium production by zoosporic oomycetes .
Involvement of other molecules in ZFF activity
Acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs), or bacterial autoinducer 1, are utilized by zoospores of the green seaweed Enteromorpha (Ulva) for communication in the search for settlement surfaces . A bioassay was performed using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens reporter strain KYC55/pJZ410/pJZ384/pJZ372  in plate and spectrophotometric tests to determine whether this molecule is present in ZFF. LacZ activity was detected in all four positive control plates at nM concentrations of AHL but not in ZFFnic or ZFFsoj prepared from zoospore suspensions at > 104 spores ml-1 nor in concentrated extracts from them obtained with ethyl acetate. These results indicate that zoospores from these oomycete species do not produce AHLs which therefore cannot be responsible for any ZFF activity.
Temperature sensitivity of ZFF activities
This study demonstrated inter-specific activities of zoospore extracellular products in promoting zoospore aggregation and plant infection by Phytophthora. Zoosporic oomycetes contain hundreds of species and are widespread in irrigation water and plant production fields. However, specific populations detected in primary inoculum sources are not in sufficient numbers to produce signals that could promote plant infection. Inter-specific chemical communication (probably self-interested) as a strategy used by zoosporic pathogens for effective plant infection provides insights into the destructiveness of these pathogens and the importance of the microbial community and the environment in the infection process.
AI-2 was excluded as a signal for communal behavior in zoosporic oomycetes, despite its detection in ZFF and widespread presence in the environment. AI-2 synthase RPI and purified AI-2 both were not required for regulation of zoospore aggregation and infection. AHLs also were excluded because of their absence in ZFF. Thus, zoosporic oomycetes may use completely different chemicals from bacteria for quorum sensing. Analysis of ZFF revealed that functional signals controlling zoospore aggregation and plant infection differ in molecular composition. The former is not temperature labile and acts upon a restricted number of species while the latter is heat labile and non-species-specific. Identifying these molecules will facilitate our understanding of the mechanisms underlying natural plant infection by these pathogens and may lead to innovative control strategies.
Zoosporic oomycetes and culture conditions
Four Phytophthora species, P. nicotianae (1B11), P. sojae (28G4), P. capsici (24F4), P. hydropathica (37E6) and one Pythium species Py. aphanidermatum (18H7) were used in this study. These species are distinct in morphology and genetics [2, 47]. Specifically, P. nicotianae, P. capsici and Py. aphanidermatum have broad host ranges while P. sojae has a restricted host range, generally infecting only soybeans and lupines. P. hydropathica (37E6) originated from irrigation water and is a pathogen of nursery plants . The isolates were maintained on clarified vegetable juice agar (CV8A) medium  at 23°C.
Preparation of zoospore-free fluid
Zoospore-free fluid (ZFF) from a particular species is designated with an abbreviated species name. For example, ZFFnic represents ZFF from a P. nicotianae zoospore suspension. ZFF was prepared from nutrient-depleted zoospore suspensions starting with sporangium induction as described previously [18, 21]. Specifically, prior to sporangium production, P. sojae and Py. aphanidermatum were cultured for 3-4 days and the other species were cultured for 1-2 wk in 10% CV8 broth. After nutrient depletion (medium removal and water rinses), the mycelial mats were further incubated for 16-18 h for P. sojae and Py. aphanidermatum, 2-3 days for P. capsici and one week for the other species under fluorescent light at 23°C to obtain a desired number of sporangia. To induce zoospore release, the mats with sporangia were flooded with chilled SDW and kept under lights until the desired zoospore density was reached. ZFF was obtained by passing a zoospore suspension through a 0.2 μm pore-size filter after vortexing for 2 min. ZFF was used fresh or stored at -20°C. Freezing destroyed the aggregation-promoting activity of ZFF, but not its infection-promoting activity.
Phytopathosystems, plant growth conditions, inoculum preparation and inoculation
Four phytopathosystems, P. nicotianae × annual vinca (Catharanthus roseus cv. Little Bright Eye), P. sojae × lupine (Lupinus polyphyllus), P. sojae × soybean (Glycine max cv. Williams) and P. capsici × pepper (Capsicum annum cv. California Wonder) were used.
Annual vinca plants were prepared in the greenhouse where 4-wk old seedlings were grown in pine bark with fertilizer for 4-6 wk. Soybean and pepper seedlings were prepared by growing 9 seeds per pot in sterilized Soilless Potting Mix (Schultz Professional) supplied with fertilizer and fungicide for 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, in the greenhouse. For lupine plants, 10 germinated seeds per styrofoam cup were grown in sterilized vermiculite (Whittemore Com) and fertilizer solution 20-20-20 (Scotts) for 2 wk in the growth chamber.
Single-zoospore inocula with an average concentration of one zoospore per drop (10 μl) were prepared by dilution of a fresh zoospore suspension at 104 ml-1 with a test solution to 100 zoospore ml-1. Test solutions included SDW, dilutions from 1 mM purified AI-2 (Omm Scientific Inc, Dallas, TX) and ZFF from different species. To test whether ZFF was heat or freezing labile, ZFFnic boiled for 5 min or freeze thawed was also included. For determination of the infection threshold of P. capsici, the zoospore suspension was diluted in SDW to prepare inocula at 102, 103 or 104 ml-1, containing an average of 1, 10, or 100 zoospores per 10-μl drop.
For inoculation with P. nicotianae, detached annual vinca leaves were used as described previously . Each leaf was inoculated at 10 sites unless stated otherwise with a 10-μl drop of single zoospore inocula. Each treatment included six replicate leaves and was done at least three times.
In the P. sojae × lupine phytopathosystem, each cotyledon of lupine plants received one 10-μl drop of a single zoospore inoculum. Each treatment included 10 cups. Each cup contained 5-10 plants. Inoculated plants were kept in a moist chamber at 23°C in the dark overnight, then at a 10 h/14 h day/night cycle until symptoms appeared. Plants with damping-off symptoms were recorded as dead plants. Each assay was repeated twice.
Similarly, for soybean and pepper plant inoculation, two 10-μl drops of an inoculum containing single or multiple zoospores were placed on the hypocotyls of each plant which was laid on its side in a moist chamber. Inoculated plants were kept in the dark overnight and then placed upright in a growth chamber at 26°C until symptoms appeared. For soybean, each treatment included at least 3 replicate pots containing 7-9 plants and was repeated twice. For pepper plants, each inoculation was performed in 6 replicate pots containing 3-8 plants.
Microscopy of zoospore activity
To determine zoospore responses to ZFF and other chemicals, 30 μl zoospore suspensions at 104 zoospores ml-1 were added to 120 μl of a test solution in a well on a depression slide to obtain a density of 2 × 103 zoospores ml-1. Test solutions included fresh or treated (boiled or freeze/thawed) ZFF, a serial dilution from purified AI-2 at 1 mM, or SDW. Each test contained two replicate wells per treatment and was repeated once. The slides were placed on wet filter paper in 10-cm Petri dishes and incubated at 23°C. Zoospore behaviors including encystment, aggregation, germination and differentiation in three random fields in each well were examined with an IX71 inverted microscope (Olympus America Inc., Pennsylvania, USA) after overnight incubation. Images were captured with the Image-Pro® Plus software version 5.1 (Media Cybernetics, Inc, Maryland, USA).
Transient RPI gene silencing mediated by dsRNA and RT-PCR analysis
The procedure was adopted from that for P. infestans. To obtain a template for preparation of sense and antisense RNAs by transcription, two pairs of primers containing the T7 RNA polymerase promoter in their forward or reverse sequences were designed for amplification of a partial RPI sequence extracted from the P. capsici genome http://genome.jgi-psf.org/PhycaF7/PhycaF7.home.html. These primers were dsRPIPcapF: 5'-CAA GCT AAG CAG CTC ATC GCC CA-3'; dsRPIPcapRT7: 5'-GTA ATA CGA CTC ACT ATA GGG CAA CAG GCA CCC CCT GGG TCC A-3'; dsRPIPcapR: 5'-CAA CAG GCA CCC CCT GGG TCC A-3'(TGGACCCAGGGGGTGCCTGTTG); and dsRPIPcapFT7: 5'-GTA ATA CGA CTC ACT ATA GGG CAA GCT AAG CAG CTC ATC GCC CA-3'. Concentrated PCR amplicons were transcribed to produce sense and antisense RNAs using Megascrit RNAi kit (Ambion). Both sense and antisense RNA were mixed to obtain dsRNA at 168 ng μl-1.
To silence RPI, P. capsici protoplasts were transfected with the dsRNA. For each transfection, 24 μl of dsRNA (4 μg) was dried under vacuum (20-30 min) and then suspended in 10 μl PEG and 0.8 M mannitol solutions, respectively then incubated with 10 μl Lipofectin (Invitrogen) for 15 min prior to mixing with 20 μl P. capsici protoplasts. Protoplasts were prepared using a modified transformation protocol for P. sojae. After further incubation for 24 h at 23°C, the mixture was transferred to 200 ml pea broth with ampicillin and vancomycin then 4 ml was transferred into each well of 12-well plates.
To determine RPI expression in dsRNA-treated lines, mycelia from each well (line) were subcultured and extracted for RNA on day 7 using the Qiagen RNeasy plant kit. RNA was prepared from the lines before (T0) and two weeks after transfer (T1) as well as from the wild type culture. All the RNAs were treated with the RNase-Free DNAase Set (Qiagen), quantified and subjected to reverse transcription using the SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase kit (Roche) followed by PCR using primers RPIPcapF: 5'- CAG ACG TCG CAG ATA CTA TTA ACC A-3'; and RPIPcapR: 5'-CTC CAG GAA GTA ATG CAT GAC ACA A-3' for RPI and actin housekeeping gene primers  for an endogenous control. The PCR products were then analyzed by electrophoresis.
Detection of AHL activity
Acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) activity was determined with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens AHL reporter strain (KYC55/pJZ410/pJZ384/pJZ372) . The reporter strain cannot produce AHLs but has plasmids containing a traI-lacZ reporter fusion and the regulator TraR driven by a T7 expression system. In the presence of exogenous AHLs, the over-expressed TraR activates the reporter fusion, resulting in production of β-galactosidase. The reporter can detect a broad range of AHLs ranging from 4- to 18-carbon acyl moieties at nanomolar levels . We monitored LacZ activity by observing X-gal hydrolysis colorimetrically in the culture plates  and quantified the activity using the lactose analog ONPG (orthonitrophenyl-galactopyranoside) in a spectrophotometric assay . ZFFnic and ZFFsoj from different zoospore suspensions, their ethyl acetate extracts, four positive controls (N-hexanoyl-, N-octanoyl-, N-decanoyl-, and dodecanoyl-DL-homoserine lactones (Sigma-Aldrich, Atlanta, Georgia, US) and a negative control (SDW) were included in the experiments. All AHLs were assessed at concentrations of 10 nM and 100 nM.
In plate assays, 10 μl of ZFF, a synthetic AHL or SDW was injected at the center of the test plates with a pipette once the overlay was set. After incubation at 28°C for 2 days, LacZ activity was measured by the diameter of the blue area in test plates. The experiments were performed four times, and each experiment had two replicate plates. In spectrophotometric assays, the reporter was pre-induced in the AT medium containing antibiotics and stored at -80°C. The thawed cells were resuspended in AT medium (1:1000). A 200-μl aliquot of ZFF or SDW, or 50 μl of synthetic AHL was added to glass tubes containing 2 ml suspension. Cultures were grown on a shaker at 28°C until OD600 = 1.0 (1.5 days). The bacterial cells in each tube were lysed by the addition of 800 μl of Z buffer, 20 μl of 0.05% SDS and 30 μl of chloroform followed by vortexing. LacZ activity was measured using the Miller Unit at OD420 for the supernatant after the reaction with 100 μl of ONPG was ended by 1 M Na2CO3. The experiment was carried out in replicate and performed twice.
Data from independent experiments were processed and statistically analyzed using ANOVA in Excel. All P-values were determined based on one-way ANOVA unless otherwise stated.
The authors are indebted to Dr. Jun Zhu at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine for providing AHL-reporter strain KYC55 and the assay protocol. This work was supported in part by grants to CH from USDA-NIFA (2005-51101-02337 and 2010-51181-21140) and to ZSZ from NIAID/NIH (1R01AI058146) as well as an oomycete genomics and bioinformatics training fellowship to PK, supported by the NSF Research Collaboration Networks grant to BMT for the oomycete community.
- Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK: Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide. 1996, St Paul, MN, USA: APS PressGoogle Scholar
- Dick MW: Keys to Pythium. 1990, Reading, U. K.: University of ReadingGoogle Scholar
- Deacon JW, Donaldson SP: Molecular recognition in the homing responses of zoosporic fungi, with special reference to Pythium and Phytophthora. Mycol Res. 1993, 97: 1153-1171. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81278-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erwin DC, Bartnicki-Garcia S, Tsao PH: Phytophthora: Its Biology, Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathology. 1983, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: The American Phytopathologcal SocietyGoogle Scholar
- Judelson HS, Blanco FA: The spores of Phytophthora: Weapons of the plant destroyer. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2005, 3 (1): 47-58. 10.1038/nrmicro1064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hong CX, Moorman GW: Plant pathogens in irrigation water: challenges and opportunities. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2005, 24: 189-208. 10.1080/07352680591005838.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacDonald JD, Abeliovich A, Lagunas-Solar M, Faiman D, Kabashima J: Treatment of irrigation effluent water to reduce nitrogenous contaminants and plant pathogens. BARD Scientific Reports. 1997, 1-47.Google Scholar
- Bush EA: Characterization of Phytophthora species in recycled irrigation water at a container nursery in southwestern Virginia. 2002, Blacksburg, VA, USA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Kong P, Hong CX, Jeffers SN, Richardson PA: A species-specific polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of Phytophthora nicotianae in irrigation water. Phytopathology. 2003, 93 (7): 822-831. 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.7.822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reid B, Morris BM, Gow NAR: Calcium-dependent, genus-specific, autoaggregation of zoospores of phytopathogenic fungi. Exp Mycol. 1995, 19 (3): 202-213. 10.1006/emyc.1995.1025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ko WH, Chan MJ: Aggregation of Phytophthora capsici zoospores and their interaction with zoospores of P. palmivora. Journal of General Microbiology. 1974, 80: 3-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Latijnhouwers M, Ligterink W, Vleeshouwers V, van West P, Govers F: A G alpha subunit controls zoospore motility and virulence in the potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (4): 925-936. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03893.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamoun S, vanWest P, deJong AJ, deGroot KE, Vleeshouwers V, Govers F: A gene encoding a protein elicitor of Phytophthora infestans is down-regulated during infection of potato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 1997, 10 (1): 13-20. 10.1094/MPMI.19184.108.40.206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- von Broembsen SL, Deacon JW: Calcium interference with zoospore biology and infectivity of Phytophthora parasitica in nutrient irrigation solutions. Phytopathology. 1997, 87 (5): 522-528. 10.1094/PHYTO.19220.127.116.112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fraedrich SW, Tainter FH, Miller AE: Zoospore inoculum density of Phytophthora cinnamomi and the infection of lateral root-tips of shortleaf and loblolly-pine. Phytopathology. 1989, 79 (10): 1109-1113. 10.1094/Phyto-79-1109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell DJ, Kannwischer-Mitchell ME: Relationship of inoculum density of Phytophthora species to disease incidence in various hosts. Phytophthora: Its Biology, Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathology. Edited by: Erwin DC, Bartnicki-Garcia S, Tsao PH. 1983, St. Paul, MN, USA: APS Press, 259-269.Google Scholar
- Clarke DD: Factors affecting the development of single zoospore colonies of Phytophthora infestans. Tran Br Mycol Soc. 1966, 49: 177-184. 10.1016/S0007-1536(66)80051-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kong P, Hong CX: Zoospore density-dependent behaviors of Phytophthora nicotianae are autoregulated by extracellular products. Phytopathology. 2010, 100 (7): 632-637. 10.1094/PHYTO-100-7-0632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Irving HR, Griffith JM, Grant BR: Calcium efflux associated with encystment of Phytophthora palmivora zoospores. Cell Calcium. 1984, 5 (5): 487-500. 10.1016/0143-4160(84)90026-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warburton AJ, Deacon JW: Transmembrane Ca2+ fluxes associated with zoospore encystment and cyst germination by the phytopathogen Phytophthora parasitica. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 1998, 25 (1): 54-62. 10.1006/fgbi.1998.1086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kong P, Lee BWK, Zhou ZS, Hong CX: Zoosporic plant pathogens produce bacterial autoinducer-2 that affects Vibrio harveyi quorum sensing. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2010, 303 (1): 55-60. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01861.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gubler F, Hardham AR, Duniec J: Characterizing adhesiveness of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores during encystment. Protoplasma. 1989, 149: 24-30. 10.1007/BF01623979.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deacon JW: Ecological implications of recognition events in the pre-infection stages of root pathogens. New Phytologist. 1996, 133 (1): 135-145. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04349.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Broembsen SL, Deacon JW: Effects of calcium on germination and further zoospore release from zoospore cysts of Phytophthora parasitica. Mycological Research. 1996, 100: 1498-1504. 10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80085-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bassler BL: How bacteria talk to each other: regulation of gene expression by quorum sensing. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 1999, 2 (6): 582-587. 10.1016/S1369-5274(99)00025-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winzer K, Hardie KR, Williams P: LuxS and autoinducer-2: Their contribution to quorum sensing and metabolism in bacteria. Advances in Applied Microbiology. 2003, 53: 291-full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vendeville A, Winzer K, Heurlier K, Tang CM, Hardie KR: Making 'sense' of metabolism: Autoinducer-2, LuxS and pathogenic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3 (5): 383-396. 10.1038/nrmicro1146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hauck T, Hubner Y, Bruhlmann F, Schwab W: Alternative pathway for the formation of 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione, the proposed precursor of 4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)-furanone as well as autoinducer-2, and its detection as natural constituent of tomato fruit. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-General Subjects. 2003, 1623 (2-3): 109-119. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2003.08.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao M, Teplitski M, Robinson JB, Bauer WD: Production of substances by Medicago truncatula that affect bacterial quorum sensing. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2003, 16 (9): 827-834. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.9.827.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teplitski M, Chen HC, Rajamani S, Gao M, Merighi M, Sayre RT, Robinson JB, Rolfe BG, Bauer WD: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii secretes compounds that mimic bacterial signals and interfere with quorum sensing regulation in bacteria. Plant Physiology. 2004, 134 (1): 137-146. 10.1104/pp.103.029918.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taga ME, Semmelhack JL, Bassler BL: The LuxS-dependent autoinducer Al-2 controls the expression of an ABC transporter that functions in Al-2 uptake in Salmonella typhimurium. Molecular Microbiology. 2001, 42 (3): 777-793. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02669.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun JB, Daniel R, Wagner-Dobler I, Zeng AP: Is autoinducer-2 a universal signal for interspecies communication: a comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis of the synthesis and signal transduction pathways?. BMC Evol Biol. 2004, 4 (36):Google Scholar
- Bassler BL, Greenberg EP, Stevens AM: Cross-species induction of luminescence in the quorum-sensing bacterium Vibrio harveyi. J of Bacteriol. 1997, 179 (12): 4043-4045.Google Scholar
- Federle MJ, Bassler BL: Interspecies communication in bacteria. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112 (9): 1291-1299.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higgins DA, Pomianek ME, Kraml CM, Taylor RK, Semmelhack MF, Bassler BL: The major Vibrio cholerae autoinducer and its role in virulence factor production. Nature. 2007, 450 (7171): 883-886. 10.1038/nature06284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rader BA, Campagna SR, Semmelhack MF, Bassler BL, Guillemin K: The quorum-sensing molecule autoinducer 2 regulates motility and flagellar morphogenesis in Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007, 189 (17): 6109-6117. 10.1128/JB.00246-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kozlova EV, Popov VL, Sha J, Foltz SM, Erova TE, Agar SL, Horneman AJ, Chopra AK: Mutation in the S-ribosylhomocysteinase (luxS) gene involved in quorum sensing affects biofilm formation and virulence in a clinical isolate of Aeromonas hydrophila. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2008, 45 (5-6): 343-354. 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.08.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Surette MG, Bassler BL: Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998, 95 (12): 7046-7050. 10.1073/pnas.95.12.7046.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen X, Schauder S, Potier N, Van Dorsselaer A, Pelczer I, Bassler BL, Hughson FM: Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature. 2002, 415 (6871): 545-549. 10.1038/415545a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waters CM, Bassler BL: Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005, 21: 319-346. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whisson SC, Avrova AO, Van West P, Jones JT: A method for double-stranded RNA-mediated transient gene silencing in Phytophthora infestans. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2005, 6 (2): 153-163. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00272.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broughton WJ, Jabbouri S, Perret X: Keys to Symbiotic Harmony. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182 (20): 5641-5652. 10.1128/JB.182.20.5641-5652.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riedlinger J, Schrey SD, Tarkka MT, Hampp R, Kapur M, Fiedler H-P: Auxofuran, a novel metabolite that stimulates the growth of fly agaric, is produced by the Mycorrhiza helper bacterium Streptomyces strain AcH 505. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72 (5): 3550-3557. 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3550-3557.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zentmyer GA: Bacterial stimulation of sporangium production in Phytophthora cinnamomi. Science. 1965, 150 (3700): 1178-1179. 10.1126/science.150.3700.1178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joint I, Tait K, Callow ME, Callow JA, Milton D, Williams P, Camara M: Cell-to-cell communication across the prokaryote-eukaryote boundary. Science. 2002, 298: 1207-10.1126/science.1077075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu J, Chai YR, Zhong ZT, Li SP, Winans SC: Agrobacterium bioassay strain for ultrasensitive detection of N-acylhomoserine lactone-type quorum-sensing molecules: Detection of autoinducers in Mesorhizobium huakuii. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003, 69 (11): 6949-6953. 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6949-6953.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gallegly ME, Hong C: Phytophthora: Identifying Species by Morphology and DNA Fingerprints. 2008, St. Paul: APS PressGoogle Scholar
- Hong CX, Gallegly M, Richardson P, Kong P, Moorman G, Lea-Cox J, Ross D: Phytophthora irrigata and Phytophthora hydropathica, two new species from irrigation water at ornamental plant nurseries. Phytopathology. 2008, 98 (6): S68-S68.Google Scholar
- Ribeiro OK: A Source Book of the Genus Phytophthora. J Cramer Press, Germany. 1978Google Scholar
- Dou D, Kale SD, Wang X, Chen Y, Wang Q, Wang X, Jiang RHY, Arredondo FD, Anderson RG, Thakur PB: Conserved c-terminal motifs required for avirulence and suppression of cell death by Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b. Plant Cell. 2008, 20 (4): 1118-1133. 10.1105/tpc.107.057067.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szenthe A, Page WJ: Quorum sensing in Agrobacterium tunmefaciens using N-oxo-acyl-homoserine lactone chemical signal. Tested studies for laboratory teaching. Edited by: O' Donnell MA. 2003, Proceedings of 24th Workshop/Conference of the Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE), 24: 145-152. http://www.ableweb.org/volumes/vol-24/10-szenthe.pdfGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.