- Research article
- Open Access
Involvement of EupR, a response regulator of the NarL/FixJ family, in the control of the uptake of the compatible solutes ectoines by the halophilic bacterium Chromohalobacter salexigens
- Javier Rodríguez-Moya†1,
- Montserrat Argandoña†1,
- Mercedes Reina-Bueno1,
- Joaquín J Nieto1,
- Fernando Iglesias-Guerra2,
- Mohamed Jebbar3, 4 and
- Carmen Vargas1Email author
© Rodríguez-Moya et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 23 March 2010
- Accepted: 13 October 2010
- Published: 13 October 2010
Osmosensing and associated signal transduction pathways have not yet been described in obligately halophilic bacteria. Chromohalobacter salexigens is a halophilic bacterium with a broad range of salt tolerance. In response to osmotic stress, it synthesizes and accumulates large amounts of the compatible solutes ectoine and hydroxyectoine. In a previous work, we showed that ectoines can be also accumulated upon transport from the external medium, and that they can be used as carbon sources at optimal, but not at low salinity. This was related to an insufficient ectoine(s) transport under these conditions.
A C. salexigens Tn1732-induced mutant (CHR95) showed a delayed growth with glucose at low and optimal salinities, could not grow at high salinity, and was able to use ectoines as carbon sources at low salinity. CHR95 was affected in the transport and/or metabolism of glucose, and showed a deregulated ectoine uptake at any salinity, but it was not affected in ectoine metabolism. Transposon insertion in CHR95 caused deletion of three genes, Csal0865-Csal0867: acs, encoding an acetyl-CoA synthase, mntR, encoding a transcriptional regulator of the DtxR/MntR family, and eupR, encoding a putative two-component response regulator with a LuxR_C-like DNA-binding helix-turn-helix domain. A single mntR mutant was sensitive to manganese, suggesting that mntR encodes a manganese-dependent transcriptional regulator. Deletion of eupR led to salt-sensitivity and enabled the mutant strain to use ectoines as carbon source at low salinity. Domain analysis included EupR as a member of the NarL/FixJ family of two component response regulators. Finally, the protein encoded by Csal869, located three genes downstream of eupR was suggested to be the cognate histidine kinase of EupR. This protein was predicted to be a hybrid histidine kinase with one transmembrane and one cytoplasmic sensor domain.
This work represents the first example of the involvement of a two-component response regulator in the osmoadaptation of a true halophilic bacterium. Our results pave the way to the elucidation of the signal transduction pathway involved in the control of ectoine transport in C. salexigens.
- Wild Type Strain
- Compatible Solute
- Histidine Kinase
- Halophilic Bacterium
Due to the frequent osmolarity changes in their habitat, microorganisms have developed a number of osmoadaptation mechanisms to adapt to these fluctuations [1, 2]. In most bacteria, the long-term response to hyperosmotic conditions involves the intracellular accumulation of large quantities of small, specific organic osmolytes called compatible solutes since they do not interfere with the normal functioning of the cell . It has been demonstrated that compatible solutes have the ability to protect enzymes and whole cells against different stresses such as those caused by salt, heating, freezing and desiccation [3, 4]. Thus, they are considered as biostabilizers. It is commonly accepted that uptake of exogenous compatible solutes (osmoprotectants) is preferred over their synthesis de novo, as it is energetically less costly . On the other hand, hypoosmotic stress leads to opening of mechanosensitive channels, which function as emergence valves leading to rapid efflux of compatible solutes thereby lowering the osmotic driving force for water entry . Besides their role as stress protectants, some compatible solutes can be used as carbon, energy or nitrogen sources. This duality of functions (stress protection and nutrition) requires complex regulatory circuits (most of them not yet elucidated) to adjust the rate of compatible solute biosynthesis, transport and catabolism [4, 7, 8].
A number of genes and enzymes responsible for synthesis, uptake and efflux of compatible solutes have been identified in diverse bacteria [1, 6–10]. However, the mechanisms by which bacteria sense osmotic shifts (osmosensing) and the signal transduction pathways leading to these genes (osmosignaling) have focused on membrane-based osmosensors from moderately halotolerant, but not halophilic, bacteria. These include osmosensory transporters, histidine kinases of two-component transcriptional regulatory systems , and mechanosensitive channels of the MscL, MscS and MscK type . Whereas the first and the third group can detect osmotic pressure changes and respond by mediating compatible solute uptake or efflux, respectively, without the assistance of other proteins, membrane-bound histidine kinases detect changes in osmotic pressure and other signals and then respond by directing cognate response regulators to modulate transcription of osmoregulated genes. The best studied osmosensory transporters mediate uptake of potassium, i.e. Trk from Escherichia coli, and betaine, such as ProP from E. coli, OpuA from Lactococcus lactis and BetP from Corynebacterium glutamicum[9, 11]. On the other hand, the best characterized two-component transcriptional regulatory systems involved in bacterial osmoadaptation are KdpDE and EnvZ/OmpR from E. coli, and MtrAB from C. glutamicum[11–13].
Both sensory histidine protein kinases and response regulators of two-component signal transduction systems are multi-domain proteins. Histidine protein kinases typically consist of a variable N-terminal sensory or "input" domain, which detects environmental stimuli and activates a conserved C-terminal cytoplasmic transmitter domain, comprising an ATP-binding kinase domain and a histidine-containing dimerization domain. On the other hand, most response regulators contain a conserved N-terminal receiver (REC) domain and a variable C-terminal effector or "output" domain. The first one catalyzes the transfer of the phosphoryl group from the cognate histidine protein kinase to one of its own aspartic residues. As a result, the receiver domain undergoes a conformational change capable of promoting activity of the effector domain [14, 16].
Two general approaches have been used for classifying bacterial two-component systems. The first one is based on the diversity of input (i.e. cellular location, membrane topology, arrangement of sensory domains) or output (i.e., DNA-binding, RNA-binding, protein-binding, enzymatic, etc) domain architecture and domain combinations [14, 15, 17]. The second one is based on the phylogeny of transmitter and receiver domains . Interestingly, the results of both classifications agree to a certain extent, as it seems that the majority of signal transduction proteins belong to a relatively small number of major families, which share common ancestry, and gene/domain architecture. Osmosensing and associated signal transduction pathways have not yet been described in obligate halophilic bacteria. Chromohalobacter salexigens is a halophilic gamma proteobacterium that grows optimally at 1.5 M NaCl in minimal medium . It requires at least 0.5 M NaCl for any growth at all, and can tolerate up to 3 M NaCl, being considered as a model microorganism to study prokaryotic osmoadaptation . Interestingly, C. salexigens lowest salinity for growth is the highest NaCl concentration that the non halophilic E. coli, traditionally used for osmoregulation studies, can tolerate. C. salexigens finely adjusts its cytoplasmic compatible solute pool in order to cope with high salinity and supra-optimal temperatures [21, 22]. This is achieved by a highly hierarchical accumulation of solutes, dominated by the uptake of external osmoprotectants such as betaine or its precursor choline [23, 24], and followed by the synthesis of endogenous solutes, mainly ectoines (ectoine and hydroxyectoine), and minor amounts of glutamate, glutamine, trehalose and glucosylglycerate . Ectoine and hydroxyectoine are essential for osmoprotection and thermoprotection, respectively .
C. salexigens can also accumulate ectoines after transport from the external medium, and the ectoine transport rate is maximal at optimal salinity . Within the sequence of the C. salexigens genome, we have found orthologs to the TRAP-T-type TeaABC transport system for ectoines of the closely related Halomonas elongata. We have experimental evidence that this system is the main responsible for the uptake of ectoines in C. salexigens (J. Rodriguez-Moya, unpublished data). On the other hand, although glucose is the preferred carbon and energy source, C. salexigens can use a wide range of substrates as nutrients, including the compatible solutes betaine, ectoine and hydroxyectoine . Remarkably, neither ectoines nor betaine could support C. salexigens growth at low salinity, most probably due to an insufficient uptake of these compatible solutes .
Osmoadaptive response through ectoine(s) synthesis in C. salexigens seems to be finely controlled at the transcriptional level, and several general (σS, σ32, Fur) or specific regulators have been described [8, 24]. However, the associated sensors remain to be elucidated. In addition, information on osmosensing and signal transduction pathways leading to osmoprotectant uptake in C. salexigens is missing. In this work, we isolated a C. salexigens salt-sensitive mutant, strain CHR95, which was nevertheless able to use ectoines as a sole carbon source at low salinities due to a deregulated transport. This mutant was affected in three genes, two of which were transcriptional regulators. Analyses of single mutants affected in these regulators suggested the protein EupR as the response regulator of a two-component system involved in the regulation of ectoine(s) uptake. In addition, we predicted and analyzed its putative sensor histidine kinase. This work establishes the first analysis of the involvement of the response regulator of a two-component system in the osmoadaptive response of halophilic bacteria.
C. salexigens mutant CHR95 can use ectoines as the sole carbon sources at low salinity
Growth rates of C. salexigens wild type strain (CHR61) and mutant CHR95 on glucose and ectoines at different salinities
Strain and carbon source
Growth rate (h-1)
We also compared the ability of the C. salexigens wild type strain and mutant CHR95 to use ectoine and hydroxyectoine as the sole carbon sources at different salinities. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, in all growth experiments ectoine was better carbon source than hydroxyectoine. Ectoine and hydroxyectoine did not support the growth of the wild type strain at low salinity (0.6 M NaCl), and growth was severely impaired at 0.75 M NaCl). They were used as carbon sources at optimal (1.5 M NaCl) and high (2.5 M NaCl) salinity (in this latter case, only ectoine and after a prolonged lag phase). Remarkably, mutant CHR95 was able to use ectoine and hydroxyectoine as the sole carbon and energy source at low salinities (0.6-0.75 M NaCl), although growth with hydroxyectoine was initiated after a long lag phase (Figure 1 and Table 1). Other compatible solutes like glycine betaine were not metabolized under low salinity conditions (not shown). At 1.5 M NaCl with ectoine or hydroxyectoine, growth of the mutant was delayed, if compared to the wild type strain, whereas at 2.5 M NaCl ectoine or hydroxyectoine did weakly support or not, respectively, CHR95 growth (Figure 1 and Table 1).
Given that strain CHR95 showed a delayed growth with glucose at any salinity tested, we used natural abundance 13C-NMR to determine the total pool of compatible solutes accumulated by cells grown in M63 with 2.5 M NaCl. The 13C-NMR spectrum of the mutant contained four sets of resonances that were assigned to ectoine, hydroxyectoine, glutamate and glutamine (not shown). This observation suggested that CHR95 was not affected in the genes encoding the synthesis of compatible solutes.
Mutant CHR95 is affected in the transport and metabolism of glucose
Mutant CHR95 possesses a deregulated ectoine uptake
Transposon insertion in mutant CHR95 caused deletion of genes for the acetyl-CoA synthase and two transcriptional regulators
The C. salexigens MntR regulator is involved in the control of manganese uptake
Deletion of the eupR gene in the CHR95 mutant is responsible for deregulation of ectoine uptake
Growth rates of C. salexigens strains CHR161 (mntR) and CHR183 (eupR) on ectoines at different salinities
Strain and carbon source
Growth rate (h-1)
EupR is a response regulator of the NarL/FixJ family of proteins
Identification and analysis of the sensor histidine kinase putatively associated to EupR
The classical two-component regulatory systems require a response regulator protein and a sensor protein, usually a membrane-bound sensor histidine protein kinase . To identify the cognate histidine kinase of EupR, we used the the online application STRING 8.2 (http://string.embl.de/; ), a database and web resource dedicated to predict protein-protein interactions including both physical and functional interactions. STRING uses prediction algorithms based on data of neighborhood, gene fusion and co-occurrence across genomes, among others. A total of 21 histidine protein kinases and 29 response regulators are included in the genome of C. salexigens (http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/Complete_Genomes/SignalCensus.html) but only the protein encoded by Csal869, located three genes downstream EupR (see Figure 5), was connected with EupR by STRING with a high confidence score (0.772, composed of a neighborhood score of 0.193 and a co-occurrence across genomes score of 0.736). Predictions based on STRING algorithms do not have the specificity of experimental data, but have enough statistical robustness as to be considered reliable .
To make a deeper functional in silico analysis of this signal transduction protein, we first compared it against several domain databases (see Methods). As Figure 8b shows, we found five distinct domains in the protein: two N-terminal "input" or sensor domains (SSF and PAS-PAC), a transmitter C-terminal region with a His-containing phosphoaceptor HiskA domain and an ATP-binding HATPase domain, and a C-terminal signal receiver domain (REC). The key residues (active site) were conserved in HiskA, HATPase and REC domains. Thus, this protein may be classified as a multi-sensor hybrid histidine kinase. In fact, it was included as such in the Signaling Census database [28, 29]. Although sensory domains of histidine kinases are extremely diverse, members of the same family domain typically recognize the same (or very close) substrates . Therefore, we anticipated that the analysis of the two sensory domains in our histidine kinase could help us to predict its putative function. The first one showed homology to transmembrane sensory domains like PutP (Na+/proline symporter-like, in COG database) and SSF (sodium/solute symporter family, in Pfam database). It was preceded by a signal peptide and predicted to form twelve transmembrane helices. The second one, predicted to be cytoplasmatic, showed two PAS subdomains followed by a C-terminal PAC subdomain. In summary, the putative cognate histidine kinase of EupR was predicted to be a hybrid histidine kinase with both transmembrane and cytoplasmic sensor domains, suggesting that it could sense both external and internal conditions, and integrate them. Moreover, our in silico analysis supports the hypothesis that it may be the sensor partner of EupR.
In this work, we have characterized the Tn1732-induced salt-sensitive mutant CHR95 of C. salexigens, which showed a multiple affected phenotype: (i) inability to grow with glucose at high salinity, but not affection in the synthesis of compatible solutes, (ii) a slow growth with glucose at low and optimal salinity, (iii) a reduced uptake and metabolism of glucose, (iv) a deregulated ectoine uptake at any salinity, and specially at low salinity, but unaffected ectoine metabolism, and (v) sensitivity to manganese. This pleiotropic phenotype was due to deletion of three genes by the insertion of Tn1732, acs, encoding a putative acetyl-CoA synthase, mntR, encoding a manganese-dependent transcriptional regulator of the DtxR/MntR family, and eupR, encoding a two-component response regulator of the NarL/FixJ family of transcriptional regulators. Transposon Tn1732 is a derivative of Tn1721, which in turn is a member of the Tn21 subgroup of the Tn3 family . It has been widely used for generalized insertion mutagenesis in strains of Halomonas and Chromohalobacter, yielding single mutants . However, as any Tn1721-derivative, it may cause deletions and inversions . Thus, deletion of the region comprising acs-eupR-mntR upon Tn1732 insertion in CHR95 is not surprising. In fact, in the same mutagenesis experiment in which CHR95 was isolated, we also isolated the salt-sensitive mutant CHR62, showing a deletion of the ectABC genes [21, 22].
Whereas the sensitivity of strain CHR95 to manganese was correlated with the absence of mntR, its inability to grow with glucose at high salt, and the reduced transport and metabolism of glucose at low and optimal salinity (leading to a slow growth with this carbon source) may be related to deletion of the acs and/or eupR genes. The physiological role of the Acs enzyme is to activate acetate to acetyl-coenzyme A (Ac-CoA), providing the cell with the two-carbon metabolite used in many anabolic and energy generation processes . Besides Acs (YP_572921), C. salexigens genome encodes at least one protein (YP_573871) showing a PRK03584 domain of Ac-CoA synthases, and also two more proteins with putative acyl CoA synthase domains (YP_573520 and YP_574569). One or more of these proteins might compensate the lack of Acs in CHR95. In addition, it has been reported that prokaryotic cells have evolved different pathways to obtain Ac-CoA, some of them independent of the acs gene . Therefore, with the present data we cannot conclude that deletion of the acs gene influenced the ability of strain CHR95 to grow with glucose as the sole carbon source. The role of the response regulator EupR in such a phenotype seems to be more clearly established, as a single eupR mutant showed the same growth pattern with glucose as the original mutant CHR95.
Uptake of exogenous compatible solutes is preferred over the synthesis, as it is energetically more favorable to the cells . In C. salexigens, the uptake of ectoine, which can be used as a carbon source as well as an osmoprotectant, is maximal at optimal salinity and minimal at low salinity, suggesting that ectoine transport is osmoregulated and most probably devoted to ectoine accumulation from the external medium. In agreement with these transport data, ectoine(s) can be used as carbon source(s) at optimal but not at low salinity . Our previous studies on glucose and ectoine metabolism in this microorganism showed that glucose represses partially ectoine catabolism . However, strain CHR95, which was affected in the transport and metabolism of glucose, did not show an enhanced catabolism of ectoine. These observations indicate that the ability of CHR95 to use ectoine(s) as carbon source at low salinity is decoupled from its impaired glucose catabolism. Rather, it was related to a deregulated ectoine uptake, especially at low salinity. Our results suggest that this phenotype is due to the lack of the two-component response regulator EupR, as a single eupR mutant reproduced the ability of CHR95 to use ectoine(s) as carbon source(s) at low salinity. Preliminary data on the expression of a transcriptional fusion between the C. salexigens teaA gene, encoding the ectoine binding protein of the TRAP-transporter for ectoine(s), and the lacZ reporter gene, revealed that expression of teaA in an eupR mutant at 0.75 M NaCl is 66% higher than in the wild type (J. Rodriguez-Moya, unpublished results), supporting the hypothesis that EupR is involved in the transcriptional control of ectoine uptake.
In the closely related H. elongata, the teaABC genes (encoding the osmoregulated TRAP transporter for ectoine) are followed by teaD, encoding a putative universal stress protein (USP). Deletion of teaD resulted in an enhanced uptake for ectoine by the transporter TeaABC, but it did not affect teaA mRNA-levels, excluding a transcriptional regulation mechanism for TeaD. Rather, TeaD was suggested to function either as a translational regulator or as a direct/indirect regulator of TeaABC transport activity . EupR and TeaD proteins do not show homology to each other, as they belong to different protein families and do not share functional domains. Thus, whereas H. elongata TeaD shows the conserved sensory domain of cytoplasmic proteins of the Universal stress protein family , C. salexigens EupR contains a single N-terminal receiver domain and a C-terminal HTH DNA-binding domain of the NarL/FixJ family of response regulators [14, 17]. As judged by the fact that the eupR mutant is salt-sensitive and grows slower than the wild type with glucose, most probably EupR regulates other processes, besides ectoine uptake, which may or may not be related to the osmostress response. This seems to be also the case of OmpR and MtrA, two response regulators involved in osmoadaptation in E. coli and C. glutamicum, respectively. Our phylogenetic analysis grouped EupR with proteins of unknown functions. Its closest characterized relative was the E. coli NarL, which is responsible for the control of nitrate- and nitrite-regulated gene expression . However, assigning protein function based on the function of its closest experimentally characterized homolog is not readily applicable to signal transduction components, as proteins with very similar sequences may have dramatically different biological functions . Therefore, we cannot infer a role of EupR in nitrate- and nitrite-regulated gene expression, besides its involvement in the control of ectoine uptake.
The typical scheme of bacterial two-component signal transduction involves signal sensing by a sensory histidine kinase that leads to its autophosphorylation, followed by phosphoryl transfer to Asp residue in the N-terminal REC domain of the cognate response regulator . However, the cognate response regulator and the histidine kinase are not always encoded in close proximity to each other, which complicates their identification . In any case, presence of a gene in the neighborhood of a response regulator could strengthen the case for the analyzed protein being a histidine kinase . The gene Csal869, located three genes downstream of eupR, was predicted to be the cognate histidine kinase associated to EupR. This protein satisfies all the key criteria to be considered as the sensory hybrid histidine kinase. The N-terminal sensor domains of the histidine kinases vary greatly in sequence, membrane topology, composition, and domain arrangement. This variability presumably reflects different principles in stimulus perception and processing. For instance, E. coli KdpD seems to have a cytoplasmic sensor domain (for K+)and also a transmembrane-associated sensing mechanism (osmolality) . The histidine kinase putatively associated to EupR showed two sensor domains. The first one was predicted to form twelve transmembrane helices and was homologous to sodium/solute symporters (SSSF domain). The stimuli sensed by transmembrane sensory domains such as SSF are membrane associated or occur directly within the membrane interface. They include turgor and mechanical stress, ion or electrochemical gradients and transport processes. For instance, the SSF domain is present in E. coli PutP , which uses the free energy stored in electrochemical Na+ gradients for the uptake of the compatible solute proline. The second sensory domain was predicted to be cytoplasmatic, and showed two PAS subdomains followed by a C-terminal PAC subdomain. Cytoplasmic sensor domains such as PAS detect the presence of cytoplasmic solutes or respond to diffusible or internal stimuli, such as O2 or H2, or stimuli transmitted by transmembrane sensors.
This redundancy of sensory domains is not rare in nature and in fact a large number of sensor kinases harbor more than one (putative) input domain . The most obvious explanation for the presence of two sensor domains in the protein kinase putatively associated to EupR is that it could sense both external and internal conditions and integrate them. This will be the focus of a further work.
This work paves the way to the elucidation of the osmosensing and signal transduction pathway leading to the control of ectoine uptake in the model halophilic bacterium C. salexigens. Through the characterization of the salt-sensitive mutant CHR95, we found the gene eupR, encoding a two-component response regulator of the NarL/FixJ family of transcriptional regulators. In our view, the original annotation of EupR as a "two component LuxR family transcriptional regulator" was imprecise, as the EupR protein is not involved in quorum sensing. However, it was precisely annotated in the specialized Signaling Census database, and further confirmed by our phylogenetic analysis, as a response regulator of the NarL/FixJ family. Our results suggest that EupR is not only involved in the control of ectoine uptake, but also in other processes that might or not be related to the C. salexigens osmostress response. Finally, our bioinformatic analysis predicted that the gene csal869 encodes a multi sensor hybrid histidine protein kinase which could be the sensory partner of EupR. The presence of two sensor domains in this protein suggest that it could participate in the cross-talk between different signal transduction pathways, as it might be able to sense both external (ions gradient, turgor stress, transport) and internal (cytoplasmatic solutes or proteins, redox state) conditions and integrate them. Future work should focus on (i) elucidating the EupR regulon through transcriptomic analysis, (ii) the in vivo analysis of the role of Csal869 as the cognate protein histidine of EupR, and (iii) investigating if the putative EupR histidine kinase could sense the presence of solutes such as ectoine(s) during uptake.
Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Strain or plasmid
Relevant genotype and/or description
Source or reference
C. salexigens strains
Spontaneous Rfr mutant of C. salexigens DSM 3043
CHR61 ΔeupRmntR::Tn1732; Rfr Kmr
CHR61 mntR::Ω; Rfr Smr Spcr
CHR61 eupR::Ω; Rfr Gnr
E. coli strain
supE44 Δ(lac)U169 ϕ80dlacZ ΔM15 hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1; host for DNA manipulations
Cloning vector; Apr
pBR322 derivative carrying the Ω cassette; Apr Smr Spr
pBR322 derivative carrying the Ωaac cassette; Apr Gmr Gnr
Helper plasmid; Cmr tra
Suicide vector; Gmr mob sac
Mutagenesis plasmid carrying Tn1732; Cmr Kmr Gmr
pKS derivative carrying a 20.8-kb sac I fragment from CHR95 including Tn1732; Apr Kmr
3-kb Xba I-Apa I fragment from C. salexigens genome (containing orf1, eupR, mntR, orf4) cloned into pKS; Apr
pMntREupR derivative containing a Hpa I recognition site within mntR; Apr
pMntREupR derivative containing a Hin dIII recognition site within eupR; Apr
pHpaIMntr derivative with Ω cassette within mntR; Apr Smr Spr
pHindIIIEupR derivative with Ωaac cassette within eupR; Apr Gnr Gmr
5-kb Xba I-Apa I fragment from pΩMntR (containing orf1, eupR, mntR::Ω, orf4) cloned into pJQ200-SK; Gmr Smr Spr
5-kb Xba I-Apa I fragment from pΩEupR (containing orf1, eupR::Ωaac, mntR, orf4) cloned into pJQ200-SK; Gmr Gnr
Conjugal transfer of plasmids
Plasmids were transferred from E. coli to C. salexigens by triparental mating on SW-2 medium, using pRK600 as a helper plasmid, as described by Vargas et al. .
Methods for nucleic acid manipulation
Plasmid DNA was isolated from E. coli with a Wizard Plus SV miniprep kit (Promega), and genomic DNA was isolated with a SpinClean Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Mbiotech). Restriction enzyme digestion and ligation were performed as recommended by the manufacturers (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech and Fermentas). DNA sequencing was performed by Newbiotechnic (Seville, Spain).
Transposon mutagenesis was performed by conjugal transfer of pSUP102-Gm::Tn1732 from E. coli SM10 [40, 49] to C. salexigens strain CHR61. Matings were carried out by mixing the donor and recipient cultures at a ratio of 1:4 (100 μl of donor, 400 μl of recipient). The mixed cultures were washed with sterile SW-2 medium to eliminate the antibiotics. The pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of SW-2 and placed on a 0.45-μm pore filter on SW-2 solid media (which allows the growth of E. coli and the putative salt-sensitive mutants of C. salexigens). After overnight incubation at 30°C, cells were resuspended in 20% (v/v) sterile glycerol and, after appropriate dilutions, inoculated on SW-2 + rifampicin + Km plates at a density resulting in about 100-200 colonies per plate. Colonies from these master plates were transferred with sterile toothpicks to duplicate M63 plates, one contained 2.7 M NaCl and the other contained 0.5 M NaCl. Plates were incubated at 37°C and inspected for colonies that had grown at 0.5 M but not at 2.7 M NaCl. One of these colonies was selected for further experiments and was named CHR95.
To clone the DNA region flanking the Tn1732 insertion in CHR95, genomic DNA of this mutant was digested with Sac I, ligated to Sac I-digested pKS(-) and the ligation mix was used to transform E. coli DH5α cells. From Kmr Apr colonies, the plasmid pRR1, containing the transposon Tn1732 within one Sac I fragment of about 20.7-kb, was isolated.
To generate C. salexigens mutants affected in mntR or eupR, a 3.054-bp fragment from genome containing 680 bp of orf1, eupR, mntR and orf4 was PCR amplified with Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene) by using two synthetic oligonucleotides (MntRfw: 5'-CATGCTGATC T AGA CGCTGTCGG-3' and MntRrv: 5'-GCAGGCG G GC C C CATCTG-3') that were modified (residues in bold) to introduce a Xba I and an Apa I site, respectively (underlined). The resulting PCR fragment was digested with Xba I and Apa I, and the 3,054-bp fragment generated was cloned into pKS bluescript to give plasmid pMntREupR. Subsequently, an Hpa I or Hin dIII recognition site was introduced in mntR or eupR respectively, using the PCR-based QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) and the following oligonucleotides: MntRHpa_fw: 5' CCGAATTGGTCGAGGACTATGTTA AC GAGATTGCGCATTTGC-3', MntRHpa_rv: 5'-GCAAATGCGCAATCTCG TTA ACATAGTCCTCGACCAATTCGG-3', EupRHind_fw: 5'-GCACGGCGCACCACCGGCGAAG CTTCGCTTCCCCAGATGACC-3', and EupRHind_rv: 5'- GGTCATCTCGGGAAGCGAAGCTT CGCCGGTGGTGCGCCGTGC-3', that were modified (residues in bold) to introduce the corresponding restriction sites. The resultant plasmids, pHpaIMntR and pHindIIIEupR were linearized with the enzyme Hpa I or Hin dIII and ligated to 2-kb Sma I or Hin dIII fragments from pHP45-Ω  or pHP45-Ωaac , containing the Ω interposons for insertional mutagenesis (Smr or Gnr). The resulting plasmids were named pΩMntR and pΩEupR. To recombine the mntR or eupR mutations into the C. salexigens chromosome, 5-kb Xba I-Apa II fragments from pΩMntR or pΩEupR were cloned into the suicide vector pJQSK200 (Gmr)  to give plasmids pJQMntR and pJQEupR, which were mobilized into the C. salexigens wild type strain by triparental mating. Mutant strains resulting from a double homologous recombination event were identified as Smr Gms, or Gnr Gms colonies on SW-2 plates containing 10% sucrose. Two of these colonies were purified for further analysis and were named CHR161 (mntR::Ω) and CHR183 (eupR::Ωaac). Insertions of the omega cassette in CHR161 and CHR183 were confirmed by PCR and sequencing.
Determination of sensitivity to Mn
To determine the sensitivity of C. salexigens strains to Mn, we used fresh plates of a modified SW-2 medium containing less than 1 mM of SO4Mg (to avoid interference of Mg2+ with Mn2+), which was additioned with 0.5 to 2.5 mM MnCl2. An overnight culture of each strain (100 μl) was spread onto the assay plate and growth was observed after incubation at 37°C for 48 h.
Determination of ectoine uptake
Cells grown overnight in SW-2 were subcultured at a 1:100 dilution in glucose M63 medium containing 0.75, 1.5 or 2.5 M of NaCl, and grown up to exponential phase (OD600 ca. 0.5). Transport was initiated by adding [14C]-ectoine to 0.2 ml of bacterial suspensions and incubating the cultures at room temperature. The [14C]-ectoine (5.5 MBq mM) was prepared biologically from Brevibacterium linens as described  and was added at a final concentration of 87 μM. During 2 min, 50 μl of samples were taken at 30-s intervals, and transport was terminated by rapid filtration through Whatman GF/F discs (Fisher Bioblock, Illkirch, France). The cells were quickly washed twice with 2 ml of isotonic M63 medium. The filters were solubilized in scintillation fluid and radioactivity was determined in a Packard Liquid Scintillation Analyzer, 1600 TR (Perkin Elmer, Courtabeouf, France). Transport rates were expressed as nmol min-1 OD-1 unit.
Determination of the metabolic fate of [14C]-glucose
Cells grown overnight in SW-2 were subcultured at a 1:100 dilution in M63 containing 1.5 M NaCl and 20 mM glucose, and grown up to exponential phase (OD600ca. 0.5). 2 ml samples were centrifuged, resuspended in 1.5 M NaCl M63 to an OD600 of ca. 0.6 and transferred to a Warburg flask. 14C-labelled glucose (5.5 mCi/mmol, 390000 dpm/5 μl) was added at a final concentration of 100 μM to the samples. After different incubation times at 37°C, 1 ml of sample was centrifuged for 10 min at 16000 g; 50 μl of supernatant was taken (twice) and radioactivity was measured as above, indicating the glucose remaining in the supernatant (S, dpm ml-1). Cell pellet was resuspended in 20 μl of H2O, extracted with 80 μl of pure ethanol and centrifuged for 10 min at 13000 rev min-1. The ethanolic supernatant was dried in a Speed Vac (Savant Instruments, Holbrook, NY, USA), and the solid residue was resuspended in 50 μl of H2O. An aliquot of 10 μl was used to measure the radioactivity caused by the ethanol-soluble 28 compounds synthesized from glucose (ESF, dpm per OD unit). The ethanol insoluble pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of H2O and used to measure the radioactivity caused by the ethanol-insoluble compounds synthesized from glucose (EIF, dpm per OD unit).
Determination of the metabolic fate of [14C]-ectoine
Cells grown overnight in SW-2 were subcultured at a 1:100 dilution in M63 containing 1.5 M NaCl and 20 mM glucose and grown up to exponential phase (OD600ca. 0.5). Two independent 2 ml samples were centrifuged, resuspended in 1.5 M NaCl M63 to an OD600 of ca. 0.6 and transferred to a Warburg flask. 14C-labelled ectoine (5.5 MBq mM) was added at a final concentration of 87 μM to the samples. Glucose was added to one of the samples at a final concentration of 20 mM. After 2-h incubation at 37°C, the fate of radioactive ectoine was analysed as follows: (i) respired radioactive CO2 was trapped on a strip of 3 MM Whatman filter paper moistened with 50 μl of 6 mol l-1 of KOH and 14CO2 production (dpm per OD600 unit) was measured by liquid scintillation; (ii) 1 ml of sample was centrifuged for 10 min at 16000 g; 50 μl of supernatant was taken (twice) and radioactivity was measured as above, indicating the ectoine remaining in the supernatant (S, dpm ml-1); and (iii) cell pellet was resuspended in 20 μ l of H2O, extracted with 80 μl of pure ethanol and centrifuged for 10 min at 13 000 rev min-1. The ethanolic supernatant was dried in a Speed Vac (Savant Instruments, Holbrook, NY, USA), and the solid residue was resuspended in 50 μl of H2O. An aliquot of 10 μl was used to measure the radioactivity caused by the ethanol-soluble compounds synthesized from ectoine (ESF, dpm per OD unit). The ethanol insoluble pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of H2O and used to measure the radioactivity caused by the ethanol-insoluble compounds synthesized from ectoine (EIF, dpm per OD unit).
Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA version 4 . C. salexigens EupR and other LuxR family proteins including well characterized members of different subclasses with a common LuxR-C-like conserved domain and others different domains were included in the phylogenetic analyses. We also included some uncharacterized proteins with a high similarity to C. salexigens EupR, including two paralogs present in C. salexigens genome.
The sequences were aligned with clustalW (1.6) using a BLOSUM62 matrix and manually edited. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the Neighbor-joining method  and the evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method. The rate variation among sites was modelled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1.5) and all the positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated only in pairwise sequence comparisons. The robustness of the tree branches was assessed by performing bootstrap analysis of the Neighbor-joining data based on 1000 resamplings .
DNA and protein sequences analysis
The sequence of the C. salexigens genome is available at NCBI microbial genome database (http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/genomes/lproks.cgi Ac N°: NC_007963). Sequence data were analyzed using PSI-BLAST at NCBI server http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/BLAST. Promoter sequences were predicted using BGDP Neural Network Promoter Prediction http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/promoter.html. Signal peptides and topology of proteins were predicted using SMART 6 (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/; [57, 58]). Other programs and databases used in proteins topology and functional analysis were STRING 8.2 (http://string.embl.de/; ) KEGG (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/pathway/ko/ko02020.html; ), Signaling census (http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/Complete_Genomes/SignalCensus.html; [28, 29]), PROSITE (http://www.expasy.org/prosite/; ), BLOCKS (http://blocks.fhcrc.org/; ), Pfam (http://pfam.janelia.org/; ), CDD (http://0-www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml; ), InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/; ), and Phobius (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/phobius/; ).
This research was financially supported by grants from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (BIO2008-04117), and Junta de Andalucía (P08-CVI-03724). Javier Rodriguez-Moya and Mercedes Reina-Bueno were recipients of a fellowship from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
- Bremer E, Krämer R: Coping with osmotic challenges: osmoregulation trough accumulation and release of compatible solutes in bacteria. Bacterial Stress Responses. Edited by: Storz G, Hengge-Aronis R. 2000, Washington DC: ASM Press, 79-97.Google Scholar
- Wood JM, Bremer E, Csonka LN, Krämer R, Poolman B, van der Heide T, Smith LT: Osmosensing and osmoregulatory compatible solutes accumulation by bacteria. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2001, 130: 437-460. 10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00442-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galinski EA, Trüper HG: Microbial behaviour in salt-stressed ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994, 15: 95-108. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00128.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Welsh DT: Ecological significance of compatible solute accumulation by micro-organisms: from single cells to global climate. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000, 24: 263-290. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00542.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oren A: Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999, 63: 334-348.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Booth IR, Edwards MD, Black S, Schumann U, Miller S: Mechanosensitive channels in bacteria: signs of closure?. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007, 6: 431-440. 10.1038/nrmicro1659.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jebbar M, Sohn-Bösser L, Bremer E, Bernard T, Blanco C: Ectoine-induced proteins in Sinorhizobium meliloti include an Ectoine ABC-type transporter involved in osmoprotection and ectoine catabolism. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 1293-1304. 10.1128/JB.187.4.1293-1304.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vargas C, Argandoña M, Reina-Bueno M, Rodríguez-Moya J, Fernández-Aunión C, Nieto JJ: Unravelling the adaptation responses to osmotic and temperature stress in Chromohalobacter salexigens, a bacterium with broad salinity tolerance. Saline Systems. 2008, 4: 14-10.1186/1746-1448-4-14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wood JM: Bacterial osmosensing transporters. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 428: 77-107. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grammann K, Volke A, Kunte HJ: New type of osmoregulated solute transporter identified in halophilic members of the bacteria domain: TRAP transporter TeaABC mediates uptake of ectoine and hydroxyectoine in Halomonas elongata DSM 2581(T). J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 3078-3085. 10.1128/JB.184.11.3078-3085.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krämer R: Osmosensing and osmosignaling in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Amino Acids. 2009, 37: 487-497. 10.1007/s00726-009-0271-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamann K, Zimmann P, Altendorf K: Reduction of turgor is not the stimulus for the sensor kinase KdpD of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 2360-2367. 10.1128/JB.01635-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung K, Hamann K, Revermann A: K+ stimulates specifically the autokinase activity of purified and reconstituted EnvZ of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 40896-40902. 10.1074/jbc.M107871200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao R, Mack TR, Stock AM: Bacterial response regulators: versatile regulatory strategies from common domains. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007, 32: 225-234. 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.03.002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mascher T, Helmann JD, Unden G: Stimulus perception in bacterial signal-transducing histidine kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006, 70: 910-938. 10.1128/MMBR.00020-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN: Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000, 69: 183-215. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galperin MY: Structural classification of bacterial response regulators: Diversity of output domains and domains combinations. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 4169-4182. 10.1128/JB.01887-05.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koretke KK, Lupas AN, Warren PV, Rosenberg M, Brown JR: Evolution of two-component signal transduction. Mol Biol Evol. 2000, 17: 1956-1970.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arahal DR, García MT, Vargas C, Cánovas D, Nieto JJ, Ventosa A: Chromohalobacter salexigens sp. nov., a moderately halophilic species that includes Halomonas elongata DSM 3043 and ATCC 33174. Int J System Evol Microbiol. 2001, 51: 1457-1462.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canovas D, Vargas C, Csonka LN, Ventosa A, Nieto JJ: Osmoprotectants in Halomonas elongata: high-affinity betaine transport system and choline-betaine pathway. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 7221-7226.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cánovas D, Vargas C, Iglesias-Guerra F, Csonka LN, Rhodes D, Ventosa A, Nieto JJ: Isolation and characterization of salt-sensitive mutants of the moderate halophile Halomonas elongata and cloning of the ectoine synthesis genes. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 25794-25801. 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25794.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- García-Estepa R, Argandoña M, Reina-Bueno M, Capote N, Iglesias-Guerra F, Nieto JJ, Vargas C: The ectD gene, which is involved in the synthesis of the compatible solute hydroxyectoine, is essential for thermo protection of the halophilic bacterium Chromohalobacter salexigens. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 3774-3784. 10.1128/JB.00136-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cánovas D, Vargas C, Calderon MI, Ventosa A, Nieto JJ: Characterization of the genes for the biosynthesis of the compatible solute ectoine in the moderately halophilic bacterium Halomonas elongata DSM3043. System Appl Microbiol. 1998, 21: 487-497.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calderón MI, Vargas C, Rojo F, Iglesias-Guerra F, Csonka LN, Ventosa A, Nieto JJ: Complex regulation of the synthesis of the compatible solute ectoine in the halophilic bacterium Chromohalobacter salexigens DSM3043T. Microbiology. 2004, 150: 3051-3063. 10.1099/mic.0.27122-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vargas C, Jebbar M, Carrasco R, Blanco C, Calderón MI, Iglesias-Guerra F, Nieto JJ: Ectoines as compatible solutes and carbon and energy sources for the halophilic bacterium Chromohalobacter salexigens. J Appl Microbiol. 2006, 100: 98-107. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02757.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore C, Helmann JD: Metal ion homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005, 8: 188-195. 10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH: CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: W327-331. 10.1093/nar/gkh454.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galperin MY: A census of membrane-bound and intracellular signal transduction proteins in bacteria: bacterial IQ, extroverts and introverts. BMC Microbiol. 2005, 14 (5): 35-10.1186/1471-2180-5-35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galperin MY, Higdon R, Kolker E: Interplay of heritage and habitat in the distribution of bacterial signal transduction systems. Mol BioSyst. 2010, 6: 721-728. 10.1039/b908047c.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aravind L, Anantharaman V, Balaji S, Babu MM, Iyer LM: The many faces of the helix-turn-helix domain: transcription regulation and beyond. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005, 29: 231-262. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foussard M, Garnerone AM, Ni F, Soupène E, Boistard P, Batut J: Negative autoregulation of the Rhizobium meliloti fixK gene is indirect and requires a newly identified regulator, FixT. Mol Microbiol. 1997, 25: 27-37. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4501814.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olekhnovich IN, Kadner RJ: Mutational scanning and affinity cleavage analysis of UhpA-binding sites in the Escherichia coli uhpT promoter. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 2682-2691. 10.1128/JB.184.10.2682-2691.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rabin RS, Stewart V: Dual response regulators (NarL and NarP) interact with dual sensors (NarX and NarQ) to control nitrate- and nitrite-regulated gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 3259-3268.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gambello MJ, Iglewski BH: Cloning and characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR gene, a transcriptional activator of elastase expression. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173: 3000-3009.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGowan S, Sebaihia M, Jones S, Yu B, Bainton N, Chan PF, Bycroft B, Stewart GS, Williams P, Salmond GP: Carbapenem antibiotic production in Erwinia carotovora is regulated by CarR, a homologue of the LuxR transcriptional activator. Microbiology. 1995, 141: 541-550. 10.1099/13500872-141-3-541.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ducros VM, Lewis RJ, Verma CS, Dodson EJ, Leonard G, Turkenburg JP, Murshudov GN, Wilkinson AJ, Brannigan JA: Crystal structure of GerE, the ultimate transcriptional regulator of spore formation in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol. 2001, 306: 759-771. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dubern JF, Coppoolse ER, Stiekema WJ, Bloemberg GV: Genetic and functional characterization of the gene cluster directing the biosynthesis of putisolvin I and II in Pseudomonas putida strain PCL1445. Microbiology. 2008, 154: 2070-2083. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/016444-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, Muller J, Doerks T, Julien P, Roth A, Simonovic M, Bork P, von Mering C: STRING 8--a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D412-D416. 10.1093/nar/gkn760.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galperin MY, Nikolskaya AN: Identification of sensory and signal-transducing domains in two-component signalling systems. Methods Enzymol. 2007, 422: 47-74. full_text.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ubben D, Schmitt R: Tn1721 derivatives for transposon mutagenesis, restriction mapping and nucleotide sequence analysis. Gene. 1986, 41: 145-152. 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90093-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vargas C, Nieto JJ: Genetic tools for the manipulation of moderately halophilic bacteria of the family Halomonadaceae. Methods in Molecular Biology. Edited by: Balbás P, Lorence A. 2004, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc, 267: 183-208.Google Scholar
- Altenbuchner J, Schmitt R: Transposon Tn1721: site-specific recombination generates deletions and inversions. Mol Gen Genet. 1983, 190: 300-308. 10.1007/BF00330655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Starai VJ, Escalante-Semerena JC: Acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase (AMP forming). Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004, 61: 2020-2030. 10.1007/s00018-004-3448-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schweikhard ES, Kuhlmann SI, Kunte HJ, Grammann K, Ziegler CM: Structure and function of the universal stress protein TeaD and its role in regulating the ectoine transporter TeaABC of Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T. Biochemistry. 2010, 49: 2194-2204. 10.1021/bi9017522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jung H: The sodium/substrate symporter family: structural and functional features. FEBS Lett. 2002, 529: 73-77. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03184-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vargas C, Coronado MJ, Ventosa A, Nieto JJ: Host range, stability, and compatibility of broad host-range-plasmids and a shuttle vector in moderately halophilic bacteria. Evidence of intragenic and intergenic conjugation in moderate halophiles. System Appl Microbiol. 1997, 20: 173-181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller JH: A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. 1992, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- Csonka LN: A third L-proline permease in Salmonella typhimurium which functions in media of elevated osmotic strength. J Bacteriol. 1982, 151: 1433-1443.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A: A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Biotechnology. 1983, 1: 784-791. 10.1038/nbt1183-784.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prentki P, Krisch HM: In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene. 1984, 29: 303-313. 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90059-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blondelet-Rouault MH, Weiser J, Lebrihi A, Branny P, Pernodet JL: Antibiotic resistance gene cassettes derived from the π interposon for use in E. coli and Streptomyces. Gene. 1997, 190: 315-317. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00014-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quandt J, Hynes MF: Versatile suicide vectors which allow direct selection for gene replacement in gram-negative bacteria. Gene. 1993, 127: 15-21. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90611-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jebbar M, Talibart R, Gloux K, Bernard T, Blanco C: Osmoprotection of Escherichia coli by ectoine: uptake and accumulation characteristics. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 5027-5035.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M: The Neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4: 406-425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felsenstein J: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985, 39: 783-791. 10.2307/2408678.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P, Ponting CP: SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: Identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 5857-5864. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5857.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P: SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D229-D232. 10.1093/nar/gkn808.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M: The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: D277-280. 10.1093/nar/gkh063.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hulo N, Bairoch A, Bulliard V, Cerutti L, Cuche B, De Castro E, Lachaize C, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Sigrist CJA: The 20 years of PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: D245-D249. 10.1093/nar/gkm977.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Henikoff JG, Pietrokovski S, McCallum CM, Henikoff S: Blocks-based methods for detecting protein homology. Electrophoresis. 2000, 21: 1700-1706. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000501)21:9<1700::AID-ELPS1700>3.0.CO;2-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunesekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A: The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: D211-222. 10.1093/nar/gkp985.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R: InterProScan - an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 847-848. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL: A Combined Transmembrane Topology and Signal Peptide Prediction Method. J Mol Biol. 2004, 338: 1027-1036. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanahan D: Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983, 166: 557-580. 10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kessler B, de Lorenzo V, Timmis KN: A general system to integrate lacZ fusion into the chromosome of gram negative bacteria: regulation of the Pm promoter of the TOL plasmid studied with all controlling elements in monocopy. Mol Gen Genet. 1992, 233: 293-301. 10.1007/BF00587591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.